Whether you like it or not, the PlayStation 4K – or Neo, as it's purportedly codenamed – is real. The system, which has been a hot source of speculation since the Game Developers Conference earlier in the year, was blown wide open earlier today, as internal documents outlining its specifications and integration into the existing PS4 ecosystem were laid bare. While we still don't have the full picture – the Japanese giant, at the time of typing, has yet to comment on any of the reports – we do know that development kits are currently in the hands of some studios, with the manufacturer set to mandate compatibility with the upgraded console as soon as October. But what do we know about the box right now, and should you be worried or excited about its introduction? Let's get to the bottom of it.
What Is the PS4K?
We should stress right off the bat that everything you read in this article – unless explicitly stated – is based on well-sourced reports from around the web. That means that, while we can be confident in all of the information, there is the potential for plans to change. Nothing, of course, is final until Sony puts out a press release. Given its reluctance to comment over the past month or so, you probably shouldn't hold your breath for any official information until at least E3.
That said, we can now be pretty confident what the PS4K is: it's an upgraded console based upon the specifications of the original PS4 console. Codenamed internally as Neo, the system will include a CPU with eight Jaguar cores running at 2.1GHz, 8GB GDDR5 RAM running at 218GB/s, and an "improved" GPU with 36 compute units. You can see how these upgraded components compare to the existing PS4 courtesy of Digital Foundry's reference table below:
We're not hardware specialists, unfortunately, so do check Digital Foundry's article for more information on what these tweaks will actually mean. Leaked documentation from Sony suggests that the new console will enable improvements in the following areas, however: framerate, resolution, and "graphical features". In other words, you can expect games to offer a more stable, moderately enhanced experience when running on the PS4K.
What's the 4K Bit About?
There have been rumours regarding a 4K capable PS4 for quite some time now, which are finally materialising in the form of the PS4K. It's believed that Neo will include an upscaler, ensuring that all games look extra presentable on a 4K television. However, the platform holder is not expecting developers to target Ultra HD for their games – though this may well be possible for indie releases that demand less from the hardware than AAA blockbusters.
The one obvious area of confusion pertains to the inclusion of a 4K Blu-ray drive. Apparently, the devkits that Sony has been shipping do not include an upgraded drive, but this makes sense, as in order to remain compatible with the existing PS4 console, games will not be able to take advantage of the larger Ultra HD Blu-ray discs anyway. However, if the Japanese giant does intend to market this as a 4K device, it's reasonable to assume that it will include a 4K Blu-ray drive.
Is My PS4 Going to be Obsolete?
The short answer is: no – but it does come with a few caveats. Until the system is out on store shelves we simply don't know how developers are going to treat the existing model, but with 40 million PS4 consoles already sold, it stands to reason that publishers will pour more resources into the greater install base; in other words, it's more likely that the PS4K's additional horsepower will be ignored than your current console be fed shoddy seconds.
What we do know is that Sony is requesting developers to submit their games in two formats from October: Base Mode and Neo Mode. The former will ensure a high quality of performance for existing consoles, while the latter will take advantage of any bells and whistles made possible by the PS4K's upgraded internals. These could, as mentioned earlier, involve a higher resolution or a sturdier framerate. It's important to note, though, that – if done correctly – the existing console experience should not be compromised; any improvements made possible by the PS4K would never exist on the current PS4 anyway.
It's also important to note that Sony is not allowing additional modes or features to be unlocked "exclusively" on the PS4K – games would need to be the same from a gameplay perspective across both devices. So the upgraded hardware is purely for performance purposes. All console owners – be it PS4 or PS4K – will use the same PlayStation Store, same PlayStation Network, and same operating system. There will be no segmentation between models.
Will PlayStation VR Be Better on PS4K?
It's hard to say as leaked documents make no mention of PlayStation VR in conjunction with the PS4K. If there are any improvements to the PlayStation VR experience on the PS4K console, then they're likely to be additional visual bells and whistles as alluded to above. There's no word on the breakout box – a core portion of the PlayStation VR package – being integrated into the upgraded hardware, so this seems unlikely as well.
Will Old Games Be Upgraded to Use PS4K's Specs?
This is a possibility that Sony points to, but it will depend upon a developer's desire to revisit their old code. If they want to, though, the platform holder mentions "forward compatibility" in its documentation, meaning a patch could be released for an existing game to improve its performance on the PS4K. This means that a title like, say, Fallout 4 or The Witcher III: Wild Hunt could benefit from a sturdier framerate on Sony's new format – if the developer is willing to put in the work.
When Will the PS4K Release and How Much Will It Cost?
Sony's request to developers to support the PS4K starting October suggests that it will be out before Christmas, but with PlayStation VR also due out around the same time, it's difficulty to envision it deploying two tough-to-communicate products all in the same quarter. However, leaving the launch until 2017 could damage consumer confidence during the busy holiday period, so our personal opinion is that it needs to be out before the end of the year if the manufacture plans to announce it soon.
As for how much it will cost, the number that's frequently being touted is $399.99, which would put it back at the same price as the platform at launch. That makes sense as Sony had significant success at such a price point – and it may even pave the way for it to heavily discount the current model at Christmas, too.
Do you have any other questions or queries about PS4K? What do you make of the information above? Tell us to 4K off in the comments section below.
Comments 30
My biggest concern is that with the extra work load on developers the standard model games will not be completed to the highest standard because of time restraints and budget targets. I hope I'm proved wrong but there will really be no way of measuring this for new games as the publisher will always state there game other best it can be.
@gingerfrog It's a legit concern, but I can't see it myself. Seeing as the existing PS4 install base has sold 40 million units, it's more likely the PS4K version would get shafted - if such a thing even happens at all.
@gingerfrog @get2sammyb
The biggest strain is on Sony's marketing team, like was pointed out in an earlier article on this website. I studied PR and Marketing a bit when I was going for my journalism degree. I don't envy at all what Sony's teams are going to have to do this holiday season. I do think Sony had to make a an upgrade though. Is it supposed to just sit there and let Nintendo release a new console that sh*ts all over the PS4 specwise and let MS possibly get a jump as well? As I've posted before if early adopters were getting left behind this PS4K would be a huge issue, but that's not the case. The overreaction is just typical of consumers getting p*ssed and making an issue where one doesn't exist while at the same time continuing to ignore actual problems (like the fact the PS4 still doesn't have an option for external harddrives in freaking 2016). Hopefully this will blow over soon, like the New 3DS controversy did, and people will find the next insignificant thing to b*tch about.
We live in a world where most people upgrade their $500-$1000 cell phones every or every other year. I'm fine with an incremental update coming out mid-console generation. We can't, in 2016, expect console generations to last 8 to 10 years anymore. The tech just moves too quickly.
This is probably going to sell for $399 at launch, dropping the base model to $299. That's a win/win. Don't care about the new features? The base model is now more affordable (esp if you buy used as the market will be flooded by those who are upgrading). Do care about the new features? Sweet. You can either sell your old one and put the earnings toward the new one, or keep it for your bedroom. Were you holding of on buying a current gen console? Then boy is this your lucky day.
I think as long as they aren't splitting the gamer base, which they aren't, then we're all set. I will absolutely get this if it means that I can play games like FO4 with a higher level of stability. That's worth the upgrade to me.
Some people want the iPhone 6s, some want the 6s Plus. It's a personal choice. It doesn't split the user base. This is the same thing.
@MadAussieBloke This is exactly it. Games are almost always made with higher resolution graphics and with the mentality of "throw everything we want in there and we'll prune it down later".
This just means they'll cut out less for the PS4.5 or whatever they end up calling it. No harm no foul.
@glassmusic.
Ugh, let's not follow the Greg Miller train of thought here, Colin may be an ass, but he doesn't have an ego the size of Delaware, and he's willing to speak his mind / not brown nose Sony.
I laugh at the notion of tech moving too fast as well, does anybody remember the effect that 3D graphics cards had on the PC industry. The PS1 looked like texture warped crap. Every console was obsolete by 97.....the PS2, obsolete by late 2001, the PS3 and 360, anybody remember Crysis on the PC in 07?
Consoles are always behind the curb within 12 to 18 months. This is nothing new, but as the last Gen showed, when the sales are there, developers will find a way.....even if it's for 5 to 6 years......that's why we love consoles.
My ps4 is only 4 months old. If i purchase a new higher power console in 9 months to a year from now i will first compare what MS has to offer vs the ps4.5.
I don't want it, if I have to plug the needle into the back of my skull to get 4k.
I'm on board. This is actually a sunstantial upgrade to specs. Now all I really wanna know is if I can simply take the 2tb hdd from my "old" ps4 and install it in the Neo, without having to format and redownload those 30+ games I bought online?? That would save me quite a lot of time and frustration
@glassmusic "We can't, in 2016, expect console generations to last 8 to 10 years anymore. The tech just moves too quickly."
I agree, but I dont think because the tech moves faster now then it was before, I think the consumers have become more demanding. We allways want the newest and the best stuff out there.
Doesn't the average punter upgrade their phone every 2/3 years to average £200-£300? Guess it'll be more expressive for iPhone fans. And how often do we upgrade our PC's? Anyways I plan to sell my ps4 on either eBay/gumtree or flog it at CeX near ps4k launch. Hoping to sell mine for £200. So an extra £100 bucks can bag a new console upgrade! Still much cheaper than upgrading my pc rig.
The PS4 was actually cheaper than the PS3 at launch - especially if you factor in inflation. I am sure if Sony had built a console to the 'same' budget and taken a loss on each 'unit' like last gen, this gen wouldn't seem so 'weak' and would probably last a bit longer.
Sometimes technology moves on at a steady pace but sometimes there is more of a 'leap'. At the time of the consoles release, we knew there were 'big' developments due in the next few years - things like DX12/Mantel, smaller, faster, more powerful chips, better architecture, VR, 4k etc. All of these have helped drive the technology to the 'next' step. Sony and MS couldn't wait until this technology was actually available because their old technology was incapable of running a lot of the games we have seen over the past few years and so had to release something.
Its kind of like buying a state of the art, 36" CRT TV and then 50-60" 1080p Flat screens release for the same money...
I think this is a 'sensible' move for Sony. They could do nothing and we could see games slowly decline in visual presentation for the next few years, its competition release new hardware that's more powerful etc. We could see Sony release the PS5, split the user base and signal the end for the PS4. Or go this route and prolong the PS4's life by ensuring that any future game will also have a PS4 base version.
I can honestly see MS opting for the 'new' console and that will give developers the 'choice' to release a 'lesser' visual version - maybe even make more than just visual changes or just release the new console version.
At release, it was 'possible' to build an AMD based PC that could run BF4 at 1080/60 (higher than the PS4 was) for the same cost.That PC though would have struggled with games like the Witcher 3 without spending a lot of money on it - probably a new cpu, gpu and more RAM - probably more than the cost of the PS4k
I really don't see the problem, i'll be keeping my old PS4 but if it bother's you that much start saving now. As an OP has said you'll only need £100-£150 if you sell your old one and have a shiny new more powerfull console and you'll only need to save £10 a week or thereabout's. I don't see a problem here only people making them for themselve's.
@get2sammyb
40M old PS4 users won't get shafted until the PS4K will sell significant enough to start pushing old PS4 users to upgrade.
@Splatburst Sure, which is three or four years away. By that point, PS5 will probably be coming out.
@glassmusic
The people who upgrade their phones yearly are mostly those that take advantage of the service provider plans that lets you upgrade your old phone with minimal additional costs to the new one. Plus phones tend to get scratched/broken etc that there's a need to upgrade. You can't really compare it to videogame consoles. Consoles are more comparable to TVs when it comes to when to upgrade.
Hmmm Project Morpheus and now Project Neo
@get2sammyb Hi, will retailers be selling both Base Mode and Neo Mode versions of the same game or will PS4K users just have to download a Neo Mode patch for their games?
@get2sammyb The question is will there be a PS5? Given the move to x86 architecture with the current gen of consoles it makes using existing upgrades, traditionally developed for the PC, easily integrated into either console. Therefore, to me at least, this move to a 'PS4.5' indicates that the future plans for consoles may well be an iterative process with new hardware released every 2-3 years and older models being phased out after 5-6 years. That way I guess Sony can still argue a console still has a 5-6 year lifespan, but stay in touch with the abilities of a medium spec PC. Not keen on the idea myself, but it is the most logical way I can understand/explain this current move.
I only bought the console a few months ago, I also bought the Vita and PS TV to see them pretty much dropped. I would have hoped for more features to be added to the PS4 (like PS1 games), at this point, an 'upgrade' that requires the purchase of a whole new console has no interest for me.
If this is the way consoles are going, I'll just switch to PC if I find I'm interested in keeping up with new games, the upgrade options would be far more varied.
same for me
@WanderingBullet The Base Mode and Neo Mode versions will both be included on the same disc - it's the same game.
This is Sony's was of saying don't get the NX because we're still "better" trolllol. Ugh.
@get2sammyb That's good. So standard PS4 users can still get the enhanced experience once they've eventually upgraded to the PS4K without having to buy the same game(s) again. Thanks.
Andrew House, President of Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. (SCEI), has said : “Again. Not giving hard numbers, but the best guidance that I think I can offer based on the landscape that we see right now, is that we have high hopes that the PlayStation 4 will exceed the overall life cycle of PlayStation 3. It remains a significant question mark as to whether this will approach or exceed that of PlayStation 2.”
That was 2014 ... all lies as it seems
@WanderingBullet Yes! All your existing games will work on PS4/PS4K and any future ones you buy will, too.
@Bonito He was talking about sales, and he's not lying even if he's not. PS4 will continue to be supported 100% irrespective of PS4K.
@get2sammyb Oh, my bad! I know all existing games will work on on PS4/PS4K. I was actually referring to the games starting from October 2016 onwards not having two versions of the same game like you said.
@gingerfrog I think the acid test will be the Oct/Dec release window lets see how many big third party games get put back to september. For example Mafia III having a 7th October release date suggest its not supporting the Neo.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...