
Australia's current Labor government, led by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, plans to impose strict rules on teenagers' use of social media. With broad support from the states and both major parties in agreement, the Online Safety Act could pass before the end of the year, likely being introduced in 2025. It would restrict teenagers under 16 from accessing online platforms like Facebook or X, but that's just for starters; Aussie teens will be cut off from broader, ubiquitous platforms like YouTube and, perhaps most devastating of all, the PlayStation Network (as well as Xbox Live).
Now, all of this is obviously not great for Aussie teens who deserve unfettered access to (if nothing else) the PlayStation Network, and this Aussie scribe is not a fan. While the plan sounds draconian, international readers should know that the government in question is largely inept and has no idea how this proposal will be enforced.
Aussie outlet Press Start has been keeping tabs on the situation. More information was posted ahead of the weekend, outlining the government's broad definition of what a "social media service" is, as per the Online Safety Act:
- The sole or primary purpose of the service is to enable online social interaction between two or more end-users;
- The service allows end users to link to or interact with some or all of the other end users;
- The service allows end users to post material on the service.
Albanese's plan is to hold social media companies accountable, mandating that they "take reasonable steps to block people under 16" from accessing them and imposing flaccid fines on offenders. The "maximum fines are less than a million dollars," which is pocket change for these massive corporations.
Of course, offending Aussie teens and their parents will face no punishment for breaking or circumventing these rules, and so the ungovernable Australian public will immediately flout them. Hilariously, the Labor government won't or can't specify the technical method it will use to verify age. Burning all of its goodwill amongst younger voters to appease their elders, we’d bet it will cost them the next election.
Are you surprised that the extremely skittish Australian government is now targeting social media? Could you imagine your own government taking away your PlayStation during those formative teenage years? Head down under to the comments section below.
[source abc.net.au]
Comments 84
To be honest, under 16s should be forced to at least have their account in private mode. Far far too many cases of grooming.
Social media should be cut off for young teens but come on even online play that is disgusting. Facebook, TikTok, Instagram i can see the problems here but online play why.
I kinda get it but thing is the ship sailed long ago on this type of thing. These are the types of rules you enforce at the start not nearly 20 years later.
We are slowly losing our country to a dictatorship trying to control everything..Australia needs freedom 🦅
@Flaming_Kaiser Because it has a messaging aspect that is used to exploit young people. I don’t necessarily agree with it, but that’s the reason.
Imagine if the ban was for people aged 50 plus watching TV because it features biased opinions and endless adverts that try to alter people's opinions on various products. This is the classic thing of old men not knowing anything about what they're legislating.
I mean. It wasn't cool that I had access to everything at the age I was. And looking at todays kids and their totally ***** attention span and social skills …
Hmm, to implement/enforce this they'd need to make it mandatory for Aussies to provide government issued ID wouldn't they?
But if they must have ID-approved accounts then the predators would just slither away to shadier pastures. Youth are usually at the forefront of technology and quicker to adapt to emerging digital habits. Then the government need to s-l-o-w-l-y catch up with updated systems to include new tech.
The only way for Australia to shield itself from the Internet would be to cut off all Internet content/access to it's citizens unless it's pre-approved by the government. Sounds like quite the task.
I'm all for keeping kids safe. But this, to me, sounds more of a case of the government wanting everyone to register their ID to use the internet and then using the age old "won't anyone think of the children" tactics to force it through.
Again, I agree that something needs to be done to fight the predators. But this sounds like an bureaucratic and totalitarian nightmare.
But this won't be the first time my tiny brain can't comprehend the thought processes that goes into a lot of corporate and governmental decisions. 🤷♂️
@VatoLoco47 nah albo thinks we need "the voice" not freedom
@Victor_Meldrew and a bunch of them were sold as "4g and 5g" but weren't so it screwed a lot of people over.
If I was running some sort of dictatorship yeah I would probably ban X and Facebook because those platforms have cooked almost everyone's brains.
Of course I don't run a dictatorship and Australia is not one either so I don't agree with just banning stuff to protect the kids, parents need to parent more not the government.
But when will they ban Vegemite? 🤔
@LuXifer Very eloquently stated. Bravo. 👏🏻 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
@SoulChimera Can’t believe Alf’s leaving after all these years. It’s a sad day for Summer Bay 🫡
But how will teens keep up with tweets from the International Drainage Commission?
So here we go with the over-blown rhetoric... it is definitely true (as a parent) that social media is brain cancer for kids these day... and it doesn't matter what sort of parent you think makes a difference. It's just ubiquitous.
So the concept of "reducing" harmful social media influence on kids is laudable. I think however, this is one of those cases that (1) they see it's popular with parents so MORE OF THAT; but also (2) they have no idea about IT - media - gaming - chat - or the various ways around things. When they start making blanket bans on things like YouTube (which is minimally 'social media' in only loose terms, especially if you don't upload), or PSN (unless you're on MP games like Roblox etc), then I don't see how this is a solution to any particular problem. X / TikTok / Snapchat / Instagram / Discord / Whatsapp... I can totally get on board with in terms of restricting access to at least some of this particular brain-rot for kids.
This definitely appears to be an over-reaction by pollies; but I don't think it's some form of nefarious government conspiracy... just poorly thought out vote-bait for parents.
@NEStalgia you WILL be assimilated!.... praise the Lord Vege MIGHTY!
@Tecinthebrain just curious - are you a parent? What age kids? It's just my experience that people who go around telling parents to be better parents; either aren't parents or have very different aged kids. My experience is that almost without exception, parenting friends we know are struggling with their kids' social media (and IT time in general). So apparently - it's all 'our' fault?
@Matroska one HUGE difference. 16 year olds are minors, hence adults can tell them what to do, as far as being on social media. Adults can't tell other adults what tv to watch
If there was any merit to these social media bans then they should have happened back in 2008. That ship has long since sailed.
Besides which, granddad government is always about 5 steps behind the kids when it comes to tech. They aren't policing this.
@NEStalgia yes and fosters as well..
Not gaming channels! The one place where youth can find fellow wholesome, uplifting and well adjusted individuals!
It might not be the best way, but I commend them
For at least trying.
Social media is a cesspit.
I don't know much about Australian news/politics, as an American, but I'd agree that this seems impossible to enforce and an overreach. I'm a parent, although my child is still a bit young, he does use YouTubeKids once in a while.
I think there is a lot of danger in social media, but I would agree with the a few of the commenter's that better moderation is where to start. I know I spend more time than I would like scrolling Facebook and Instagram, but as had also been said, you can't put that genie back in the bottle.
We can't restrict kids from accessing social media - I mean, based on that limited definition, this comment section is social media, is it not? The best we can strive for is cleaning it up, policing it and finding better strategies for how they access it. I know easier said than done, but this is not an all or nothing scenario.
When it comes to governments around the world, one thought enters my head:-
The inmates are running the asylum.
To be fair, the UK did something stupid too, with it's HFSS law.
Can't have anything with high fat, sugar or salt within 2m of tills, on the end of an aisle, 15m of the store entrance, and in any prominent promotional spaces.
But there is no one to enforce it. Womp womp
Social media is a cancer of the modern age. My kids are not old enough for it yet but I’m dreading the day when they want to start using it all
With the amount of grooming, bullying, general harm social media does to young people, it’s not a terrible decision. It is, however, a pointless one.
VPN’s and other methods would make any block, short of China’s extreme measure, redundant.
Maybe hold social media platforms to better account when they don’t adequately try to protect minors. Charge them a substantial fine when their platforms are used to spread misinformation, steal information, fail to prevent grooming. Put the onus on them.
Social media is the absolute poison of society. But as others have said, once Pandora's Box is open, it doesn't get shut again.
And certainly not for freedom loving Australians. I heard much like us in the States, they are an unruly bunch. And I admire that. Both our countries started as glorified penal colonies to an extent and propagated by subjugating an indigenous population, and I think that gives us a special connection 😆
Our equally messed up cousins. Go Australia!
The internet is a pretty toxic and dangerous place esp for younger and vulnerable users, so some form of restrictions on Social Media / Internet access for 16 and unders isn't a terrible idea, but I'm not sure this is the right way to go about it.
Im not going to join the is it right or wrong debate - I dont have a good opinion of social media at all, particularly for teenagers (& younger), but given the age some kids start using it im not sure a ban is easily workable.
In this case though, removing messaging and related functions from child accounts to comply with the ban, would seem not too difficult for the likes of Sony and MS.
I'm generally in support of banning social media for under 16s. Studies have routinely found it has a negative impact on mental wellbeing. I think its fair its limited. After all tobacco, alcohol and gambling all have age limits because they are harmful. Why should social media be exempt? These things have been age restricted for ages yet no one cries draconia about them.
I wouldn't restrict online play entirely though. Instead make it the responsibility of Sony, MS, Nintendo and game devs in general to remove voice chat, text chat and general end to end communication on accounts belonging to under 16s. As a comment above me says, it wouldn't be hard to achieve. Ofcourse this will require parental controls and parents will be the ones who enable/disable these measures. But the point is setting up the measures is not hard and entirely feasible.
Regarding the measures being circumvented by a VPN I don't think its a worry on a large scale. Younger generations have grown up with tablets and smartphones and are used to a closed eco system which has resulted in a limited, bordering on technical ilterate, understanding of how to use one.
As a side note you also have the benefit of awful TikTok and YouTube personalities losing their audience and with it their ill-begotten income stream.
Obviously its not an easy or quick decision. There would be lots of bumps on the road. But at its core I support the restriction.
@SoulChimera HERE, HERE Mr. Stuart
The Australian government doesn't know how the Internet works.
A new dawn of clubbing, tabletop gaming and if alone then single player gaming. I couldn't agree more. False (online) friends, false fame (influencers), false examples that anything is allowed (because no one will punish you for anything you do on internet), this all make young people unusable in real life.
Parent if you won't parent, then the nanny government will do it for you.... I guess
As much as I dislike social media, to the point last account I got was a facebook one back in 2014, gotta say that this whole wave of bans is more political than anything.
They don't care about children at all, they care about people realizing there are more political views than what the government allows you to have.
@CielloArc Yep. The cynical side of me cannot help but think that a lot of these bans are a response to a certain somebody buying Twitter.
This will inevitably lead to more underage pregnancy as what else you going to do with your time. Communist Australia 🦘
This is a poorly executed plan that's trying to have good intentions 😅
So they ban PSN and Xbox live but not places like tick tock? Where is there logic in that?
"international readers should know that the government in question is largely inept" - Please do not state your own political opinion as fact. I do not come hear to have other people's politics rammed down my throat. This isn't the BBC (some free satire for you there).
@Northern_munkey Fosters (the amber nectar) is hard to find in bars or to buy in Australia as it’s just not popular at all. The joke is that they export it (via Japanese’s brewing group Asahi) to make room on the taps for the good stuff. 🦘
Torn on this - agree on all comments questioning about how achievable it actually is and how it could possibly work. Also, some elements of online gaming is going to be very unfair - so much of gaming is online these days to a certain extent.
At the same time, with two kids now in the digital world, I can attest to the impact online use has to kids these days. Even with a lot of supervision, they get bombarded with all sorts and gaming is no exception - most of the biggest games have predatory monetary systems. Even with supervised time, I've spotted big differences in moods when they are regularly spending time online etc.
Which is a long winded way of saying I agree that social media can have negative impacts on kids but I have no idea what should be done about it.
“ Could you imagine your own government taking away your …”
Well Canada isn’t my government but they did just shut down a TikTok office.😂
https://vancouversun.com/news/tiktok-vancouver-office-closure-big-blow-to-employees-content-creators
A lot of good replies here this morning. As a parent of 2 college age “kids” we kind of grew up the opposite. Neither of them have any social media presence outside of Discord, and when they were younger I actually lied about their ages on PSN and Wii U, making them older, so that they did have access to “adult” games and playing online.
Social media is a problem though for a lot of people, I’d say similar to an addiction along the lines of gambling, or porn, or binge watching Netflix, or over eating. So something does probably need to be done, but do band ever work? As a former teenager myself, though it was so long ago I can’t barely remember any of it, the fastest way to make kids want to do something is tell them they can’t, it’s for grownups only.
This is all political grandstanding by people who don’t know how to deal with a problem, they just want to look like they are.
And 16 seems a little old to me, maybe 12? Guess it depends what they are trying to do, it’s not just 1 problem. Protecting overweight kids from bullying by their peers isn’t nearly the same as protecting kids from pedophiles. 2 very different things that won’t have the same solution. Sure banning kids would take care of both, online, but then what, the kids just leave their rooms and go back to being bullied and raped IRL?
The problem isn’t social media, it’s humans.😝
I try not to comment on or bash foreign politics but this should be an interesting study to watch over the years. I am genuinely interested in how this goes.
I would be livid if it was in my home country.
Well... i dunno what spurted this, but i do think social media creates attention deficits and other mental issues. Good on Australia to bring this on.
We "parents" didn't have to grow up with this as there was no internet until we were in our teens. But, it does seem to create a lot of issues on new children.
How well it will go, we will see.
I am thankful that I grew up in the 80s and 90s. If being perpetually online was available back then, I would have been.
Good, maybe I'll get some peace and quiet then.
Hahaha i love this.. my 5 and 7 yo will have full access to everything (not playstation tho as we are PC gaming only) as usual the boomer dead men walking in the government will do an absolute abysmal job at preventing anything.. as a system engineer for the last 30 years including working in cyber crimes for federal piggies i can say with complete knowledge.. they hire they biggest scrub corporate morons with the typical stupid thinking thay uni degrees make you smart and good at your job vs real world ability.. yet to meet a uni grad in IT with half a brain cell so fear not..
If they demand an ID i will simply give my girls a copy of my license.. tho i will likely be able to create a verification hijack with middleman approach.. basically if the kid or parent isn't luddite filth it will be easy.. waiting for them to go after roblox next which is %90 kids and %10 pedos trying to groom that we have fun trolling daily..
This entire thing is %100 a parental problem and the government vermin have no business in this.. parents need to control their brats it is that simple.. my girls both have custom built systems with top of the line specs because it is only money and easy to build.. when told to get up they do.. we play outside daily etc.. it is lazy parents who don't play with the kids that get the things that spend all day on their systems..
@Flaming_Kaiser guess because you can talk to strangers
@Ooccoo_Jr to be fair you could say that about any countries government and it would be more factual than opinion 🤣
@khyal Rather than being a news piece, this story is an opinion piece presented as facts. Some pretty biased language throughout. Very, very poor.
Wish I could give this article a thumbs down just for that.
@Tymelock Uh...? Might not be smart to gloat about breaking a law. Just saying. That said, I definitely don't agree with this law. Would this also ban the Playstation Store and the Nintendo eShop as well as access to your digital games?
I personally think recent/current technologies such as social media and AI (deep fakes etc) have completely regressed civil society. The ratio of considerate, informed and generally decent folks is at an all time low. We should do something to protect children but adults are equally compromised. Who knows what the answer is? A phone ban in schools would be a good start. (I work in an NYC school).
This looks like a recipe for disaster in the making
@Ooccoo_Jr then your on the wrong website mate.
@nessisonett That is the problem with politicians that they don't understand these things and have no idea.
In Amerika they have gun issues and who do they blame videogames that should not be played younger kids. Parents should watch their kids if you can't do it don't take kids.
Social media is a totally different beast. The pressure kids get from these platforms is disgusting and how they target addiction. The fines should be 10 times higher for a Google and TikTok, Instagram.
Im 100% sure they can add timers how long kids can be in social media also with consoles and PC you can give your kids certain restrictions.
They want to change something then remove gambling, addictive mechanics in games and microtransactions and make them put checks in things like Roblox to combat pedophiles.
You can't take away social media like it's a young child's toy it's misusing. This genie can't be put back in a bottle. A better solution is required Australia. Who's running things there, Jack Thompson?
Would the government be compensating under 16 PSN account holders who have paid a small fortune for a library of digital games, who could no longer access their PSN account under this potential legislation?
@Oz_Who_Dat_Dare
I put the blame squarely on parents as well and feel that the govt shouldnt be in anyones business.
I am a parent(I have a 24 year old and a 9 year old, both girls) The 24 year old was the first gen of common social media. My 9 year old isnt allowed on it, but i do allow her controlled communications with her friends as long as I personally know them and their parents.
Point im getting at here is ive dealt with 2 cycles now and by keeping myself involved have had no issues with social media related to my children. Its parenting, plain and simple. Putting your kids first and not relying on a govt to raise them. (Note I am not an aussie or brit though either, im an american. )
@WiiWareWave with fake details on all my accounts, knowledge of internet security and first hand knowledge the things the government hires in tech security and law enforcement i know with certainty that i am safe lel.. besides any breach is on tech company and states there is no penalty for parent or child.. so sfa would be done if they did find me..
@arronplanet the irony is not wasted on me 🤣
@Lofty1985 Give him a dumb phone he can still call you and they won't get distracted with a bigger plus the battery will last longer.
@Hundred_Hand_Slap But you can in the Netherlands the kids are happy they cant have mobile phones in the class. They are less distracted and feel less pressure social media isn't really a blessing with the like of Jake Paul and all that other garbage.
@Toot1st Just block off certain things for younger kids. I understand that it's great that kids can be connected but a little less connection and pressure won't be a bad thing. Im somewhat happy i didnt have all that pressure at my young age and just being able to be a dumb kid.
But PS5 PRO will bring improvements and we can chat at 120 fps.
@Northern_munkey Coming from the country of Bud Light, I'm unallowed to laugh at that joke.
I'm glad social media didn't exist in my formative teenage years. If it had, I probably wouldn't have made it this far.
@Matroska https://www.pmc.gov.au/office-women/womens-leadership/gender-balance-australian-government-boards
Not sure if that old "men" shtick will really hold up anymore. Especially in Australia, as it is pretty balanced, gender wise. We all need to look at the policies rather than make remarks about the gender of the people governing. It brings nothing of merit to the discussion and only introduces divisive rhetoric.
https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/measuring-what-matters/measuring-what-matters-themes-and-indicators/cohesive/representation-parliament#:~:text=In%202022%2C%20at%20the%20opening,up%20from%2028%25%20in%202002.
From what I've read about Roblox jesus
@Lofty1985 this is a terrible arguement here and now.
If a kid gets a phone then their friends want one. It doesn't matter how great a parent you are. Peer pressure is peer pressure. If you don't let your kid have a phone. They will be castigated by their friends. So almost every kid of secondary school age has a phone.
Due to the open nature of the internet. It's far too easy for people with bad intentions to gain access to kids. At best it encourages additional bullying outside school.
Social media can and does feature disgusting stuff. From beheadings to car crashes. Its also the jumping off point for radicalisation. So a sweeping ban is all but essential right now.
Parents have limited oversight in the online world as they can scrub their history.
@AsterZero As an American, never underestimate any political party to use any situation/crisis/platform/emergency/disaster/"victory" to gain more power over the people. Cause when the other party/group wins the elections they too will have that power as well, and you rarely see an opposing party overturn laws set in place previously.
No party is a champion of "good" they are all just championing their own good.
I'm genuinely surprised that the headline of this wasn't "Australia's Planned Social Media Ban Even Better On PS5 PRO!" considering this site's output lately.
Oh, the classic example of taking a real problem and using it as an excuse to impose draconian measures. This is so incredibly naive, unthoughtful and ill conceived, that I struggle to understand where these people have their head at.
This is a super complicated issue. And in such situations, government overreach is almost always the wrong direction.
Some intentions make sense and others are just so far it's a bit much. There are other things they could focus on but sigh I guess this has some fairness but also a lot of do we need this when other things may be going on and hiding? Or are they? I'm skeptical and not sure what to think really.
But ID/age restriction tactics to be put in place, further than parental controls will be 'interesting' but yeah.....
Fines being so small is also a 'who cares' and not a surprise they aren't really going to blink much and companies can maybe try and make the illusion of effort but will they care not really. Australia is so small of audience to any of them it's a bit less but nothing in comparison to other countries making up a larger amount of the userbase.
Businesses 'do or don't' do so much yet once not good enough in parents/leaders eyes it goes that step further.
If they created a country social media like a Miiverse type segmented and heavily moderated that'd be even more a question for sure (not giving ideas at all). But would they give up on it eventually?
There is only so much to prevent people from, inform about, restrict and so on. To avoid bullying sure (how much do people mature versus how much do bullying sessions to cover awareness of it actually solve?), to restrict access to exploring things sure, but that's on parents, companies can only do so much, users find ways around things.
I never cared for social apps when I got a phone, I used it for any entertainment, learnt how it worked alongside Windows 8 so to me it was for only the 'going for tests and end early in the day' type days otherwise media. But I mean when you have Windows Phone you know the limits of the app support but that didn't bother me I was happy just using things I actually cared about (aka like a PC using it to mess around, I do the same with any research/experimenting with tech) not socialising or mainstream apps everyone else used. It's why Wii U/Vita weren't an issue for me the Indies were good enough I wasn't fussed was libraries they have.
I mean the 'go outside' isn't a great solution but I mean people do need fresh air just not all their youth as if they are all sporty types when not everyone is. Unless they have a book club/chess club or something I guess? XD
Then again as if mainstream gaming versus niche games or gamers then casuals.
People playing singleplayer games doesn't effect things. XD Or split screen games either. But at the same time if it gets people playing games with their family members (or friends then used to online) then just friends and a PS+ subscription then....... That isn't effected of course it's just what comments on PSN? Mics? Nah that won't happen distances between people is for a reason unless they are able to bridge it.
We can't just pretend that a lot of technology started just disappears either.
Internet for research then books and controlled by book companies, the next editions and more is one thing but yeah it's social media, is it that necessary, for voicing some things yes, for brain rot garbage, trends and more unnecessary no.
I mean ever since the internet I had questioned the 'how much schools' block things with filters and how effective they actually are, how students put games and other things on computers all the time, this stuff always happened, pay attention to school program laptop rules and so on (obviously different nowadays and had iPad that was a surprise).
I mean as if the Dove ad I'd seen a few times wasn't a sign of this of 'ok girls don't take what you see of beauty ads too seriously and understand it's photoshop/editing things ok'. Like they didn't say exactly that but I thought it was a valid campaign of awareness which for a shampoo/other type of products company is a bit odd.
After seeing a TikTok parent controls or so type ad on Youtube or hearing about more controlled settings on other social media I'm surprised but doubt much will change.
I do think the reality/internet side of things can get muddled together for sure. But it's weird in 2015 or younger I never questioned much of that stuff, 2012+ was a time for sure with people having phones and social media but how much it's gone on now for the next gen is a whole other scale is how I hear it but don't know if it's a blown up thing or effects some but not as many as it sounds.
But parenting is one thing, especially those that have experienced it, pass on the necessary knowledge and reassurance and lessons, those in the gen it was created, awareness, learning from it.
I hate seeing social media mentioned in tv shows, but I mean banning it and it still being widely in tv shows isn't going to half be a bit hmm eye brow razing of getting into people's heads or people still finding ways around restrictions as people do besides the mentions of it in places and people go oh that reminds me.
I can watch old tv shows with messages no matter how subtle or direct and go huh that still has value today, that's dated, and so on but get the idea they were going for the themes and people understanding the internet, tv shows, games, etc. is another.
I making something for adults or more restrictive or cut off for teens is something instead of censoring adult stuff all the time but what about emails? Text? Other communication? Kids/teens will always find a way to communicate to people besides just in person or never with those they did again once they leave school (if, it varies per person or closeness or other factors).
I mean preparing people for professional speak/behaviour in business is something. I'm just not sure what to think other than what I've seen, can theorise and more.
@JuiceboxMeister Yeah okay. I wasn't saying "men" in a consciously gender focused way. I'm a man myself. I was just saying it as a default thing - if anything sexist against women as I accidentally assumed it would be mainly men. The main point was it was legislation by people out of touch with what they're legislating about.
Letting your kids (especially around pre-teen and below) play online games interacting with strangers is just outrageous to me. I for one think these social media restrictions are actually a very good idea, and I usually dont even vote labor.
One big concern is the slippery nature of the internet and how new platforms are popping up all the time. How can they possibly control for all that?
Doesn’t sound like it has much teeth and Australia has always seemed like a nanny state with stupid restrictions on games and such.
@Runex2121 so we've got a 17 and 12 yo, and I'd suggest you might have a different experience when your youngest gets to High School. It's completely different now from when our eldest started. Things are changing very quickly. Possibly a covid hold-over, but IMHO it's essentially unavoidable... and hate to say it... parent's have increasingly little to add to teenager's sense of identity these days; it's mostly coming from social-media-lead peer-pressure. We just work at the edges, and hope our core values are strong enough.
But, maybe you will be lucky. No one expects bad things to happen, until they they do. Edit - we used to think most positively about our parental influence (based on our eldest experience with tech/social-media). We now have a much more humbled view based on what's happened with our youngest (and seeing her cohort move into High School).
And no - I don't think governments are the best solution - but I do think the people profiting off social media influence on kids should take on a lot more responsibility too. And government's (and of course consumer power) are generally the only ones that can make that happen.
Well I get it.. needs to be properly defined but social media probably should be a bit more regulated. Maybe parents should be required to have oversight in some way? Although unsure how to balance that with privacy etc
I think this might be a good idea. Under-18s stuck in their rooms raging online isn't a good look. Gaming rage has always been a thing but it's different now because it's actual people. feels way more personal. Can't see any real problem with banning under 18s. Still play games just not online
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...