Firewalk Studios finally unveiled Concord at Sony's recent State of Play, and the reaction was... well it wasn’t great. After a year of staring at the admittedly gorgeous CGI teaser trailer, the State of Play pulled the curtain back with a world-building cinematic, some brief developer interviews, and a full trailer packed with gameplay. It turns out that Concord is a 5v5 first-person hero shooter that's heading to PS5 and PC later this year. We really liked the look of Concord and initially thought that Sony could have another hit on its hands — but comments after the show seemed to suggest the contrary.
Now, don’t get us wrong, Concord isn’t the most original game on PlayStation. Like an amalgam of Guardians of the Galaxy and Overwatch 2, there are elements of hero shooters you’ve played in the past here. But the vitriolic reaction to hero shooter aspects of this game have us scratching our chin. The big takeaway from the internet’s reaction is that nobody wants another hero shooter, but we have to ask if that’s really the case.
Whether you’re looking towards Overwatch 2, Rainbow Six: Siege, Apex Legends, or Valorant on PC, you’ll see consistently high player counts that showcase just how steady the hero shooter genre actually is. Not to mention other upcoming hero shooter Marvel Rivals, which is obviously riffing on Overwatch 2, seemingly passing the vibe check because Marvel, we guess.
The hero shooter genre’s influence is also felt in adjacent games, like Destiny 2, which currently has our Warlocks, Titans, and Hunters working through The Final Shape. Or XDefiant, the back-to-basics, supposed Call of Duty killer that features themed factions with unique abilities. Or even Embark Studios’ The Finals, a frenetic 3v3v3 shooter that utilises light, medium, and heavy builds. The reach of the hero shooter genre is percolating through the multiplayer space in a way that shows the popularity of games like Concord.
So why then, has Concord been received so harshly? Truthfully, we think it’s the big old PlayStation Studios logo that’s attached to it. Sony’s rip-roaring PS4 era has meant that the Japanese giant has solidified its reputation as a single player publisher. However, Concord, the first of its first-party live service games, is arriving in a year noticeably void of a big AAA release like Spider-Man 2.
Does that mean it's over before it's even truly began for Firewalk Studios? We reckon the multiplayer crowd will show up to at least try out the beta in July. It could be a make or break moment for Concord, but with ex-Bungie talent at the helm, we're confident that it'll be a tightly controlled shooter at the very least.
Whatever the case, we feel that Concord has been given a hard rap, and all before any of us have even played the game. We have our fingers crossed that Firewalk is able to showcase what’s special about this particular hero shooter on the run-up to its August 23rd release date.
But what do you think about Concord? Have you written it off already? Or are you quietly hopeful that Sony has another Helldivers 2 on its hands? Freerun your way to the comments below.
Comments 74
Priced game with PSN account required for PC players. You're delusional if you think this game is not DOA.
It's not a game I would play, but I hope it does turn out successful. Coz I don't wanna see another studio close.
I will playing day one, got physically for £32.85
At £35 I think it will do just fine, I don't think it will do as well as HellDivers 2 but 8+ million sales within 12 months would not be a failure. They just need to make sure people aren't put off by making their game full of MTX, if we're paying for the game upfront then MTX should be kept at a minimum and not necessary, just like with HellDivers 2.
Like a lot of people, I liked the idea of a Single player story driven shooter that had a multiplayer component added, but once the 5v5 gameplay was highlighted at just about all there was, it kinda ruined the whole feel of the game for me. I will definitely try the Beta and a lot of my friends are willing to do the same. In its defence, the price point is a plus. But as this article highlights, people are just used to seeing a huge Story driven bonanza from Sony. Still not a fan of this Live Service jump either (which definitely has been downgraded since the first announcement).
The game is incredibly generic looking and will be released amidst a sea of more established games in this genre. It might surprise and pop off, but I could also see an initial surge of interest giving way to a disinterested player-base.
Either way, it's yet another Sony title that just isn't for me.
There's nothing compelling or original about Concord. The entire thing looks like it was built by AI. Even the gameplay was primarily bots.
Overwatch 2 is on life support, the hero shooter had its time and place, so don't see this turning it around with Concord. Then again, a lot of people didn't think Helldivers 2 would succeed either, so let's wait and see.
Not my type of game, but neither are all the others mentioned here. I could see this doing ok on PC but not on PS5 as people aren't looking to pay $40 for a live service game, though Helldivers proves that wrong.
I guess it depends on the metrics. I do think it will do better than Foamsters and Suicide Squad, though that just gives them a slow painful death rather than a quick one. 😝
The name is generic, the look is generic, the $40 is too much, and nobody will have time for this when CoD releases. The August release may help it at the onset but I don't see it surviving.
Should probably be free w/ some level of PS+. Do you need PS+ to play this online? Probably I suppose. So many online multiplayer games do NOT need PS+, not sure how they make some of them do. 🤷♂️
I can say that I have exactly zero interest in this game. At all. I’m tired of games like this.
Judging by the initial reaction I predict its release playerbase will be a combination of the most die hard of the sony fans and the kind of players who just bounce around to the next new thing.
So maybe an adequate amount of players on release, but I don't see it retaining a healthy number within the first six months. We have like ten trillion other games exactly like this we can use as an example to tell where this is going to go. Nowhere.
Let the game comes, and them we judge. no negativity campaign please;
It's not WILL IT FAIL - it's more... why would it succeed? It's a mid-priced game (maybe) that is wrapped up in a PVP, mtx / seasons pay-model.... but without anything to offer in terms of unique gameplay or characters or reason to play (compared to F2P alternatives). They might pull this out of the fire - but this was seriously a meh start point for a game that has perhaps a week during launch to make it big, or make it go boom-baby. At the moment, I think this is going to Destruction All-over FoamStars... with a pfft - and not even a bang.
This feels like a large pile of advertising for a company you are beholden too. To blame Sony's known pedigree and them moving away from that to chase games designed to prey on people in the name of greed is kinda a mute point now.
We have known for years now that Sony has grown tone deaf, anti consumer, and are cooking up a multitude of these schemes.
What is happening with Concord is the same thing that happened with Gotham Knights, Redfall, and most recently Suicide squad. The games looked generic, boring, iterative, and uninspired even in early showings. Further reveals only reasserted that massively agreed upon sentiment. A sentiment that went on to be largely true upon release for Most people. These just weren't good games that chose to retread long overdone themes and mechanics.
Concord backlash is directly Because it looks derivative and mediocre in a time where people are growing tired of these attempts. You contrast that with something like hell divers and really Examine what is different about that gameplay and design and it's clear what's refreshing with that project.
That being said, let's be real here, even if you look at the live service schemes that were received well on release, the player counts dwindle greatly a month or two after launch (the finals, hell divers etc). Hell divers is now at sub 50000 players. A nearly 400% decline after the hype faded.
All of these devs and overlords are chasing a level of revenue extraction with a longevity at fortnite/apex/GTA/pubg/destiny/counterstrike/cod/naraka/overwatch levels that In all reality is extremely rare.
You certainly aren't going to achieve this by retreading the same themes (hero shooter bs) that players have invested years into with live service schemes they are already addicted to.
@TrickyDicky99 Of course Positivity is "toxic" to you.
I'm leaning toward a day one but the beta will help me decide! This game looks like it's basically meant to fill the void after Destiny 2 Echoes Episodes wrap up.
I'd love to hear more about the 6 different modes before the beta launches
@TrickyDicky99 baitin
Yeah sadly it is.
Imo the problem was the generic, derivative characters more than "oh no another hero shooter".
These games, and MOBAs, live or die on the appeal of their characters. In Concord I didn't find even one character that I wanted to play as.
Tbh I expected (ie. preferred) it to be more like a PvE with a bouty hunter theme but alas it's another 5v5 shooter.
People need to remember this isn't a free to play full of MTX game like Fortnite, Apex Legends, Call of Duty Warzone, Overwatch 2, Counter Strike and Destiny 2. They aren't chasing that kind of game, it's a buy now multiplayer title which everything can be earnt and unlocked in game, their revenue is coming from game sales not MTX. People keep saying Sony are chasing the cash grab games like those I mentioned yet this game and HellDivers 2 say otherwise.
@BeerIsAwesome Personally I don't see how making a bland Overwatch knock-off in 2024 is taking a risk but ok?
I still don't see a USP, something to hook me in to play this over any of the competition. It all just looks very generic.
This game never claimed to be anything more than what is was from the start. People get made Sony doesn't have enough variety, then they make different games and suddenly "that's not what I wanted". The single player game aren't going away but you can't have. a business running on just that alone. Will this be good who knows, Helldrivers 2 got the same flack but that is also a PvE game so only time will tell.
@arsmolinarc From the day it was announced they said it was a PvP game. I don't know why everyone is acting like this is brand new news.
@Keyblade-Dan Well Overwatch 2 has had so much bad press since release and it's fans have lost some faith in the series, on steam it's review score is "overwhelmingly negative", so a new Hero Shooter may get those players attention and maybe is just what's needed to give them (Blizzard) a kick up the a** and make them improve the game.
I hope so. It looks like another generic cheap live service game.
I'm not so sure, based on pure vibes, I reckon this could do quite well. I don't think it will be a Helldivers level of success, but we might be surprised.
Sony needs to drop the PSN acct requirement for PC. Other than that, everyone claiming this game is DOA are ignoring who this game is meant for. It's clearly targeting the Overwatch crowd. Personally, this is not a game I'm interested in and will likely never play as I don't care for MP games. But this game also isn't aimed at me.
Concord...That game will honor the airline that once was.....going down in flames.
I’m looking forward to it and don’t really get all the negativity. Sure it has guardians of the galaxy clone written all over it but honestly who plays a hero shooter game for the story? Concord will live and die by its gameplay and it’s been a while since a Sony 1st party has let me down on that front. I will be happy to eat my words in a few months if I’m wrong but I think this will sell much better than the hardcore crowd predicts and have a similar critical reception as Helldivers 2. Is it going to revolutionise and change the face of gaming forever? No. Is it going to be a fun multiplayer game to dip in and out of? Hopefully.
It’s too early to say. The internet is vicious and tends to try to kill games pretty frequently. It certainly happened to Forspoken, which is a better game than the internet said it was (if you played it and disagree, that’s one thing, but if you just want to call it cringe, that’s another thing), but also no one’s played it yet, so it may have legs following that. Also, the internet’s been trying to kill Ubisoft for ages and it hasn’t happened yet. I’m not trying to support the game, as I think it looks rough to me, but I’ll give it the benefit of the doubt.
Again so much I feel like is riding on that beta. It starts only about a month before launch so it's basically a glorified demo. If people are impressed when they get their hands on it then I could see a success. If that beta is a failure though... then I think you can start preparing for its funeral.😅
But I'm going to remain optimistic! At least until I try it.
Like marvel rivals isn’t criticised because it’s marvel. Concord does because it’s sony
Don't listen to the naysayers. Everyone said Suicide Squad and Skull and Bones would fail for years, and that turned out just fine!
As it basically requires me, a 41 yo man, to have 4 other gaming friends I can block out my limited free time with…I just don’t think this is aimed at me.
@theSpectre why should they every other dam company asks for one when u play any of their games why it so bad for Sony asking
@theSpectre yeah but the question is what does this game have to make that crowd want to play it over the game they're already playing?
This is the first FPS first party game from Sony in over a decade. FPS players are STARVED. Destiny 2 killed its PvP, and I think this game will be a great alternative. Character design/writing-wise it looks generic as hell, but I don't think about that stuff when I'm enjoying a good gameplay experience. Think of the haptic feedback! I think it'll pick up popularity after the beta for sure
It’s looks like a generic hero shooter filled with woke characters.
@NEStalgia Nice one. 🤣🤣🤣
@FPSfan1337 Haptic feedback is the most overrated feature in all gaming history.
an article such as this is only going to push more negativity from the community since it dismisses the years and years of concerns many of us have had with the AAA industry at large. i don't know how many times we will have to make our thoughts known for the publisher(s) to get the point?
and no, it has nothing to do with sony being the publisher, although it makes it even more sad and disappointing that it is. this game could have released from ubisoft, wb, ea, activision etc and the result would be just as negative. these games feel like they grew out of a focus-tested lab and were designed for the perfect speciman of gamer that is somehow going to drop all the other hero shooters that they have already invested hundreds if not thousands of hours into? good luck.
at least if the game "looked" original and not some cheap, watered down guardians of the galaxy clone it might have had a bit more appeal to some people? as we have learned from suicide squad, the initial reveal and perception is critical to the success or failure of the game. suicide squad botched it hard (to be honest there was no way they could have put on a good front due to the the cursed genre that it is) and we all know how that turned out. concord is following in the same footsteps and regardless of the outcome of the finished product, i feel like it is already dead on arrival just by being a hero shooter in an oversaturated genre. i don't think sony would even know how to support it long-term since this is its first foray into the hero shooter genre. well, i hope this pleases the sony shareholders. there goes a $500m investment
Fortnite has over 500 million players, yet the internet would make you think no one at all likes live service games. Not every game has to cater to you...
There's hundreds of single player games for every one live service game, but instead of enjoying those games people would rather spend time focusing on hating that one game 🤦.
I hope all their live service attemps will fail so they will go back to focusing on single player games. On the other hand, I badly want the likes of Astro to sell millions, so they will know what we really want.
Good grief I'm Not sure why anyone would ever want a game to fail.
It has no chance. Enough said.
Yes. Yes it is. It really is.
@djlard HD Rumble 2.0
I don't think you can compare Helldivers 2 to Concord. Helldivers 2 was always going to do well because it had a fan base on PlayStation & PC as it turns out Helldivers 2 did really well. Concord on the hand is another Hero shooter that does nothing to stand out and unlike the rest of the Hero shooters it isn't free. Personally I don't see this game doing well.
Anyone arguing push is not toxic only needs to look here to see how wrong they are.
Its not my kind of game, but if someone like skillup can see reasons to be hopeful in terms of gameplay, then Im happy to give it the benefit of the doubt. I dont trust the views of any of the usual doombots posting in here as they hate and distrust everything. I remember most of the same people writting off Helldivers 2 and we can all see how wrong they were, why would anyone listen to them now?
This really just screams "creative bankruptcy". As far as I can tell, it's just another game chasing a trend. We won't even remember it a year after its release.
@Tintin I was glad that Skill Up recognised what the game was going for and who's made by...I.E. the former Destiny PVP team.
@QiaraIris Well every PC game from Sony going forward will require a PSN account so people will just have to get used to it, if they want Sony's games.
I'd be more into the Hero Shooter aspect if I liked the look of the heroes more. Overwatch is on another level in that aspect. The thing I have the most issue with is that it's not F2P.
To me this game is too late. The hero shooter goldrush is over. Its like World of Warcraft all over again. People are trying to chase that MMORPG money.
Yes, without question.
Concord was so uninteresting and uninspired from the trailer, I'd forgotten its existence before the SOP ended. Sony hasn't got hardly a clue what it's players want. We could see a return of classic IPs like Syphon Filter or Infamous, or another entry of Uncharted or an update about Ghost of Tsushima 2, but instead we get this dime a dozen hero loot shooter #57 crap.
Also, the name. To me, Concord is both a hypersonic aircraft that was retired, or a type of grape jelly. 🤷♂️
@AdamNovice It doesn't affect me as I have a PlayStation.
but I'm also a PC Gamer where we'd rather not play the game when it's exclusive to Epic Game Store than actually made an Epic Game Store account.
@Zenos OMG... 🤦♂️
Removed - flaming/arguing
@Slayer25c what?
All these MP games, looks the same to me.
Yes. Way too late after the fad has passed for this to be coming out. With extended dev cycles for games, if you’re chasing a trend, you’re going to release after it’s already over.
Don't you even dare speak of The Finals in the same article as this game.
The Finals has literally zero to do with this game, and hero shooters in general; hell, its build customisation is off the charts and absolutely central to the game.
Not to mention it is infinitely more unique and innovative, and has a personality of its own to boot, instead of riffing on already popular IP's.
Not my kind of game at all but I don't want to see it fail.
I think it's the camel breaking straw. It's like when League of Legends was the rage and everyone was trying to make their own. Announce a new moba and people are like "oh lord another one". Concord isn't doing anything egregious on a gameplay level; it's just throwing their hat into a hole that's already chockful of hats.
I am not sure why people started using the term 'anti-consumer" to describe the money-making schemes that companies use to extract wealth from our pockets. The term Anti-Consumer comes from a movement where people refuse to buy things or consume products on principle.
Quoting a Google search:
"Anti-consumerism is a sociopolitical ideology. It has been defined as "intentionally and meaningfully excluding or cutting goods from one's consumption routine or reusing once-acquired goods with the goal of avoiding consumption""
This sounds to me like we should be the anti-consumer and refuse to purchase or "consume" these products that the game companies offer us.
The best term to use for some of these wealth-extracting practices should just be "Rip Off"
Eg: Making me pay for New Game Plus is a Rip Off and I am going to be an anti-consumer regarding this game.
However, Merriam-Webster does define Anti-Consumer as "not favourable to consumers: improperly favouring the interests of businesses over the interests of consumers" so /shrug/
Anyway, just expressing a small annoyance with the use of a term...
I've never cared for PlayStation's live service push and this is no different.
I feel a little bad for the developers who are getting their game rather excessively bombarded by negativity, but ultimately this game's failure would likely be for the better in terms of what PS chooses to focus on moving forward. Then again, they've got like three hundred other live service projects already in the pipeline, so...
My takeaway is that the problem is Sony is speaking to the wrong audience for games like this when it puts them in a State of Play. The people who tune into those presentations are fans of PlayStation's single player narrative games. They don't like F2P, they don't want another live service, etc, etc. I'm sure there's an audience for Concord, but I don't think you reach them in this way.
Don't know, and I'm happy if people enjoy it, but ultimately I really don't care either way.
the issue is the game looks generic . what made overwatch successful in the past was that it was oozing creativity and originality , it was something new that we’ve never seen before. i know team fortress 2 did it first , but overwatch was able to distinguish itself from it
Well the hate train obviously wants it to fail but the gameplay definitely looked solid so I'm going to give the beta a shot.
The Finals look 100% better and it's free to play. I don't know how they will make someone to pay for this.
@KillerBoy "It’s looks like a generic hero shooter filled with woke characters.".
I'll bite what woke characters? Most are aliens, generic af but still aliens, do you mean the asian lady? Being a Asian female means woke, so EVE from Stellar Blade is woke? 🤔
7 years too late. DOA. The free to play game Marvel Rivals looked a lot better.
There's no reason for this game to exist, because there are original games this one is cloned off. Why would anyone prefer that to the original?
Of course it is doomed to fail. Differentiate or die.
I didn't buy a PS5 to play this kind of generic, derivative drivel. Hence why I pre-ordered Astro Bot yesterday and not Concord.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...