If I remember right this was specifically made for TV and was going to be a much larger mini series before it got cut down to a mini film in two parts @crimsontadpoles
Tim Curry is deviously hammy as Pennywise, though he does get in the horror too fairly well. The outfit certainly does make him look initially less intimdating... And I think that kinda helps when he does lay on the creep factor.
The 2017 version is quite enjoyable too. I wasn't too sure about the new Pennywise before seeing the film (Though I loved the 18th century looking Harlequin outfit) but he's quite good indeed!
There's not much more I can really say about life. I think you summed up what I hadn't already said perfectly @Ralizah ... I enjoyed the Prince Of Persia film more honestly. A bad adaptation of a game... but an enjoyable enough romp 😂
I should probably watch Halloween again. I've seen it twice and the first I think I was nine (sneakily staying up late) and the other was maybe six-seven years back and I don't think I enjoyed it either time.
I can however wholeheartedly agree about Terminator 2. I think the stop motion T-101 was fine in the original, especially with the smaller budget... but T2 is a visual treat even now.
Granted everyone probably knows the twist even if they're going in the film for the first time but the hallway scene was wonderfully shot and a great reveal of the allegiances of our two mysterious time travellers
I also love the bit where the T-1000 starts breaking from the liquid nitrogen. Very cool indeed
Well the worst sin really is that the film actually gives the crew legitimate outs a number of times @JohnnyShoulder
Like the Russian commander outside the space station whom should've just jumped away the moment Clavin got out and on her, Ryan Reynolds should've left the scientist in the quarantine chamber... Or better yet they just don't prod the alien with electricity in the first place!
Compared to something like Alien which if I recall doesn't give them anything really til the end on how to fight/stop the Xenomorph
So all the characters have to act incredibly stupid thanks to the poor writing and it only ends up making it worse
@Foxy-Goddess-Scotchy With that Terminator 2 twist, the trailers completely spoiled it. So even those watching when it first released in cinema knew about that.
I actually got surprised by the reverse of the twist. The first I'd heard of the Terminator movies was when one of my school teachers showed us that motorbike chase from Terminator 2. We were learning the whole speed = distance / time thing, so our teacher gave us sheets listing the distances travelled at different parts of the scene, and we had to use stopclocks to measure the time taken and then calculate the speeds. So when I finally got around to watching the movies, I was surprised to see that he was the bad guy in Terminator 1.
@Ralizah nice read. I've not seen Halloween, but do love Terminator 2. It's in amongst my favourite movies list. And your lower budget argument makes a lot of sense.
Blade Runner's only big mistake, I think, was assigning a specific date to the film, especially considering the film is a sort of surrealist nightmare about a future in which corporate power has overwhelmed, exploited, and/or destroyed human subjectivity (the fact that replicants have mass-produced memories designed to give them an identity and keep them in line is terrifying, as it strikes at the heart of what makes us persons as opposed to mere beasts), human rights, the environment, etc. While the details are obviously dated, its thematic concerns in a time of abusive immigrant detention camps (for us Americans, at least), corporate megapowers run amok, an impending environmental crisis that could destabilize ecosystems across the globe, etc. are arguably more relevant than ever.
Fast Times at Ridgemont High (Blu-Ray) -80's movie that follows the happenings of various high school students throughout a year.
The characters' exploits in love & sex, mall culture, the workforce & more are explored & it's pretty interesting seeing how youth culture was seen at the time. While it mostly strikes a more lighthearted situational comedy tone (the exchanges between stoner student Spicoli & rigid teacher Mr Hand never fail to raise a chuckle), it can delve into some heavier material (such as an abortion subplot, which was probably pretty heavy for the time), making it a pretty well rounded watch.
Currently Playing:
Switch - Blade Strangers
PS4 - Kingdom Hearts III, Tetris Effect (VR)
I watched the 2018 Halloween last night. As a big fan of the original, I've turned increasingly cold on it over the years with each subsequent instalment. This was my favourite since the first one and although it wasn't without its faults (some bits were plain stupid) it reminded me why I liked the first one so much. So it must have been all right.
Good job, Parappa. You can go on to the next stage now.
@RogerRoger The story behind the production of Gotti is way more interesting than the actual film. It's on YouTube, you should check it out!
I thought the film was pretty awful on every level, there are some unintentional hiliarous moments however. The problem I have with those types of movies is it's all been done before, and any new film just feels like you are watching another version of Goodfellas or Donnie Brasco.
Life is more fun when you help people succeed, instead of wishing them to fail.
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.
@LN78@RogerRoger well what do you expect it was basically a fluff piece for Scientology
"I pity you. You just don't get it at all...there's not a thing I don't cherish!"
"Now! This is it! Now is the time to choose! Die and be free of pain or live and fight your sorrow! Now is the time to shape your stories! Your fate is in your hands!
So... Terminator: Dark Fate. This isn't going to be sleeky written as an impression. It might resemble an angry rant, actually. I don't know. I'm tired.
Reviews have been saying it's the best film in the Terminator franchise since T2. And... that's probably technically true. As a noisy action-blockbuster, it's pretty competent fare. Lots of slick visuals and setpieces. In more ways than one, it reminds me of Star Wars: The Force Awakens: a pretty, but empty and creatively bankrupt affair that only manages to be notable as a sequel because it's not aggressively bad like previous sequels were.
In this case, it's basically T2, but with diversity-friendly casting and all the things that made T2 great systematically stripped away. It starts out with a twist: a T-800 that was sent out after the T-1000 in T2, but before Skynet ceased to exist, manages to assassinate John Connor in front of his mother one morning on a beach. A surprising opening, but maybe one that might have been an interesting lead in to a unique film. It's just business as usual after that, however: you have a young woman in Mexico City, nicknamed "Dani," who is being chased by a Terminator that looks like it's made out of liquid metal (although, in a bizarre and unexplained twist, this Terminator is able to effectively duplicate himself by separating his outer body, made of mimetic polyalloy like the T-1000, from his endoskeleton; but the mere presence of solid metal bits underneath makes him weirdly inferior to the T-1000, who could sustain any level of physical injury thanks to his composition). A cyborg supersoldier from the future named Grace (I couldn't help but see a young Ellen Degeneres) is sent back to save her. Meanwhile, the two run into Sarah Connor, who is being fed the coordinates to spots where Terminators will show up by a mysterious source. It turns out that this source is actually the T-800 who killed John Connor years ago. After having carried out his instructions, he loses his purpose in life and, after a few months, apparently finds it in the form of a hispanic woman and her young son, who are being abused by the woman's husband. Having magically grown a conscience, he tries to help Sarah work through the trauma of her son's death by sending her locations where other Terminators will show up. Grace actually has the coordinates for the T-800's log cabin in the woods tattoo'd on her body, which is how she finds him. This bit is never really explained. Anyway, Sarah and Co. have to work alongside the T-800 to help save Dani from the new Terminator.
Where did this new Terminator come from if Skynet never existed? Well, apparently all of the drama in the first two films is for naught. The epic struggle to save the world from Skynet's apocalypse only manages to buy the world a decade or two of time before the next computer system goes nuts and attempts to wipe out humans. Throughout the film, characters just assume Dani is going to birth the savior of humanity. This is an attempt to try and subvert the sexist assumptions of an audience that apparently couldn't accept the idea of a girl savior of humanity because, lo and behold, the films gloriously tries to pull the rug out from under us by revealing that it is Dani who was the savior of humanity all along! Of course, this comes at the expense of Sarah Connor's presence in the series; at one point, Connor says Dani "doesn't matter," that she's just "the womb for the savior." The clear implication being that Sarah's role as the mother of the resistance leader is some sort of slight against her. And here I always appreciated classic sci-fi cinema giving us badass mothers (or mother figures) like Sarah Connor or Ellen Ripley. As with everything else in the old films, the epic science-fiction re-contextualization of the immaculate conception is problematic in 2019.
I could go on recounting the film's plot, but I'm a bit tired of talking about it, and you can probably imagine how it ends. Because there was absolutely nothing surprising about this film. It's just a loud, busy, stupid action movie. Gone is the tension of the old films and the thrill of the chase (this new Terminator chases them, of course, but he's so ridiculously good at his job that it just starts becoming a parody of itself; at one point the characters escape from a facility onto a plane to get away from him, so the Terminator somehow acquires a plane, flies up to their plane, jumps onto it, there's this big action sequence, the plane everyone was on crashes near a hydro power plant, with the main cast escaping on a... jeep with airbags (a vehicle with a parachute, actually; lol I did say I was tired) on it, or something. Anyway, immediately after this ridiculous, nearly 20 minute sequence, the Terminator is immediately on top of them again... it's so relentless that it stops being menacing and becomes like something out of a cartoon skit). No moody cinematography or frightening dreams of the future. We see the future, but it has lost the dark, stylized feeling you got when seeing the future in the old films: these sequences just feel like something out of a standard futuristic war movie. There are no interesting character dynamics (it approaches something interesting when Sarah is asked to work alongside the T-800 who killed her son, but this is never really explored). The action isn't cinematic and sleek, like in T2, but more like something out of a Transformers film. The characters are almost universally forgettable, with the sole exception being Sarah Connor. No iconic lines of dialogue are introduced here, and the actors seem so exhausted that they barely seem able to manage to alluding to classic dialogue from the first two films (at one point, Sarah boredly intones: "I'll... be back;" at another point, the T-800 picks up a pair of sunglasses, the classic Terminator music starts playing, and then he just sort of sits them down and walks off. The film doesn't even have the decency to shamelessly pander to the audience. I don't understand what the point was of killing off John Connor and practically invalidating the first two films if they were just going to retell the same basic story, but in a worse fashion.
EDIT: The T-800 in T2 reveals that they're put into "read only mode" so that their algorithms can't grow or evolve and make them into less efficient killers. How, then, is the T-800 in this film apparently able to randomly grow a conscience without some external help, and without a strong socializing presence in his life from the beginning? You know what? Doesn't matter.
I was prepared for the worst, yet somehow still ended up feeling insulted by this production. I can't necessarily say it's a "bad film." It's worse. It's an utterly soulless one. It feels like it was designed by a committee of people in grey suits. It's what happens when late stage capitalism happens to an iconic sci-fi property.
@LN78 Yeah, this film has nothing to offer fans of the first two movies. Even TFA had some nice nostalgic bits for old fans. This is just an attempt to strip-mine an earlier classic for content in order to generate more money from the property.
It's too bad the TV show was canceled after two seasons, as I actually kind of liked it while it was on.
Currently Playing: Fields of Mistria (PC); Cookie Clicker (PC); Metaphor: ReFantazio (PC); Overboard! (PC)
@LN78 Cameron did basically nothing towards this film.
He's on record as saying that Terminator finished with T2, he's never been interested in revisiting the franchise but is happy for his friends to make money from it - hence him never having a bad word to say about the post T2 films on release.
PSN: KALofKRYPTON (so you can see how often I don't play anything!)
Twitter: @KALofKRYPTON (at your own risk, I don't care if you're offended)
"Fate: Protects fools, little children, and ships named Enterprise." - Cmdr William T. Riker
@LN78 He has very little financial stake other than garnering the (undoubtedly profitable) producer credit. He didn't even own the rights to Terminator (sold the rights for $1 to get production money) or T2.
Miller said in an interview that he'd spoken to Cameron a couple of times and noted that he'd moved to NZ to concentrate on Avatar. Cameron did sod all on Dark Fate, but the rights owners need to turn a profit - so a slightly woke soft reboot with Cameron's name on it was the way forward.
As I say, he's big on his friends (namely, Schwarzenegger) being able to make money out of the brand.
PSN: KALofKRYPTON (so you can see how often I don't play anything!)
Twitter: @KALofKRYPTON (at your own risk, I don't care if you're offended)
"Fate: Protects fools, little children, and ships named Enterprise." - Cmdr William T. Riker
I watched Doctor Sleep at the cinema last night, and I really enjoyed it. A great cast, particularly Rebecca Ferguson as the main antagonist, Rose The Hat. Ewan McGregor is great too as Danny (protagonist), although I did want a tad bit more depth to the emotional moments of his arc.
The film is 2 1/2 hours long, but the story didn’t drag at all, has a great score and cinematography, and some fantastic set pieces.
I didn’t find it particularly scary, but parts are most certainly thrilling and tense, with a couple of gore bits that made me wince.
I love horror as a genre, and I like Kubrick’s The Shining, but don’t hold it as an elevated masterpiece as some do. I’ve never read any of Stephen King’s books, but I am aware of his reported dislike for the movie adaptation of The Shining, and am also aware that he’s been praising Mike Flanagan’s Doctor Sleep adaptation.
Now, I am a huge fan of Mike Flanagan, and I think Doctor Sleep works really well as a sequel, and is another great addition to Flanagan’s impressive resumé.
It’d be great to hear the thoughts of any horror fans that have read both the books and seen these films, so please let me know 👍
It isn’t a dream
You only heard yourself
The means of your life
Create and melt
@Ralizah Thanks for the Terminator Dark Fate impressions. I didn’t (and certainly don’t now) have any plans to see the movie, but I read them mostly for their entertainment value since I enjoy reading your posts.
It sounds like the Terminator IP is dying a slow and painful death. It’s a metaphorical irony —like it’s machine characters, the franchise just won’t stay dead and every few years it keeps rising up from the ashes after fans and critics shoot down each new bungled entry. Maybe it will stay down this time.
Found a bit more - the rights reverted back to Cameron after 35 years - it's still in the hands of Skydance by way of a license agreement.
So yes, Cameron does have a very vested interest in DF making a lot of money.
"I was kind of reluctant to come back into that world, but when I had the opportunity to recover the rights through the copyright law, I started thinking about it," Cameron admitted. "It's like, 'Well is there still something to say?' And when I met with David Ellison at Skydance, he said, 'Look, what I want to do is take it back to the basics. In a sense you can do the sequel to Terminator 2.' And I thought, 'Well that simplifies things.' The movie came from him; that was not my vision walking in the door."
PSN: KALofKRYPTON (so you can see how often I don't play anything!)
Twitter: @KALofKRYPTON (at your own risk, I don't care if you're offended)
"Fate: Protects fools, little children, and ships named Enterprise." - Cmdr William T. Riker
@LN78 Yeah. He was married to the producer he sold the rights to initially and divorced her between T1 and T2.
Between Annapurna, Skydance and now Cameron - there will never be a shortage of people trying to squeeze cash from the brand. DF has probably done badly enough not to warrant the planned sequels as they'd hoped, but there'll be something.
PSN: KALofKRYPTON (so you can see how often I don't play anything!)
Twitter: @KALofKRYPTON (at your own risk, I don't care if you're offended)
"Fate: Protects fools, little children, and ships named Enterprise." - Cmdr William T. Riker
I'll never quite understand how creators whose names are so closely associated with classic, beloved films can stand to agree to associating those names with cheap knock-offs within the same franchise.
I'd forgotten the horrible way Alien 3 basically undid the entirety of the character/plot development in Aliens to justify another sequel. Unlike this, though, I still thought Alien 3 was, overall, a pretty decent film. Certainly the last one. Resurrection was awful. Prometheus was a disappointment. As was Covenant (aside from the hilariously homoerotic interactions between the two androids; put this flute in your mouth while 'I do the fingering' wink wink). Actually, that whole movie would have been improved if it had just been about the two Michael Fassbender androids making out the whole time.
@Th3solution It's the horror story of capitalism. Nothing is sacred in the light of profit. I'm telling you, once science figures out how to resurrect the dead, there are going to be chain-gangs of corpses working the local Walmart and McDonalds, as if the companies were run by powerful Haitian sorcerers.
Forums
Topic: The Movie Thread
Posts 2,461 to 2,480 of 8,695
Please login or sign up to reply to this topic