The ongoing saga between Disco Elysium lead creatives and studio ZA/UM has taken another turn for the dramatic, with game director Robert Kurvitz and art director Aleksander Rostov straight up accusing their former company of fraud. ZA/UM, not to be outdone, has denied these allegations and made some of their own, alleging that the former employees shirked their responsibilities, created a toxic work environment, engaged in verbal abuse and gender discrimination, and attempted to sell the company's intellectual property illegally.
If this is all news to you, let's try to catch you up without getting lost in the weeds. Throughout October, a war of words has slowly been brewing after Martin Luiga, an editor who worked on Disco Elysium, revealed that some of the key creative minds responsible for the game had departed the studio "involuntarily". Luiga later claimed that Kurvitz, Rostov, and writer Helen Hindpere were actually fired under false premises. Finally, we learned that Kurvitz had filed a lawsuit against ZA/UM with the Estonian court.
The latest on the situation is as follows. Kurvitz and Rostov have published an open letter on Medium to fans of Disco Elysium, concerning the situation at ZA/UM, in which it is alleged that Estonian businessmen Ilmar Kompus and Tõnis Haavel (who became the majority shareholders in ZA/UM after the release of Disco Elysium) used fraudulent means to take control of the company. Kompus and Havel were formerly minority shareholders, and their own company, Tütreke OÜ, acquired a controlling stake after purchasing shares from Margus Linnamäe, the entrepreneur who put up much of the capital for the project in the first place.
Kurvitz details the state of affairs, noting that "we have now learned that Tütreke OÜ must have obtained control over Zaum Studio OÜ by fraud. We believe the money used by Tütreke OÜ to buy the majority stake was taken illegally from Zaum Studio OÜ itself, money that belonged to the studio and all shareholders but was used for the benefit of one. Money that should have gone towards making the sequel."
There's more to the matter, including a lot of nuances, but we will move on in the interest of brevity. In response, ZA/UM has issued its own statement to GamesIndustry.biz, denying the accusation of fraud, and addressing the dismissals, stating that "we are confident that ZA/UM will prevail in court once all the facts are heard, we believe it is necessary to address baseless claims and falsehoods if only to rightly defend ZA/UM and protect our employ."
The studio provided its reasoning for the dismissals, alleging that there was "limited to no engagement in their responsibilities and work – including not working at all for almost two years while still being paid by the studio," and that they had contributed to "creating a toxic work environment that is antithetical to the ZA/UM culture and team productivity." Finally, the company cites "misconduct in interacting with other colleagues that includes verbal abuse and gender discrimination," and "attempts to illegally sell to other gaming companies ZA/UM’s intellectual property with the aim of undermining the rest of the team."
It's a lot to take in, and it seems like the situation is only going to become more complex once the now-inevitable court case moves forward. We will monitor the situation and update you on any major developments. What do you think of Kurvitz and Rostov's claims and of ZA/UM's allegations? Let us know in the comments section below.
[source medium.com, via gamesindustry.biz]
Comments 6
If you fire someone and pay them whatever amount of severance is legally required can you really get in trouble?
@Hindenburg Depends on the Country's laws. There is such a thing as 'unfair' dismissal and numerous other laws to protect employees. You can't be 'fired' for refusing to work unpaid overtime or excessively long hours for example - so if they fired you for that, you have a legitimate case to take the company to court.
You can't fire someone for the colour of their skin, their gender etc regardless of whether you pay them whatever Severance pay they are 'legally' entitled to either...
Being fired can have a detrimental impact on that person and their ability to find employment - especially in 'skilled', highly competitive environments. Companies maybe reluctant to hire someone who has just been fired - especially if they have a lot of alternative options. So it can be important to prove that you are the 'innocent' party and was 'unfairly' dismissed by a 'poor/badly run' company.
I don't know the actual details here so I can't comment on the situation, the laws of the Country etc so I don't know if they can get in trouble but it seems as though it may go to court to be resolved.
This sounds like an absolute mess.
Nevertheless, I usually try to not get too concerned about background drama in my media consumption (you know, “separate the artist from the art”) because I know if you look deep enough then almost every company and every person has behavior you would disapprove of. Often one person or one company that gets blasted for something ends up being the unfortunate one that was actually caught, and meanwhile loads of others are engaging in similar or even worse behavior and we just don’t know about it.
I realize that two wrongs don’t make a right, though. So it doesn’t excuse illegal or unethical behavior. It’s just that as a consumer I have a hard time on where to draw the line when choosing whether to give money to a potentially corrupt entity.
The developers at ZA/UM had a questionable reputation to begin with but I chose not to worry about it and I bought Disco Elysium anyways (haven’t played it yet). Not sure if I unknowingly supported a crooked operation, but it’s probably not the first (or the last) time. Case in point — all that money we gave to Activision over the years. 😅
I wish you wouldn't have because Kurvitz's statement reads as total nonsense. How in the world does a minority shareholder get a company to buy and then hand them over free shares?
Edit: they don't go into any more detail on the medium article. So they're just making an outlandish nonsensical "I don't like what you did so you must've cheated!" statement without backing it up on any way. Not a great look for them...
Edit2: and it looks like most of the claims from the company have been independently verified by Gameindustry.biz. Yeah, with what's out there currently, doesn't look good for Kurvitz and the others claims.
My level of english is too low to understand this article more than half, so I just say: Yes, get well soon.
"[...] including not working at all for almost two years while still being paid by the studio".
Are these the guys that had a Stallin picture hanged on the studio's wall?
If it was, well... the writing was literally on the wall.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...