After Concord's vague debut teaser, we now know much more about Sony's shooter for PS5 and PC. This sci-fi, team-based hero shooter brought to mind Overwatch with a twist of Destiny in the above gameplay video.
In this first-person shooter, two teams of five are pitted against each other in a variety of modes, taking control of various characters called Freegunners, each with their own skills and weapons. They make up the crew of the Northstar, which will be your hub between matches.
Writing on the PS Blog, developer Firewalk Studios says it's taken inspiration from its favourite fighting and strategy games, putting a heavy emphasis on gameplay that'll allow for improvisation and "asymmetry to the characters".
Each week when you log into the game, you'll be greeted with cinematic vignettes that progress the story of the Northstar crew, which is a nice touch to keep you invested. Concord will feature 16 playable characters at launch, but of course that's just the beginning, with lots of free post-launch updates on the way.
The game is scheduled to launch on 23rd August, 2024, but that won't be your first opportunity to play it. There will be an open beta test in July, and you'll be able to gain early access to it if you pre-order — which you can do starting 6th June.
What are your thoughts on Concord? Let us know in the comments section below.
[source blog.playstation.com]
Comments 61
Looked good to me. Looking forward to trying it out.
A new game, yet feels like every other 5v5 online game.
It’s not for me, but I got to admit it did look of a good standard
Looked pretty decent and will definitely be playing day one, loved overwatch but it's now got stale so this will replace it.
This set the tone for the show... underwhelming
I enjoyed it until they showed it a 5v5 shooter XD
Honestly looked better than I expected. Once the painful Concord Netflix show ended
It did very little for me personally. The writing seems fine at least, but still quite generic. I was also hoping there would be more than just pvp gameplay - if you create a cool world i want lots of ways to explore and interact with it.
Also can't help but wonder what the decision was to not make it free to play. It's closest, already immensely popular competitors are.
I like the look of it. Excited to try it out.
If it's not free to play,it won't survive the Hero-shooter market.
Looks unbelievably generic, how did Sony greenlit this and even acquired this studio for yet another Overwatch copy?
This looks awful the whole show was basically bunk...... expect for our boi Astro that game looks absolutely Sensational
I thought it looked like every other gaas game on the market. Will be competing in that sea of them(hell it's competing with the other Marvel game they showed in this very state of play) and wasn't even attractive at all when it came to gameplay. It's just dreadful how desperate companies have come in this space for the next fortnite/cod.
Concord got me con-BORED.
Haha, no but seriously it looks weak.
Getting two Overwatch clones in one State of Play is insanity! I was invested in the CGI trailer of Concord, the characters were interesting... till the gameplay hit then they all seemed insignificant and small.
No one will remember this at the end of year.
This entire show felt like it could have been an email
Actually impressed for how visually good this is but gameplay and level design will be everything.
This took up a third of the entire presentation's runtime and I still feel like I barely have a clue as to what its actually about.
@Malaise Did it? CG trailer looks super generic and the gameplay was even more so
This basically is Destiny's neglected PVP mode.
Of course everyone is writing it off already...have you lot not learned from Helldivers?
@Azex Every State of Play is like this lmao.
@IOI I should have known better than to think more than Astrobot would have interested me
Yeah I could tell it wasn't gonna be any good once I started hearing the quirky Marvel humor dialogue. Well at least I got to see more Monster Hunter Wilds. That's the most positive thing I can say about this State of Play.
i like the look of it excited to see more of it characters look a little bland though
You guys will be playing it once the pc guys says it’s good just like helldrivers 2.
@Azex Yup, I was only expecting to care about Astro Bot and that’s exactly what it happened lol, something I’ve learned this gen is to always have zero expectations for States of Play, however I didn’t expect Concord to look this generic/insignificant.
Another generic live service hero shooter except this one rips off Guardians of the Galaxy badly. Can't see this lasting.
This looks uninteresting
Destiny is a really good fps with a story.is concord gonna have have that.the trailer looks ok.but does it includes a campaign.wors up son
I’m so disappointed in PlayStation fans right now. you guys are just as worse as the green team fans that call every single player PlayStation game a walking simulator. PlayStation need variety in their first party game lineup badly. people just don’t want to play single player third person action games from PlayStation studios.
@AdamNovice This. And as I said in another thread, they wheeled out two former devs who were Destiny PvP big guns back in the day, who are at the heart of Concord's gameplay design. Expecting it to be super-tight.
It looks like GotG x Overwatch. It's just doesn't looks unique compare to other PvP games that already existed. So i'm not sure what was old Jimbo trying to do with this game when live service PvP market already oversaturated.
Not to mention Sony still have other live service PvP games in their kitchen; Fairgame$ and Marathon and they gonna eat each other sales when all three games available in the market lol.
@Jay767 PS fans actually asked for single player games either 3rd person action, platformer, survival horror, or RPG. That's why games like GOW, Horizon, Ghost, Ratchet, TLOU, Spiderman, Stellar Blade, NiOh, and Rise of the Ronin sold well. Single player games is always PS bread and butter.
Was excited until they reveal it's just a live service game.
The trailer was clear of an Overwatch competitor but with Guardians of the Galaxy flare. Wow pathetically unimaginative their team is just going trend hard, what lacking imagination you have to have to do that I'm sorry.
That aside the trailer was good yes, it had charm but for a NON STORU FOCUSED GAME in a typical singleplayer sense or a Titanfall 1 multiplayer campaign sense I think it's misrepresenting the product.
Even then I find the game to be just recycling/copy catting. I didn't see any abilities or modes that were unique to it to stand out. How disappointing.
Then again I had more ideas for Foamstars then the game itself launched with of 2 modes done to death yet I had more fun coming up with uses for foam/modes then I did not playing the game ever because the game lacked depth or good ideas.
This seems the same, copy cat for money and skin swapped. I won't deny they don't have talent or they can replicate the formula sure or the characters/some differences are there but from the footage alone I couldn't tell you it looking any different then it's blatant competitor. Such multiplayer talent imagination that isn't there.
@Serpenterror While we were told it was a multiplayer game (wasn't clear then in what way) anyway during the logo reveal last year for those that didn't know/didn't see that or didn't hear about that detail yeah it was disappointing for newcomers with this trailer or just knowing and going OH it's an Overwatch clone then some other type of multiplayer game.
But a fancy trailer. Is it false advertising (trailer can be whatever they want but it's still misleading) I don't know because if Blizzard can do it Firewalk can too........... I don't know on that.
This game looks totally uninteresting. If I were going to play an online PVP game, I think I'd choose Concord over this, assuming Concord is better than Overwatch, which is admittedly a low bar to clear.
A premium priced generic looking arena shooter in 2024, this is going to die a miserable death and I really do not know what Sony saw in this studio to immediately acquire them.
@DonJorginho
Are you sure the game is $70? If so, is it going to receive regular free updates that would be microtransactions in other games?
@PuppetMaster the gameplay gunplay wise is more destiny than overwatch. And how can you make a fps really unique Aesthetic wise.
@The_Wailing_Doom I’ll change my wording as I don’t mean it to look like it’s £70 but online most people are saying between the £40-50 range which is 40/50 too much, this should’ve been free to play, as there’s just no appeal especially with better free options in Marvels Rivals/xDefiant/Destiny 2 and the imminent premium competitor in Black Ops 6 looking to be a return to form for the franchise
I just don’t see how this doesn’t flop horribly unless Sony change the structure of its release, especially locking beta access behind a preorder paywall.
@Jay767 They do need variety yes it's why I appreciated the variety of PS1-3/PSP/Vita and am playing the ones I missed out on. Same with the many OG/360 Xbox third parties or 1st party I missed out on. To me I'm more on Switch or retro even more then on current gen. I use all 3 even if been a primarily PS then Xbox then Nintendo the least (filled in that gap over time) but have become more retro on all platforms or Switch these days. So I have no console loyalty mindset at all.
The problem is this multiplayer game isn't distant enough from it's blatant competition it's after here.
The trailer made you think hmm ok, those during the logo reveal knew it was a multiplayer game but not in what way it was. So a Guardians of the Galaxy style characters trailer with some charm even if a bit lacking in the imagination in some areas.
To an Overwatch clone makes me go oh.... it's got an Overwatch style trailer so it works but the problem is the game design or the trailer and they just don't match up at all.
I thought maybe a Titanfall 1 multilplayer but story approach going hmm that'd be an angle it could be, or something with 5 heroes doing some dungeon crawling but in space, but nope it's just a more sci-fi Apex 3x3 but instead 5x5 or whatever Overwatch does for teams I guess I don't know.
I say Foamstars and went foam and they under utilise it. I had 5+ ideas and they made a game with 2 recycled modes from other games but with slight tweaks. Where is a reverse foam maze, a foam building contest, surfboard modes, traps, chemicals to be good or bad mixes with the foam. I came up with those during the launch trailer. XD
That's more effort though up then the whole game. So the fact I can outhink (not saying I'm better I'm just saying creatively thinking outside the box on what it could offer and showing the gaps they didn't feel is my problem with the industry and some games lacking factors).
When we get blatant games it makes me question the talent or money hungry nature that's why I get disappointed even if I'm not going to play any of them.
There is inspiration and there is lack of trying to compete because laziness or so direct it's hilarious (I've seen good, I've seen passable, I've seen shovelware and I've seen copy cat blatant of platformers and old school racing so rip off-ish I'm surprised they can get away with it and aren't fan games and yet they lack anything original. Just we did the bare minimum of these popular games inspirations level of LAZY, no new spin just blatant.
That or they do have differences of world/characters and such sure but the mechanics are so pathetically repetitive and 1 new idea, wow 1 whole new idea. Coming up with ideas is hard yes, but trying to stand out has been pushed to the way side so much yet I can go back 20 years ago and see the competition being broader and better not blatant and lazy from Indies not just AAA/AA, it's direct competition not fair competition with actually 'trying' they don't try anymore, a bunch of visuals/characters/worlds or map design is ok that's unique and ripping off the rest of abilities, modes and other factors is as well apparently).
That's how pathetic the industry is for generic games. Too close to be called creative because they aren't. Then again many Square publish (not Square developed I notice the quality differences) were very underwhelming to me. Valkyrie Elysium was good but Diofield was weaker then Sega's Valkyria Chronciles has more depth then and others were just poor in qualities.
So it has the look and style but it is under the hook a competitor to something. That's MY issue with games these days is the visuals and character means nothing if the game design is what I care about and is very blatant and I'm not a multiplayer person but if I see fair game design ideas I will still praise it even if I won't play it. This had abilities and maps/roles that look so obvious and like any other game in the space...... That's kind of sad. When they talk up some good people that's a claim. When they present a direct competitor you ask questions. You see trend following similiarities of gameplay and movie characters vibe it goes for your imagination mind goes your ok with that or wow how unimaginiative of design they came up with was that Sony's decision or are these people THAT talented they can directly compete but not have a good enough imagination to make it stand out better then that. That's my problem with the industry is safe games not just in game design but in other aspects to be even more unconvincing.
I'm not playing ANY of the PlayStation big IPs anyways. Astro appealed, whatever Media Molecule does next. Japan/London studios dead. So to me I have a I don't care for team blue as much and team green well I'm not playing theirs either but if 1 oddity pops up I would. Technically Hi Fi Rush would be that but it's not physical and well like buying it supports the studio now anyway.
Looked at Astor which launched before the State of Play and it was more exciting of an Indie. It's not much but was more interested in it as a Zelda, Darksiders type game that good enough for kids but also aspects I like in those games. Yet I'll also play some obstacle course puzzle game on PSP where my new favourite puzzle games are or others.
While seeing Gravity Trickster as a Kula World clone which is cool but also kind of disappointing but it sticks out a lot when most are Bejeweled/Candy Crush or Tetris clones and I see Match Masters for the 1000th time and I hate match 3/block falling puzzle games yeah the advertising tolerance goes way down when the algorithms won't bugger off but you can't tell the algorithm to get stuffed and leave me alone. XD
Looks pretty cool but it's not really my favorite genre, so I don't know if it'll be a go-to for me. I was honestly a little let down since the trailer made it seem like a story-based sci-fi adventure. Oh well.
I honestly would have preferred a game more like their cinematic - a singleplayer game focusing on a lively, crew of space outlaws - infinitely more than what Concord actually is.
As it was, giving is an "in-engine cinematic" that will neither be featured in the game itself nor represents the experience in any meaningful way was one hell of a bum note to start on.
@Jay767 For you it looks like Destiny but for me it looks like Overwatch.
And i'm sure they can make a unique FPS since Metroid Prime exist. I mean, i'm okay for inspired from other games as long as they put their own spin. But what they did here looks lazy af, just blatant copy without anything that set apart from their inspirations :/
The reveal of this gave me flashbacks of killzone 2 E3. The opening cinematic looked like a great game then they switch to the actual game which looks nor feels nothing like the cinematic. Why do studios still do this?
@TrickyDicky99 Concord. Like the grape. For making wine. To go with your liter of rum.
But that's still not enough to get through all 30 minutes of this show.
Wait is this going to be free or cost money? Free I'll try it but if it costs money I'm good.
The shooting looked great but a hero shooter was about the last thing I wanted from this. So much you can do with a sci fi multiplayer game. Definitely did not want this. I'll try the beta though.
I was all about this until I saw it was first-person and multiplayer. Also, having cosmetics in a first-person game that doesn’t really let you see them very much isn’t my favorite thing.
The concept of story-focused episodes dropping over time for players to watch seems nice, though not enough to warrant playing a game that just isn’t for me. It’s a shame, because I’m intrigued by the characters.
I hope this does well though, because I’d certainly like to see some spinoff single player titles or a third-person mode.
This looked much better than I expected actually. I'm not totally sold yet but I'm looking forward to giving the beta a shot.
How irreverent.
Does anyone want these quirky characters anymore? This style of character writing is outdated. Not just because the cringe factor of such unique individuals, it's also just that we know these characters already, right? We have gotten them a million times already. Stahp.
@Jay767 i have to agree with you on this. I want more variety on PS. To many single player action adventure games during PS4 for me. I don’t think this looked great but i bet it’s fun to play. The overall show wasn’t strong but Sony said this is a year in which they didn’t have huge AAA to announce. Better hope half the Xbox game show is PS5 releases cause they will for sure have the bigger games this year anyhow. Can’t remember when i last said that and it was true. Anyhow I’ll give concord a spin. But Doom, Indiana Jones, Avowed, Gears of War, Fable, and many others are just a better lineup no matter how much you bleed blue. Don’t worry many of them will be on PS. This show gets a 5/10 for me.
How it plays and feels are more important to me than how it looks. I’m looking forward to something that can fill the Overwatch shaped void in my gaming line up. Would be nice if this is it.
Maybe they should have added in the announcement "shutting servers in 2026"
it doesn't look bad at all to be honest....but it's gonna live long enough?
Jesus. Writing in this game sounds horrendous.
Like MCU fanfic.
@Tecinthebrain
Exactly! I was hyped after the amazing CGI trailer, and really disappointed when they finally showed another 5v5 arena arcade shooter.
There is so much more to do with this universe and these characters.
Personally thought the gunplay looked top notch. I'll try the beta.
The reveal cinematic was incredible. It had such a nice vibe that made it look like Guardians of the Galaxy, which is perhaps the Marvel IP that I like the most. And then... it's the most uninteresting game following on from that. Who needed another hero shooter? To hell with these live service games. As expected, turning out to be completely underwhelming.
I’ve been wanting Sony to return to the FPS genre for years, this was NOT what I had in mind.
If this was their answer, they should've just let it go to voicemail.
@TrickyDicky99 Concorde! It looks like a chip shop Guardians of the Galaxy too. The hero shooter has worn thin imo. Soulless cash grab. Concorde is taking a nose dive for sure.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...