The new PS5 model has been dubbed the 'PS5 Slim' just about everywhere, but that's not the revised console's official name. Indeed, as far as Sony's concerned, this is just the new PS5. It's a replacement for the original system, and although it is smaller than its predecessor, Sony's never actually referred to it as a 'Slim' specifically.
And to be fair, it's easy to see why. A tweet from The Game Awards organiser and host Geoff Keighley has picked up a lot of traction over the last 24 hours or so, as the hype master himself posted a picture of the new and old PS5 models side by side.
Needless to say, there really isn't much difference between the two in terms of size. The redesign has shaved off a bit of volume, for sure, but at a glance, the only real change is that the side panels have been cut down at the top of the console.
Keighley's post has already ruffled a few feathers, with plenty of people pointing out that there's barely an improvement. Some of the most popular replies include direct comparisons to the PS2, which slimmed down significantly. But again, the term 'PS5 Slim' isn't official, and it never has been.
What do you make of the redesigned PS5? Were you expecting a more marked improvement, or were people always jumping the gun by calling it a 'Slim'? Don't replace your old system just yet in the comments section below.
[source twitter.com]
Comments 62
The original is butt ugly and so is the new one. It's not Slim, but I suppose it' s a bit less fat. Still vile to behold though!
Still a slim to me and if they make a new slim model, that would be the super slim. And if they make another smaller version after that, that will be the ultra super slim lol.
It could be a neon green cardboard box for all I care. That said, yes, I think neither of them are particularly pretty.
Isn't the heat sink smaller? I couldn't care less what it looks like, its a box to play games, not the next catwalk model 🤣
I was going to wait until the new design was revealed until I got a ps5, but I decided to get one the other month on sale for £400. I didn't like the design at first but it Is growing on me a bit, it is the fin parts than bothered me mainly but they don't stand out too much when horizontal. I think the new one does look slightly better with the shorter fins sticking out, but apart from that there is not much difference.
What’s going on here, how can people fail to tell the difference? There are videos out showing the difference and it’s significant, yet people are saying it isnt(?). I think people’s expectations are off for how much can realistically be trimmed from such a machine.
Not a fan of the design but at least the face plates are smaller and closer to the console's size unlike the original. Also, the faceplates have a glossy finish, correct?
This is the stupidest gaming saga of the year by far 🤣
Made much worse by trusted sites and affiliates buying in to the whole collective idiocy of randomly deciding the name for the revised replacement PS5 was 'Slim' when it's always just been a PS5.
Now it just brings out more idiots complaining that it's not "different enough", when it isn't supposed to be 🤦♂️
As usual the media started and fed the narrative that this could be a 'slim' version and now sheeple are pointing out the PS5 revision has hardly changed. Congratulations all round. Why report news when you can make it.
Oh come on, the pic is clearly taken to minimize the difference between both models as much as it can (the angle of the oic, the fact the OG is put a little in the back, the way the rear of both models are lost in the background, etc). Breakdown videos have shown that the new model is almost 1/3 smaller than the OG.
I have no interest in buying the new model since I'm very happy with my OG, and I think both designs are ugly, but this is trolling.
As long as it runs properly, I couldn't care less what it looks like
Waiting in the ps5 pro
The only issue with the new model is not whether its size has been reduced enough or not, but how come a device with same processing power is not cheaper (and worst, more expensive) than it was 3 years ago.
Wow, if there isn't too much perspective fiddling like mentioned above, this is just a redesign. I must admit the new model dies look a bitbetter but definitely no reason to buy unless u don't own one already
The above photo doesn't match some teardown videos on YouTube though.
Above photo looks like they are almost identical in height yet videos clearly show that the new model is quite a bit lower.
Edit I'm referring to when placed vertical, so height I guess means width.
Edit 2 The above photo also shows that the 'Slim' is closer to the camera making it look bigger.
I think you need to do your homework a bit better before an article like this tbh.
Prefer the OG and especially if i want the disc drive
I could tell immediately there was little to no difference.
Well, fans might be really blind. Because I see lots of difference. Watched enough of videos and tear downs and can easily see the height and width difference, thickness is still there, but it's different on the outside and inside. Other than dye itself.
Besides, it is not meant to be bought if you already have ps5. It's a win win if you are about to get your first PS5. For me, I am fine with my old one. So these fans are acting stupid imo.
I think that’s a decent return to be honest. It’s only 30% remember so put that over the entire surface area and it’s substantial. On a side note the cash left my account this morning for Portal.. it’s on! 👍👍
The left one looks cheap and tacky. While the right one is bigger, it looks higher quality.
Definitely looks less prestige, and the shoddy plastic feet (for horizontal layout) are doing it no favours.
Sony has managed to do the impossible once again - make an even uglier PS5. Honestly I think that line going through the middle of the cover make it looks worse. But as long as what is inside continues to be top notch, we should be good.
As usual the later revision just looks cheaper to me. Cutting corners. But I DO think it's significantly smaller than the launch PS5 around 33% smaller by volume, not enough to be called a slim.
Some of the close up pictures I've seen of the middle section joining to the faceplates makes it look really, really cheap. I'll be sticking with my original thanks.
Didn't we have essentially the exact same article on here a couple of days ago already? Why are we seeing this again, just because someone (who?) tweeted a picture? The dimensions have been known for ages.
It's definitely thinner, but it does look a little bit like a knock-off Chinese console.
They've never called any of their console revisions "slim". That is a fan name.
@sanderson72 Yup. Hopefully they use the next revision to remodel this monstrosity into something less unsightly.
Showing just one angle doesn’t tell the whole story, though.
@Netret0120 Yeah, at least the disc drive “bulge” in the OG tapers, versus just being a stuck out chunk in the “slim”.
Let me be the first to name it, (the new) PS5 Slim Shady
Is it though? Like seriously when has sony ever called a playstation model "The slim" model. They don't. It's simply the newest model that takes over for the last. WE call it the slim because its smaller, but I can't honestly remember a day that was put on marketing material or on the box. Closest we've come to them calling something slim was the PSOne. What we call the PS2 slim is the community calling it hte PS2 slim. For sony it was simply the model that doesn't have a hard drive bay and had its power supply removed with a smaller manufacturing process for the chipset, that ran cooler. That model got several revisions, if memory serves had one where the power supply was still inside the damned thing. PS3 same deal. We all called it the slim, but for sony it was simply a means of getting to 299, super slim..... couldn't tell you the reason why that was even made, but there ya have it. What about the PS4? Simply a means of getting the price down and making the look of the PS4 Pro and PS4 to have a common appearance. It was simply a revision, barely much smaller than the base PS4 that launched prior. Some how it got the name slim.
This thing is the PS5 Slim, because the community deemed it so. As far as sony is concerned. It's just a means to revise their distribution approach and cut costs. Likely to get it aesthetically in line with the PS5 Pro/Edge next year.
@get2sammyb aren't these consoles partially made in China so that statement is kinda true 🤔 😅
I remember when the PS3 came out it was bigger than the original Xbox and the whole XBOX HEUG meme, but now when you have the PS5 next to the original PS3 it's way bigger and takes up a lot of space in a media centre. I think it's worth it for how much quieter it runs compared to the PS4 but yeah, it's a weird design that doesn't sit horizontally flat without the stand or being propped up, and reminds me of the art style from Detroit: Become Human, but not in a good way.
I have a feeling Sony cheaped out on the redesign because then they could probably use either a similar or the same PCB fabrication from the original models, and that it's been done to facilitate different face plates plus sell the disc drive as an upgradeable accessory for those who got lumped with the Digital model and realise that used disc games are cheaper than the store basically all of the time.
With modern PlayStation, just remember everything is driven by the acquisition of easy money, and the "Slim" is a perfect example of that.
Actually, have you not watch Linus video he does a tear down and from what i can tell in video formate its miles slimer and even linus himself said it.
Edit; even stating that it seems to be fine stood up on its own no need for the stand
To those of you holding off on buying a system in order to get the revision... Hope that wait was worth it for ya, lol.
Still too bulky and ugly for me. I’ll keep playing on my PS4, and hope that a Slim (as designated by Sony) comes out at some point, and the price drops a tad
I think it's pretty clear that this move is to streamline production of the console, nothing more. This way they only have to produce one console instead of two, with an optional optical drive as an accessory.
New players will get cheaper materials and the industry standard 1TB storage for the same price. 30% less of anything is literally something. But not a lot of something really. Hopefully the newer model holds up as long as the original.
@Olmaz Shrinkflation is happening with consoles now?
@KillerBoy
PS6 for me.
@JimbobLink Clearly! : )
In the end we shouldn't be surprised. Take a look at the differences between the models of the PS4 and PS3. Are they that much smaller?
@NeonPizza And I'm also confused that buttons are not marked, so I always shut down system instead of ejecting disc... 🤦
It does look a little slimmer - and I really like how the center portion is curvier, too. But I'm not buying one unless my launch-day PS5 dies.
If (when?) they release a Pro, I might buy it - but I doubt a lot of people will buy this just because it's a little smaller, they'll buy it because they want a PS5 and this is what's available.
Is it just me, or does the new model look like one of those knock-off systems you would find in some counterfeit store in China? It just looks....cheap.... compared to the "normal" model.
So some ps5's are manufactured in china...so what? People saying this new revised ps5 looks like a chinese knock off are forgetting the ps4 was manufactured in china as well but nobody accused the ps4 "slim" as looking like a cheap chinese knock off. I understand now why sony has redesigned the ps5 to save on production costs and shipping etc,etc,etc but it still consumes the same power,has the same soc specs,a smaller heat sink with an extra pipe on it and an extra usb socket. So really its just lost a bit of the casing. Its not hard to customise your ps5 really if you dont like the look of it and i'm still trying to get my wife to air brush my diablo 4 design on my ps5 face plates once she has some free time. And i quite like the look of the new ps5 even though i'll only buy one if anything happens to my full fat ps5..i refuse to body shame it 🤣
Honestly, if this is all you have in your life to cause you grief... you're doing ok. I'd personally just not worry about it.
@get2sammyb The clear plastic feet for horizontal play are a shockingly bad piece of design.
Removed - flaming/arguing
@Northern_munkey It has nothing to do with where the PS5 is manufactured. Virtually every electronic device is made in Chine nowadays. It has to do with the fact there are lots of Chinese companies that rip off the the design of successful consoles to sell trashy, low grade imitations. The new redesign looks more like one of those than an official product.
That's the point.
@__jamiie alright doris put your handbag away..
Removed - flaming/arguing
Let's stay on topic here, please.
@Maddie47 The article has now been amended
They could call it the "PS5 thick" for all I care. I don't ever see myself buying it.
@jorel262 PS3 Slim was a lot smaller than the original or subsequent fatties (60GB, 40GB, 80GB).
I think we can ignore the PS3 Super Slim as that was smaller again but tacky in every way.
As for the PS4, the Pro was about the same size as the original, not that the stylish 4 was particularly massive to start with. The Slim WAS slim being about half the height of the Pro.
I think they've kept the PS5 the same (vile) design as the innards of the new one are effectively the same as the 1216 version (the last full FAT revision)
A outraged community riled up by fake/incorrect news. Sony never called the console a PS5 slim.
@sanderson72 But also stripped of tons of extras with the PS3 and the PS2 slim was quite a bit worse in quality.
@Flaming_Kaiser Never had a 'slim' PS2 as my motorised disc drive version original fatty (GT3 pack) just kept working.
Yes, the PS3 had things stripped away. The OG 60GB had the PS2 Emotion Engine chip, 4 USB sockets, and the multi-format card reader. However, the 40GB fat one that replaced it stripped most of these away having no EE chip, 2 USB sockets and the card reader had gone. The Slim was on a par with those post-launch models. Personally I think the Slim was better looking than the later fatties as not only had all the internal gubbins been removed, but so had the exterior chrome trim, replaced by naff painted plastic.
@Maddie47 @HammerKirby3 "Oh yes they have!" (getting into panto season...)
The PSP 2000 and later 3000 series were designated "Slim & Lite". Even says so on the box.
@Maddie47 "Sony has NEVER used the term “slim” for its console refreshes" I'm simply saying that they did. You didn't say home consoles.
You are right on the home console front though - Sony just refer to SKUs or model numbers if they need to differentiate.
@sanderson72 I like the PS3 slim and the PS4 slim but I also love my Phat PS5 and the silence it brings I love it so much. The premium look of the PS5 is something I like to even the futuristic look. With the PS5 slim I just dislike the materials I hope they will be selling shells.
@NeonPizza "HAVE" does not = "OF" FFS...
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...