The Last of Us: Part I has been officially announced, and it’s already got fans debating passionately. Some feel the differences are far too subtle to warrant a remake, and it does reignite the discussion about diminishing returns when it comes to video game visuals. It is important to remember, however, that many of the original PS3 and PS4 remaster’s cut-scenes were pre-rendered – but will be running in realtime in 4K at 60 frames-per-second on the PS5.
Nevertheless, we reckon there’s a clear upgrade to the character models, lighting, and just overall realism of the remake. Naughty Dog co-president Neil Druckmann said during Summer Game Fest that all of the facial animations have been redone to better reflect Troy Baker and Ashley Johnson’s original performances. And, as mentioned above, it’s all running in real-time this time.
Here are some direct comparisons, using official Sony assets:
And we also have tons more screenshots from the game, which is coming out on 2nd September for PS5 and later PC.
There’s also a pretty great comparison you can watch below which digs into the nitty-gritty of the remake based on its trailer:
If you pre-order, you’ll get bonus Supplements and Weapon Parts, to help you to upgrade your skillset and arsenal a little earlier. If you plump up for the pricier Digital Deluxe Edition ($79.99), you’ll also get early access to features like a Speedrun Mode.
Will you be revisiting this game on PS5 or PC? Remember, you can check out the announcement trailer through here.
Please note that some external links on this page are affiliate links, which means if you click them and make a purchase we may receive a small percentage of the sale. Please read our FTC Disclosure for more information.
Comments 108
Seen this comparison doing the rounds on social media, too, which appears to be from gameplay rather than a pre-rendered cut-scene side-by-side:
Pretty impressive.
(Sorry, not sure of source!)
In b4 the usual lot say "the original looks better"
@get2sammyb I didn’t think there was mushroom for improvement but clearly there is.
Don't even need to enlarge the pictures to see there's a big difference... Honestly don't get the hate whilst skyrim has released on the last three console generations and with 16 versions with worse upgrades and at full price yet no one bat's an eyelid.
Some of you would die if you owned a switch with the amount of full priced basic ports, so be grateful sony atleast went with a full remake from the ground up
I want to play these games on PC mainly for the unlocked framerate. Even 60 feels sluggish nowadays. 4K Max settings 120hz on Grounded difficulty will be a definite way to experience this game. I hope they port TLOU2 soon afterwards.
@AdamNovice
Because you asked so nicely. The original looks better.
To be honest, originally I thought it looks terrible, but the more screenshots I see, the more I like it. Ellie does look better (I.e. closer to the sequel) and the Clickers look more resident evily, which isn't a bad thing.
@Bismarck I would bet we'll see TloU2 on the PC early next year or something.
edit: a word
From charging £10 for the PS4-PS5 upgrade for Spider-Man and other games, to now charging £70 standalone price for what is essentially just some new textures and a reworking of the game engine!
Genuinely unbelievable.... £50 for the remake with the LoU2 factions thrown in would have been more swallowable but this is vastly overpriced!
@pip_muzz I think you're vastly underselling the amount of work that's gone into this, but even if that's how you feel remember that you don't have to buy it!
@pip_muzz You were never going to get Factions 2 for a bundle price of £50 with this. Factions is going to be absolutely massive.
£70 for this is overkill though. I'd have paid £60 on the high side for this. But even that would have made me think twice and wait.
Not that it matters much for me, but both of them changed a bit. New Ellie seems like she's been reverse engineered from how she ended up being designed in Part II. Kinda weird really, when it goes that way around. Overall I don't know how I feel about these types of revisions.
It looks so much better than the original release. I know people are saying it looks either no different or not much of an improvement, but it looks way better, especially in motion.
@get2sammyb I remember similar comments about the amount of work for the Insomniac PS4 upgrade path, but that cost £10 (which was already pushing it)
It's not about the amount of work the art team has done, it's the precedent set by essentially charging the exact same amount as Horizon: Forbidden West for which is essentially just a texture update and graphical smooth over. Either this game is overpriced or Horizon:Forbidden West should be retailing for £120+
@SolaceCreed It's because when you first see it, it's on a compressed stream which always blurs out the details a bit.
Not subtle differences at all and I'm no doubt getting this but was hoping they wouldn't go all in on the next gen prices.
It looks amazing. Does anyone know if the online factions mode from the first one will be in this? Or are we meant to be waiting on the standalone
Microtransactions are the devil but sell me a game for the third time in a row please.
If this sells well expect PS5 versions of all the PS4s greatest hits at a premium starting with TLOU Part 2.
Nope. I am happy with the free remaster for my PS5. I am glad Naughty Dog is using it as a chance to learn how to work with Ps5 though.
@get2sammyb I was under the impression this was just a side project for naughty dog to get used to developing for the ps5 architecture
@theMEGAniggle No online, sadly. Just the main game and the Left Behind DLC.
@Would_you_kindly Yeah, they're working on multiple things.
@pip_muzz Again, I think you're underselling it a bit. Fortunately, I'm sure the game will come down in price over time — it may even be added to PS Plus one day!
@get2sammyb that screenshot says it all for me, just shows how much effort and time they've put into this and not just some other basic port/remaster.
Don't agree with the price but it was definitely worth them doing especially with the show on the way and a new multiplayer game.
And skyrim and GTA have already proved that people will buy the same game again and again if its good, and this game is definitely good.
@UltimateOtaku91 Are you seriously suggesting that people don’t make loads and loads of jokes about Skyrim and GTA V being remastered twice in 3 different generations?
I mean yeah it looks a little better...but enough for $70? I'm sorry I just don't see it. I hope those who buy it enjoy but I'm a hard pass on this one...which is kind of crazy I don't think I've ever passed on a new Naughty Dog release before in my entire life! Welp there's a first for everything I guess.
I'm just glad it's announced and coming soon so we can hopefully move on to more exciting things.
@nessisonett not as much as I've seen today/yesterday about this game on various gaming sites and social media.
@UltimateOtaku91 Then you absolutely haven’t been paying attention for the last 6 or 7 years. They literally made a joke about Skyrim being turned into an Alexa game and all sorts.
@get2sammyb that means the platinum will be obtainble this time round but I'm not ready for another playthru of grounded mode, speed run mode is overkill for stress levels, I won't be touching this till the price is reasonable like the uncharted collection now is £25, it's patient to wait
Can I see differences? Sure. Would I ever call this a remake? No. Final fantasy VII was a remake. This is an overpriced remaster.
I’ll likely buy it at some point, when it’s on a deep deep discount in a few years. Really hope this is not all Sony got this year.
@get2sammyb "I think you're vastly underselling the amount of work that's gone into this"
I'm sure Capcom is putting just as much effort into the PS5 updates of the various Resident Evil games that will be ported and guess how much they are asking from everyone that already owns the games?
Now do I think this game should be free? of course not that's ridiculous, no one is saying or will say that. But $70?! for essentially a texture update and updated controls.
The remake looks really good.thats a huge comparison to the original one.word up son
@UltimateOtaku91 'Honestly don't get the hate whilst skyrim has released on the last three console generations and with 16 versions with worse upgrades and at full price yet no one bat's an eyelid.'
This has got to be a trolling. Even Bethesda themselves joked about it at E3 a few years back prior to the Microsoft buyout.
The reality is none of us were asking for TLOU part one remake. But they made it anyway. I will probably play it a few years from now for the nostalgia but for me, Sony have always been the bastions of moving on and away from franchises, trying something new. I don't want them to become Nintendo esque with the same regurgitated franchises regardless of how much I love the first game.
@Tharsman You can somewhat see the differences, like you said it's a very polished remaster with a full price tag. Compare the original Demon's Souls to the remake then look at this effort and tell me which one should be full price and the other budget price.
The changes are miniscule, and tbh the characters faces kind of look off in the remake. Definitely not worth 70 dollars! Might play this again when it hits the bargain bin or comes to Plus, lol.
$70 is too much but then again, it's Naughty Dog and I want them to get all the paid they can get for such a talented studio. At least they're not selling 1px outfits(outfits which is basically part of what makes RPGs) for real world money like Persona 5.
@get2sammyb I seriously cannot wait for that standalone multiplayer project 🤩
many comparisons here https://youtu.be/pNQhkIrlC6M
Overpriced. I have paid for it three times now. I will get the free ps plus premium version. Graphics are obviously better in remake but I preffer the style of the characters in the remaster.
There is NO WAY i'll ever pay 70$ for a game. I rather pay 120$ for a year of premium and wait to play them for free.
Eventually every single First party PS game will available on premium and PC. No more exclusives.
I mean, it’s cool and all but I already played it when it was new so I have no interest in playing it again. Even if it was free. I don’t spend my time replaying old experiences I spend it searching for new ones
Im still not a fan of how... clean Joel's character model looks.
@TheArt Outfits are clearly not what makes an RPG an RPG and outfits are absolutely not what makes Persona a Persona game whatsoever.
@nessisonett They really broke the mold for this remake. The developers have really decomposed the visuals an incredibly realistic quality. For Naughty Dog nothing less mildew.
@Nepp67 You should know what I meant but clearly you don't. You expect me to explain vividly.
Atleast no one can moan that PS4 is it holding this back seen as it's not releasing on the PS4 lol
@TheArt "Outfits which is basically part of what makes an RPG"
Don't be ridiculous with me.
Sure the graphics look better. But there’s plenty of new next gen games to spend next gen prices on. Don’t need to spend $70 for a game I’ve already paid for - twice.
Thank goodness Sony is moving towards PC where modders do this sort of work for free......
Can’t wait for this and the inevitable TLOU2 PS5 version. This game though will go on sale for Black Friday which will be great for those buy 2 for 1 free or buy 1 for 1 free deals.
Jesus this continued trend to cash in on old content, remakes, all of it is just sick. It's killing creativity and art in this industry in favor of revenue streams and balance sheets focused in putting out content at the lowest cost possible yet charging as much as they can for it
This is clearly just a remaster of a remaster with updated controls. It's borderline shameful to charge the current full game price for this again, just as it is when the EA, Activision, and Bethesda do it. Welcome to that shameless club Naughty Dog.
But hey thanks for the one instance of concept art regarding something new....
I'm sure we'll see that and anything else new after you try and swindle a few more gullible individuals into paying for rehashed content in the next two years.
@get2sammyb more importantly, they don't have to buy it at launch!
Why is that so hard to understand for some people? Have they gotten used to getting what they want when they want that when -for whatever reason- they can't, they revolt?
I am excited for this and am guaranteed to buy this day one.
But I also think it is a bit much to ask 70 dollars for this. When Ratchet and Clank (2016) came out, it was priced at 40 dollars because it was made in about a year.
I think this game should have been priced at ~50 dollars to reflect that this was more of a budget project.
Ok, In fairness that’s does look better. Sometimes I feel remakes generally strive for more realism, whereas the more stylised look of originals can be my preference, but in this case the remake is just better in all aspects. Really impressed.
It looks fantastic. Really. I’m sorry to be that guy but the original art style is better though. Especially Joel looks more like any (less subtle) angry guy now, In two words less likeable.
@naruball
Yes, It’s hard for me to understand the mentality of getting something at launch. It’s often unfinished and much more expensive than you can find later.
I’ve been told some people like to be part of a launch community, having a feeling of discovering something for the first time along with their friends or the general gaming community, but being completely antisocial, I don’t get the appeal of that.
I guess some people have also, genuinely, played everything they want to. Crazy to me. But, in that case, I can understand not wanting to wait to play games. There are so many games released though that it feels like someone would have to have a very narrow interest in games to get to that point.
I suspect, as you imply, that it’s more an impulse control issue.
$70 remaster and no online. What a joke
Demon souls no said if looks better then the original 💯 so that was a total remake
I'd normally wait for this to come down in price but most Sony first party PS5 games are still over fifty quid!
@thefourfoldroot1 yeah, I get that when it comes to multiplayer games. But for single player games, it makes less sense.
You're right, though. They want to be part of a community. It's why people with zero talent, like the Kardashians, have so many followers. Their "fans" want to be part of something. It's middle/high school mentality.
@nessisonett I just want to say thank you for that 😂
It looks nice , but it’s expensive for a game we well
Most of us have played , if they were cheaper then I guess why not , but it seems there running out of gaming ideas and holding on to games that ain’t even that old to remaster , looks beautiful but it’s still the same game
Looks absolutely amazing. No joke. I don’t think it is awfully overpriced either.
However, no graphical improvements in the world can make me replay the same game a third time. Hell, not many games warrant a second playthrough for me.
@pip_muzz when will people realise that £70 is purely for the digital edition? Nobody is asking you to buy the thing day one either. It'll easily be £50 around release. EASILY!! Keep an eye on deal sites such as HUKD
"you don't have to buy it at launch"
°companies spending half the budget to get people to buy at launch°
This really does look much better than the original. Some of the scenes look so more atmospheric and it was pretty atmospheric to begin with. I'll be waiting a month or so for when its massively reduced in price, possibly longer depending on how much it reduces. I only wish I could wipe the 4 playthrough's of the PS4 version from my memory and play it for the first time again.
@thefourfoldroot1
I mean it’s not hard to understand being passionate and wanting what you really like ASAP
Some games I can wait and some I can’t. It’s human.
If the price is an issue there’s a moderate middle ground depending of course.
Since TLOU is know for it's story and not gameplay I can't think of a reason to pay 80€ to experience same story again with slightly updated gameplay.
No thanks. I'll wait for PS Plus Extra drop. Not that I will have spoilers to avoid, right?
Ha the more I think of it the less I like it tbh.
The characters are all subtlety and their attitudes convey a lot. I can already feel this Joel will be more pathetic and not inspire respect. I dread to see the opening scenes with Sarah.
Don’t like it, don’t buy it.
Why is it so difficult for people to votes with their wallets.
Entitled cry babies everywhere.
Not much difference, really. There are definitely better things to spend £70 on.
Anyone who doesn't see large improvements needs to go to Specsavers. That doesn't mean this still isn't mostly a pointless upgrade, the original still looks great and this appears to be a shot for shot remake/remaster. But at £70 there is NO WAY I am buying at launch as it stands. Will likely play it, and enjoy it, further down the line.
The biggest artistic difference I can see is they seem to have toned down or removed the unnatural key light on characters in some scenes, which illuminates them in unnatural ways but looks quite cinematic. They did similar in H:FW between the early previews and the final game. Subjective choice. Some like it others really don't. Personally I prefer it toned down but not removed.
I expect this on PC within 0-6 months of launch and TLOU2 Directors cut on PS5 and then PC later down the line. That makes more business sense why they are (re)making this.
It only naughty dog but a lot of developers/studios are using valuable resource doing the remakes/remasters instead of focusing on new games.
Seems to be the trend and to me a waste of time
As I played the originals on the original consoles.
I bet Sunday with Xbox we will get a goldeneye remaster and gears of war collection of remakes/remasters.
Why can’t studios just put all resources onto new AAA new generation gaming development.
It’s not surprising we get new game delays with resources spread to thinly.
The new Ellie looks like a totally different person...
@JJ2
I understand that, you just fall into the “caught up with everything I want to play camp”. That’s cool, I was there when I was young. But now I have lots I want to play that is already older, so I’m always behind and couldn’t imagine needing to buy an unfinished game at a higher price. We are all in different positions of course.
I won't rebuy it for the third time. Unless very heavy price drop down the line. If this the first time to play it, then oh boy you will be in for a treat.
Maybe they will have upgrade patch for owners of ps4 version. Which is highly unlikely knowing Sony.
@Dezzy70 its because game developers dont just service your needs.
As you rightly point out, beloved games such as this or resi 4 are getting remade to better fullfill the original vision for a proven sucessful game.
If people didnt want them, then they wouldn't sell and companies wouldnt make more. Your beef is with consumers, not developers.
Personally I feel a game like tlou deserves several replays and its been 9 years since the original. No doubt there are many new gamers who will play this ps5 version for the first time and I envy them that experience. I played the original and also the remaster, but ill still be happy dive in again. Same with resi 4.
No point in calling out companies that are serving a genuine consumer need. Indeed it would be stupid not to service a buisness need that would guarentee a decent profit. Its only decent financial footing that allows companies to branch out to more speculative titles, so you should welcome such projects as they help fund the gambles...
@Titntin
I guess I come from an era that when you got new generations of consoles you basically got all new games.
Say like the SNES to N64 with Mario 64 etc.
Yes new versions of old games came out like a new Yoshi island 2 but it was a new game.
We currently seem to be soaking up developers resources on backwards compatibility and remasters and remakes.
I prefer the old days, new generation, lots of new games.
@huyi mu thoughts as well. Game prices drop pretty fast 3 to 6 months from release. It's not like I'll be worried about it getting spoilers..
Might just be me but i dont see any difference!
Do feel that £70 is a bit much for this, seeing as I'll be buying this for a third time. That said, looks awesome so probably will get it. And the inevitable PS5 version of Part II that will launch around the time of the TV show.
I do think this sort of thing shows that the massive commitments of time and money to develop AAA titles for each new generation mean that many studios aren't able to pump out title after title during the console lifespan (what's the average development time for a AAA title these days? 3 years? 4?) So I do expect to see these kind of upgrades being offered more and more. Not entirely sure how I feel about that.
@Dezzy70 Maybe it's a product of the increasing amounts of money and time it takes to make a new AAA title? Guess it's far easier to have a smaller team working on this while the majority work on newer stuff that might not see the light of day for another few years. Would be interesting to see how many AAA titles a studio can put out during this console generation
@Dezzy70
Thats fair enough mate, and given the choice I'd also prefer an interesting new ip.
But I dont blame a company for maximising revenue from a sucessful ip. Its why they are in buisness in the first place. If they can sell it to new comers and a lot of us who simply love the game, then thats exactly what they will do, particlarly in this case when a new tv show will take the franchise to a new audience.
Its precisely because they can maximise revenue on such proven ip, that they can invest in new studios and ideas, and sony have shown often in their history they are not afraid to invest in the new and take a risk with unoroven tech and ideas. Most of the time that pays off and they have new income streams to support the new investment as a result.
.... and if we want to talk eras, I come from an era when games didnt exsist when I were young (space invaders came to arcades when I was 15), and ive seen every era come and go as a developer and punter both. Now im an old man, one of the ways I try and age with more grace is to let go of the idea that what worked in the past is going to work today. As every decade passes it become more obvious that you need to let go of old ideals and adapt to the new realities to remain relevant. What worked for snes and megadrive might not be relevant today!
Thing is those are all images are from cutscenes in the original game where everything is way more detailed and than the actual gameplay models and environment so it's not a great comparison .
They should've shown more gameplay
@UltimateOtaku91 people do bat an eyelid though, loads of people moan about Skyrim's billion versions, as well as GTA V
It looks great but I'm not forking out full price for a game I already own twice ,hopefully it maybe free on that new ps plus thing.
@Titntin
interesting point about letting go of old ideas and moving forward.
Because I actually have Game Pass and yes it definitely could do with some more new AAA ip but I think that will come with all the studios attached to Xbox now.
And yes I like cloud streaming, just wish my internet was better so I could quickly try a game through cloud and if I like download the game.
So I like these new moves, but would enjoy more new top end games as I really enjoy new big AAA experiences. I think development is taking longer now a days, and I wrote a piece blaming working from home had not helped this, as I deal with WFH in my industry and it is a pain being honest.
Yes during covid it was essential but now it’s used because the employee prefers to be at home for many reasons that to me are not beneficial for productiveness. I have witnessed this and have shown this with data, especially when it comes to communication and sometimes output.
Everything just lacks and takes longer and I guess WFH in the game development businesses suffers the same.
Could just be biased but the original Joel and Ellie look better imo
I'm excited to see how different the gameplay is. For its faults story wise, Part 2 had some fantastic gameplay. If they can transfer that to the story of part 1 then I'm probably gonna really enjoy this
I definitely see Xbox could out sell PlayStation this generation, I am not saying they will I am saying they could. The graphic update looks great and will look better when you are actually playing it, but at the end of the day it's about optics. People will have paid for the original PS3 version & brought the PS4 remaster, at a time when Microsoft (Gears 5) & other companies like capcom are giving their customers free upgrades for owning the original the optics don't look good for Sony.
I can't wait for this. One of if not the best game (imo) I ever played. In the beginning I was worried that this would be just a simple remaster, but seeing it side by side just shows that they actually put in alot of effort. Can't wait to see how they improved the gameplay.
OK, so it definitely looks better. Does that somehow translate into making the game more fun all of the sudden? Or a new experience we haven’t had before with the various versions and remasters over the years? This reeks of a cash grab trying to capitalize on the upcoming show and MP offering and I, for one, want no part of it. Great for those who do but I have other upcoming games that are an entirely new experience I want to put my time into instead of rehashing an old and well known game I’ve played before. Just my personal preference.
@pip_muzz amazing you have enough viriol to comment and denounce, but not to watch the presentation or find out what went into making this. They did give insight and its been rebuilt from the ground up. Knowing what you are talking about is the first step to gaining credibility for your view.
Im not going to tell you its not worth full price, thats a decision everyone can make for themselves, but if you are going to call it out, then you need to do for the right reasons, not simply because you couldnt be bothered to watch the presentation.
I do have some sympathy with your view though, those of us who have already bought twice might feel a sting paying for it again.
But no one is twisting our arms... if im not interested, I simply wont buy. This will sell to those of us that treasure this game and want to see it at the best in can be, and newer gamers who are attracked by the new show.
Older gamers who dont want it can simply ignore it.
@Martijn87 I'm hoping they give it Part 2's gameplay treatment. Would be good for them to do something more advanced with it then what was available to them in the days of the PS3.
I'm down with it. Looks like a lot of work has went into compared to most remakes, probably not Demon's Souls level but I like it.
Also, I never played the game on PS4. Last time I played part 1 was when it came out. I'm actually very excited for this.
@pip_muzz
Can’t believe in almost 100 comments no ones pointed this out, but there is no “upgrade path” for Spiderman PS4 on PS5.
You can buy the MM ultimate edition which was $70 at launch (sorry I live in the U.S. and don’t know conversion to £) and that’s it. There’s no way for people who own the game for PS4 to upgrade their version. No matter what way people want to spin it even if you own the PS4 version of the game you have to shell out what is now $50 to get the upgraded version.
Still baffled we have this many comments and no one pointed that out 😅
We just need to wait for a sale and grab it. I like some aspects of the original and other that can be seem in this new version. Either is worth of our attention and time.
Now without ray tracing? 🧐 can't see it
@thefourfoldroot1
Not really. There are priorities. Elden Ring should make you understand how it is for a lot of people.
There’s no way dark souls fans would want to wait even though they have a lot of other games.
Let’s not do the blind fanboyism. They’re charging $70 for a remake of the game when there’s already a remaster that looks great on PS4. Unless they add a ton of new gameplay features and extra add-ons I don’t see a reason to spend $70. $40 would be better.
@HazyDave no, of course not, by the time you have gone through your backlog this will be cheap as chips, there is no point buying games like this at day one prices anymore it's pointless
@nessisonett For me its more the fact that in 3 generations the game still isnt bug free and that the fans did a better job with the fixes.
@roe Look at the gameplay the screenshots do it no Justice after its really weird but the trailer looks so much better somehow.
@SolaceCreed
I also hope that, maybe even improve on that. The gameplay of 2 was excellent.
Yeah the graphics look “better” but the dark lighting of the original suits the setting more imo. It should be dark and gritty, that’s the whole atmosphere they nailed the first time.
Is a great game but there’s no way I’d pay 70 for this…
@naruball Rabble! Rabble, Rabble, Rabble.
No doubt the game has improved visually. But you have to wonder how much better part 1 would look if it was developed in a time where people actually wanted it
I think the character models models look great in the remaster. The biggest room for improvement is the environment (which is pretty impressive for its release date). I’m interested in playing the remake but not at $70. Would be an amazing psPlus premium inclusion
@SolaceCreed hahaha!
There is barely any difference. This is just a glorified remaster being sold for $70. FF7 Remake and Resident Evil 2 Remake are what true remakes look like.
Doesn’t bother me at all to spend money again to have the chance to play this game again without it feeling aged. That’s what you get to do as a developer when you make a masterpiece. And I bought TLOU R six years ago so no, I can’t feel being robbed or something. Instead my preorder of C2077 still stings. Don’t make a mistake on who’s the enemy here
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...