Time magazine has named the PlayStation 5 among its top 100 inventions of 2020, praising its “small advancements that combine to create a revolutionary experience”. The publication runs a similar list annually, on the basis of products that it feels are “making the world better, smarter, and even a bit more fun”. Presumably, Sony’s next-gen console is ticking that third box.
Here’s what the publication had to say: “Games load almost instantaneously, thanks to a solid-state hard drive. The graphics processor is almost 10 times faster than that of the PS4, which allows for beautiful visuals, and a new controller is full of haptic feedback sensors that add a new dimension to play.”
In fact, Time had plenty of praise for the DualSense: “When a character walks on sand, players feel the grit in the controller; when Spider-Man grips a subway car, players feel the train’s rumble. Add it up, and it just may be the most powerful video game console we’ve ever seen.” Lots of praise for PlayStation’s revolutionary new pad, eh?
For the record, the magazine also listed the Xbox Series S, but not its superior counterpart the Xbox Series X; it specifically referenced the low price point of Microsoft’s entry level system. It’s great to see gaming get recognition in lists like this, so hats off to all of the Sony engineers who helped make the PS5 a reality.
[source time.com, via videogameschronicle.com]
Comments 26
But in my opinion, PS5 >>>>> Xbox Series X/S.
Unique Machine design, check.
Color scheme White and Black, check.
Blue game box, check.
Indie games in physical, check.
PlayStation 4 and Nintendo Switch 3rd party games only, check.
No Online checking, check.
Easy to spell product's name, check.
I'm not surprised the XSX didn't get mentioned. Outside of the DualSense and 3D audio, which were added layers to the immersion, it appears the PS5 actually performs better than the XSX...at least according to Digital Foundry comparisons of Assassin's Creed Valhalla and Dirt 5. DF did give XSX an advantage on Devil May Cry, but that was due to a bug with how the PS5 handled 120Hz, which has now been patched.
Other than that, it's the VRR that Sony is eventually patching in (hopefully before I'm able to get one).
Strange, considering it was probably "invented" in 2014 or thereabouts.
Sorry don’t agree with this, partly as it most definitely was NOT invented in 2020!!!.... and it isn’t worthy of being on the list even if it was. Neither is the Xbox. Game Pass is though as that is something new and a bit revolutionary to gaming IMO.
Not surprised. After just a few days and 3 games - already obvious Sony has another hardware gem with PS5.
It is a nice piece of tech. Just wish it was black.
@S1ayeR74 game pass isn’t revolutionary, it’s just a game subscription service, they’ve been around a couple of decades. It’s good value but you couldn’t say it’s anything new.
The limit time I’ve had with the ps5 so far (thanks Amazon) the big thing for me is the dual sense, anything else just feels like standard evolution so far.
Of course, ps5 is the best, most powerful, most innovative, most easy to develop for console sony released ever, the competition can't even compare 😃
Ah yes, that console which was invented a good couple of years ago. Just give every spot to the work being done on vaccines around the world.
@lacerz There is a known bug with both XSX versions of AC: Valhalla and Dirt 5. Once they are patched the PS5 will no longer have claim to have advantage over the XSX.
@Medic_Alert It has been proven that the XSX’s SSD is quicker at loading games than the PS5, despite the PS5’s SSD supposedly being twice as fast 🤔
@wiiware Aside from the haptic feedback, adaptive triggers and “faster” SSD what does the PS5 have or does better than the competition?
@nessisonett To be fair I'm guessing that any invention released to the consumers or even other invention made public in 2020 have their roots in the years prior.
@MaccaMUFC Right so, aside from the haptic feedback, adaptive triggers, “faster” SSD, microphone built into the controller, a free game with every console that scored 83 on Metacritic, share play, 5 actual exclusives in the launch line up alone & a brand new UI........ what has the PS5 ever done for us? 😂😂😂😂😂
@lacerz the Series S made the list.
@AJDarkstar Does it offer first party AAA games say and date? And when it launched wasn’t it purely based on streaming and you couldn’t download any games?
@Robinsad Yeah it is, and now Sony are going to copy it.
@AJDarkstar lol ok whatever. Think what ever you want if it helps you sleep better at night.
Series X should be in there since Microsoft invented the first console ever to launch without any unique games to play on it and still somehow tricked people into buying it. That's an impressive feat.
@MaccaMUFC It has games!!!! 😂😂😂😂
@MaccaMUFC Better place to play 3rd party games? 😛
Also, exclusive 1st party games 😁
@MaccaMUFC
Better games. Better performance. Better interaction.
PS5>XSX
#DealWithIt
@lacerz Apart from COD where the PS5 can’t handle 60FPS and ray tracing you mean, unlike the Series X running at a locked 60. Stick to the facts eh.
Both consoles runs perfectly fine and almost exactly alike 99% of the times on every multiplatform titles, so far. DF has just highlighted the very small percentage of time either one or the other performs worse or better than the competition but by and large they perform exactly like each other.
@S1ayeR74 @MaccaMUFC
Facts (spoilers: COD plays better on PS5):
https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2020-cod-black-ops-cold-war-series-x-s-ps5-tested
Regardless, the standard 60Hz experience runs at a dynamic 4K, hitting the resolution and performance target, with an 1800p-2160p DRS window when ray tracing is enabled. Cold War can also scale horizontally too, as well as on both axes, depending on the load. There may be variations 'in the moment' in pixel counts, but if so, we couldn't find any substantial evidence here - practically, Series X and PS5 present in the same way.
Frame-rates are rock solid for most of the duration whether you run with RT or without (our advice: definitely use it) though we did find one area on PS5 that can drop to 45fps, while Series X remains rock solid. Curiously, restarting to the checkpoint can see PS5 leap back to 60fps sometimes too - so this is likely a minor bug that needs resolving. It's a moot point really though as this solitary drop in performance happens in a non-playable part of the game so it has no real importance to the way Cold War plays.
Both Series X and PS5 deliver a grea (sic) 120 frames per second experience, with no issues at all during the multiplayer mode and only minimal slowdown in the campaign - but curiously for this 120Hz mode, PS5 maintains a closer lock to the target frame-rate than Series X.
There's even some intriguing use of the Sony DualSense controller, with the adaptive triggers used to simulate the feel of pulling the actual trigger - a feeling that changes according to the weapon used. It's a nice effect overall and fun in the campaign...
@lacerz I’ll go by the Digital Foundry video thanks where I can see for myself the Series X performing better.
@S1ayeR74
I'll just drop this right here for you...
https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2020-11-26-microsoft-acknowledges-xbox-series-x-and-s-performance-issues
@lacerz As I said I’ll go by actual experts and Digital Foundry, not wannabe journalists that know nothing.. your very salty it seems.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...