Tribute Games has been churning out unremarkable indie games for quite a while now. Each illuminates a finer aspect from all of those 8 and 16-bit titles we grew to know and love but always does so in a negative way. Wizorb is unique but trite in its presentation. Mercenary Kings is what Metal Slug would've looked like after a bout with a Stairmaster. Curses 'N Chaos is a dumbed down Time Splitters. And Ninja Senki DX appears to have taken tips from Ben Stein's voice coach.
The game is the console debut of Tribute's freeware title Ninja Senki and, needless to say, it borrows a lot from that formula – a little too much in some regards. For instance, a handful of the bugs which plagued the original have made it into this one. We're talking about momentary lapses in controller input, screen-tearing, and a number of moments when it seemed like our Vita was going to crash.
Ninja Senki tells the tale of Hayate, an angry ninja – go figure – with an interest in anything that gets on his bad side. The demon that killed the love of his life, Princess Kinuhime, fits the bill. In other words, it's clear right from the jump that you're not here for story. The Mega Man-style platforming action is the title's only saving grace, and it only does this satisfactorily. However, it seems like Tribute took a gander at a Flash game and decided that its success would warrant a console release – there's a problem, though, in that the title feels like a Flash game. The simplistic mechanics appear to be better suited to the corner of your workplace monitor and not a full-fledged console like the Vita.
The game's most noticeable difficulty spike involves traversing a body of water by skipping – it's a harrowing scenario as the developer has made little to no effort to teach the subtle mechanics necessary to pull it off. Suffice to say, poorly taught mechanics make for poorly executed mechanics, which, ultimately, leads to a sub-par experience.
Furthermore, the reward systems native to the title involves little trinkets at the end of each level, similar to the ones that you'd find at the end of Green Hill Zone in Sonic 3. Other than pacifying a personal barometer for success, they do nothing to supplement the gameplay in any way. There's no need to care about how many enemies you've killed at the end of a level because points seem to serve no purpose outside the realm of personal achievement; they're like a pat on the back, and it seems difficult to care about something so trite without the presence of engaging leaderboards.
The level design suffers, too. There are no real surprises other than a bevy of secret areas – too obviously inspired by contemporary classics like Super Mario – and enemy types are so cut-and-paste that they'll make your skin boil from occlusion. That's right, the only real surprise here is how little heterogeneity there actually is on display. That being said, the "obstacles" amount to iterative overuse of previously encountered roadblocks, each contributing to added difficulty in progression, yes – but also paying dividends towards the ultimate degradation of your sanity.
Speaking of sanity, the bosses hardly resemble the bombastic monoliths that many of us grew up with. There are no Robotniks or Cut Men here, only a handful of goons which contribute poorly to the narrative in their own insignificant ways. Even worse, each bears attack algorithms that would make Robotnik's Hydrocity outing look like a coup de grâce. Let's not forget the one boss that appears four times – half of the game's total boss battles – with no slight or nod at a change in tactics, its only ability involving the release of a projectile while standing in place.
Conclusion
Ninja Senki DX reads like an old codger's take on modern literature and walks like a decrepit schoolgirl gallivanting her way to her first tax return and, fittingly so, her first heart attack. When life gives you lemons, make lemonade. Tribute Games made garbage.
Comments 57
Rekt
Garbage? A bit harsh coming from a reviewer. Even if they game is bad, I think that's crossing the line. As a youtube comment, it would have been fine.
This review is so snarky and edgy. It's crap. I know not to take this James guy seriously from now on. @get2sammyb good job on letting horrible reviews like this on the site.
@naruball If a game's truly terrible, I don't think there's much can be too "harsh". If I was reviewing a game that I thought was a 3/10 I'd call it what it is.
@Grawlog To be fair, if we really wanted hits on a review we'd start giving them headlines like "This Ninja Game is Absolute Trash".
Here comes @Shogunrok damage controlling. Nope, never seen this before.
Ninja Senki DX reads like an old codger's take on modern literature and walks like a decrepit schoolgirl gallivanting her way to her first tax return and, fittingly so, her first heart attack. When life gives you lemons, make lemonade. Tribute Games made garbage.
What does this even mean? Apart from the Tribute games made garbage bit.
"walks like a decrepit schoolgirl gallivanting her way to her first tax return"
Um... what? I'm all for creative writing in reviews but this doesn't even begin to make sense. And on top of that, how does a decrepit person gallivant? That would seem to be the domain of the spry and able, not the decrepit.
Hear the feedback. It's been noted.
The conclusion is basically saying that the game's a bit of a fraud, but I accept it's not our usual style and we won't be trying something like this again.
@DominicanGlory Yeah, let's settle down on the tone. As an editor of the site, it's kind of my duty to step in when I feel something needs said, whether it's my writing or someone else's. I'm only ever trying to find common ground and get to the heart of what's going on - I wouldn't personally call it "damage control".
@Grawlog That's fair enough. As Sammy said, we've noted the feedback - just trying to shape a discussion!
@TheMightyPunram just calling it like it is. @shogunrok has been known for being condescending to users in favor of staff, it's just the reality. In no way shape or form have I suggested that you guys don't work hard, but I will not give any of you free passes just because I like the site.
@DominicanGlory Well, if that's the way you see it there's not much I can do about it. Just watch the tone in future - criticism is fine, but calling out staff and getting snappy puts a sour spin on things. Let's just leave it at that.
I thought the review was good until the conclusion. The comparisons to robotnik in Hydrocity and the descriptive writing has gave me a clear picture of what to expect. That conclusion though went a bit weird, maybe the coffee had worn off at that point
I'm not buying it either way.
To be fair to the writer, for the most part the review itself is fair enough. But most people skip straight to the conclusion and miss all the decent points being made in it. But there's no denying that the conclusion is, at best, spectacularly misjudged, and if we're being frank it's just poor writing.
But I get it - sometimes you try different things to make work stand out. In this case it failed horribly but at least you tried. I hope the criticism on display here doesn't discourage the reviewer from taking this on and learning from it.
Agree that the review is a bit harsh, but more disappointed in how the game turned out. I was really looking forward to this, but will give it a miss. I've got enough games in my backlog, so no need to add a broken game to it.
@naruball Suppose you were introduced to the idea of "high-concept trash" at an early age. Now I encourage you to gain a sense of what that emotional context would involve. It would involve a delineating array of thoughts and opinions regarding the subject. It would involve the development of a shortened, somewhat hyphenated description of what garbage really is. The word "garbage" is used here not in spite but in a constructively critical way. The only apology I have is my failure to explain this high-concept idea in full. Thank you for the comment.
@DominicanGlory Sammy is merely doing his job as a content curator. He published the review out of love and appreciation for his audience. Sometimes it's the knife that breaks the levy.
@themcnoisy
"@naruball Suppose you were introduced to the concept of "high-concept trash" at an early age. Now I encourage you to gain a sense of what that emotional context would involve. It would involve a delineating array of thoughts and opinions regarding the subject. It would involve the development of a shortened, somewhat hyphenated description of what garbage really is. The word "garbage" is used here not in spite but in a constructively critical way. The only apology I have is my failure to explain this high-concept idea in full. Thank you for the comment."
Let me know if there are any more questions.
@hi_drnick That's the point: decrepit schoolgirls cannot gallivant. It is sarcasm.
@get2sammyb It's always appreciated when fledgling writers are used as a guinea pigs for a site's potential changes to content style.
"This is the big leagues. If you f--- up you lose the right to play."
@Grawlog It's always a shame when everything doesn't go our way. My apologies for spicing your life with a twinge of variety.
@Grawlog I agree. The editing process should have been more deliberate. If only I had the final say on published content.
@RawShark Criticism is art in and of itself. Being critical of criticism stirs the pot, it doesn't change the ingredients of the stew.
This review is worse than Ninja Senki DX!
@jameswallace ...but constructive criticism can help the stew taste better next time around, amirite? 😉
@Yannickbelzil Scathing, yes. I should've placed a higher emphasis on my use of pronouns and conjunctions.
@jameswallace I understood what you wrote but it made no sense. Rather than showcasing your repertoire of writing talents (which you clearly have) on delusional retorts you should have amended the conclusion. Its garbage in an unhyphenated way.
@Grawlog Your statement sounds good to the ear. This is because of the number of syllables each of these words has in its standard (American) English pronunciation. Seven words you spoke: six, one, four, one, one, four, three syllables respectively (in that order). In other words, you'd make a good song writer but there exists a gaping hole in the disparity between your statement's intent and ultimate execution.
The results of a coin toss (heads or tails) are mutually exclusive. Meaning that they cannot occur at the same time. Professionalism and variety, on the other hand, can occur at the same time, therefore, they are not mutually exclusive. What I am saying here is, your statement is true and that is that. You added no extra opinions to this argument. You would have been better off saying that the sky is blue on a clear and sunny day.
@RawShark The content of the stew is strictly the product of the artist's intellect. The curation of the stew, on the other hand, is by both audience and venue. I created a piece of content (much like Tribute Games). Love me or hate, the stew remains the same.
@themcnoisy First and foremost, did you not read my response to you? I explained my justifications in detail. What has defeated your comprehension?
In addition, let me direct you to another response I shared not too long ago:
"@Grawlog I agree. The editing process should have been more deliberate. If only I had the final say on published content."
I critiqued a title and used the word "garbage". I need not explain myself more.
People like yourself would've had a ball upon first sight of the Sistine Chapel. Your first remark would have likely been, "you should have amended the conclusion."
@jameswallace isn't that what Grawlog just said? That they're not mutually exclusive?
Ok, take some advice from an old timer here. Please let this one go. Go grab a beer. Hang out with friends. Play some games. Because hanging out on here attempting to defend your work isn't going to help you right now. It's just coming across as defensive. I think we can all agree the site should be all about the games. Reviews don't need big explanations afterwards clarifying the point you were trying to convey. Or critiques of the critiques of your critique.
It's the weekend. Have fun. Clear your head and come back next week ready to take on the world. I look forward to reading whatever comes up next.
@jameswallace
People like yourself would've had a ball upon first sight of the Sistine Chapel. Your first remark would have likely been, "you should have amended the conclusion."
You know nothing about me and I come here to be insulted by you. Who are you anyway? Comparing your writing to the Sistine Chapel. I doubt you even have a passport.
@RawShark First and foremost, if you genuinely cared how I was going to spend my weekend, why would you feel the need to include the first statement in your response?
Second, the purpose of criticism is to craft an opinion and defend it (justify it). The only reason this backlash exists in the first place is because I poorly edified my conclusion (which I soulfully admit). In other words, some take issue with my critique because they think I have defended my argument poorly. So, suffice it to say, your remark on the legitimacy of my defense makes little sense. By mere fact of you composing a critique of my critique means you too take issue with my justification. Conclusively, when you present an opinion you make a defense of that claim, the same goes for any form of comment. In other words, you can hardly expect me not to be defensive when the very substance of language itself is argument and exposition. This would be like telling a dog not to bark or, worse yet, criticizing the wit and zeal of that bark and reprimanding the dog for its response which would be (and here's the kicker) defensive.
Third, I think you included this last portion out of spite. I must inform you that I'll enjoy my weekend very much but not because you encouraged me to.
Present me a challenge and I will say thrice, "Bring on the mettle, both fire and ice."
@jameswallace well I tried.
It's a shame you can't trade a fraction of your wordiness and waffle for an ounce of self-awareness. It would make you a better writer.
@Grawlog Firstly, @Rawshark was never incorrect. I never even implied that he was. In fact, I said he would make a good songwriter.
Second, the true purpose of @Rawshark's statement (and its brilliance) was to use syllabic genius as a Trojan Horse for the topic of Professionalism. In other words, by stating a fact which I could not refute, he stirred the pot of argument even more by encouraging you, and many others for that matter, to question my professionalism.
Perhaps we should all take a cue from @Rawshark's book and make pawns out of one another.
@themcnoisy I never said anything about "you". Don't be so self-conscious. I was merely making a remark on "people like yourself".
Grammar's fickle in this here bush. If you don't pay the piper he'll bury your book.
@RawShark
A fraction of wordiness for an ounce of self-awareness?
Better writers have tried and paid the consequences.
I must admit I was not expecting this much backlash for this review. This is precisely why I postponed checking the comments for more than 24 hours.
Regardless I appreciate the criticism (as heady as some of it may be) and hope that I can grow as a writer in any way possible.
We are all in need of a bit of correction and guidance. Perhaps this is what we all have in common. What we all share.
Steer clear of my blog if you aren't prepared for a fight. I jest.
@jameswallace The only reason this backlash exists in the first place is because I poorly edified my conclusion (which I soulfully admit).
Finally jeez. I hope your next game gets a 9 or 10. I think on your own there's more comments in this section than any 3/10 game before it. That's something I suppose. Implying 'people like me' is pretty much saying me isn't it? Have you even read comment #17? I actually said the review was decent.
I take it back.
@themcnoisy My friend, its okay. I love and appreciate your comment. If I referred to you in a negative light I apologize.
As for my next review, it will likely never appear on this site as @get2sammyb had to make a tough call and let me go. Below, I have included my response to his well-crafted, though terribly justified expulsion:
BEGIN
Hey Sammy,
Let's be clear here: someone had to take the hit. It might as well have been the person whose name is on the piece, right?
I took a risk, you complied and I am facing the consequences.
If you're running an organization you have to make tough choices. Here's hoping this one wasn't too easy.
Best regards
"I prefer my story unfinished."
END
How's that for professionalism?
Oh dear, wasn't expecting this. Sorry to see you go James. I hope you have better luck with the next job.
@jameswallace
Why didn't you just edit the review?
Tough draw, sorry man.
@themcnoisy I was never given the option to edit the review. My reckoning is that @get2sammyb may have been using my piece as a method of gauging interest in content of this style.
Honestly it was a departure from what I'm used to (my blog should be example enough) but, as we can see, Sammy won't be biting any bullets anytime soon.
The people have spoken.
@LieutenantFatman Thanks for the kind words. I expect you should be seeing more of my writing around the web in the near future.
I really don't want to talk about matters regarding this review publicly. If you want to discuss things further, please email me. In the meantime, unless you want to chat about Ninja Senki DX in this thread, I recommend you all find a different venue to further your current conversations.
Have to say, I never thought I'd come across this when I clicked to read the review. It's certainly been... Something. Wonder what the game is like?
That's enough, if you wish to discuss, please use the contact form below. Thanks -Tasuki-
Please use the contact form below to discuss thanks -Tasuki-
So trying to steer things back on topic here, has anyone else played the game? Have to say I quite like the look of the trailer and I enjoyed both Wizord and Mercenary Kings. As much as I would like to take the more reasonable points of this review as gospel, I feel there's a clear need for a second opinion. Anyone?
This comment section has delivered more than I possibly ever could have imagined!
I have the game and it is easily worth the $5 asking price. It's very difficult, but it is fun. There's enough variety in the different stages and enemies to keep it interesting. It really is tough, though. I'm not 100% sure I'll be able to complete it, though I said that at stage 3, and now I'm at stage 12, so we'll see. Also, FYI, your score does matter. What ending you get depends on your score - there's 3 possible endings.
Also this review was amazing!
There are aspects of this game that are good. It had potential. But did you have to make the final boss, if it even is the final boss (because I'll never beat it) so god damned difficult and random? The level itself makes you want to pull your hair out, but you can get used to it. Then you have another ninja for a boss who is, as far as I can tell, without pattern, or perhaps, worse even, reacts to what you do AND submits to RNG. Did anyone beta test that boss? I would have been fine losing five bucks on this deal if it was even beatable.
For the record, the boss I'm referring to is the "scene 16" boss, and this pile of bile is quite the charmer. He throws ninja stars at you which travel at a rate of speed that are insanely difficult to react to (and I'm a speed runner) and jumps in patterns that make it nearly impossible not to get hit on every cycle. Usually two hits on every single cycle (He walks back and forth taking up more than a reasonable portion of the screen with either his body or his ninja stars). So you have to ninja star this b******, dodge really fast projectiles at random moments and trajectories depending on if he's jumping or not, AND keep from taking hits off his person. All the while he NEVER stops moving for one second. UGH.
@crescendo2020 Mind your language, please! - TheMightyPunram
@Crunchewy @crescendo2020 Cheers guys. The game sounds a bit too hardcore for me. But good to have a more educated and (lets call a spade a spade here) less balls-out insane opinion on it.
I loved reading this review and the comments xD Made my day!
Btw, I can tell the game is crap by the 60 seconds of footage I watched on youtube, so why were you all mad? God damn...
This review an comments should result in a Gold Trophy for each reader.
:.
Would of loved if the original Reviewer was given the standard three strikes because two more reviews & comments would be worth a Platinum Trophy.
.:.
Please don't remove this page. English Teachers and Historians will make it required reading one day. It should be required reading on most sites before allowing members to comment!
.:..:.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...