Last week, you may have seen that there was a bit of a kerfuffle after an alliance of teachers were reportedly cracking down on children playing mature rated games. In a bid to get their stance across, they pointed out that they could potentially contact the police or child social care specialists, and many saw this as a rather rash approach.
"The letter was more of a blunt tool to get a message across. Communicating on games is very difficult," a teacher told Eurogamer.net in a lengthy message to the site and its community. "Parents are ignorant or apathetic about what games actually are," he began, adding: "They'll be busy people and not want to talk about it, but getting the message across has proved difficult for teachers. We're seeing the impact in the classrooms."
The teacher, who wishes to remain anonymous, apparently plays plenty of games himself, and is a regular Eurogamer reader. It's worth noting, however, that he isn't part of the Nantwich Education Partnership – the group who began the aforementioned campaign, and released the controversial letter.
"So the letter was just a way of saying, 'look, this is an issue'. It is something schools would be obliged to report. It's part of a bigger picture of general neglect. I don't think it would just be, 'if a child had been heard to be playing Call of Duty', that would be reported. This is one of many things," the teacher clarified.
Going on to talk about the actual impact of games on young minds, he said: "I've personally not seen children acting more violently because of games. The impact is more them being frightened of things they've seen or things they've played." Expanding on that point, he commented: "I had two children in particular who'd been nodding off at their desks. When you speak to them separately they all say, 'oh I couldn't sleep because I was scared of this game' they'd either been playing, or their friends had coerced them into playing. I think that's a problem."
Moving on to how age ratings are perceived, he pointed out that, in his experience, some parents wrongly view the ratings as an indicator of the title's difficulty. "There is a perception among a lot of parents that the age rating reflects difficulty," he stated, and goes on to outline the general way in which games are viewed: "The nature of the name 'games' suggests a playful thing, not necessarily something with a narrative, or something that could potentially be upsetting or violent."
Back to the letter originally sent out by the Nantwich Education Partnership, the teacher's quick to point out that it was perceived in an overly negative light by many, saying: "I don't think teachers at large or the writers of the letter have a problem with the game industry. It is parents." He continued: "It was a letter to parents who may be naive about how brilliant games can be, but also how there needs to be a considered approach to children playing games. This letter was an effort at influencing parents and making parents more aware of their responsibilities."
Perhaps most eye-opening is the teacher's account of one of his very own pupils, who was clearly influenced by mature games. "I taught a child two years ago who had been a high achiever for a long time. Then, when he got to year five he suddenly became incredibly sullen, very angry, frustrated, and exhausted," he began. "We brought in a therapist to speak to him. Eventually it came out that he was watching lots of Let's Plays of Resident Evil and other horror games," he added, before mentioning that the boy in question was just ten years old. The teacher then concluded his message by asking for understanding and help from the gaming community.
As for our own take on this, we reckon that he puts across a logical and very reasonable argument. Clearly, his own experience in relative situations is valuable, and his message is certainly one to ponder over. At the end of the day, a child's mind is far easier to influence, and if they're partaking in titles that are clearly intended for a more mature audience, then surely it's down to parents to step in and assess what's going on.
What do you make of all this? Do you agree with the teacher's message? Talk of future generations and their giant, powerfully evolved thumbs in the comments section below.
[source eurogamer.net]
Comments 24
I totally agree with this teacher. Young minds are too fragile for stuff like that, especially Resident Evil. My mom bought my cousin's 9 year old son Assassin's Creed 4 for Christmas and I told her it was a bad idea. She said it's just a game, but she then heard the cursing as he played it and was shocked. Also, after a few months playing the game I heard him say he wanted his grandpa help him make a hidden blade like the one in the game. That would be great for him to take to school, right? Children's minds are easily influenced by what they see. That's why these people are acting to help parents see the influence of video games
@Savino You've got a point - I think it can easily go the other way, where parents do too much to guard their kids from reality. As with most things, a balance is needed.
What stuck out to me was that apparently it's the video game industry's fault that one stupid kid with his negligent parents was watching a bunch of Let's Plays on YouTube and being traumatized.
Let that sink in.
It really comes down to parents being involved in their kids lives. Parents need to sit and play with the kids. I babysit my 7 year old grand daughter daily and we play everything from Diablo to Disney infinity. She never plays alone, and I make sure she understands that it's just play. My sons were raised the same way, They grew up gaming with dad. I think they are better people because of it. Personally I believe that Movies are for more real and detrimental than games can ever dream to be.
@Quorthon That's not even remotely what was being said. He quite clearly confers that he has no problem with the games industry, and that the fault is with the parents for their lack of awareness.
Personally I think this guy has a perfectly valid point, and it's basically what I was trying to get across in the article on the matter the other day (just far better written).
The problem is bad parents. Not games. I know from experience that lots of teachers are just as daft as many bad parents, you'd be surprised how often they communicate with a lack of respect, show poor English and abysmal math.
So my takeaway from this article is that watching Let's Plays is psychologically scarring and should be tightly regulated.
@Savino I agree with you! You make good points! I feel so bad for sheltered kids! That does more harm to them than good!
@Shellybird27 what you on about, the world is a pristine idyll
It's just Tipper Gore all over again.
@SteveButler2210 Dudes a troll, called senran estial versus a sexual assault simulator just report and move on.
@sonicmeerkat to be fair it does have dedicated "grope" functionality from what I read haha. Not saying he's right, as far as I'm concerned people should have full creative freedom when making a game, and if there's a market for it then why not. But I can at least see the point there haha
Mature games don't cause violent behavior. But they are more likely to bring out violent tendencies. At least from what I have seen. Regardless, I'll only buy my niece a wii.
@SteveButler2210 Nah when you dilute the definition of serious instances like sexual assault you trivialize it and it's not cool, not cool at all.
I'm not saying this as any sort of judgement of you for the record but I'm not going to tolerate such allusions that games that are sexy are alike to criminal acts.
@sonicmeerkat but at the same time, "sexual assault" doesn't just constitute one act. It's a whole spectrum of things, and i think it's fair to say groping still comes under that. Idk, maybe "harassment" would've been more the appropriate term to use. But I don't think by that he was trying to trivialise the darker end of the spectrum, just make the point that groping someone is also not cool and not to be trivialised either.
But tbh that's by the by, I see his point and i see yours. Either way I think we're getting mildly off topic here!
@Savino I'm sorry but you allow a 4 and 7 year old to play grand theft auto five a game developed for adults and swear while they are playing? Its your life and fair play to admit it, but I am literally lost for words. Theres a difference between being liberal and cruel.
@Savino Read the article. Theres an argument for teenagers possibly to play adult games - as many have said on previous comment sections, who didn't sneak into terminator 2 at 14? or watch knightmare on elm street around the same age? But at 7 and 4 children are at an easily manipulated age were they are learning what their world is, if their world is murder and foul language how do you think they will act in their teenage years? Let alone as an adult. Where are the boundaries?
@Savino @Savino @Savino @Savino I have to take your side on this , I mostly agree with your views. My 4 year old plays alot of games with me and sits with me while I play. After reading this I was a little concerned. So I asked him "is it ok to hurt people, ?" he responded with "no its bad " and then I asked him "well what about bad guys?" he replied , I quote " you sneak around behind him and throw a knife! "
if you let kids, especially younger kids play ,watch tv or expose them in one way or another to something that could influence them that you need to be there to help them understand it and regulate it. there like sponges , they absorb everything, you just need to help them take things with a grain of salt. and thats what "SAVINO " is doing, granite I don't let my kid cuss. which makes him the scum of the earth ! lmao! jk mate.
@Savino Oh great lets put grand theft auto in the school curriculum to learn the green cross code. Seriously you cannot be serious ive never heard so much ridiculous stuff in my life. How is that even acceptable? How. Why not just show them snuff movies and get it over and done with. Whatever your misguided reasons for allowing your tiny kids to play adult games which have been banned in some countries are wrong regardless of how you justify it. The article above showcases the effects of children being scared of games - did you read it?, I'm sure your 7 year old was delighted watching the torture scene in gta - bet he or she had the best nights sleep ever. As a 34 year old man I was even uncomfortable with that. You talk about kids being aggressive - no they are not, the only aggresive kids I ever see are the feral children who are left out on the streets till god knows when and have no boundaries. Ive got 3 kids I'm talking from experience, hyperactive yes, aggresive no. I do agree that everything to a degree is bad for children but in the context of the teachers communication with eurogamer its clear one of the main problems they are facing is children on mature games. My question to you would be - what is motivating you to proactively put your kids in front of unsuitable games?
@Savino I think your full of it, but that's just me.
@Savino I'm not attacking your lifestyle. You have a weighted argument but I'm concerned that you don't understand how these games can affect your very young kids. Anyway they are your kids, its your life, crack on. Just hope you don't live in Chesire.
@Savino Really? Savino that's what the article is about. Teachers in Chesire* have been threatening to go to social services if kids have been playing over age games and its effecting their school work. *chesire is an affluent area of North West England just to the North East border of Wales. Funnily I'm in a CH postcoded area although classed as Merseyside :/
@SteveButler2210
All I said is that one thing stuck out to me.
This guy is still better than the previous jackasses who, somehow, feel that threatening to destroy families with government intervention is a good idea.
I think ShogunRok summed it up perfectly. As with all things balance is needed.
I do not think it is wise to let 4-7 year olds kill people with a knife or watch horror games/movies, or watch the torture scene of GTA for example.
As a psychologist Savino you should know that even if they seem like it has no effect on them right now you can't know what effect could have later on. For your kids sake it will have any bad effect.
The other extreme is also bad in my point of view, growing up in a perfect world oblivious to reality. When your kid grows up he/she may lack the understanding and skills to cope with darker side of reality.
I do think exposing your kids without filter of any kind is the worse of the 2 extremes even if you are present.
I will aim to expose/explain my son to the mature things of life gradually as he gets a little bit older. He is 2,5. But I will not expose him to everything at 4 or 7.
After reading back your first comment I'm actually having doubts you are a psychologist.. If you are I would not want you to ever act as my psychologist lol "calling out BS!" Not exactly a comment I would expect. Or saying to someone online that Reservoir Dogs would not be suitable for your personality. I love that movie btw. But you sound a bit short sighted posting it like that.
In the article the teacher also gave examples. Is that BS too?
But each should live their own life and educate your kids as best possible as you see fit and with the best intentions. Cheers.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...