Microsoft's claiming that Xbox One owners will be able to play Star Wars: Battlefront first. While the headline that's doing the rounds may cause heart attacks among PlayStation 4 owners – the Redmond firm's no stranger to timed exclusives, after all – the situation isn't as bleak as it may initially seem. Indeed, the organisation's referring to EA Access – the subscription service that grants members to a PlayStation Plus-esque locker of free software, as well as various perks, such as pre-release trials.
It's a story that's going to get a lot of mileage for the guys in green: we've heard that Sony has a marketing partnership with EA for its forthcoming space faring foray – though we haven't been able to track down a concrete source – but early access to the game would make a pretty strong counter to any hypothetical advertising contracts. The Japanese giant has, of course, said that it doesn't believe EA Access – which costs $4.99/£3.99 per month – represents good value. Almost a year since launch, though, we're not sure that we totally agree.
In fact, paying members get access to a sizeable pool of software, including Plants vs. Zombies: Garden Warfare and Battlefield 4. This is on top of other perks, such as discounts and the aforementioned early access. It's proved itself in the eight or so months since launch to be a decent option for fans of EA titles. However, we can see Sony's concern: allow one publisher to launch its own subscription service, and it won't be long before the others follow. That could potentially take us down a dark path.
But while we admire Sony's guts in standing up to the biggest publisher in the world, can it allow its competitor to flaunt early access to big games like Star Wars: Battlefront for much longer? And should it be deciding what constitutes good value on our behalf? We appreciate its stance, but surely it should be down to us – the paying customers – to determine whether the added benefits of EA Access are worth the subscription fee that they're being sold for. Perhaps it's time for the platform holder to reconsider – and take back the differentiator that its rival has been boasting about.
Would you like to see EA Access on PS4, or do you think that Sony would be opening a can of worms by enabling publishers to introduce their own subscription services? Sign up in the comments section below.
Is it time to introduce EA Access on PS4? (62 votes)
- Yes, I’d like to subscribe
- Hmm, I’m not bothered
- No, it’s not good value
Please login to vote in this poll.
Comments 42
"allow one publisher to launch its own subscription service, and it won't be long before the others follow. That could potentially take us down a dark path."
This is true, however Sony shouldn't be able to argue this point considering they started the whole subs idea off with PS+ in the first place.
Though I'm not interested in EA Access myself, I believe we should, as Sony's paying customers, have the option to subscribe to it if we want to. It shouldn't be up to them to dictate what we want...
@Dodoo Fair enough. But what if - hypothetically - EA, Ubisoft, and Activision all introduce subs. And to play, say, Call of Duty online, you need PlayStation Plus and Activision Access...?
Can of worms and all that - but I do generally agree that Sony should give us the option.
@get2sammyb Yeah agree, a big can of worms!
If the publishers put online components behind the subscription firewall then that would be a nightmare, so this is where I think Sony would have to negotiate with the pubs that any service on PS4 would be only for benefits excluding online. In other words just access to games, beta's, early access, sales etc...
@Dodoo
As I said a few weeks ago when rumors suggested Battlefront will have some sort of PS4 exclusivity ....no way in hell when EA Access exists on XBO.
I've used it for a month with just $5 and enjoyed it. Not sure why people would have a problem with subscriptions they arent obliged to pay in to. Oh well, gamers.
PvsZ was given free to those paying attention. Its not worth the hype. I've played it twice. Battlefield is broken still as far as I've heard. I don't care about 'early' access or more feeble digital discounts. Early access to battlefront could just mean the beta/alpha. If its the full game then I don't mind Xbone owners being guinea pigs so they can polish up the PS4 version.
I doubt Sony won't be to worried, if they do have a marketing agreement for Battlefront then the chances are they will announce an exclusive beta at E3 much like with Destiny
I'd love the option to make the decision myself. Heck I paid for a year on my Xbox and I couldn't be happier with what I have gotten for what I paid for. With Xbox as my secondary console, and not much in terms of exclusive games I want to play on it currently thanks to the sad state of Mcc and the solid yet disappointing sunset overdrive, ea access has provided me with things to play when I'm not on my ps4 in the man cave and just sitting on my couch in the living room. There's a solid chance I would get It on ps4 as well, just because their are franchises I don't buy, but have played on Xbox because of access.
meh the physical release is the same on both systems and as I don't do digital unless I have too it makes no difference to me
besides I barely play any EA games so the whole service isn't any value to me
Honestly, does anyone care where it comes first? Or any game for that matter, there's great games releasing almost every week, if it comes to playstation a month later, fine, we'll play something else until then. I don't get that "first" mentality, not in this day and age.
Also, yeah, I think one sub is enough, and I admire Sony for sticking up to them. We don't need subscriptions from every publisher, and I don't think the consuming public should be entrusted with that decision.
@DrClayman yeah I agree with you. Let the EA acces guys beta play the game first and Ill be more then happy to play the inevitably patched game a month later. Whats the rush?
I believe it's irrelevant if Sony thinks that this service is cost worthy or not it should be up to the individual consumer to make that judgment for themselves. We as gamers should have the freedom to decide if this service suits us or not, instead of Sony saying it's simply not worth it. I'd rather have the freedom to make what could possibly be a bad decision then not have the ability to make any decision at all.
With that being said IF a game company were to decide to hide multi player or any other features behind their own service's paywall we as gamers would have to make our voices heard and to let them know this is not something we want. If enough people decided to not buy their games because of the paywall their revenues would drop and they would more than likely reverse their decision.
If they introduce it, enough people will start using it that it will gain traction and others will do the same.
We need the Spotify / Netflix of gaming - one subscription gives access to many games, no matter who publishes it.
@professorhat Then it was meant to be! Honestly though I think it'd just turn the majority of people off. I wouldn't subscribe to any other service in a hurry. But saying that, if the content was really really good...
I don't mind waiting to play it this time but this is getting silly we already pay for the game, then the DLC (Mortal Combat has day 1 DLC btw for a price ofc) and even the right to play our games online and now they are trying to add seperate subs for each company that makes these game's I don't know if I want the option to be able to buy these "subs" because if this end's up the trend and all company's follow suit...i'm a gamer I love it and probabaly will pay for it in the end.
EA kinda has their head up M$ arse, so of course we will have to wait...
Doesn't bother me as I wait on average about 4-5 months after release then pay about £18-£25 quid and it's fully patched and working by then . My 2 favourite games on PS4 are Driveclub and Battlefield 4 and I never experienced any of the issues the crazy pre-order cwowd had and paid less than half price for both.
Don't really care about EA games much anyways. And who cares it's only one week early. Also if Sony bought in to this BS then that would encourage other devs to pull this crap. And of course MS would take it, they need any advantage to get to sell Xbones.
They better not fudge with Star Wars... Come on, EA...
I can understand why it's not on PS4, I can't understand why it's not on PC. But sure let the service be on PS4, the floodgates will be popular then.
@Dodoo "however Sony shouldn't be able to argue this point considering they started the whole subs idea off with PS+ in the first place."
Actually MS started it with XBL Gold.
Ive written this b4 but no one should sign up as ea will be forced to put games on plus. Dont dilute psplus.
It's a dangerous precedent and one I'm glad we don't have on PS4. Yet. It is inevitable, sadly. I also see someone (can't be bothered arguing and @-ing him) is taking his usual 'it sucks as Sony don't have it and the sun shines out of their backside' side to this. He'd be polar opposite if Sony had it and Microsoft didn't. Fanboys. And this does have a point - before it's modded out - fanboys, good or bad, will buy these sort of subscriptions no matter what, even if they insist the day before they are the work of the devil. Which is why I think they'll become more common going forward.
@Bad-MuthaAdebisi Personally found Plants vs Zombies: Garden Warfare to be the most fun you can have, multiplayer-wise, on any console over the last couple of years. I'm not an online shooter kind of gamer but I absolutely love it, while my cousin who plays COD/Battlefield like if he didn't he'd die, is glued to it at the moment.
Just no.
I will not be supporting EA with a subscription to nothing. I'll buy the game, and the inevitable DLC, but no way are they getting that little extra.
I was against EA Access from the start. Individual publishers do not need these damn unnecessary subscription services. Sony is smart to avoid it, even it it means later access to Star Wars.
Though I am curious if anyone is bothering with this service on the XBO.
Nothing from EA is good, except for a few games.
Where's the option for 'yes, but I wouldn't subscribe.' I generally don't care for EA's games, outside of Mass Effect and I'd be buying the game on disc anyway so EA Access does nothing for me but I think you do have to let the consumer decide, even if I don't like where this could all lead. As @rastamadeus pointed out, it's inevitable.
@rastamadeus PvsZ is definitely a good game but it didn't click with me whatsoever. I did somewhat enjoy it the couple of times I tried it out but after that I had no urge to go back.
This is just a money grab and made to look like a great deal for the gullable, I hope it dies in the greed riddled cesspool it first spewed out from never to be seen by human eyes again. ( please dont support this rubbish, thers no reason they cant offer us this just for signing up to ea and being loyal customers for all the years we have bought there games.)
@keyser_soze ehh its really not that bad a deal if youre interested in a lot of the EA games. The only reason sony doesnt want it is because theyre afraid other companies will follow and it might lead to less free games for ps+ and less subscriptions
Ehh, don't really care about playing it first. In this day and age, with more and more games being released broken and needing to be patched, I'd actually prefer for the Xbox owners to beta test it for everyone else. Not to mention it's EA and I hardly purchase anything they put out anymore. And as far as EA Access on PS4 goes, I'd prefer to keep it on Xbox as soon as possible. But I'm usually of the mindset that consumer choice is first. I understand why Sony is keeping it off their systems though. It really doesn't matter to me either way, but considering how short sighted and irresponsible many gamers are nowadays, I'm happy that Sony is keeping it off their system.
Personally I am not bothered either way. I have an XB1 so could subscribe if I wanted but as I rarely buy EA games and less often digitally I see no benefits to subscribing. Star Wars Battlefront is certainly high on my wanted list but after so many issues with EA games - particularly at launch then I see no advantage to early access.
@Flurpsel , i understand some people might find this attractive but the bigger picture is they are just trying to squeese as much money out of gamers as they can anyway they can "fact" my whole point is there asking people to pay for things they could do for free and it started with paying to game with friends and the companies all thought they where losing money so now you have to pay to play online on the playstation.This is exactly whats going to happen and why so many gamers are afraid of crap like this. A ps plus account isnt really a choice anyway you have to buy it to play with friends online obv besides a couple free to play games, also what do you think this ea access will evolve over time into?
I'm patient enough to wait for Battlefront's inevitable poor launch issues. I have a feeling early access will be a mess.
@DrClayman agree! Outside of a very, very few games throughout the many years I've been gaming, I never understood the need to play something the second it's released. And as others said, in this age of broken releases, it's usually much safer to just wait while passengers on the hype train beta test the game for the rest of us.
On a personal note, EA destroy everything they touch, so paying them a sub so they can charge for the "privilege" of playing rubbish titles like BF hardline, while they hollow out and destroy talented studios like Bioware and Visceral, seems quite illogical to me.
This is the future and im sorry if you can't see/accept that. All EA is doing is cutting out the middleman. Eventually we will either be streaming all our games or they will be run on PC console boxes under our TV's. Both of these scenarios see EA not reliant on one particular hardware manufacturer (e.g Sony). Playstation is becoming irrelevant (rah rah rah 10 billions PS4s sold rah rah) and they are just slowing down the inevitable. Yes, this needs to be on PS4. Yes, I hate where the gaming industry is going.
@eLarkos Wrong, these pc boxes or steam consoles will never be as popular. Sony is an electronics hardware master. Steam is a fat guy with a website. The argument is sound to have pc console boxes, but as we have seen with the likes of apple tv and vita tv theres no thirst for change. I absolutely hate altering things on pc to accommodate games, installing drivers etc and so does 95% of everyone else.
@themcnoisy In case you haven't noticed, home consoles have required increasing amounts of patches, downloads, firmware updates, server fixes etc. Sounds a bit like a PC to me...
I think you will find that there is an ever increasing thirst for change for how we purchase and consume entertainment media, including gaming. Sony knows this, that's why they are pumping so many resources into streaming. However it seems that EA have the same idea, and NVIDIA, and Steam, and Apple, and Google, and MS, and everyone else in the market. Sony's brand name will only hold them so far until consumers realise that they can get their favourite games elsewhere. Who do you think will win in the digital age?... Hang on.... brb.... just going to check if PSN is online.
Sony PLEASE do keep to your guns!!! Don't let EA come in with this rubbish idea!! I mean do we really care if xbone get it 1st for acouple of weeks at most?!! It will come to the best console that is the PS4, with the added bonus of the "early" release on xbone going wrong and needing patches, the PS4 game will have all these patches and be much better game, The wait is worth it and EA will see that once it does it will out sell the xbone, pointless we have to pay enough as it is!! If every company did this "£3.99" a month idea do we really think kids will be able to pay for it?!.... Let alone people like me that has a Morgage and all the other bills to pay! I love gaming and really do hope Sony keep to there word.... For the sake of all the players that just can't afford this money grabbing rubbish!!.
Just for a note, plants vs zombies garden warfare and battlefield 4 can be picked up second hand for peanuts!!.
@eLarkos But all ps4 games work on ps4, nearly every game I have ever bought on pc has needed some tinkering to get it working. You may be as big pc fan and hats off to you, I once was and now cant stand them. Also most people cant be bothered. You are right the Sony brand will only get it so far but I don't want several streaming services, especially ea and ubisoft running them. My other point about this steam box rubbish is simple, Sony is a hardware manufacturer first and foremost with the best contacts in the hardware environment, valve is a software developer and these first runs of steam boxes will be a complete cock up you wait and see. That's my reasoning.
@themcnoisy I have to agree with you, I made a very powerful PC gaming rig (got big bonus from work) and I played loads of games, and yes the graphics are better than ps4/xbone, but there was ONE thing I kept coming across with EVERY game.... HACKERS!! PC can go blow!! Every game I played at least 2/3 players had "aim bot" or some other hack going on, which totally ruined my gaming experience to the point I brought the ps4, now I have a "gaming PC" sitting there which I use for streaming the Internet or my wife using to play The Sims 3 and 4!! Plus you got the fact you just put a disk in and play, with PC you have to install everything and for kids that would get confusing, Sony and Microsofts gaming rigs will never die... The player base is just to big!!
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...