There’s talk of the traditional single player campaign dying out, and looking at E3 2017 there was certainly some evidence of that. Ubisoft’s press conference was filled wall-to-wall with service-based experiences – and not even the long-awaited Beyond Good & Evil 2 could escape the model’s grasp. Sony, however, is one of the few publishers still going big on story, and PlayStation executive Shawn Layden believes it’s in the company’s DNA.
“My philosophy is to play to my strengths,” he told the Telegraph. “And if you look at the studios we have – Naughty Dog, Guerrilla, Santa Monica Studio, Japan Studio – that’s what we do well. We do story. We create characters.”
He continued: “Those are the kind of things we do well. It’s what we’re known for. It really speaks to our entertainment DNA. We wish to entertain. We wish to make you happy. We wish to make you cry. That whole range of emotions we can pluck at to make you have a great experience. We’re big on character. We’re big on story.”
Of course, that’s just one way of looking at Sony’s first-party portfolio, which is much more varied than some people give it credit. The company’s in the service business with games like MLB The Show 17 and Gran Turismo Sport, and it’s also creating more casual games like Everybody’s Golf and Knack 2. And then there’s all of the PlayStation VR stuff like The Inpatient and Bravo Team, as well new initiatives like PlayLink.
That said, while PlayStation does tick a helluva lot of boxes, it’s those big story-driven games that define its output. And with the rest of the industry moving towards a different type of experience, it’s good to see Sony deliver some variety on its platform by sticking to its roots.
[source telegraph.co.uk]
Comments 46
Just the kind of games I love. Keep it up, Sony.
This is why I love PlayStation, the vast majority if games I play are big story driven adventures. Online shoot things have little appeal for me on a regular basis but I do enjoy having variety in the titles I play but as I get older the more I seem to enjoy the stories that are told
The day the industry decides it's time to stop making story and character driven games is the day I'm done with gaming (not that it's likely to happen any time soon). PS4 is my first Sony's console and I'm really, really happy with how diverse the first party output is, even if some of the games are not for me.
On the other side of the spectrum is a publisher like Ubisoft. And I could write an essay on how I dislike their modus operandi. They identify a trend or a fad and desperatly cling to it, spreading it over their whole portfolio. "Seamless online experiences with living, breathing open worlds..."
Single player adventures are my favorite. Glad to hear they're not backing down from it.
I do love the variety of games Sony offers - something for everyone. That's why I prefer the PS ecosystem. For me, single-player experiences - 3rd person action, 1st person narrative, platformers, RPGs, etc... With large AAA exclusives - Infamous, Uncharted, TLOU, Bloodborne, GoW, Days Gone, Spider-Man, Ratchet & Clank... Not to mention strong 3rd party support. I love my PS4!!
I'm not much of an online gamer. I used to play Counter-Strike on the PC, but as I've aged, I prefer the solo experiences. That's not to say I don't do online. I enjoyed Destiny and The Division, and even sunk six months into FF XIV, but the single player experiences offered on PlayStation are what I really enjoy. I'm glad Sony recognizes this.
story campaign games are the best.when there is only online games only I will stop playing video games.I been playing video games since the 1980s with my first console was Atari.and I love the Sega genesis.
Online only Games are here to stay just like micro transactions
When you go to the Cinema do you not buy popcorn and a drink.
A footy match without a pie and a pint.
Train journey and an expensive pack of crisps and coffee.
These examples are what is known as fleecing gaining money on the back of someone else's creativity or hard work.
When a Games company gives it's game for Sony to sell in the store who actually profits and most importantly how is micro trans actions shared out.
Buying a physical copy from a shop without going online for patches and updates seems like the easy way out.
But as No Man's Sky showed patches are essential nowadays meaning Sony has you.....and hopefully fleece some more money of you.
Money talks, single players beware.
The only three games I can think of that I've spent more than 5 hours playing online EVER are Overwatch, Rock Band series, and MAG (if you remember that). So that should tell you something. Love those single player games.
I could only play one 1 online shooter per year and be satisfied.( still bf1). But single player story driven are my bread and butter. Nioh, persona 5, resident evil 7, horizon zero dawn are just a few i grabbed this year. Great news sony!
Nearly every AAA game chase the gaas market now, even the new assassin creed have loot system.
I'm glad sony still make proper single player story game.
The day single player games cease to exist in favour of mmos or online only shooters etc is the day I stop gaming. I love the single player narratives and adventures that companies like Sony, Rockstar etc develop. This news item is exactly the reason why I will be forever loyal to Sony systems.
One of the many reasons I have been playing on the playstation consoles since PS1, 2, 3 and now 4, the games have matured with me and have kept me interested by offering me intelligent and entertaining experiences. If you want to play mindless games where you just run around blowing stuff up then the other companies/platforms have plenty of that, I won't call any names. I'm not 9 years old anymore, one the best things sony did was make the dualshock controller bigger, it fits so much better in your hands.
I played through Horizon Zero Dawn with no fath or fuss, no connection errors, didn't have to wait for friends to log on and help me with missions, nothing like that to worry about I just enjoyed the game, felt like the good old days of gaming.
@Number09 I understand online games are here to stay. There is a strong fanbase for those games obviously and I'm glad they exist for those gamers. They're just not for me.
And no, I don't buy popcorn and drinks at the movies...BTW I'm going to see Guardians today!
@ztpayne7 I don't know if I've ever played 5 hours online in multiplayer for any game. I did the bare minimum for Far Cry 4 for the Platinum and I got online co-op help for a particularly difficult boss in Nioh (I was a Ninja, so the tactic is OK).
The race for online was a good one. Fortunately Sony and Nintendo have realized that there's only so many online games you need.
This is why I moved back to Sony after jumping ship from Microsoft.Call Of Duty was the only multiplayer game on the 360 that I spent a decent amount of time on..and that was only cuz a group of us from work was so into it at the time.
But like some guys have mentioned,if there ever comes a time when every game is online only...I'll quit gaming.
I almost never play online. Online is just an extra option to me, and I can do just as well, if not better, without it.
I used to play a lot of Call of Duty games, I own around half a dozen of them, and I never played even one of them in online multiplayer. Ever.
I used to buy CoD Games for the WWII setting. Modern Warfare being the only exception. I think the last CoD game I bought was World at War, which attracted me because of the Eastern front/Pacific theater setting. I never played CoD online and I still find it impossible to understand the kind of gamers that buy games, never even thouch the single player story and just play online. It's alien behaviour to me. A good, interesting story is the first thing I look for in a game.
They can keep their "Online Only" games and I'll keep my money to buy better ones. Personally, I do not think single player games will die any time soon. They'll keep being made as long as there'll be people willing to buy them.
And judging from the comments above, I'd say there's still a fair number of them
sammy barker is the ultimate sony fanboy. too bad he's allowed to post here as i don't think pushsquare should be a sony fanboy site.
@manu0 There's a world of difference between been a so called fanboy then been an actual fan. A fan wants the best for the platform of their choice but aren't afraid to be outspoken when needs be. And Sammy does criticize Sony a fair few times.
@adf86 maybe so. but this "article" is pure fanboyism and basically just an ad for sony.
@manu0 I don't see how, Sammy is quoting from an interview while also raising a good point where at a time where every major publisher is releasing open world/always online/ MP focused games, Sony are providing the market with high quality SP story driven titles. It's a point he's already made earlier this year.
I only really enjoy single player experiences and that is why I am all about Sony at the moment.
@Number09 that's a very downbeat way of looking at it when we've had the likes of Horizon, Uncharted 4, Witcher 3, Bloodborne, Dark souls 3, FFXV, Nier Automata, and countless others offering excellent single player experiences this gen alone. Yes there are microtransactions in a couple of those, but thankfully they're limited to completely optional multiplayer.
@manu0 Its a PS news site. Sammy is the owner (so I've heard, might be wrong) so yes. He's allowed to post here.
@THRILLHOU you know there's a difference between a news site and a fanboy site, right? for example fox news is 100 % republican fanboyism
And I will stay loyal to Sony as long as they keep making games like this! Sony's first party games are literally the only ones I really buy full priced anymore. Keep up the good work!
@THRILLHOU I will keep this short and sweet I want to play complete games not micro trans action my games or use my internet juice which indecently is unlimited........but that is besides the point.
@manu0 cut a bit o slack the lad tries his best.
@FATPC Enjoy Russian I believe.
@manu0 If you have that much of a problem with the guy, then why haven't you had the guts to actually reply to him, instead of being obnoxious.
@Number09 I have reread your comment about twenty times and I'm still unsure what your trying to say.
Online patches and single player experiences are not mutually exclusive.
Buying food and drink at an event or during travel is not comparable to buying none essential micro transactions in games.
The 'free' no man's sky updates didn't fleece customers.
There's an age old saying that a fool and his money are easily parted. Single players shouldn't really beware, when predominantly online players are footing the additional cost bill. It's online players who should beware.
Also our exclusive are actual exclusives.
Single player experiences and JRPGs are what enticed me to buy a PS4. I do like my multiplayer experiences like rocket league and battlefield but I want to be engulfed in universe created by developers
@AlwaysGreener what are you talking about? how much more directly could I reply to him than mentioning his FULL name?
@Number09 Thats the day i stop gaming and become a book reader. And a lot of things you say dont make any sense.
@themcnoisy 20 times oh boy.......in a nutshell microtransactions stink.
@Flaming_Kaiser Read books let your imagination take you there.
@Flaming_Kaiser @themcnoisy you are not alone the ones that do i keep close.
You do not understand me , I am fine with that have a good day
I like both types of game, so am happy that it's not swinging too far to either side. Good decision Sony
@Number09 👍 agreed.
It sounded like you were defending them.
@FATPC lol same here when I go to the movies I bring my own little drink screw getting overpriced popcorn and drink I don't need it
I definitely prefer this. You can't really complete service games and there are too many coming out, single player games are so much more memorable and accessible.
@manu0 He has a Push Square account, it's not that hard to miss and he usually comments on some Push Square articles. I'm guessing you're new here, since you're accusing Sammy of being a fanboy, without knowing the fact that he's made articles and comments in the past where he's been critical on some of Sony's decisions. And this article isn't really evidence of him being a fanboy either, since it's just him quoting from an interview and bringing up some good points on why having more story driven exclusives are good commodities for Sony to have. If you're still bothered by him then try to actually reply to his account, but my advice to you is to bring real evidence instead of a meager accusation.
I like that Sony focuses on story-heavy, singleplayer games (Nintendo also provides plenty of games you can enjoy singleplayer, to be fair, even if most of its games are light on story). What I don't like is that nearly everything has become a carbon copy of Naughty Dog games. As much as I want to know what Sucker Punch is working on, I kind of dread it at the same time because of this.
@manu0 Sammy created PushSquare; it's his site.
Back to the subject of the article...
It is these single-player experiences which appeal to me. Never have been much of an online gamer, and probably never will be - at least for PvP; co-op I don't mind. When I hear a game won't have online, or won't focus on PvP (like Wildlands), it put's a smile on my face.
As others have said, the day everything is online-only is the day I'll hang up my gaming boots.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...