Even if Microsoft’s unprecedented $69 billion acquisition of Activision Blizzard goes through, Call of Duty is unlikely to leave PlayStation platforms any time soon. We know that Sony has an ongoing contract with the publisher that will be honoured, and Xbox has at the very least committed to three additional years of multiformat support in an attempt to appease regulators.
EA bigwig Andrew Wilson is not losing too much sleep over the series’ future on PS5 and PS4, however – in fact, he sees a huge opportunity for his company’s own first-person shooter franchise, Battlefield. While the previous instalment Battlefield 2042 has a terrible reputation and has failed to retain players, the Australian executive was eager to reiterate that the series’ future will remain on PlayStation.
“In a world where there may be questions over the future of Call of Duty and what platforms that might be on or might not be on, being platform agnostic and completely cross-platform with Battlefield, I think is a tremendous opportunity,” he said during a recent Goldman Sachs event, as reported by Seeking Alpha.
Obviously if Call of Duty ceases to release on PlayStation platforms, it’ll leave a gigantic audience looking for something else to play. While it’s true that some players will simply leave Sony’s ecosystem and game elsewhere, others will seek an alternative – and that’s where Wilson believes his company may be able to capitalise.
Of course, before it can even begin to think about encroaching on Call of Duty’s territory, Battlefield needs to get back on track. Speaking candidly, Wilson admitted that the previous two entries in the property have failed to meet expectations. “I don't think we delivered in the last two iterations of [Battlefield] in the way that we should have,” he said of Battlefield 2042 and Battlefield V. He added that his company has a “lot of work” to do to get the series back on track, but that the right teams are now in place to realise the series’ “unbelievable ambitions” moving forwards.
To be honest, it’ll take a really good Battlefield game to unseat Call of Duty, but it’s true that if the latter departs PlayStation there will be opportunities for other publishers. There’s no question that abandoning an audience as large as Sony’s will leave space for others to occupy – but in its current state, Battlefield’s got a long way to go before it emerges as the likeliest candidate.
[source event.webcasts.com, via seekingalpha.com, gamespot.com]
Comments 43
It would be a great justice if, assuming Microsoft successfully acquires Activision-Blizzard, Call of Duty dies. Karma.
A lot of fans are upset at the potential of Microsoft owning CoD, because it’s too big and it is too much power, but all making the game exclusive would do is downsize CoD and open competition for other shooters.
This is the main reason I doubt Xbox would pull the game from PlayStation. It would just weaken the CoD IP.
I think the better option would be to come up with something that plays more like COD. Battlefield and COD don't appeal to the same crowd as much as people think. Sure they are both military FPS games buy the similarities pretty much stop there.
Oooor. Sony makes the cod killers cuz ea aint makin it
If they make a bc3 it'll be over for cod.. I'm kidding but seriously, do it EA!
That or make bf6 like bf3 and 4 and that'll get the series back on track.
If Dice rebooted bad company/battlefield franchise like how Infinity Ward did MW. Then they can win back the fans but what they did to 2042 has tarnished the franchise completely. I doubt Microsoft if they acquired Activision will keep it exclusive to Xbox, they would lose millions of potential sales from the PlayStation base. We all there are more PlayStation owners compared to Xbox’s from last gen and current gen.
Charlie Adam eyes opportunity if Kevin De Bruyne leaves Man City
EA tried to sell an unfinished online only multiplayer game for full price with 2042, while the competition offer more polished shooters for free. Time battlefield goes F2P and embraces BR
@CapGod "Sony makes the cod killers cuz ea aint makin it"
It doesn't even have to be a first person shooter for Sony to make bank, people just assume it has to be or else. Aren't they making like 175 live service games? surely one of them has a chance to make it big.
I'm sure when Fortnite first released all the execs in Activision were like " lol look at this trash this will never touch COD, it will never have as much players as our games even if a million years past..Epic clowns 😂"
Well yeah, likely people will look for an alternative instead of switching systems, and it's not like CoD be scoring 9s or 10s year in year out enough to justify buying a whole console for it. PlayStation is a huge brand and it might in turn rather give the spotlight to other shooters with the massive multiplat fanbase leaving CoD looking like Halo.
Not a fan of battlefields multiplayer feels abit to slow for me I like to just respawn right back in after I die
@Juanalf
Yeah, but ea had too many cracks at it that I don't believe they can. Epic made gears of war. Paragon happened, but most of they time they hit
I don't play either series, but I don't even think the games are really even that similar - beyond obvious aesthetics. I don't think if Battlefield is the best version of itself it would necessarily appeal to most CoD players; they're just different games.
Unfortunately, no one is looking forward to Battlefield anymore
After the back to back disastrous releases of BF: V and 2042, EA / Dice has a LOT to prove and make up for before I’ll go back to that series. I say Sony creates their own answer to COD; they’re MORE than capable of making a truly great one.
If E.A could replicate what made bad company 2 so good that would be a great start. The campaign was good with just enough b movie cheese and was just long enough to not out stay its welcome and the online multiplayer was just so well balanced and executed..then bf3 happened and it was downhill from there on in..bf3's campaign was interesting enough but was spliced together in such a bad way it was hard to fathom out what the hell was going on and the multiplayer was garbage and broken..bf4 was more of the same and both 3 and 4 lost pretty much all the destruction you could cause in bc2. Now bf2042 had a very ropey start i'll admit but i still really enjoyed it and it is getting so much better to play to the point where i dont bother with warzone at all anymore which was my go to online shooter for a very long time. E.A. have to get the next bf entry back on track or i fear it will be game over for the franchise..they have ballsed up bf and burnout and have almost killed nfs too..so much wasted potential.
@Mr_Gamecube gooooood point. I’m imagining bungie making a realistic military shooter. I’d buy that.
so people are making plans for 7 years time if cod does leave
Microsoft will probably be onto cloud streaming service by 2029 and will provide COD by streaming rather than a native ps6 port
Well... indeed it is an opportunity. MS would be cutting about 50% sales from the CoD series. Battlefield would finally be able to compete or surpass if it's good.
@Nem bf has never needed to compete with cod. The only thing they have in common is that they are both first person shooters that have both lost their way in recent years. Its like comparing the arma series to call of duty. Bf needs to reclaim its own identity again and stop pandering to the cod crowd..
I don't believe the current employee at dice capable of making good battlefield games, at least not without big shake up in the company.
To be fair if COD one day stopped being on PS platform it would ‘unseat’ itself and get to die a slow death on PC.
It definitely would be a gold opportunity for BF.
Sony already has a great IP sat on the shelf, Killzone.
@Korgon Exactly, maps are too big for my liking. If they had smaller maps like code then I would play it
I’m really enjoying battlefield with the new updates. It’s not perfect but it’s definitely much better. I think maki g it F2P and selling the battle pass would go a long way to filling up the games. I highly doubt that it’s selling many copies now anyhow
All sony need to do in reality. Is reboot Socom for the ps5. That game has so many memories for alot of ps2 owners. It was one of sony first ventures into the online world. At the time I think it had more people playing on that than cod. I admit they messed up with the last installment of it. But if they go back to the core games from the ps2 days. Then they could make a cod killing game. Or even bring mag back on ps5. I think it both them games would have a big draw to playstation owners. Especially the ogs from when they first came out. So Sony has ips already there. They just need to take a good shot at it
Believe me I want Battlefield to be great again. If wanting to be Call of Duty's replacement is enough reason for you to actually put out quality titles again then by all means Andrew. By all means.
I'm hoping the next battlefield makes me feel like a kid again like battlefield bad company did. Battlefield lost its way a little for me after BF1 then 2042 hit and I thought "well at least there's COD" but I don't like COD lol
Ha, and here's me thinking this was EA seeing a chance to revive the Medal of Honor games lol.
I guess I'm the fool.
@0niguy I was the same after bf1. I bought bf5 thinking it would be great. Ended up gathering dust as I couldn't get a good feel for it. For me it wasn't bf it went way off track. So I went back to cod that wasn't much better. But I got more enjoyment out of it. Sony has a few ips it could use like kill one Socom MAG. They would all give cod a good run in. If made right unlike the last Socom released
@Mason066 your absolutely right my man and most shooters are in that BR space I could imagine killzone BR. and socom PS exclusive shooter is easy decision on Sony part of COD is gonna be XB only
@nessisonett His corner kicks alone are worth 10 million pounds XD.
Hey EA i've solved your FPS rival COD shooter problem.
MEDAL
OF
HONOUR
@Juanalf I hope they can but not betting on it as they pretty much abandoned shooters and multiplayer in general after the PS3 era, doubt they could just magically make a better shooter after falling so far behind.
@TheCollector316 I would hate that, it's time Sony competed instead of capitalizing on the mistakes of others that would make the exclusives suffer because they wouldn't have to try hard like the PS4 era.
Battlefield is stuck in the past, the competition is better and free! They need to look at apex, warzone, pubg and fortnite. Firestorm had potential but was squandered on a WW2 setting and locked behind a purchase, 2042 was so bad it nearly killed the franchise. Time to make the next one F2P, win back some good will and give CoD some competition again
Okay battlefield 2042 is a train wreck but what is wrong with battlefield 5? Besides just being bland?
Right so make a good game first.
Yeah until Microsoft buy EA as well :-/ I really hope Microsoft can't buy any more big Publishers if they get Activision. They are just going to ruin the gaming industry
I think most of the real talent left Dice long ago, so I don't see it happening.
Now would be a perfect time for a new MAG game though.
@Northern_munkey Sure. I don't play them so i dunno. I meant just sales numbers.
I played the mw2 beta and it's the same experience all over again..I could also feel the visuals are worse than vanguard.Sony needs a f2p shooter.Something to become the new standard for Playstation.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...