RAGE 2 reviews are beginning to roll out, and it looks as though the critical reception has been a little lukewarm. The open world shooter is largely being praised for its bombastic combat, but its plot, story length, and side content are being dinged. About what we all expected?
In any case, we've compiled a number of reviews below. As for our own, we haven't received a review copy of the game, but we'll try and get our own thoughts out to you as soon as possible.
Destructoid - 8/10
I was pleasantly surprised with the shooter chimera that is Rage 2, which ended up being open world mini-Doom 2016. It's not going to make anyone a believer in shooters or the free roam format, but folks already predisposed to those vices will find plenty to sink their teeth into.
Game Informer - 7/10
For all of its attempts at garish glitter, Rage 2 is a muted, cliché, and uninspiring experience that's propped up by spectacular shooting and neverending battles that sometimes live up to the promise of a carnival of carnage.
GamesRadar - 3/5
Were everything that is planned to arrive in the coming months, there's a chance that Rage 2 could have felt like a more complete package at launch – a game that has content to complement its excellent weapons and core action. Sadly, that isn't the case and the result is a sequel hasn’t impressed me all that much at all, but it won’t be laid to rest until the roadmap comes to a close for a game many people will have grown bored of.
Gamespot - 6/10
Rage 2 is at its best when you're given the chance to keep up a gratifying momentum in combat, but struggles to setup the scenarios its combat deserves. It's satisfying in the way clearing out an open-world checklist is, especially because powers are such a joy to use. The disappointment comes from the fact that those activities are rudimentary in nature and the decent ones end well before you get your fill.
Are you looking forward to blowing stuff up in RAGE 2? Try not to make a mess in the comments section below.
Comments 51
About what I expected really. 7 and 8's across most of the board isnt a bad score to be fair.
Let's see if people keep the same energy they had with Days Gone.
Mad max had a similar reception and I enjoyed that. I was holding back from pre-ordering this until the reviews came in. I Just watched ACG’s review on YouTube, who basically says that despite it’s flaws it’s a lot of fun, which is good enough for me.
These review scores seem pretty good to me!I'll still be picking it up at some point anyway.
GOTY then 😂, jokes aside the gameplay has looked great every time I've seen it, it's just a question of whether they had the meaningful content to wrap it up in. Doom 2016 is my favourite shooter of the last 10 years so I guess I'm gonna like this one when I get round to it
I don't think anyone thought this would be an amazing game with meaningful story or side content. it just looks like it would be loads of fun after a beer or 3!! I'll be getting this at some stage, with the Danny Dyer voiceover on 🙄😂
I was initially excited for Rage 2 but that has died off, I'll be happy to play borderlands 3 instead and the new obsidian rpg thingy.
Here we go again with 7/10 being considered "not good" by some people 🙄
gamespot is horrible anyways.i will get the game.destructoid gave it a 8.its all gravy dog.word up son
Gamespot with yet another score below 7 😂 they try so hard to be controversial.
So, mindless fun then? It sounds decent but I was burned so heavily by Just Cause 3 and 4 despite 2 being one of my favourite games of the PS3 generation. Eh, maybe on sale.
I’m still interested on the game but maybe not on full price.
Sounds good but reviews I've seen say story takes about 5-8 hours and side missions takes that to around 25. So will wait for a price drop.
See gamespot is still trying to be "edgy" but come of as sad and pathetic.
It's around the ballpark I expected for this. Nothing I saw in the build-up to release really jumped out and made me excited enough to buy Day 1. At best, its a big price drop away from joining my ever increasing backlog of games but I won't lose sleep over it
@playstation1995 - Destructoid's Chris Carter is probably one of the best reviewers out there along with Karick (ACG). While I'm quite capable of making my own mind up I always make a point of seeing their reviews for any games I'm interested in.
it'll be half-price within 4 weeks i reckon. was never convinced open world was the best fit for rage.. when pretty much the only really good thing it has going for it is the combat, it's probably better to funnel that into killing zones, rather than pointless quests to go looking for it. i thought the first one was decent enough (apart from not having an ending), but the driving around in the vehicles dragged a bit, and that wasn't really open world.
@AlejandroMora 3 weeks number 1 in the UK thats not so bad. 😁
@AlejandroMora Nope unless it's a PS exclusive will they have the energy with some people on this site.
I feel Borderlands 3 is going to be high scoring compared to its colorful counterparts like Rage 2 and FC New Dawn.
Of course Gamespot just had to underscore it for those easy clicks. I'm interested in this game so I'm waiting to see how fans react before I decide to pick it up or not.
Either way, it is a Bethesda game and will be half price in 4 weeks when I may pick it up.
@Shigurui oh yeah.if you like a video games.go with your heart.i play the surge. and I always like the surge.it was a 5con this site.i play it since it was free on psplus.i love that game .it get a 8 from me.word up son
Most of the review seems to confirm that combat is great fun and it similar to Doom 2016.
Also ACG reviewed well and I normally find his reviews pretty great.
This is exactly what I am looking for so I am in👌
Was watching Cohncarnage play it game looks solid so will be picking it up tomorrow.
Yeah I dunno, like I said before, we’re conditioned by articles like this to think a game scoring the kind of numbers above is lukewarm and therefore below par.. so why complain when people say they are disappointed by anything below an 8 🤷♂️
But yes, to me this sounds like a less focused Doom game which can only be a bad thing unfortunately.
@nessisonett i thought it was just me. 2 was near open world perfection for a destruction sandbox. 3 was horrible with terrible framerates and some AI dialed up to 11. I didnt even give 4 a try because of how genuinely bad 3 was for me
Once again people complain about a certain sites low score without actually stating what about the review you didn't think was right. Here we go again arguing numbers instead of details.
Remember people, the 'score' is just one person's viewpoint, their opinion and how it may relate to the publication and their guide for how they score a game.
If, for example, 10 is 'perfect' and virtually impossible, a 6 may well be another publication's 7 (or more) because to them, they aren't so strict on what makes a game score '10'. That 6 is just an 'average' game where another site would say 7 is an average game. Both may have exactly the same perception of the game but one publication may have a different scoring values. Edge Magazine for example always seemed much stricter, less forgiving attitude to scoring games. A 5 with them often meant that other publications (like C&VG, Official [console] Magazine, etc) 7 or even 8 in some cases.
In my experience, games that score 6's and 7's are generally 'good' games if the person buying/playing has an interest in the theme, the characters. the genre etc. Someone who isn't that interested may find themselves unable to overlook some flaws, lose some immersion in the world etc.
Day's Gone is a classic example of a game that scores an avg 7/10 but those that were interested in the theme, the genre etc will likely be thinking that 7 is a bit harsh and really enjoy it. Those that had 'little' interest may well be more aware of issues, more aware of any cracks, any repetition etc because it hasn't sucked them fully into the world. That is true for games rated 9/10 too. If you aren't sucked in, you may notice some 'cracks', some 'flaws', some repetition etc - something that you may feel a game wasn't as deserving, that the Critics were somehow oblivious or had been 'paid off' to score the game the way they had.
I have always said read/watch lots of reviews and, if its not getting 9's and 10's, ask yourself do you have any interest in the genre, the theme, the world, the characters etc and if so, chances are that a 6/7/8 game will still be 'enjoyable', can still have some great moments or, in the case of a lot of games these days, actually be better thanks to Patches and/or additional free content to actually justify a AAA price tag...
@kyleforrester87 totally agree with the first part of your comment.
Now this is a lukewarm reception
2 weeks ago a 7 was a very good score....
Yep still interested in it, just dunno when I'll get round to buying it.
@arnoldlayne83 it just reinforces 8 being the minimum standard for games worth our time doesn’t it? I know it’s minor in the context of this article but it follows years of the same behaviour from the gaming media.
Look at me on my high horse, bi*ches!
the sony exclusive games biased is real..
I get the feeling we’re in the period of the PS4 lifespan where we’ve hit the heights in the mid to mid-late section (Nier, Spider Man, God Of War etc...), and now everything else being judged against those games are never going to hit the same heights. I wouldn’t call it filler, just not as good as the glory days.
I bought Devil May Cry and enjoyed that, but nothing else really springs out to be worth my money.
@Nightcrawler71 exactly. Mad max was great
Stop caring about what a score is 🤷🏻♂️ Read what they say, take with a grain of salt and make a choice. I’m playing rage, but not until I clear out a lot of stuff first
@Rudy_Manchego Bethesda didn't make rage 2
IGN gave it an 8/10. Honestly story looked to be the weakest aspect from the word go. The originals was also poor but had fun combat and it looks to be the same with this. Again tho not every game has to be a masterpiece for it to be fun.
@Danloaded I don’t trust a single word done by a single IGN reviewer. Their staff at this point has proven time and again to have a lack of understanding and knowledge of their industry
Id just like to know how the open world is. Like will i come across little unique events etc? Is it a diverse world with different environments etc? Are there ever slower quieter places where my heart is racing wondering if theres going to be a creature jumping out or an ambush?
If its just a bunch of mindless violence then im not sure thatll keep my attention.
@jly1987 very true was just adding the score to the list lol
another generic, first person, open world game that fails to innovate... because we don't have enough of this schlock already. too bad so many gamers lack a critical mind and want to replay the same game over and over again. they have ruined the industry.
on a separate note, i don't think the writers of this website realize what it is they are doing. a week ago we had a days gone article that was supposed to encourage people to play games that receive AVERAGE scores of 7's and how such scores are NOT BAD. yet here we are, with a headline that is focusing on rage 2 not being very good (due to the way the headline is worded), yet, rage 2 currently has a higher meta score than days gone. what are we as readers supposed to take away from this? do you guys realize you are sounding a bit hypocritical and only confusing readers with your original point? gee, i wonder why an article was made to damage control days gone's scores — might have something to do with it being a sony property? i could be mistaken of course
As I've had the PS3 since launch, and never picked up the first Rage game until just last year (after I saw it for $3 used, why not)...was very impressed by it, it had some enjoyment. Tempted to pick this one up, but will probably wait until it gets marked down to at least the $20 range...there's far too much else that I have yet to play or conquer, and still too much out in stores to get too. Busy library, and this will probably be another game that I'll play after I'm sitting in front of my Playstation 5 games!
That 7/10 sounds more like a 5.5/6 out of 10.
If 10 is perfect and virtually impossible, then that makes 9 the highest score, which consequently makes it worth 10 effectively!
Can't we go up to 11 instead?
I quite liked the first one, that texture pop in on PS3 was distracting though. Days Gone is taking up my gaming time at the moment, would be interested in checking out this game at some point perhaps.
Not that interested in these average meta scores myself, I read / watch a range of reviews, if a game interests me I watch some gameplay and if looks good, try the game myself. If other people dont like a game and I do, thats fine with me. RDR2 bored me, but I know people who think its amazing.
After being fooled on Days Gone I am skipping reviews on this one.
Well glad I did. A few hrs in and having a good time. The start is crazy bland with strange character models. But once you hit the road it all opens up.
Gunfight are fun. ACG gave a "Buy" on their review
I'm only about 90 mins in but so far so good. Very Mad Max-esque with plenty to upgrade and collect. Still has that Rage 1 vibe, with collecting random junk to sell/upgrade. If you enjoy killing, collecting, upgrading, and killing, you'll have fun.
"It was Crap!" and yet awards 7/10 hahahaha reviews are so broken. XD
@nessisonett
I har a good time with Just Cause 3. But 4 is so bland and ugly I can't even get myself to play it. I haven't been so disappointed in a game since Saints Row IV
@youreyesonly00 Sorry, a Bethesda published game. LIke say, Prey or Dishonoured 2 which both dropped price very very quickly.
@Nightcrawler71 I agree with this 100%! I held off with days gone and bought it two says ago because I felt that the reviews weren’t good enough. I went into the game disliking it but I’m actually fact I’m really enjoying it. I expect the same with this. I think we’ve set the bar so high for ourselves for games and relying on others opinions whereas if the game is fun to play, which this seems to be its worth a purchase in my opinion
Games like this have a more specific target audience though, in the same way Bulletstorm, Metro, Prey, Shadow Warrior, Dying Light and others, do. In other words, cool single-player FPS games
To me storylines in FPS games only really matter if it's a linear game, like Bioshock or Killzone. With open-world FPS games I mainly want a cool setting and atmosphere to do my stuff in, and some fun combat/gameplay mechanics. In general, the storyline has a rather low priority for me in FPS games: if I like the gameplay, I'll like the game.
One thing that annnoyes me though, is that most of the things that people complain about when it comes to Rage 2, and its predecessor, can be said about the Borderlands franchise as well, but the latter gets a free pass of-course.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...