The industry hasn’t been quite as eager to rush out Destiny reviews as quickly as we expected, which is good to see. That said, with the campaign purportedly taking about 10 hours to complete – leaving ample time to experience the Crucible and a few Strikes – critiques are beginning to appear for Bungie’s next big thing. We’ll be updating this article as new appraisals take to the skies, so be sure to check back for more – and for our own verdict, of course.
Cheat Code Central - 9/10
I could sit and talk about Destiny all day long, but my wife summed up best what Destiny was to gamers. “It’s like Halo and Borderlands got together one night for some great fun and had a beautiful baby.” I personally think she hit the nail on the head, but there are obviously a few things that imply other genres stepping in as well. It’s because Bungie knows the areas they need to play it safe, and because Bungie knows the areas they want to attempt to explore and make better that I am glad this is the game I have waited for all year long, and why I feel this is another example of why the next-gen console cycle is ready to take off into new, exciting, and interesting ways. Destiny, simply put, might just be the game of year, but definitely makes you want to join the next generation.
The Guardian - 4/5
Destiny, isn’t just set in space, it is an allegory of space. It is beautiful and fascinating, but oh so cold and immense, and the past engulfs everything.
Hardcore Gamer - 4/5
Destiny isn’t the convention-bending masterpiece it’s been touted to be, but it remains a fine shooter. Like a massively budgeted Phantasy Star Online, players can get lost for hours raiding planets, even if the content is finite. The visuals, interface, framerate and online matchmaking, combined with one of the best original soundtracks ever to grace a video game, make for impeccable production values. This is an experience that could have benefited from being open world, however, as well as having more varied combat and map design. Facing wave after wave of aliens could prove addictive for some, but tiring for others. Considering the lack of microtransactions and subscription fees, though, it’s undeniable that Destiny delivers. Its constellation may not yet be written in the stars, but those willing to experience its universe won’t soon be disenchanted.
NZGamer - 7/10
Destiny isn’t a bad game, by any means. If you like sci-fi shooters, you’ll get a good 20 hours of enjoyment out of this. But that’s really all it is; a fun, forgettable shooter that plays it safe and sticks to what’s been proven, with nothing to really set it apart from its peers. But maybe that’s for the best, because Destiny’s one area of attempted innovation - its hyped up social elements, persistent world, and multiplayer gameplay, are its biggest failing.
Polygon - 6/10
As just another game, Destiny is a confusing combination of often at-odds elements — it presents itself as ambitious, almost boastful, while seeming strangely safe and reserved. It wants to eat its cake as a shooter, and have the longevity of an MMO — but it lacks the combat sophistication of the former, and the deep well of content native to the latter.
Gamespot - 6/10
You might summarize Destiny by the way in which it wraps up its story. Once the final, hackneyed closing scene finishes, fireteam members are awarded the same weapon, regardless of class, and a handful of currency. This reminder of how wholly unspecial you are is the big finale of a lavishly produced but troubled game that excels in the basics but lacks creativity and heart. It is role-playing grind in shooter form--an empty house built on a firm foundation.
Giant Bomb - 3/5
When you throw it all together, you're left with a game where the missions are designed to be repeatable, but all the missions are so repetitive that it's hard to get excited to see the same handful of environments again and again and again as you attempt to grind out faction reputation or hunt around for high-end weapons. It's a beautiful game, but a hollow experience.
The Escapist - 3/5
With its banal universe and flavorless style, Destiny is packed with content, but just ... well ... content. There's a great PvP mode, and the leveling system can be rewarding, but nonetheless this is a pretty, rock-solid, ultimately pedestrian product.
Do these reviews seem on the money to you? What would you rate Activision’s latest blockbuster now that you’ve had time to try it? Dismantle everyone’s opinion in the comments section below.
Comments 48
It feels like Activision/Bungie are controlling the Gaming Media to me, hmm...
@Carl-G Well, they ain't attached their puppet strings to us. Seriously, though, how do you mean?
With the servers only going live on Monday, any reviews pushed out these past couple of days are ones I won't really bother with and are just looking to net a lot of traffic by having reviews out before the mainstream websites. With how the online aspect is interwoven into the game, being able to play online for a day before pushing a review out us doing a disservice to your publication. It would be like reviewing the multiplayer aspect of Killzone: ShadowFall based on its offline botzone
I'd agree with the above 7/10 rating based on what I've seen of the game so far. I'm failing to see what there is that is meant to elevate it to the game of the year heights, or what makes it innovative. It's a solid shooter with a convoluted storyline and very repetitive action. The hub/tower is giving me flash backs to Playstation home. I love the gunplay in it , the weapons are satisfying to fire and the design and art style are nice but it all feels a bit hollow. It's not as big a deal but I thought there would be more freedom to customise my character and make them look more unique than I've seen so far in the game.
@get2sammyb I think he means the reviews trickling out after the game releases... and the fact that many people are underwhelmed, yet a 8-10/10 storm is brewing.
I think he means that there is to much coverage for one short sci-fi shooter. It's annoying. Next we'll have an article titled "Have we been talking about Destiny too much?" and it'll have another poll.
@Artie also the reviews coming out later means huge sales based on hype, before the mediocre reviews hit that would have cooled more people off on buying the game....endless coverage causing a hype frenzy.
@MadchesterManc there are reviews of KZ Shadow Fall that completely ignore the multiplayer 'bit' in the game XD
That sums up my 'faith' in reviews
@N711 @MadchesterManc Yeah, incredibly, I found one particular review from a big site which we won't mention that didn't even point out that Shadow Fall even had multiplayer, let alone a critique of it. In fact, that's one of the most poorly treated titles in recent history as far as I'm concerned. Guerrilla must have been absolutely gutted.
To soon imo for a properly thought out review these were probably rushed to ride the hype.
This game gets an 8/10 for me just on singleplayer and co-op alone. Yeah this game was seriously over hyped but its still a damn good game.
no one seems to have mentioned the 6player raids yet...only the smaller, shorter 3player strike, there is so much left to be talked about..for me bungie has delivered everything they have talked about in the build up to destiny being released
I'll also give this game 8/10 up to now but there is so much to do thats not been covered, for example i hit 20 last night (titan) and really thats where the game begins for certain ppl, sub jobs as well throw a totaly differn't angle on your class and needs lv'n up as well, lv's 18-20 is when you can start grinding firefights/or PvP for rare armor etc, the lv'n past 20 is unique itself and i'm yet to see if it works for me, you need to be level 20 at least and see what unlocks before you can judge the game. You can't really review this game for a good week or so yet in my opinion and there is still work to be done like keyboard for area chat etc. Last word from me is that i'm having a blast tbh and the only co op i've done is matchmaking for firefights. Also if you wanna team up some time plz add a msg (saying wanna do a firefight or something like that) dont just send random inv's i never accept these!
Sorry i forgot to mention the storyline which is OK and the single player campaign seems a little easy especially if you dont do the firefights as you unlock em!
I stopped reading player reviews on meta critic. Some idiot said you're better off playing halo 4 because the graphics are comparable. Ridiculous.
@get2sammyb I still don't get the hate for shadow fall. Honestly thought it was the best KZ to date.
Classic case of way too much hype which inevitably results in disappointment regardless of the game being very good. The fact that it's not the best thing ever just makes people overly harsh and critical I think
I think GTA V will smash the PS4 through the "Next Gen" barrier, Destiny has court me but it's story was too short and now it's just Crucible.... Or you can go into the open world and repeat the same quests there! There was potential for so much more of the "open world" but it feels like they just went 1,open world. 2,stick little same like quests all over the place. 3,that's it! Raids are good but again once you have done them a couple of times they become same old, so maybe not game of the year just yet.......
I don't agree with NZgamer review and I also don't agree with the score. To me, the game is a solid 9, the multiplayer is very fun to play. it is what it is. why should I bother saying what the game should have, that's stupid since I'm not the one making the game. I could go to any game in the world and say what it should have. o.O
@heyzeus002 it happens over and over again with the hype machine. Knack suffered from way too much attention as well. I rate Destiny as a solid 7/10 based on what I've seen so far...edging to 8/10. 7/10 - 8/10 is a perfectly decent score to land on, but hype makes people rabid and act hurt when the game isn't 10/10...which it will be to some as it's all subjective anyway.
@Munkyknuts That's not really true though since a lot of sights with a 1 out of 10 rating have used 6, 7, and 8 a decent game while 5 was below average. Pretty much all websites don't use proper numbers for their scores, just read the reviews and look at the scores, it proves it. 1 out of 10, a 5 should be average and a 7 should be well above average but that isn't what any websites use those numbers as and it's not because the readers are just making it up or made it a rule that a 7 was below average. Ever website I've seen that use a 1 out of 10 rating is all suspect to the bs number system. 3 out of 5 is much more accurate as 1 out of 10 is way to much room for crappy to good to awesome. meh
@Munkyknuts im thinking along the same lines tbh. A huge problem in my view is that people see 7-8 as not a good score and if its not a 9 or 10 then its a failure somehow. Personally, some of my favourite games have averaged 70-80 so I dont put too much stock in the actual review score, prefer to read and watch something and then make a call based on personal preference. Tbh, I stopped paying too much mind to review scores after I read an article years ago about the unscrupulous behaviour of certain publishers and game journalists accepting certain 'gifts' in lieu of favourable reviews
These are all the inb4 reviews. They know people on the fence, or the less informed public will be googling "Destiny review" and this ensures that they get some attention.
I think it's far too soon to write a review on a game like this. It's like putting up a movie review based entirely on the first scene.
I don't get the gaming media (this site excluded) they spend months building up to a game 'oh its going to be this/do this' etc and then it comes out and they pan it. Suppose its mind games to keep us looking for the next game.
As for user reviews, they have become too extreme and I just don't heed them or any of it much now.
Early preview video/screen shots, general theme and concept (not deviating upon release) sell a game to me.
@Bad-MuthaAdebis my thoughts exactly. I played it through and thought it had a satisfying campaign with some really nice set pieces, I thought it was well balanced, looked stunning and had a bit of scope for experimenting. I even liked the zero g parts.
The NZGamer review sums up my opinion of the game after watching people play for an hour last night. I can see that it's not the game for me...
Still gonna get this later today though, because hype and peer pressure. Anyone have an opinion on the PVP? That's probably where I'd spend most my time.
Not entirely related to this article, but I just wanted to say I can't believe they didn't crash PSN this week! that's pretty amazing right?? I mean supposedly minecraft crashed the PSN only a week ago
@kupo
Slower than cod with no perks obv u still have ur powers once uve leveld up a wouldnt suggest playin crucible till ur atleast level 12 u get owned at lv 5 etc
Updated with several new reviews.
Just found an annoying bug you might wanna try to avoid, I fell of the edge in a firefight, died but luckily it isnt game over you can be revived at the point you fell off..unlucky though that when you do you fall off the edge again and die!! And because you cant decline a revive you just die and die until your left to respawn yourself. The guys in my group ressed me a few times then even started ressing me so they could wave at me falling off again nearly lv 22 now but i just rolled a warlock..
This game has a 7 or 8 written all over it. Reviews will say the game looks great & is fun to play, but the story sucks & it's repetitive.
Overall, it really sounds like a game that if you are like me & want a story & more of a solo experience, then avoid this game. If you want a grind like experience to get some cool loot (like a FPS Phantasy Star Online), then give it a shot.
We'll see as more reviews come out, but I probably won't be picking this up.
@kupo
Why, in god's name, would you buy a game only because of "hype" & "peer pressure"? That's just stupid.
@Godsire- Yeah, based on what you've said, I don't think it's for you. Then again, if you liked Haze... Haha, I'm just pulling your leg!
@Demi_God
It's a reviewer's JOB to say what they think the game SHOULD have. If you don't want to exercise that right, that's your choice. Don't knock reviewers for doing so just because you don't agree with their opinions.
@get2sammyb
Haha Sammy. Touche.
But no, I hated Haze. I just like the picture. Finally just switched it to my PSN picture. Thanks for the reminder. Lol.
SLIGHT SPOILER ALERT I have fallen in love with this game from Alpha stage. However, I am not naive to it's shortcomings either. It lacks a great story, (SPOILER - which I attribute a little to being dead from the beginning and being raised from the dead by your ghost, which gives you no basis in anyone else's but the ghost's and speaker's plans currently.) Cut scenes are absolute minimal (but you are only on the cusp of something huge in years to come. The "Darkness" is all around you and it's now the Traveller's last attempt to fight back by using "ghosts" to find Earth's first hope). Certain, but very very few, glitches from day one . . . (Well if you expected perfect you are soooooo unaccustomed to modern online gaming releases). This game is a candle with a long burn time. Get past level 11+ and it starts to make sense. Grind the new gear/ learn the Crucible (coz you are certainly not just "dropping in" and decimating from Day one) / spend a few hours on Strikes with random strangers who you care about enough, in an instant, to want to revive against that Spider-Tank / discover the fury and chaos when a random Event draws 6 people in to go mental on the enemy and you Gold Tier it / love the fact that you just stumbled upon a Knight's Lair and you're on your own and it's "dying time" and a random stranger from the other side of the World takes up your plight and saves your ass then waves goodbye and goes on their seperate way. It's about time spent and the "grind" for that elusive 1 more attack point or engram or piece of armor to take you up to the crescendo with fury and confidence. Go into the Iron Banner with what you think is a good previous FPS ability and game stats, and get decimated by someone who frankly spent time adjusting armor and weapons over the long haul. With story / multiplayer / stats being added to with DLC in November enjoy this two months and develop your character as far as you think you can . . . . because Bungie will prove you different. It's gonna be a long ride and I have already hitched my saddle to this pony! Good luck Guardians . . . P.s. PSN ID - Damiien666
Having spent some solid hours with the game ( about to hit Venus) I'm happy with it as a very polished very satisfying shooter...I'm still not getting what makes it groundbreaking, but it's fun to shoot things in it. Also I love games that have throwing knives in them, and the hunters ability to chuck blades around is endlessly satisfying to me. I'm indifferent to the multiplayer aspects of it but I've had some satisfaction in teaming up with other randomly encountered guardians....I suck at the crucible tho.
Can anybody tell me what the loot like? My friend is a lvl 20 Titan an his armor is almost identical to the lower lvl armour. Is there any variety in the guns/armour? Or is it more or less the same with slight changes?
Well...as I read more and more about the game I'm glad I wasn't that hyped! After playing the Beta I somehow knew I would be dissapointed...
Maybe they can fix it later with more content...
The leveling past 20 which I really wasn't sure about at first has won me over. Its got so much more than just your regular leveling, as you prob already know the only way to level higher is to get armor with the Light stats on it but its not until matchmaking at around lv 22 you notice because you realise the ppl that your getting matchmade with out of the playlist's (the lv 22 and 24 firefights) must know how to play the game because they've earnt the armor already lol, regular leveling is easy compared to it and it works. It eliminates or at least greatly narrows the chance of getting put with people who havant got a clue what to do because they've jumped into a matchmade game they are not ready for yet (if you get me), it's nice very nice Gotta say as well this is a good argument for the people that are concerned about the raids to ask even more the questeon why is there no matchmaking for them?? personally this doesn't worry me but i know alot of people are. 9/10 now for me that leveling system is just so fresh and new.
@Godsire- I understand where your going with it, I just don't agree. Up to a point, if it's missing key multiplayer options that other games have which are basically standard and up to a point, that's fair to say "it should have this". A lot of times reviewers take it a bit further and try to revolutionise the game on what they should have and pull ideas out of thin air. I've read that many times in past reviews. I mean, for a reviewer that doesn't like sci-fi shooters, why would I read a review from that same guy when it's clearly invalid. That's what I'm trying to get at. His review kind of tells me he doesn't care much for sci-fi shooters in general which is why I read the review and when looking at the score, it should be a bit more polished. Also, I have a right to criticize and disagree with any review I want, that's the great thing about reading reviews. What you are telling me is that I don't have a right or I shouldn't criticize reviews because that's their job or that's what they do?
To me, it's a solid game. Sure it could have this and that, but it doesn't right now. However, I don't see this game being supported in 10 years, I do believe Bungie kind of went over their heads a little bit with what they are aiming for with this game. regardless, solid game. The 3 out of 5 review score I certainly agree with. While I do really like the game, it is average in compared to what they hyped it up as during E3 and started showing the true boundries with the online.
@Demi_God
Fair points. Although, I never said you shouldn't be able to criticize a review that you disagree with. Hell, I do that all the time myself.
What I was saying is that you shouldn't criticize the reviewer's right to express that opinion whether you think he/she is qualified to review that game or not. That person is just doing their job.
Btw, I a HUGE fan of sci-fi shooters (sci-fi anything, really) & am on the fence about getting this game, so I am like a sponge right now.......soaking up all the info I can about it to make a decision. I will definitely take your opinion, on how the game turned out, into account.
I'd probably give it a 8.5, it's not a game changer but I enjoy the story more than I think others do, so I'd want to rate it higher than 8/10. As far as the gameplay itself, it's about as good as I'd hope for in a shooter. I've been in some large scale battles, and small ones but the gun play seems fast and fluid to me. Graphics are also really nice, but yeah, I'd agree inFamous, Killzone and even MLB The Show actually are ahead of it. Haven't tried playing on a last gen console yet but it'd be interesting to see if I could tell a difference in visuals. It's averaging about a 74 right now at Metacritic. Which I don't understand at all when Titanfall has an 86 and that pile of garbage Brokenfield 4 had an 87 last I checked. The exclusivity hype obviously sucked reviewers in when it came to Titanfall but the BF 4 reviews astound me. It's also funny how Destiny is being criticized for being 'safe' and not doing anything special, yet Titanfall, online-multiplayer only, and a game that really did nothing new for the genre, gets praised left and right.
@Godsire- I think people should criticize in the case if the person doesn't really care much for sci-fi shooters or if a person don't like sci-fi shooters to begin with as it's very valid to the review. If a reviewer is known to not like those types of shooters or shooters in general, then what makes his review valid in the first place since it's clear he will give it a much lower score.
With that being said though, You might want to skip this title if there are other games coming out this month that you're interested in. I don't believe Destiny is a game that is going to last 10 years like the devs wanted or aimed for. This is a normal game, while multiplayer in every aspect, it's still very much normal to where I may only play this until Farcry 4 comes out.
This is the type of game where I have no clue if I want to trade it in a month or so later or keep on playing it for the multiplayer. While I think the game is very solid and rightfully deserved for high scores and good written reviews, There is just something missing and that's all I can really say about it. A very solid game with a solid gameplay experience but there is that little something which is missing to really make this game shine and I can't pin point it. LOL
Updated with more reviews.
Im loving it if a little let down overall with the story.
But is early days and as a MMO, its likely to get tons of "endgame" stuff.
A raid this tuesday and The Dark Below on December 1st.
Standard practice as MMOs go but Id say a 7-8 is fair.
If you dont like grindy stuff you probably dont like games such as Diablo or DCUO.
I don't really want this game based on the sole reason that it is a FPS, because I dislike FPS. That said, I dont think any of these reviews matter. If you like and want the game, get it. The opinions from rwriters on sites that praise yearly sports, Assassin's Creed, and Call of Duty games should NEVER be considered valid.
Only a 5 or 6 out of 10 for me. Ry wanted it to be a game changing IP but it is too repetitive. Short campaign too. I personally felt disappointed
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...