EA just wrapped up Battlefield V’s awful reveal stream, which made last week’s Call of Duty: Black Ops 4 showcase look like a masterpiece. In truth, we’re not sure why the publisher decided to put this show on at all: it hired out a fancy set purely to put three awkward looking devs on stage for 30 minutes to talk about the new title. Gameplay is being saved until EA Play next month.
So what did we learn? Well, as rumoured the game’s set during World War 2, and it’ll release on 19th October, sandwiched between Call of Duty: Black Ops 4 and Red Dead Redemption 2. There’ll be a new Grand Operations mode which sounds like a multi-layered objectives-type playlist, and co-op will also return. Meanwhile, single player fans will find new War Stories to enjoy, similar to those in Battlefield 1.
Perhaps the biggest announcement is that the sequel – which is pronounced Battlefield 5, by the way – will do away with the Premium Pass (or Season Pass), meaning all post-release support will be free. There’ll be no pay-to-win content either, but DICE is absolutely going to have to monetise this title, and it seems like that will come courtesy of new customisation options that will enable your squad to standout.
And that’s it. You can check out the reveal trailer embedded above, but there’s already plenty of debate about whether it’s actual gameplay or not. We’ll let you decide on that front – it certainly seems far too scripted to be totally authentic. It’s a good trailer, though, so give it a watch – and be sure to let us know what you think in the comments section.
Update: Those who pre-order Battlefield V will get early access to the game's beta. It looks like if you plump up for the Deluxe Edition you'll also be able to play three days early, on 16th October.
Comments 49
I bet it is gameplay but they just did everything right to make it look good.
Are we in bizarro world?
Yeah, no thanks
Not sure about the art direction. It looks amazing, but also really cartoony. What's with the lady's robot arm? It could be a cool alternative take, but I'd need to see more to understand what they're doing properly.
Also, is the lady in the key art Emily Blunt? It looks like her to me.
all i heard was a lot of vacuous waffle and not much else.. basically as if they didn't really want to reveal all that much important. trailer might be a mish-mash of heavily scripted campaign gameplay moments and cutscenes. at least it looked more colourful than BF1.
No pay to win but you can bet there will be micro-transactions for cosmetic items to customise your soldier(s), weapons and maybe even vehicles too. Different clothes, 'face-paints', different prosthetic arms, different 'junk' you can attach to your tank...
Whilst you can earn it by playing, I bet it will be a 'slow' process but you can buy credits with real money to get these sooner...
Seemed like BF1 with a reskin to me...
30+mins of chat and an obviously scripted 2min trailer - maybe in engine with a few seconds of actual game-play thrown in...
Apparently the presentation that press/influencers saw was really mind blowing, so maybe they just did a bad job with the presentation.
..or maybe the 'influencrrs' have been incentivised. you could barely see a frame which didn't have an Nvidia or xbox logo..
@get2sammyb
I'm more interested what the hell is up with a guy with a katana on his back tbh.
@SlimDrizzyLamar yeah, where's the BR stuff? Or, if there isn't any, what's with this "Battlefield will never be the same" tagline? Definitely lacking in information, and I'm sure glad I didn't watch the whole presentation (I want some concise bullet points on what's new and what we're getting! Like in the COD4 trailer!).
I'm definitely annoyed by this reveal!
A single player campaign and no season pass, sounds good.
Was expecting a Battle Royale mode announcement too...
''Battlefield V Leaves Season Pass in the Trenches''
Good, because the only pass they're getting from me is a hard pass
WW2. Yawn. Nope, not for me, thanks.
Will wait in hope of Bad Company 3 next year.
Damn, why cant they bring a more realistic Brothers in Arms back ( Ubisoft) that game rocked . Not interested in this game . Next WW2 game >> batlle of kursk Please
Snooze
@get2sammyb I think it looks awsome a little like Inglorious Bastards and its a prostetic arm. Did not want to play it but after the trailer im preordering. 😁
Meh. Same old really.
@RogerRoger I will hate all lootboxes or lootdrops cosmetic or not. Yeah i heard in the past you bought the wanted and you did not need to gamble... 🤨😔🤑
Are people this stupid EA makes a horrible mess and now we accept gambling DLC instead of normal DLC..... GTFO 😤😤😤😤
@get2sammyb Lol I find it funny that the trailer you used has an advert for Xbox.
I might actually pass.on this one and stick with Battlefield 1.
@Tasuki Microsoft is the marketing partner so all the Battlefield stuff is going to end up covered in Xbox branding.
@get2sammyb Ah didn't know that. Makes sense though since CoD is partnered with Sony.
Looks good to me! No season pass, solid looking multiplayer, a single player mode. Day 1 buy.
@get2sammyb
Back then all Swedish women were cyborgs.
Guys I just found out theres a huge backlash for two things...first there's women and people are freaking out! Second, people are saying the trailer was crap and the soldiers are represented badly, with inaccurate clothing and such!
Seems like the majority of people lol
@AFCC Dunno why people are upset about there being women. It may not be completely historically accurate but from the katanas and robot arms I'm sure women soldiers are the least of the inaccuracies. Plus everyone deserves characters in an online game that represents them. If you're just a nameless soldier in this sorta game then being able to customize that character to represent you as a player should be welcomed, not vilified.
@nessisonett @AFCC The reality is there are still people alive today who fought in WW2 and millions more whos parents or grandparents fought or lived through it. If its not historically correct there will obviously be a backlash. Player choice is all well and good but its World War 2. Nazi Germany, Pearl Harbour, Kids being sent away from their families, the blitz etc etc. If its done cackhanded people will obviously get upset - that includes women on the battlefield as much as I agree with inclusivity and in fictional games usually play a female character.
@themcnoisy @nessisonett But there were women on ww2! A huge minority of course, but there were women! Especially in the French resistance...
From what I know the USSR and British and Australian forces had women too!
Not with metal arms maybe lol
@nessisonett It wasn't a robot arm it's a prosthetic arm, that's how they looked in the 40s. And it wasn't uncoomon for Japanese troops to carry their family katana into battle a tradition which dates back to ancient Japan, during WWII. That's how alot of katanas made their way out of Japan and into the US cause soliders would take them off of dead Japanese as spoils of war.
@nessisonett
At this point people b*tching about gender and race of playable characters should be expected, sadly. The unfortunate part is there was a time people would welcome female playable characters in games. Somewhere along the way, people went crazy and now think it's all about agenda pushing. To be fair, I think it's also because idiots b*tch about games geared towards males and use stupid terms like 'toxic masculinity.' If everybody would just shut up play the games they want, avoid the ones they don't want but lets others who might like something they don't, enjoy it, there wouldn't be any problems. But everybody has to bring their obnoxious political views to everything these days. For what it's worth, the lady in this game seems pretty cool, and with all the stuff that goes on in a video game the last thing to be concerned about, at least imo, is 'historical accuracy' unless that's how the game is pitched. As far as I know, that's never been the pitch for Battlefield.
Anyway, on topic, I probably won't be getting this. Not a big fan of the WW II setting.
They replaced single player campaign with single-shot cinematography, now.
Was thinking of giving this a shot over COD, just need to gently direct my friends to do the same.
Look up the video by jackfrags on youtube it goes waaaay more in depth about all the details that will really make or break bf5. Its gotten me way more hyped about bf5 then the lame trailer did.
@Flurpsel yeah!! Thanx that video from jackfrags realy gave me a better idea whats so different in this game.
Sounds like what Black Ops 4 should have been. Though the art style kinda puts me off.
@get2sammyb I agree, that trailer looks the complete opposite of any WW2 film etc I've ever seen. Robotic arms?? The guy in the vest looks like he should be in a Vietnam game rather than a WW2 game.
@tomassi @get2sammyb I'm no expert, but didn't these sort of arms exist around then?
https://www.wired.com/2012/03/ff_prosthetics/
question is will they stick to real world weapons in the story mode or make up ones like they did in the last game
@FullbringIchigo There was a guy running around with a katana, so I believe anything is possible.
That means EA is gonna surprise us by ruining it in a way we haven't seen before. Can't wait for October
Hmm everyone got excited about EA doing the same sort of thing with Battlefront 2 and look how that turned out I don't trust these big companies anymore :-/
@FreakerZ I know right. I listened to this guys monotonous voice for 25minutes straight. I'm such a fanboy..
@get2sammyb cartoony? No
@kyleforrester87 I honestly have no idea. It's a random choice to add in on the face of it though because I can't imagine, even if they did exist back then, that they would have been very prevelant or sophisticated. Anyway, the still from that trailer above doesn't say WW2 to me, more 'Nam or something. Who knows, maybe it will be good. FPS and Multiplayer not my cup of tea anyway really. I don't like it when there aren't any local co-op modes on these games.
@tomassi Random, perhaps, but it looks like they are trying to inject some character (for better or worse). They'll probably take a few liberties in the process. "Big Boss" has a similar claw hand at the start of MGS5 (although granted this is 15-20 years later).
@AFCC yeah, The U.S was the only real major power not to use women in WW2 although only the soviet Union out of the big powers allowed women to fight on the front lines
Britain had a Woman's air force though plus they also maned anti-aircraft guns and the like
bu if people are saying that women didn't fight in WW2 at all then they are wrong
oh hey, yet another WW2 FPS game... sigh
A nice directed trailer. If EA and DICE have really decided to ditch the Loot Boxes and Pay-to-Win policies (Yes not even the season pass and Sith) I bet this will make a fine game. I'll definitely grab it if it doesn't have micro-transactions other than cosmetics which... who needs cosmetics lol
Man some of the attitudes on this comment section 😂
If you cared to listen properly to the stream, you'd remember that these guys are simply resistance fighters, with no 'official' ties to any side. Hence the non standard uniforms and get-ups.
Meh another war game I don't care for. I hope everyone else likes it though.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...