With Kingdom Come: Deliverance and its stellar sequel gathering a legion of fans, and the Plague Tale games offering epic dark fantasy on a double-A budget, the medieval genre has found fresh momentum.
1348 Ex Voto (from the Latin ex voto suscepto, meaning "from the vow made") rides that wave with a tale of revenge sweeping across the fields and castles of 14th century Tuscany.
Unfortunately, developer Sedleo's ambitious attempt to tell an intimate story within an epic setting falls short, held back by uneven presentation and truly awful combat.
The story couldn't be simpler. Aeta's life as a fledgling knight is thrown into turmoil when her town is raided by brigands. With her companion Bianca abducted, she sets out across the countryside in pursuit of her captors.
What follows is a linear trek through countryside, mountains, and castles as Aeta makes allies in her search for Bianca and cuts down roving packs of enemies with her knightly skills.
Combat is the only real activity in 1348, aside from walking, so the fighting needed to be solid. That isn't the case.
When Aeta faces an enemy, the camera zooms in to create a duelling perspective. Blocking and dodging act as your main defence, though the dodge leaves a lot to be desired.
Offensively, you rely on one- and two-handed combos. When timed well, they chip away at an enemy's guard and leave them vulnerable once their defence breaks.
Combat looks good initially and has the potential for cinematic spectacle. That potential is squandered by tedious repetition and an utterly broken targeting system.
Aeta will automatically focus on an enemy, but whether she zones in on the most appropriate attacker is a complete dice roll. Often you'll completely whiff a hit because aim swapped at the last second, resulting in the enemy you missed catching you in a nasty combo.
That's not the only issue with fighting. Defending after executing a combo can have completely inconsistent timing, gifting hits to the enemy. Then there are the brigands themselves, who sometimes materialise out of thin air mid-fight.
It's a shame that combat in 1348 is such a chore, because there isn't anything else to do during Aeta's quest. There are some gorgeous environments here, with lush fields and vast mountainsides, but all you'll be doing in them is walking through corridors, with occasional forks in the road to find upgrades.
Finally, the overall technical execution leaves a lot to be desired. This is an indie title, so certain dispensations can be made. However, a wildly inconsistent frame rate, constant texture pop-in, and a truly bizarre facial animation system test the patience more than most low budget releases.





Comments 71
That hairstyle is f... diabolical 🤣🤣
Was slightly looking forward to this but I won't be bothering now, this is going to be up there with Code Violet for worst game of the year.
Ex Voto? More like Concord 3!
https://flopathon.cc/game/1348-ex-voto
Flopathon knew it.
THE NUMBERS DON‘T LIE.
For context this got the same score as Code Violet, let that sink in....
I think 4/10 is still a tad too high.
Bummer. I'm a huge sucker for medieval settings, but this gets a hard pass from me.
What the fudge is up with that hair 🤣
It’s honestly sad how much people who supposedly enjoy video games continuously root for, and celebrate their failures.
Oh yeah, this is that bowlcut game.
I'd hardly call it ambitious - more like a smorgasbord of box ticking 😐
@Yor-sama
Not kidding, as a young gamer in the 80's this was my haircut. Turned out medieval girls were first.
Removed - inappropriate
I would be a little more forgiving and give it a 6. Once you get the rhythm of combat down it’s actually a decent system and the environments are absolutely drop dead gorgeous that you go through
@Yousef- it was a style in those times and she does it because she wants to be a knight but women weren’t allowed so she uses it to pass off as a man. Throughout the game the enemies constantly call her boy or man until she talks and it catches them off guard lol
4 is about 2 points higher than it deserves
Too bad this looked interesting at first. Ah well, at least I'll save some money and besides there are too many other games to play right now.
Bad games are bad games. But I have no idea why this bad indie game from an unknown dev, put out by an unknown publisher took so much heat pre and post-release. No idea whatsoever. What could it have possibly been. It's not a live service game. It's an original IP. Huh. Guess I'll never know.
@NonbinaryStarr the only reason it is even mentioned on this site is because it is a ps console exclusive (also on pc of course). outside of that, nobody even knew this existed.
@dark_knightmare2 that’s sweet and all but I dislike bowlcuts regardless of context 🤣
@ButterySmooth30FPS with the amount of concord-likes coming out, I think you’ll be overloaded.
This game is amazing, it think it peaked at less than 80 players on steam.
Jennifer English wont be collecting any rewards for this one -.-
I like everything about the fact that the game exists and that you all wrote a review on it. Thank you.
I ain’t playing that junk though. Lol
Removed - trolling/baiting
I'd suggest one of the reasons there was a backlash against this game, is that regular average normies like me who have lives and don't spend all our time on social media, logged on one day and suddenly found ourselves being subjected to the most appalling insults and abuse.
A bit like when you come out of the toilets in a nightclub and immediately get punched in the face and find yourself in the middle of a massive brawl, without having any clue as to who is fighting who, and why.
In this case the reason given was that we supposedly didn't like a game that we hadn't seen or heard of before, because we'd been at work all day or out for a meal with the missus when it kicked off.
Then when we looked it up to see what the heck was going on, we could clearly see that it wasn't a great looking game and was visually unappealing.
Naturally we, who represent the majority of gamers, opted to side with those who were criticising the title, rather than those who'd been throwing unprovoked spiteful insults at us the second we logged on.
I see that behaviour is still going on in this thread. I'd say those of you doing that should reflect on the fact that you aren't the good guys, and actually harmed the product. I'm generally open-minded about games and would have given it a fairer crack of the whip if it weren't for you. Trying to insult people into spending money has NEVER worked.
@NonbinaryStarr Because whoever was in charge of the Twitter account was instigating people to predicable results as have been shown time and time again this plays out. But instead of acknowledging that or that the gameplay ended up being bad outside of design or story choices anyways in the end, people will just go 'it's the chuds fault', even though they were told their sales weren't wanted or needed.
Too bad because the PS5 is lacking in true exclusives
Th Devs didn't help themselves making digs at other Devs and basically admitting they were pushing an agenda.
Maybe without that there would have been less backlash.
I thought in the trailers it looked quite interesting but then saw previews and reviews and realised it's not for me and it's not looking good.
Read and listened to reviewers trying to like it and having to admit defeat. If it ever comes to plus I may give it a go
If absurd catastrophes had a flag, this game would be hoisting it on the highest point of reality.
Lots of “disappointing” games recently on Push Square. This, Crimson Desert…
'Indy' it was funded by the government.. lol its propaganda
Removed - flaming/arguing
Removed - flaming/arguing
@NonbinaryStarr exactly
never heard of this game till today to bad it ended up a even worse version of hellblade and attracted the as*holes and incel herd.
thanks for the review! I think this is the first console review I've seen for it & really wanted to know how it fared on PS5. I'll probably get it eventually after some patches & a discount, it seems short so it's not asking for some crazy investment & I enjoy medieval stuff.
@Dogbreath It's amazing, right? The gaming world is a mess with the majority of gamers being blamed for not wanting the games developers are making. The history of business is littered with the corpses of businesses thought they knew better than their customers. 1348 could have avoided a lot of wasted time if they just asked the question - who is this for?
The entire industry seems to be chasing an audience that doesn't exist. No matter how many flops, they just keep doubling down.
@Blauwe_Chimay ohh really I bet in the 80s this haircut was kinda okay but on medieval times is straight diabolical
I believe a score of 4 is too generous and that it deserves a 2
@BamBamBaklava89 gamers want good games not this so we have right to criticize
This one is up there with code violet for worst game of the year they tried to put an hot character in code violet and failed miserably before ppl start comment "this game flop because of the right wing fanatics"it's false a bad game will always fail even if the character is hot
@Drnsnsr
Do you like the cut? It looks dumb. If it was a male main character with that cut it'd look equally stupid. People don't like to play as dumb looking characters unless there is a character editor and we can make ourselves look like complete freaks.
@dark_knightmare2 still don't understand if the game is on medieval era why putting that in the first place
Not even the so called "modern audience" saved the game from flopping the "right wing child's" didn't cause the flop the devs did plus like I said the modern audience didn't buy it either
I thought the game looked cool, certainly a nice visual quality to it, with locations and the time period. If it had a little more open exploration, and a more fine tuned combat system, it could have been pretty fun. Something like 'For Honor'... Don't really understand all the hate for the haircut, to be honest.
@Yor-sama I never said that was the reason was just stating the fact right wing man children have had it out for this game since day one
Period accurate hair with a reasonable reason for a woman adopting a mans haircut means that it doesn't detract at all for me personally. But I literally hadn't even heard of the game before today. Having literally been at a medieval exhibition, and a separate samurai exhibition in the same weekend I came home and was looking for medieval/samurai games to play. Settled on reattempting to get into ghost of tsushima, bounced off it again after another 12 bored hours. Might have tried this if I'd known. But guess I'll wait and see if any patches make it feel better to play
@NonbinaryStarr Probably because it sucks in every regard.
Killer haircut…I was rockin that in elementary school
Watched a play through of this garbage for giggles its absolutely terrible , doesnt even deserve a 4 , enemies waiting about for there turn to attack , 2 types of attack , terrible animation , atrocious characters , main character looks like she's gurning all the time , what the hell was Jennifer english thinking, its just a really bad game ,whos devs thought it would do well because of its medieval gayness.
@J2theEzzo she looks like Edmund blackadder
Removed - flaming/arguing
The premise of this entire game is ridiculous.
Removed - inappropriate
Who knew a medieval lesbian adventure game would attract such passionate comments, delighting in its low score and/or getting conspicuously defensive?
It's a shame the game's not great though - it's always a fascinating setting, and had a unique hook for it that could have been fascinating to properly explore.
Maybe I'll just check out the OST on this occasion though.
Haircut and story aside just looking at the gameplay. It looks like a cheap Senua knock off. One if my favorite souls streamer played it and he struggled with the combat. It just looked so sluggish. Like you have flashing weapons which tells you when you can parry but the window seems inconsistent. Idc if there's a medieval lesbian plot that's fine if done well. Actually there's alot of room there for a really good and emotional story. But it seems they fumbled that too.
Maybe the dev studio can fix some of the bigger issues with the performance and the combat in the coming weeks. Shouldn't we wait with the scored review until some of the problems are ironed out?
@lazarus11 wow I spent 26.99 whatever will I do lmao calm down dude. I thought it looked interesting and I had an okay time for the five or six hours it took to beat and moved on to Crimson Desert and Screamer
now this is a disappointing game but yet its described the same as crimson desert
I was curious about this. Looks like not worth my time.
I was hoping this would be a good game. I won’t be purchasing it now, at least not until it’s heavily discounted. I’ll never not wish demos were still a thing so we could try out games before buying, but I appreciate the review Push Square!
This is a prime example of a game, that should have been scrapped, before release.
@TrollOfWar as the saying goes....you cant polish a turd
I was looking forward to this one, I love medieval stuff. I don't even know if I'd try it on Plus now.
@Hyena_socks Let me fix your comment - Who knew a bad game would attract such negative comments.
Stop looking for bigotry where it doesn't exist.
@lazarus11
Actually, the Myth Busters proved that you can "polish a turd". 😄
That's one ugly joker
@TrollOfWar ok..as I was saying you can polish a turd , but its still a turd 😂
@Ambassador_Kong disappointed or negative comments on a bad game are one thing.
But there's also been a shouty contingent at this game's throat from first announcement, who take annoying pleasure in a game missing the mark they don't like. Which is a bit sad really.
But a game that looked promising missed the mark, it's a shame, let's all move on with our lives and go back to shouting at inanimate objects we injure ourselves on.
By all accounts this isn't a very good game, it's an indie game lacking polish. The Push Square review gives it 4/10, the low score is a clear recommendation to NOT buy it. However I don't understand why some people are criticising other players for not being interested in it; if you've bought it, paid money, played it and are enjoying it, then you have every right to express your enjoyment! However, if you haven't bought it and played it, you do not have hands-on experience so it is disingenuous to celebrate it.
@dark_knightmare2 I'm not aware of that I don't have twitter/X
@lazarus11 He was a fashionable dude for the time...
Obviously this game won't be BOWLing anyone over.
I'll let myself out.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...