
Microsoft’s unprecedented $69 billion buyout of Activision Blizzard has brought out the worst in everyone, as the trillion dollar Team in Green has pleaded poverty to the press while PlayStation has embarrassingly undermined its entire catalogue in front of regulators. However, it now looks like the deal will be approved, and we can begin to move forward from this sorry chapter in the industry’s history.
In an email to staff, CEO Bobby Kotick – who’ll almost certainly be booted out of the publisher with a golden parachute the moment the deal closes – has indicated he’s been disappointed by Sony’s behaviour, but says it won’t affect the long-term relationship between the two firms at all.
Of course, it remains to be seen whether there’ll even be a relationship to maintain moving forwards: Microsoft is saying that it’ll commit to releasing Call of Duty on PlayStation for a further ten years, but there’s been no mention of series like Crash Bandicoot, Tony Hawk’s Pro Skater, or Spyro the Dragon – all with rich, storied histories on PlayStation.
“You may have seen statements from Sony, including an argument that if this deal goes through, Microsoft could release deliberately ‘buggy’ versions of our games on PlayStation,” he said. “We all know our passionate players would be the first to hold Microsoft accountable for keeping its promises of content and quality parity. And, all of us who work so hard to deliver the best games in our industry care too deeply about our players to ever launch sub-par versions of our games.”
Lawyers from PlayStation’s legal team had argued that Microsoft couldn’t promise parity between all versions of Call of Duty, because there’s always the possibility bugs could emerge – even in later parts of a release. It said that even if these problems were detected quickly and immediately remedied, this could cause a loss of trust in Sony’s systems. Of course, all this could also feasibly occur under Activision’s watch should it remain an independent organisation, so the point doesn’t really stand up to scrutiny.
Nevertheless, Kotick continued that while relations between Sony and Activision have been strained, it won’t cause any long-standing issues between the two giants: “PlayStation players know we will continue to deliver the best games possible on Sony platforms as we have since the launch of PlayStation.”
[source eurogamer.net]
Comments 116
Disappointed he almost didn't get his $100 million pay off more like
Bobby Kotick is a disgusting specimen of human flesh who oversaw and engaged in egregious abuse towards employees at Activision. He is not allowed to be disappointed in anyone's behaviour.
Yeah I'm disappointed in Sony. How dare Sony block ms from removing the option to play certain games on playstation. Sony is just so evil!!!
My compassion is limited.
Does that vile disgusting piece of filth think anyone cares what he has to say?
"Humanity disappointed by Activision boss"
@Cutmastavictory that’s the entire industry. It also is included in other areas that Sony participates. And it’s gone back to beta vs vhs. HDdvd va Blu-ray. It currently exists with streaming services. And the same with consoles. Don’t worry you get to enjoy final fantasy and was able to have street fighter. Plus sony is the best so surely they could make their own fps.
Cool, so we will still get every new release from ABK? He didn't say CoD only.
I still don't think Sony is going to sign anything. I think they will call Microsoft's bluff. MS says they have zero intentions to remove COD from Playstation? Prove it. That shouldn't need a contract. Let's see if they were blowing smoke.
So tired of this Activision thing. MS should just buy em already at this point and go ahead and mess up COD and whatever other games they have cuz that's what MS does anyways. Then they can go and blame PS somehow cuz you know, excuses...
@Neonix well if everyone is so tired of activision then why has Sony done everything they can to try to stop this and why does anyone here care.
"Best games... possible"
"Oh, it's not actually possible now, sorry. Microsoft said we're going to focus on a gamepass, digital only and cloud release and there's no gamepass or Xbox marketplace on PS hardware, but they say if you allow gamepass on PS Hardware then it's available"
Yeah, that’s rich - Kotick being disappointed in anyone’s behavior.
@jmac1686 I would expect this if there wasn’t so much money on the line. MS says they want to release the next COD on PS? Tell them to kick rocks and eat the $1B loss.
@jmac1686 While I appreciate your point, I don't think it'd be wise to put potentially billions of dollars on the line to call a bluff.
I think in the end Sony will get a decent contract out of Microsoft and the world will keep turning.
@sixrings Because COD is the beat selling console FPS that makes Sony $1 billion per year. COD as an exclusive would have the potential to make Xbox a monopoly. That's why.
@sixrings your reply and reality have nothing in common. What are you talking about? You're just saying nonsense to support ms, that's fine, just as long as you are aware. Have a great day.
Approval of the ABK acquisition would be a disaster. Microsoft already bought a publisher and will keep doing it until they bought their way to dominance or they are stopped. This is the only way Microsoft operates.
@Ambassador_Kong I’m sure Xbox is not thrilled about losing out on steetfighter or final fantasy money either. But this is what consoles, streaming services, are about. Content. Sometimes you get some… sometimes you don’t. But normally companies don’t have fits over it nor are normally customers so loyal to their products. I guess apple is the same way. But they too have their own exclusives. I guess exclusives are ok when they are on a product you like.
@Cutmastavictory I’m not supporting Microsoft. I’m supporting a free market. That’s the world I’m apart of. Your take and reality (capitalist society) have nothing in common.
@Neonix Microsoft has repeatedly bought things and then they tanked. Who uses Skype anymore. They killed Nokia with their windows phone deal. Zune died on launch. If they buy activision, a company which most thinks sucks, and ruin them as well then the only loser is Microsoft. Shouldn’t Sony fans be happy to watch Microsoft lose 69 billion dollars.
@jmac1686 You guys really underestimate how important Cod money is for sony
I don't believe Activision makes anything I'm interested in but the action Sony has taken against the deal will surely make MS reconsider bringing other titles to PS5 that they don't have too. Case in point, the one game MS has that I want is the new Indiana Jones. I highly doubt it will come to PS5 now even if they had started making a PS5 version.
@get2sammyb Yeah exactly this. The world goes on.
Personally I think this has all been an exercise from Sony in squeezing as much as they could get before this deal goes through.
They were never going to be able to stop it.
Also, if they hadn't acted the way they did, would MS have gone around to all of those other platforms booking 10 year deals?
Maybe they would. Maybe they wouldn't.
More like disappointed that Sony tried to block him from getting a massive payday lol
@Uncharted2007 unless it was in a licensing agreement, I doubt it was ever coming to PlayStation after Microsoft acquired Bethesda.
@sixrings lol. A free market wouldn't need to lobby the government for support. A free market would allow for good and services to a have price dictated by the consumer and not under a socialist umbrella of a system like streaming. This will be our last interaction of the day.
man …..
where are the games …….?
somewhere…..
or not
@sixrings "I’m sure Xbox is not thrilled about losing out on steetfighter or final fantasy money either."
Compared to COD streetfighter and final fantasy make peanuts. The difference is so massive, there is a reason Sony didn't object to the purchase of Bethesda, which was still huge.
@Cutmastavictory the people will speak with their wallets. That’s how it always is. A few people complain. Most don’t care and will go where the content is. I go to the movie theatre that plays the movie I want to see. sometimes I go to the other theatre because they have something I want. It isn’t that serious.
The problem in this case is that Sony is the dominant player so in theory that’s a whole bunch of people switching over. But guess what in this case they don’t have to. They have ten years to live in cod bliss no different than they still play Minecraft.
@naruball still genuinely confused how I have been gaming since the original nes and master system days. Exclusives has always played a part. The difference here is instead of back room deals this is just a clear buy out. The thing everyone here is forgetting to mention is that Sony had a 10 year contract in front of them but they don’t want to sign it. 10 years is a long time. The whole landscape could be completely different and cod could be dead by then.
@sixrings Let's not compare signing six month Final Fantasy console exclusivity with $69,000,000,000 publisher buyouts.
I know people love to "Sony too" and of course they're all greedy corporations at the end of the day, but these things are not comparable and it's a poor argument.
@get2sammyb six months???? Wow final fantasy 7 remake must have come out more recent than I thought.
@sixrings your analogies are terrible and lack logic. The minecraft deal, it was agreed upon to not remove it from other platforms. Y'all really get on here and say anything.
@sixrings It's still not even remotely comparable even if it's a lifetime exclusive and you know it. Good work defending trillion dollar corporations, though!
@Cutmastavictory go ahead. Go buy capcom. Go buy sega. Go buy square Enix. This is what it is. It’s content and services bid for them. It’s everywhere.
@get2sammyb no worries man. I have no problem defending any company from buying another. Didn’t even flinch when ford bought jaguar. Or Volkswagen bought lambo. It’s part of life.
Either everyone here hasn’t figured it out that this is what life is about or you’re just upset your company doesn’t have the money.
@sixrings
Minidisc - failed format
Betamax - failed format
Memory Stick pro duo - overpriced fail
UMD Disks - failed format
Aibo Robot Dog - fail
Super Audio CD (SACD) - failed format
Just saying...
@sixrings I don't want them to be bought. I enjoy gaming way too much to want that type of future. Console wars was just for fun to bs around with as gamers, not remotely serious. But you champion this behavior like consolidation has ever been good for the consumer. Wow. Great job shilling for a company you don't even have any stock in... literally.
@Smiffy01 true. Sony has its own failures. Like any major company. I remember Sony from the 90s. “It’s a Sony” my phone was a Sony. We once had a Sony computer. A Sony tv. A Sony stereo. A Walkman. A disc man. Since the Trinitron died and they had to buy their flat screen panels from sharp it feels like Sony is walking a slow journey to death. Perhaps streaming will eventually kill them the same way apple killed their Walkman’s, Samsung killed their TVs and Alexa, google, Spotify killed the home stereo.
@Cutmastavictory I don’t think we should try to count each others bank accounts and or stocks on here. Whether I have or not my answer is the same. Companies are bought out all the time. We shall see what happens next. Btw I game almost exclusively on my switch and am very happy about our own 10 year call of duty deal. So thank you to Sony for that. Helping get the games into more people’s hands. Very considerate of you.
Perhaps though if you don’t own stock. And you think this is a 10000% victory from Microsoft. Then maybe you should buy some stalk instead of spending your time fighting a losing battle on here. It’s over. Accept it. But maybe you can profit from it.
@sixrings Yup was just pointing out that every company has is successes and failures (i loved the xb360 era fir example). Markets can be hard to predict, some you win, some you lose.
If MS ultimately wins, which seems likely, Kotick needs to go. Like yesterday! He’s a corrupt, enabling slimeball…and I don’t want to say worse so this doesn’t get removed.
Bobby Kotick should be quiet he is one of the worst human beings alive. The amount of horrible stuff he pulled is insane its even more baffling Kotick is still head of Activision Blizzard that says a lot about the company.
@sixrings I would love to see the failures of MS summed up the only reason they are still around is the massive amounts of money they made with and buying up everything worth a damn.
The American way buy up the competition and the politicians.
I am just happy to see goldeneye reloaded rereleased with Xbox one x enhancements and series x hdr.
Anyone that has paid attention to MS history of acquisitions, dating back to Mojang, not just recent, should know that outside CoD, and maintaining existing released games, no other ABK game will ever come to Playstation.
Hell, this time around we have not even gotten a "game by game basis" line, its been complete silence about anything other than CoD. Once this deal closes, Phill will go to ABK and tell everyone that is not doing CoD:
@get2sammyb I think there is a BIG difference between buying IP's, Publishing Rights and then owning the Studios so they are NOW first Party and those IP's now 'belong' to that company etc compared to going to some third Party Publisher with a 'third Party IP' and paying them not to release games/content on 'other' platforms.
I'd have a LOT less issue with Sony if they bought Square Enix so that they owned Final Fantasy, owned the Studio, the Publishing Rights etc and then decided its 'better' utilised as an 'Exclusive' to bring players into Playstation. If they OWN the IP, that's very different...
ALL publishers (regardless of whether they have their OWN platform or Not) have bought Studios/IP's etc to improve their OWN content line-up. SE Sold Tomb Raider so can no longer make or offer new Tomb Raider games - now you have to rely on Amazon to make Tomb Raider and 'hope' they consider your 'platform' to Publish too - maybe they'll keep Tomb Raider 'Exclusive' to get you into their gaming Ecosystem.
Point is, I do think there is big difference between OWNING something and paying someone else to 'block' them from releasing content on specific Platforms. How annoyed would you be if MS approached EA and paid them not to make Fifa or Battlefield for Playstation? If they 'owned' EA, then its their 'right' to release where they choose.
No-one here would expect Sony to keep SE 'multi-platform' IP's on Xbox if they acquired them. No-one expects MS to 'negotiate' a sequel to Sunset Overdrive exclusively on Xbox anymore so why expect MS to make their IP's multi-platform when its clear they need those IP's to compete with Sony's award winning IP's - Spider-Man, Wolverine, God of War, Horizon, Uncharted, Last of Us etc etc.
You wouldn't 'expect' Sony to keep funding a 'newly' acquired Studio, keep paying them to develop, port, optimise, manufacture & distribute (physical), update and continuously support Xbox hardware and give Xbox '30%' of all digital sales and 'lose' the impact an Exclusive has on Playstation hardware sales and bringing players into Playstation to spend more 'money' in - so why 'expect' MS to?
Unless Playstation has a big active online community of gamers that they can keep selling content too so that they can keep playing ONLINE together with their friends/family regardless of Platform, I don't expect MS to release games on Playstation as they are better served to pull players into their ecosystem. Games like ES6 are 'stand-alone' games and you even create a 'new' character at the start so I don't expect them to come either because it makes more sense to use these to 'compete' with Sony's Single Player IP's...
I actually think its 'better' to go out and BUY the Company, own the IP and Studio, than to pay money to a third party to ensure they won't release their own IPs on whatever platforms they 'choose'...
@get2sammyb
That offer was not for Sony, I mean, it was, but it was meant to appease regulators regardless if Sony accepted it or not, they plan to keep up with that. They said many times they would, and the contracts are just to make it legally enforceable.
If MS dares backpedal on that just because Sony didn't sign, they will have a hard time getting any acquisitions through regulators for a decade or more, regardless how small the acquisition might be. They wont want to be on such a position, MS wont be taking CoD away, I genuinely think Sony can keep their pride and not sign if they don't want to, they will still have CoD.
Lol Trash Bobby doesn't get a say. Wasn't he supposed to resign after the merger anyways? Making empty promises.
Trash journalist with war post aim to Sony
Just leave this PushSquare and join XboxEra post, it's the place for you
@Tharsman The ONLY way I think CoD will leave Playstation is if Sony themselves block it or make it very difficult for MS to support Playstation. They could recall all their PS5 'dev-kits' for example and that would make it difficult for MS to release CoD.
I can understand Sony not really wanting to deal with Microsoft and 'keep' CoD on their Platform - after all, it would mean that they'd have to supply the latest dev kits for PS5 Pro or PS6 before they are officially released to optimise games for - which may give MS valuable insight into Sony's next hardware and/or plan a strategy around that.
I can also understand Sony being a 'bit' upset about a Playstation Mascot now a Microsoft owned IP - but after more than 20yrs, get over it!! Sony own 'Bungie' - the Studio and Talent behind Halo - such is 'Business'. Who owns Ocean or Acclaim or Psygnosis and their IP's - who owns Codemasters today and Dizzy? Rare and their IP's have changed ownership over the years too and Sony didn't 'buy' Crash IP when they bought Naughty Dog so can't complain about where it ends up...
Even the threat of COD being removed from PlayStation likely won't bring Killzone, Resistance, and SOCOM back from the grave, which is disappointing to me. Bluepoint could absolutely nail any of these games remade on modern consoles...
@NomNom
I would absolutely love it if Sony started work on porting/remastering old PS3 era first party classics.
But please, start with White Knight Chronicles! Oh and a remake of Ico in the style of Shadow of the Colossus Remake... [I know that's PS2 era but still]
@NomNom Last killzone was horrible and resistance is done they could write more story and I don't know why Sony got rid of socom
@get2sammyb I wonder just how motivated MS will be to give Sony any contact at this point. The contract offers were for the regulators. That's mostly done. I think Sony returns to the table a lot weaker than it was when it so publicity turned down the 10 year offer. If I was negotiating for MS I would now be in no hurry at all. There is a contract in place for a few years. I don't see what is on the table for MS to offer more. MS will know exactly how much Sony needs COD, they have the books now. I think, long term Sony's stand will have a cost to PS players.
@TooBarFoo But the regulators are operating under the assumption that Call of Duty is too big to be removed from PlayStation.
Also, Microsoft has made a bug hullabaloo publicly about how they're not taking anything away. They could renege on that, but they won't.
@C25CLOUD
The team that handled SOCOM closed down, at the same time COD was on the rise, so Sony didn't bother to make a new one.
Killzone Shadow Fall was meant to be a showcase of the power a PS4 console could output. Even to this day, it's one of the most visually impressive games we have ever seen on the PlayStation 4, unfortunately, Gorilla dropped the ball on the story. Which was unfortunate.
For Resistance, I wouldn't mind a full remake of the series bundled for modern consoles.
So for years sony fans have claimed that Xbox just has shooters and racers. Their claim to fame is god of war, naughty dog and Spider-Man. Now all of a sudden their best use of vr is a racing game and they maybe losing their fps and everyone is losing their mind. Hold on. They aren’t even losing their fps. They simply are going to collect a check from Microsoft to have them on their system rather than activision. I’m still confused about the what the issue is.
@sixrings Very shortsighted to say that those games are Sony's claim to fame. We're just going to skim over other notable titles in GT, Ratchet, etc? C'mon now....
@get2sammyb no, not short term they won't. But just by the 10 year contracts they have signed Sony will have ever increasing competition for COD income going forward and streaming will matter. When every TV have Xbox and Gforce now apps built in at launch, that will eat income. Nintendo will take a bite as COD returns. And as these user bases grow Sony's share shrinks. And the regulators know Sony turned down the deal offered. Sony said no, now what happens in 5 years they will not care about. They don't look back. All that will remain in the regulatory case files is the fact Sony, very publicly, turned down the 10 year offer. Sony may well still get a 10 year deal but the damage has been done. And they will not get as good a deal as they could have gotten just a month ago. Not by a 100 miles. And PS players will not get the benefits they could have negotiated.
@NomNom me too I love resistance series I wish they make new all star almost
@Neonix Argument from anecdote is a logical fallacy. Your personal experience (12 people) is not even a rounding error in the size of the population that will be effected if COD goes XBOX exlusive. There are a large number of people that play COD exclusively and they absolutely will change platforms to keep playing. You seem absolutely convinced that Microsoft won't pull COD because of the lost revenue, well... then why do they want to own COD? They are one of the richest corporations on the planet, so it isn't about the revenue. They're burning tons of cash to give games away for free at launch. Occam's Razor suggests it's about market dominance. They want COD because they know that players will buy an XBOX when it become an exclusive.
@Smiffy01 Unfortunately, you could probably lump the PS Vita in with those. Sony dropped it like a stone and left indie devs to carry the system for years.
@sixrings Let me explain it again. COD is not a typical game. It is a huge game. It is a game that is so big that people will absolutely make console purchases based on where they can play it. If Microsoft makes it an exclusive, they will potentially have a monopoly on the gaming market as Sony loses customers to the new XBOX. But let's not forget that Blizzard and King are parts of this deal. A huge amount of market share will be captured by Microsoft and I find it absurd that people just think that this is okay. Also, be real, Street Fighter (which Sony paid to develop) and Final Fantasy are nothing compared to the size of the franchises that Microsoft will own if this deal goes through.
@Rafie I personally think of crash and a bunch of namco games when I think of Sony. Guess crash is gone but Sony has tekken and soul calibur still.
@Ambassador_Kong
To have CoD day one in Game Pass, plus the mobile presence (CoD mobile makes a huge amount of money).
For what its worth, going forward, Microsoft will be the one paying to develop every single ABK game.
@Ambassador_Kong and what exactly is wrong with Microsoft collecting on that market share after spending 69 billion dollars on it. If Sony has such a huge amount of support what does this do. Level the playing field. Why is everyone concerned that the playing field will be closer to level. It’s been leaning far to the Sony side for years now.
@__jamiie and PSP GO
@sixrings
It's not Sony's fualt Microsoft turned down Street Fighter 5 hence Sony funded Street Fighter 5, and as for FF when has Microsoft give a crap about FF that has a long history with PlayStation. Your saying Microsoft without buying publishers cannot make their own first party game's, I actually agree with that statement the last generation proves that.
@Smiffy01 I forgot about the PSP Go. That was so ahead of its time. Great system.
@DanteDevilHunter and it’s not Microsoft’s fault they have 69 billion dollars to spend.
Sure I can question Microsoft’s competence of making games. Other than forza their games aren’t exactly stellar. So maybe they needed to buy some games.
However if Sony is so competent about making games this whole debate is silly. They should just resurrect an old fps franchise and be done with it. They do own bungie don’t they?
If Bobby is upset then Sony is doing something right.
That’s a pretty rich statement from Bobby Kotick. Disappointed? Those that live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.
@Tharsman While it's undoubtedly true that Microsoft would be the ones paying for every ABK game going forward they will also be getting revenue from any ABK game that sells on PlayStation, past, present and future. Those revenues would also in part go towards development of those games.
@Kevw2006 My point was relative to the argument that Sony paid for the development of SF5 and it being permanently exclusive because of it.
What you state will only give MS money going forward because they wont make CoD exclusive, despite them financing the whole development going forward.
@Neonix the facts are that all sorts of video game companies have come and gone. Panasonic, Atari, sega, neo geo. If this is Sonys time. So be it. But it’s on Sony to respond. They have developers. They are equipped.
@Tharsman Fair point, I wasn't disputing what you said. It was more just a generalisation. Although surely CoD must bring in enough money to fund it's own development. Obviously it all will just become Microsoft's money which is then up to them to distribute as they see fit and may be spread out to fund other releases, but I'd expect that a large chunk of what CoD brings in will go back in to funding future CoD releases.
@get2sammyb "Also, Microsoft has made a bug hullabaloo publicly about how they're not taking anything away. They could renege on that, but they won't."
Like they won't take Bethesda games off Playstation? Yes, I know they didn't make any promises about that for the Bethesda purchase - but the same executives also said it was obvious that was the plan. Why is it somehow less obvious now? "You took me serious?" - Inigo Montoya
You can dislike Sony and think they're handling this badly, and you may be right - but I don't see MS keeping anything coming to Sony platforms unless they're convinced the money left on the table is more than the money they could make by converting players to their ecosystem.
They could seriously hurt Sony while still bringing games to their consoles - just require in-game purchases to go through MS rather than Sony's store, and make Sony de-list the games and look like the bad guy. Imagine what Sony would think of Fortnite if they didn't get a dime from in-game purchases?!?!
Who knows what the landscape will look like 5-10 years from now. Today MS seems to be all-in on GP - down the road it could take over everything, be stripped down to a smaller library, turn into pay-as-you-play, or just quadruple in price. People forget how quickly some things can change.
@Kevw2006 so long as sales don't stumble, CoD brings in a ton of money every year, but it also takes a lot of money to keep 3 titles (4 if you count warzone, 5 if you count CoD mobile, plus the seasonal content for the current yearly release...) in continues development every single year. A small stumble can make that whole house of cards collapse.
It is a very risky landslide and after the disappointing sales of the previous entry (not MW2, I forget the name of the previous one) Its very likely that the main reason they wanted to sell is fear of that avalanche occurring under their watch.
@RobN I agree with you in that I dont think MS will keep anything other than CoD coming to PlayStation.
I don't agree in the reading I get from the whole "not taking anything away". Every interview I seen with that context comes along with wording that makes it, to me, clear he has always simply meant "we are not delisting games that are already there."
Only reason I believe CoD will continue to come to PS, is because they been clear, same with Minecraft [and all its spinoffs]. Unless a title is mentioned by name, I don't expect it to come again to other platforms.
Removed - flaming/arguing
@IndoorEnthusiast I have plenty of comments primarily in nintendolife. And I’ve probably caught up to my purexbox comment count in this thread alone. I’m not a bot and thanks for the big welcome. Hard to be friendly chocking on those sour grapes.
@IndoorEnthusiast
No comment history? Thats odd... I have them in my ignore list since 2020, so they got to have a comment history somewhere... maybe they only post in PureXbox...?
@Ambassador_Kong LOL no it doesn't, and believe me call of duty wont be nearly as popular in 10 years as it is now, also no one is going to switch consoles just for one generic ass fps, some will do but the vast majority wont.
From one piece of ***** to another.
@Shepherd_Tallon exactly, that's what people don't get, sony knew they wouldn't be able to stop the purchase, they just wanted to set a precedent for microsoft when the eventually try to buy another big publisher in a couple of years down the road , that and bad press.
@Cutmastavictory hahah bro stop the nonsense you just humiliating yourself, 'prices dictated by the consumer" lol people would pay 1 dollar for AAA games if they had it their way XD
@Neonix What MS technologies did you work on?
@sixrings no one is going to switch consoles for call of duty, they play it bc its available but COD is not enough reason to switch consoles, gamers will just play something else, call of duty is the most generic FPS out there.
So obviously, I want to begin with screw Bobby Kotick and everything he stands for. He does not deserve to get the golden parachute he'll inevitably get.
With that out of the way, I wonder if Sony had played ball with Microsoft, if they could have gotten better contractual conditions.
Do you think there is any way Sony and Microsoft would have agreed to a 10-year contract that would have put all franchises previously on Playstation systems (so, Elder Scrolls, Fallout, Hellblade, etc.) on Playstation for the duration of the contract? I wonder if the Sony lawyers tried that and MS refused.
@Neonix Curiosity
@LordBakemono so you don't understand basic economic principles....lmao. have a great day.
What microsoft department do you think is the most sleazy one?
@XenonKnight OneDrive is pretty creative in the cloud space in that I despise its existence in every possible way and I hate that Office programs are always asking me to use it.
@LordBakemono exactly. If no one is switching consoles and the game is lame then why is everyone freaking out.
@Neonix Apple can never gain control in gaming. Their apple arcade is nothing but a bunch of glorified mobile games. And with google failing there are done with gaming.
@XenonKnight to compete in gaming you just have to want to and then open your wallet. Apple could do both those things one day. Google really screwed up stadia though. Amazing how these companies can waste billions like me dropping a quarter out of my pocket.
@Neonix Out of those three the one you gotta worry about is amazon.
@sixrings bc people love drama and to fight each other
@Cutmastavictory K
@LordBakemono there’s more drama here than in a full season of keeping up with the kardasians.
@Neonix I see your check cleared from Sony this week.
Sony is acting defensively and ridiculously in all this but damn, this is how Microsoft plays? They can’t beat Sony at video games so they buy up the biggest studios so they own the games you have to buy on the competition?! This seems so crazy to me! This is like the rich school across town not being able to beat the “poor” kids so they buy the gym the poor kids play in. They continue to let the poor kids play there but the poor kids know they can lose those privileges at any time.
@AhmadSumadi they gave it a fair shot. They played nice during Xbox, 360 and Xbox one generations. You expect the rich kid just to sit there and be content with seconds forever?
@Total_Weirdo You think Sony is the only one that pays to keep games off of other consoles?! They all do it. Doesn't matter how much or often. The point is that they ALL do it.
@Rafie you think Microsoft is the only one who buys developers to keep games off of other consoles? They all do it. Doesn’t matter how much or how often. The point is that they ALL do it.
@sixrings Now what was the point of that, outside of being facetious? It's already clear Sony does it, but the poster I replied to made it seem like it's just Sony doing this when all 3 of them partake in deals like that.
Awwww I'm so damn sorry to hear that.
@Rafie I don’t know…. It’s been a long day
If sony is worried about their reputation being damaged by shoddy games why did they give out battlefield 2042 on psn plus? BAZONGLE!
@sonicmeerkat Because ea was selling cheap.
@EhronLocke sure that makes sense. The rich kid just thought to themselves I will give the poor kids three generations of a head start. Then right when they think they have won I will whip out my wallet and show them who’s boss. Buhahahahaha. What an ingenious plan!!!!!
Or maybe they tried. The just sucked at it. So now they are buying.
For this to be a PlayStation committed site, I feel there has been more hate towards Sony than Microsoft regarding this acquisition. Both sides played dirty. Especially on social media. Both companies shared embarrassing or even surprising info regarding sales and more.
But Microsoft is worth more than the entirety of Sony. Sony I feel won't be at a disadvantage for years to come, maybe even this will begin being shown next-gen.
@EhronLocke “As if Microsoft ever tried in the first place”
“They tried during 360, had success and then dog f*cked during the X1, so yeah, they are buying their way to be number 1 now since they’re lazy as well as inspirationally and creatively bankrupt.”
Make a decision instead of flip flopping. So they tried. They failed. They spent their money. This is capitalism. You have a problem with this?
@SillyBoyJudas 100% agreed with your thoughts. No one is innocent in this debacle.
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...