The emergence of Game Pass on the Xbox One reminds us of PlayStation Plus’ rise last generation. With the PlayStation 3 scrambling for marketshare against the Xbox 360, a very shrewd Sony transformed its subscription service into a secret weapon, giving away big name games to its small pool of subscribers. It was buttering up consumers ahead of making the service mandatory on the PlayStation 4, and it worked like a charm.
Microsoft is, perhaps, looking a little deeper than goodwill gestures. Its aforementioned initiative – which includes "free" copies of every new first-party title day-and-date, as well as select third-party releases – is unquestionably in loss-leader mode, as it blows cash with $1 discounts hoping to establish a big enough base to make a Netflix-esque model viable in the future. But is it something that PlayStation could realistically copy?
Well, it’s worth mentioning that the mechanics of the model aren’t all that difficult to implement. As you’ll already know, the PlayStation Store is more than capable of serving up subscriptions these days, and Sony has a compelling enough catalogue of content to make its own iteration of Game Pass enticing. In fact, with PlayStation Now offering downloads, it’s already dipping its toe into the ocean – although obviously you won’t be playing Death Stranding day one via the service.
And this is the big difference that currently sets Microsoft’s efforts apart: it’s been willing to tank the sales of Gears 5 – which are just a quarter of its underperforming predecessor at retail in the UK – in order to try and entice subscribers. But is this something that Sony, with its primarily single player-driven catalogue, could replicate? And with PlayStation exclusives performing better than they ever have in the past, does it even make sense to change tact?
It’s clearly too early to say either way. There was a lot of talk in the early days of Xbox Game Pass about the model actually increasing full-price sales, and it’s a sound suggestion in some instances; a game like Rocket League, for example, would not have obtained half of the success it ultimately achieved without reaching critical mass through PlayStation Plus. But when it comes to a blockbuster like Halo: Infinite, it’s hard to imagine the same scenario reoccurring.
The same is true of Sony’s catalogue: would Marvel’s Spider-Man really have set the kind of sales records it attained if it was part of some cut-price subscription service? The Japanese giant must be looking at the way its titles are performing full-price at both retail and on the PlayStation Store, and balking at the idea of practically giving them away. But while it may limit revenue on big hits, it’s perhaps worth remembering that subscription models can shield flops as well.
Our biggest concern is that if PlayStation were to adopt the Game Pass model and offer exclusives day-and-date, would it have an impact on the kind of software the company makes? The manufacturer has established itself as the master of cinematic single player campaigns, but subscription models tend to favour high retention titles, like multiplayer games or maybe even episodic releases. Our guess is that Microsoft will leverage its new teams to make smaller titles which release often.
But we’re going to need to see how things settle down over the coming years. Microsoft will sell its next Xbox with the pitch that a monthly subscription will get you access to all the content you need; theoretically, you won’t even need to buy a single game. That’s compelling, and a threat to the status quo. Realistically, there’s nothing stopping Sony from matching the proposition, but at what cost? This is what the platform holder’s going to have to weigh up as the PlayStation 5 approaches.
Do you think a PlayStation Game Pass is viable? What sacrifices in Sony's output would you be willing to accept in order to make this a success? Don't forget to subscribe in the comments section below.
Comments 88
hell naw. i just want sony to keep making great single player games without any bs like MS or 3rd party publishers well pretty much most of em. f*** subscription services in games.
Could they... sure. Should they? Not so much. Until someone can explain the business to me, how exactly is a developer motivated to make a great instead of good game. Normal model, profit usually provides that motivation. In this model, I'm not so sure. Maybe im just blind or something.
Even if such a pass was great value for money, I'd be somewhat hesitant. It's probably because I'm old fashioned, but I feel a lot more comfortable buying the game outright then knowing I have it forever.
I don't think it's viable to make great single player games with no mtx like god of war and spider-man if sony sells it bundled with subscription service. It's the same as launching avenger movie first/day one in subscription service, it's won't happen.
Also all big AAA microsoft games has mtx/mtx focused, I don't want sony or nintendo games becomes like that.
I'm all for it if there are deals like Xbox Game Pass has every month or 2. Tried out many games thanks to that, and that's always good.
Game Pass is all Microsoft lives for now, despite all these studios they've bought there exclusives seem less important then ever before now. And as Jim Sterling points out today, when Sony and Nintendo are consistently pushing out high quality exclusives, MS are acting like a 3rd party publishers complete with the shady business practices they adopt.
At the end of the day their interest lies in Game Pass because they can't win through the traditional means. Xbox doesn't have neither the global reach or the variety of beloved IPs that it's competitors have spent 25 years cultivating.
MS would rather consoles went away at this point and everything just be services, personally I wish they just leave the console market to Sony and Nintendo who both have long proven to do the market right and MS can just focus working on been an actual 3rd party publisher.
If PlayStation were to offer a Game Pass with their library of titles, I'd absolutely subscribe. They wouldn't even need to put brand new titles on it, the back catalogue is so strong.
Personally I think all the gaming subscriptions going are brilliant and offer superb value the likes of which haven't been seen before. Obviously if you sub to all of them it's gonna add up but if you pick and choose which ones interest you at certain times, you're genuinely able to access hundreds of top quality games for just a few quid. It's ridiculous value really.
Sony would never do this anytime soon. Their exclusives sell a little too well at launch to give away for a mere 10$.
Gamepass is great but obviously a massive loss leader. I think eventually Sony will do something similar but I don’t think it will have the same release model of their AAA exclusives on launch day. Everyone wants subs over sales, that is clear.
Gamepass is fantastic value and is basically how I game on my Xbox One and dip in and out when I'm using it. I've just returned as it was £2 for two months and for that I get to play Devil May Cry 5, Gears 5 and The Outer Worlds amongst others and if you want to keep the games you get a decent discount too.
As for Sony I definitely think they should replicate it on PS5 using all of their PS4 exclusives giving any new adopters an instant library of games, then perhaps adding new titles after 6 months or so when sales have died down
I think if the PS5 offering gamepass with PS4 and select PS5 titles it would work really well. Save titles like the Medievil remaster for Day 1 on gamepass, while a bigger franchise such as God of War could wait like 3 months to hit the service.
Sony would be stupid to do this, only reason Microsoft did it is because their fan base didn't go out and support their games. It would devalue their exclusives and eventually lead to mediocre AA games like Xbox. I wont support something that will lead to the death of great single player games.
I actually enjoy the Gamepass from MS. For the price of two triple A games I get a.years worth of Gamepass. Plus if I don't like a game I am not out of $60 like Inwas with BL3. If Sony did a reasonable priced Gamepass I would definitely jump at it.
Spider-Man : 13.2m
God of War : 11m
Uncharted 4: 16.3m
The Last of Us : 11.8m
Horizon: Zero Dawn : 10m
that's why sony would be mad to do it. maybe, smaller games like the last guardian, shadow of the colossus, concrete genie, etc. might benefit from being on a gamepass-like model, but it always has the option of using those titles to bolster playstation plus.
gears of war 3 sold 20 times more than gears of war 5. i just don't see a viable future for sony where its biggest games sell maybe 0.5m at $60 and the rest play it for the equivalent of a few bucks.
@HailHydra97 couldn't have said it better my self
I'm not sure if Sony would be willing to do something like this. Games take money to make, PlayStation exclusive titles probably have loads of money pumped into them, so would the money they could get with a game pass esque service be worth not getting as much from full price retail/digital? I get that more subscriptions = more $$$, but I'm sure everyone's seen those sales figures of other PS exclusive titles and well, they can probably afford to do it, but would it be worth it?
Would I subscribe to it? Only if I have no option, I guess. I mean, I only use PS+ for gaming subscriptions. I don't use PS Now, but I can imagine that being a base for this model. In the end, it just comes down to how it's handled and ultimately, how many of these things I'll have to pay for just to enjoy my hobby.
Zero interest. I buy discs for a reason that a sub can never offer, the ability to play what I want when I want. Even with plus, if a game goes on there that I've tried and think I might like to play again sometime then I'll buy a hard copy. Ownership all the way.
GamePass is nothing but shovelware how wants that!!
@Tasuki Right now it's good value but it's a loss leader which will lead to price rises which people won't be too fond of, plus there's the concern on the lack of incentive for games to be anything reaching AAA status cos why should studios and publishers put there all and money into a game if it's just going to be given away on a service for a few quid. If anything it risks devaluing games going forward like what happened to the mobile market where it's considered commercial suicide to price your game anything above free.
@Shigurui same thing i like buying my games too.
Sure Sony could do this, but I think this approach better suits Microsoft's business model. Microsoft is doing fine with the gamepass approach, whereas Sony currently has no problems shifting copies of their games.
Personally I'm not bothered either way. I prefer to own a game and then be able to play it whenever I want instead of it disappearing as soon as I stop paying a subscription.
I don't understand the business plan of putting all the first party exclusives on Game Pass. Surely everyone is going to play it there and not buy the full price game. There's so many gamepads deals where you can buy several months for a few quid.
Of course MS will argue they gain huge subs numbers but surely the financial difference between potential full price sales and game pass subs sales must be gigantic. I think 99% of Xbox owners would have bought this if Gamepads didn't exist, so how do they justify this to the shareholders.
Nope i dont want one for PlayStation.i dont want to buy god of war ghost of tshushima and last of us 2 for gamepass.i want to own them.and PlayStation dont have to follow what Microsoft is doing.microsoft is already left in the dust.playstation won this war.for ps5 or before that just give ps owners 2 aaa ps4 games and 2 indie games.word up son
@AdamNovice the only studios who have to put their games on there day one are owned by Microsoft so I don't think that will be an issue. It's not as if Gears 5 has a small budget or Halo will, for other developers that's their own choice depending on the deal offered and bigger studios tend to put their games on after a few months when sales have dropped.
As for this being a loss leader for them, does anyone know this for certain? There is very little information about it and the only thing I have found is that Gamepass makes up quite a significant proportion of all Xbox earnings with some estimates putting subscriber numbers at 9.5 million early this year. Even with those who have discounts, that is still a lot of money before you even take into account sales acquired through the service and dlc sales generated
I’d like it if they did, but I guess they simply don’t need to right now. I can absolutely see it happening in the future, though.
Would Xbox of even considered gamepass if they had sold 100million consoles like Sony..... probably not. Gamepass is a must for Microsoft this console generation to win back fans. Will Xbox continue gamepass into the next console generation? I myself am really enjoying playing gears 5 for £1 and I’ll bet I’m not the only one who’s took advantage of the gamepass ultimate offer.
Big AAA games from Sony are big special events for me. Having them in a subscription service feels.....iffy....
Gamepass is not making money for devs so only if they want to lose money. Sony's games actually sell unlike M$ so I don't know where this talking point came from.
@Cutmastavictory That is why they are actually losing money. Games need to make back a return. A subscription model does not yield the same returns. Notice PSNow has old games on it and no new games. That's for a reason.
Xbox Gamepass in its current state is not sustainable long-term in my opinion. It’s only a matter of time until monthly prices are increased just like what happens periodically with Netflix, and you will start to see less offerings of free and discounted trials.
I don't know why is so hard to understand Xbox Game Pass concept. I'll try to explain from Microsoft perspective, not as a player.
If a digital game is on the store and you don't buy it. It still has cost money, and on this case, didn't generate profit, as 'you' didn't bought it.
However, when you put this game on game pass there are a high chance people will try it out and if they like it they'll probably buy it physically or at least keep subscribing so it don't lose their game.
Xbox Game Pass costs $15 on its normal price. In 4 months you gave Microsoft $60, the value of AAA release.
Now, here is the point that make MS profit. You don't own the games on Game Pass, so if you want to keep playing them, you should keep subscribing. Also, a really big part of people subscribing to XGP wouldn't buy all those releases anyway, so they would give $0 to MS but are giving $15 instead. As a curiosity this also happens with PS players, I have lots of friends on PSN who hadn't played God of War to this date, they gave $0 to sony on this title, they could instead be giving $15 as well just to play the game.
TL;DR they're not going from $60 to $15, they're going from $0 to $15.
There are no lose of profit on services like XGP, it's a Win-win for Microsoft.
@duhsoares21 If it's that simple to earn profit from Game Pass, Nintendo and Sony would have started their own version of Game Pass already. There is a reason why they haven't copied Game Pass yet.
Why? Their traditional business model is running away from the competition
@IamNotPerfect Sony will do eventually, just wait, probably during PS5 era. They will evolve PS Now to become Game Pass like. Just wait and see. It's not that easy to implement a system like that, sony has to evaluate their situation first, but they will do it eventually, as it was with cross-play. They said 'no' countless times but had to just accept that this was the future.
Nintendo doesn't even has a decent online system yet, no achievements, no leaderboards, no free games.. NES and SNES, really?
They won't be doing Game Pass like service anytime soon, not because it doesn't give profit, but because its Nintendo.
Sony already does this w/ PS Now. I don't understand all of the "No, Sony would never do this!!" comments.
Sure, it isn't NEW games, and they shouldn't' be new, just put a 12 window on them, when they usually drop to $9.99 Black Friday anyway, done.
Well probably get PS4 games on PS5.
@JayDub Well the morons who also keep crying about this and keep crying about a service that would include brand new games day 1 seem to want to conveniently ignore that Microsoft....DOESN'T MAKE MONEY ON XBOX....MS can do it because all of their money comes from Windows and Office services...Sony makes their money on PS consoles and PS games....Why the hell would they want to offer anything even remotely like gamepass
There is no way of knowing whether or not it makes 'business' sense to offer Game Pass or similar. It may increase additional spending (DLC for example) as more people have access to a game they may not of bought.
You also don't know how many games are sold at 'full' price - especially as the time goes by and the inevitable price drops. All the while, people are continuously paying a subscription charge as well as the subscription to play games online too. Which method is bringing in the most money? Physical sales for example are probably the 'worst' for profitability for the publisher/dev - not only for the manufacturing cost but the distribution, the retailer profits etc so 'maybe' the amount of profit for selling the Physical disc is less than the amount of money they get in from the subscription. As the months go by, the cost of the Physical version drops too whilst MS is still receiving money from the subscription - safe in the knowledge that they are getting money from people who will never own these games.
I am not in a position to declare that one option is financially better for MS or Sony. All I am saying is that it seems crazy to give away access to the games on Day 1 for subscribers which also means that you sacrifice potential chart position and the sales figures. However we don't know if MS actually get more money from all those subscribers that will be paying every month for years - whether any new games release or not.
Personally I much prefer to buy my games Physically and have no intention of signing up to more subscription services if I don't have to. I like to own my game - even if they will or won't be playable 20yrs from now (like Destiny probably won't be). As such, I couldn't care less if Sony follow suit or not - just as long as they both continue to release their games Physically...
I think all Sony need to do is expose PS Now a little more.
It's a good service with a good selection of games. The latest additions are very good
Do they not do this with PS Now?
85% have said 'No, I have very little interest in subscription services' But how many of that 85% have a Netflix subscription?
Subscription services are the obvious direction that gaming is going in. And personally, I'm all for it. It seems that not enough people have really given time to consider the massive positives of the concept.
@__marc oh well....
https://variety.com/2018/gaming/news/microsoft-xbox-gaming-revenue-2018-1203065766/
Is it 10 billion revenue good enough for you? Saying Microsoft don't profit with xbox its a big joke.
And it keep doing great on 2019
https://www.theverge.com/2019/4/24/18513990/microsoft-q3-2019-earnings-surface-windows-xbox-revenue-profit
They already have it, it's called PS Now.
As an adult ive got enough monthly bills thank you very much and ALREADY have to pay a monthly fee for ps+. bit much i think
Sony will copy game pass like they have with alot of Xbox features ie built in hard drives, online connectivity as standard, and backwards compatability.
PlayStation has too many great exclusives to just hand them out like trick or treat candy!
I cant help but feel that many Xbox owners play the games free and never buy the title. This has got to hurt the bottom line for Dev's and lower game budgets. While its Great for consumers it may also stab them in the back with less games and poor quality games.
I am all for choice and fair market competition, if Microsoft feels the need to turn video game development into your local lunch buffet...."where nothing tastes good but at least they keep bringing out a lot of different no good tasting things!". Be my guest Microsoff, but I prefer my games to be made in an environment where they are given years to develop and grow. Development based off of learned mistakes and perseverance....not cookie cutter gaming where the winner is whoever can rush the next episode of Halo: Downtrodden #6 out the quickest. The very nature of this subscription based gaming files against part of the essence of what makes a game. Similar to how TV shows are great for binge watching on NetFlix, movies not nearly as much. I dont want my games to get lower budget compact versions, all for the sake of promoting some gimmicky service Microsoft is peddling in an attempt to justify the existence of its rapidly wilting gaming department. Do not ruin the industry and the market while you sink and burn XBox.
Game pass is a great deal for the people who have actually used it, There is some amazing games from this gen and the last that can be played on one console ( yay backwards compatability) . Only people crying about it are fanboys who are only using one platform.
@XoTruthHurtZoX Says the fanboy who created an account today just to have a cry on this topic, righto.
Didn't expect that split, I wonder how many of the 85 % have a plus subscription? I would be interested, it would probably be better value for most than a plus subscription. Like others though I would worry that the quality of exclusives would drop.
@53 backwards compatibility was first adopted on a games console in 1986. It was the Atari 7800, retro fans!
Nope i see the trade in firstparty titles full of microtransactions. Just use the money for quality firstparty titles.
@LaJettatura Yeah i know probably the last generation for me and then im going retro. 😉 👍
@XoTruthHurtZoX Microsoft bought us a lot of great things massive microtransactions / timesavers in firstparty games thanks for that BTW. 😉
@JayDub Jaydub i own ps4 and Xbox one so i can form an opinion based on having used both, unlike you who probably only owns one console 😂
@Flaming_Kaiser i think the first game with microtransactions was a Japanese game, so nice try. And most microtransactions are implemented by third party developers on all gaming platforms.
@JayDub by the way how would i comment if I didn't create an account, isn't that what you did to post your first comment 🙄🙄🙄
There already is a Playstation Gamepass it's called PSNow
@duhsoares21 $10bn is their entire revenue (not profit) which includes hardware sales, licensing royalties from third party publishers, as well as xbox live, etc. subs. by contrast, PSN alone made $12.5bn - but sony didn't report anything like that as profit, and neither will microsoft.
@XoTruthHurtZoX Lets compare xbox gamertags, I would guarantee I have played more games than you, but I'm sure you will just make an excuse.
Your first two comments on a playstation site is defending your favorite plastic box, says it all really, you "Neutral" gamers aint fooling anybody.
your forgetting one thing, the XBOX Game Pass is doing very well for MS BUT it's also not just a XB console thing, it's also on P.C and there is talk to bring it to Switch and if that happened it would make owning a XB1 completely meaningless
yeah Sony could do a game pass system and in the short term it might give them a big boost but limited to just their consoles it might not be good in the long run and if it was mandatory i can see MANY people saying NO, people are already complaining about having to subscribe to so many TV and Film streaming services can you imagine if they also had to use a gaming one too especially if you just want to play games, what if you was a PS and XB owner, not only do you need to pay a monthly sub to play your games online but now you would have to pay a monthly sub to play ANY game at all and that on both systems, that 4 things you have to be subbed to just to play one game
they day this happens is the day i stop buying consoles
I still don't fully understand how Game pass is making any profit for Microsoft, but that may be because everyone i know who uses it, gets the £1 trail, plays everything they want for a month, don't renew, and if xbox puts another exclusive they want to play on there, they create a new account and just get another trail.
I've seen so many people laughing that they're essentially getting full price games for free.
As somewhat of a relapsed lapsed gamer, (mostly sat out the previous generation, then started again with PS4 but hardly play any more) i would love a subscription service. I rarely buy games as most modern games aren't to my tastes. (Nothing beats the 32bit and Dreamcast/PS2 eras in my book!)
I would love a service that throws a bunch of games on there to check out when i get the chance to actually play games. Especially if it included heaps of retro titles. It doesnt have to be brand new games, maybe give the big titles at least 1 year on the market before putting them onto the service. Keep the money coming in from retail sales when a game is hyped up, and then add to the service when the hype is gone, to either keep a decent sized player base for multiplayer games or try to flog off some dlc for it.
Will it happen? Who knows. But i am all for it. Not enough to make me jump ship to a microsoft console though. The few games i do buy only get released on Sony's machines. Plus their 1st party games are top notch if i ever want to jump back into gaming.
Nope nope and more nope. I want to OWN my games so I can forever come back to them again and again over time.
The only thing I can think of is that if a game would've sold 10 million at £40 each, if they can get 100 million subs at £4 a month, they've made the same money. But then you have to divide it up across all the games on the service.
Maybe their plan is to use it like a Trojan Horse to get people playing lots of games then hit them with DLC, battle passes and paid product placement like some games have done in the past (e.g. MGS).
I do buy digital games only if there cheap but I also keep the discs version too, if I'm playing it it's just to save getting up changing discs. But I getting fed up of subscription services there's to many
Sky, Internet, Netflix are just some I use but it sucks because where I live my internet is separate I can't get say a sky bundle or Virgin Media because of who owns the phone lines and it's it's own phone company called KCom
Ultimately, PS Now is there already and I think that Sony will look to expand on that more than create a game pass, not that it is completely out of the question, but a reduction in cost for starters would do more to encourage than anything else... of course this also depends on how far backwards compatability goes too.
MS also have the extra bonus of the PC to use their Gamepass on, plus the remoured driveless new Xbox. So again, unless Sony adjust other aspects of their approach (which is possible), it remains unlikely in my humble opinion., especially with the money making they are currently doing at this moment.
As much as companies look to make "all of the money", Sony potentially neutering themselves on day one releases may backfire... but as i dont have a crystal ball, it could work...
I'd buy it for sure, if it had a good library at good price. I live in Argentina where everything is expensive as hell, and I'm very happy with EA Access at the moment. I'd buy Gamepass if I had an Xbox.
I don't think so. I mean, if they had one I'd pay for it. It'd be hellish value. But they'd be shooting themselves in the foot.
Gamepass works for Microsoft because - frankly - they don't have many good games. It's hard to convince someone to throw sixty notes at Crackdown 3, or Sea of Thieves, or that mad fox one, but all together for a smaller subscription? The value is in getting a bunch of things for a subscription fee, and then they hope you'll try out other things that you might not have ordinarily. Maybe you'll get suckered into some microtransactions. Maybe you'll play Super Lucky's Tale. Who knows.
God of War 2, Horizon 2, Last of Us 2, Spider-Man 2 - all of these games will sell millions of copies. Sony would be insane in the membrane to tie them to a subscription service.
@XoTruthHurtZoX Lets refrase MS made it mainstream and did it as platform holder in firstparty titles and without shame.
Hahahahaha 82% No, what a joke. Maybe people misread the question? It says 'Would you' not 'Should they'. You're telling me 82% of you lovely people wouldn't want hundreds of free games?! Who are you trying to kid. I love my PS4, a lot. But Game Pass is one of the greatest things to happen to gaming. The value gained by subscribers is obscene.
@dellyrascal They already have a driveless Xbox dont they?
@LocalPenguin Whats free nothing is free and if that means losing great games for liveservice and microtransactions maybe even no more games with any risk. Yeah keep that Ubisoft, Microsoft, EA, Bethesda garbage. How many big releases did we have from Rockstar for me its 2 where one is a upgrade from the last generation with liveservice in it.
I do not see the point in owning games/music/movies etc. Subscription services are good value cancel when you want play/listen watch when you want. I rarely play a game twice or watch tv or films more than once. Game pass is a master stroke by Microsoft. I am sure the lack of this service will make people think about what console they want next generation. Games are expensive and will only keep going up in price.
People who want to buy the games will always buy them. Games passes give people options. Some will use it to test a game to see if they like it. Others will only ever play it on the pass.
@Oh_fiddlesticks
If a service is good and offers value then a lot people will carry on payiong for the service or forget to cancel it. I got a 3 month free sub for spotify and have been paying for it ever since.
@koaeinferno Why would you make big titles if you have to sell them for peanuts. Microsoft has their games full with microtransactions and little difference. What do they have racing and 3rd person shooters, firstperson and 2 indies?
@Flaming_Kaiser possibly not taken much notice to be fair... 😊😊
@Flaming_Kaiser @JoeBlogs Oh don't get me wrong guys, SHOULD Sony offer a similar service? Absolutely not. They're market leaders with phenomenal first party titles, it would be a foolish move on their part. My point was IF Sony did follow in the Game Pass pattern those 82% would be tested. They're not free games, I appreciate that, but if the likes of God of War, Death Stranding, Spiderman, Horizon etc were all available day one for the monthly cost of a few quid people would be signing up in droves. They'd be mad not to.
as i'm approaching 30, purchasing a £50 on release is becoming less and less likely. (bills, savings, holidays)
only paying £10 (ofern much less) for new games to play with friends is hugely appealing
My PS4 Pro is my go to console but the second hand xbox one S does get more attention just because of the free* titles on hand
@Flaming_Kaiser have you even used game pass and seen the titles on there. Probably not 🙄
@LocalPenguin if Sony do a game pass they should put their exclusives on maybe 12 months after release to ensure they get the sales from early adopters. Sony would make a killing from a game pass subscription as i would be all over it with the library of games at Sonys disposal
@Flaming_Kaiser ok course they did 🤪🤪🤪
@JayDub i was actually praising game pass you moron not my Xbox , and I'm a gamer first, fanboy second unlike you with your one console. I bet I've played more games than you comment was funny, you sound like a 5 year old 😂😂😂
@Cutmastavictory
When it comes to negotiate how much Microsoft pay to have the game on game pass, the meta score will play a big part of that.
I'm glad most people have some common sense.
Subscription$ are yikes.
@LocalPenguin Its just not realistic too think the quality will stay the same. I rather pay so ill keep the quality. Its a pity the new generation does not know that you have too pay for quality. 😩
Without making use of the big library of PS3 the entire idea is usless.
I think PS3 System of operation will be the most down side in history of SONY.
How do you know exactly that a subscription service like game pass favors mostly multiplayer games and episodic games ? Most of the games in the service are single player story driven games with a multiplayer aspect yes . What you say in the article is simply wrong .
Maybe not Gamepass, but getting closer w/ that list.
https://blog.us.playstation.com/2019/10/01/playstation-now-subscriptions-start-at-9-99-monthly-gta-v-god-of-war-more-blockbuster-games-added/
God of War
Grand Theft Auto V**
inFAMOUS Second Son
Uncharted 4: A Thief’s End
I may finally play GTAV if they give out a new 1 week trial, I tried Now when it first came out on PS3.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...