
Tim Sweeney, the boss of Fortnite maker Epic, believes the future of gaming is, well, Fortnite. Speaking at the Unreal Fest in Seattle, as reported by PC Gamer, he said that “a lot of games are released with high budgets, and they're not selling nearly as well as expected”. According to the executive, this is because players are gravitating towards the “really big games where they can play with their friends”.
While other titles fail, Fortnite is going from strength to strength, according to Sweeney. He said the Battle Royale – which has become more of a platform of late – attracted record highs of 110 million active users over the last holiday season, demonstrating a “generational change” for the industry.
Sweeney believes the value of a game “grows in proportion to the number of your friends you can connect to”. Fortnite has really innovated in this area, too: it’s not just a shooter, but also a place where you can watch live concerts, drive cars, and build worlds in LEGO Fortnite.
He said the industry is divided over what actually constitutes the metaverse, but he said Fortnite is “new, exciting, and something that’s never happened at this scale in the history of entertainment”.
He also attributed a chunk of the title’s success to the way it’s become a magnet for various different brands: “Musicians, Disney and Star Wars, and others [are] all coming together to create a world-class entertainment experience that's ever-evolving and live. That's really what we think the future of gaming is about.”
Of course, there’s no real surprise to what Sweeney’s saying here: the boss of Fortnite believes Fortnite is good. But we do think there’s some truth to what he’s saying: whether you like it or loathe it, a lot of players are simply choosing to play the same games forever now. Whether it’s Roblox, GTA Online, Final Fantasy 14, Genshin Impact, or, indeed, Fortnite – that’s where players want to spend their time (and, crucially, money).
Sony’s obviously seen the statistics, and it wants in on the action, too. That’s why it’s making Fairgame$ and has plans for more live service games. The danger is there’s only so much room for titles of this type: just look at the dramatic failure of Concord for evidence of that.
Our belief is that live service games and traditional single player games can co-exist, but the industry is changing dramatically, and it does feel volatile right now. Big budget single player games like Star Wars Outlaws and even Final Fantasy 7 Rebirth have been struggling, and while they all have their own individual issues, it’s clear that the biggest live service games, like Fortnite, are sucking a lot of air out of the room.
So, of course, Sweeney thinks Fortnite is the future of the industry – he’d never argue otherwise, would he? But the industry does feel like it’s going through a dramatic change, and it’s going to be interesting to see where things settle in the end.
[source pcgamer.com]
Comments 90
Fortnite is the future of gaming says Tim Fortnite.
They are a PART of the future, not THE future. Games as we know them seem will always have an audience. How niche that section of the market will be, however? Only time will tell, unfortunately.
@Medic_alert Yes, I‘ll rather stuck in the past.
No they’re not.
Feckin hope not.
I really hope this is a joke article ; personally want nothing to do with fortnite or predatory live service games that only goal is take every penny from gamers . Learned my lesson from destiny/destiny2
Wait, aren't these high budget games also live-services? So how is online gaming the future if the majority of the games failing are also online?
Fortnite is successful because it's Fortnite, same case of Call of Duty, and Roblox. They are the main online games of our age, nothing will have the same popularity.
Plus, Hogwarts Legacy, Stellar Blade, and Wukong send their regards to Tim.
@RiceC03 I'd have similar sentiments. They're definitely a massive part of the future, but not the whole future.
Obviously the guy who needs people to keep investing in Fortnite as a platform is going to say it's the future, like the people who needed streaming to succeed said it was the future or that we'd have to get used to not owning our games.
tbh though I can see Fortnite becoming a kind of Oasis or PS Home where we go to launch other games.
It's kind of already happened with Lego Fortnite.
But no. It's like we said before here - As long as we want single player games and consoles, they'll keep making single player games and consoles.
There's plenty of room.
Also, didn't Black Myth WuKong just happen a few weeks ago?
We're fine.
Why the hell are we still taking whatever this moron saying as "news"? This is the same guy that tried to have exclusivities on PC with EGS only to still not making any profit out of the storefront, still feature lacking, and now most of his exclusive partners have run back to Steam.
Single player video games for life.thats the best.old school style.word up son
I think what he meant to say is that they make the most money. The problem is, every individual player only has so much time. If they are busy with one live service, they won't have time to focus on another. I don't understand how all these publishers expect us to play all these never ending games.
"it's my opinion that my game is the future of gaming, not your game or your friend Steve's game but my game which is currently making me lots of money"
Possible that the majority of people thinks this way. It is not what I am looking forward to.
Let's go! Can't wait to pledge my life to a couple of games for the rest of my life. Just link that sh*t straight to my brain and bank account so that they can withdraw cash based on my fomo-meter. Can't wait to imagine the jealous look on other depressed players as they see all the cool gear I totally earned.
Another epic win for Sweeny, Gabe must be steaming knowing he has such a brilliant opponent.
Yeah...anything is the future as long as you have money to push it.
I f***ing love that there hasn’t been a single article on this website about Throne and Liberty launching on PS5 today. Let’s keep it that way, no one should be burdened by that game lol 😂
Gaming is too broad and varied a hobby for just one type of experience to ever define it.
Something obvious to anyone who actually games, but outright incomprehensible for corporate clowns like Timmy over here.
Sure Tim sure.
really big games where they can play with their friends
Didn't know Wu Kong, Zelda BoTW, Hogwarts Legacy, God of War Ragnarok and Spider Man 2 and had multiplayer.
Yet they all sold incredibly well and are all single player only games.
The only “live service” games I’m ever considering trying are FFXIV (but I’m overwhelmed on where to start) and the Persona 5 game that’ll eventually launch in English. I tried Genshin but it wasn’t for me. I’m just not big into shooters like Fortnite (lol I think it’s a shooter) or live service games in general
@AlexPorto Stellar Blade only sold a million copies,that’s nothing for any major company. Also plenty of single player games didn’t sell enough,look at hi Fi rush and Rebirth
I think I want to hurl right about now 🤢🤮🤢
I’m surprised sweeney has any time to spend on Fortnite these days seeing as he’s usually busy suing or bad mouthing Google, Apple, Samsung etc…
Sorry tim I’m personally not interested in your future of gaming.
@UltimateOtaku91 cherry picked games. What about Mario Kart that has multiplayer and sold more than all of those,or Splatoon or even Smash Bros or Animal Crossing that people play with friends.
Nintendo’s most popular games have a social element
@JalapenoSpiceLife you can borrow my sick bucket when I’m finished with it! 😂
@LuXifer I mean that’s already been happening, I know people who used to basically play nothing but call of duty and halo back in the 360 era nothing else really besides maybe gta and sports games
@Shad361 Of course they sold well, nearly every first party game on Switch has sold well, but I was specifically picking out single-player games that have sold high amounts as a counter point to his comment. Single Player games still sell well if they are done right and are actually good games.
Future of multiplayer not gaming. But we're already in that future. At least Fortnite & co are free and not releasing each year at full price like FIFA and CoD. SP will never die though.
I don't think live service games will create a life-long love of games like good single players with good stories and characters. Fortnite players will grow up and be bored of the formula and move on.
@UltimateOtaku91 single player games will always exist, but the fact that even Nintendo is actually putting effort into online stuff and their most successful games have a multiplayer component says a lot. Even they think it’s important now.
Nothing loses my interest quicker than “Live Service” and “Free To Play”
Honestly Concord kinda showd that it isn't. Yeah some work out like Fortnite but many flop.
You could have said the same thing about any genre at it's peak. Good games will always rise to the top no matter the genre.
@Shad361 Yeah, that's nothing new. I got a friend who played nothing but DayZ for 2 years straight. And I have over 1K hours playtime in Pathfinder: WotR.
But Timmys dream of evergreen mtx-games with no end is quite a different beast IMO.
@DogPark I remember when people said similar about call of duty as early as 2010 when black ops lol. Sports games have lasted even longer.
Well, then screw you epic boss Tim Sweeney.
Yeeeah. No way in hell is that happening. Even if it does, I’ll just stick to my Vita, 3DS, and 360. Sure, I enjoy a few mobile games, but I really don’t like all these new “live service” crap that keeps popping up.
Not my future. There will always continue to be offline, single-player games out there. More than enough to sustain me for life.
I'll just leave this future for the shareholders.
The one thing that actually grinds my gears are people saying single player games are "better". Do I like them better? Yes. Do you like them better? Maybe so. But there are loads of people that don't. And there's plenty that enjoy both equally. I kinda see it as a movies vs. TV series situation. I prefer watching movies more. Some others might enjoy watch a series more. But we can both enjoy our different things without one being "better". And both things can exist.
The Horizon live service game Guerrilla is working on makes me nervous. Great studios wasting so many resources on a live service flop is awful.
"Future of gaming" translates as "the best way to make lots of money".
Other people will continue to make real games while giant companies will continue to chase after payouts.
For kids and teenagers.
I genuinely can’t stand this guy
I would consider such a future a dystopia.
@Medic_alert that’s what Sony is trying to do with their live service initiative, but people are too stupid to see it.
@16BitHero young adults too . multiplayer is fun 😁
by the way guys, the first video game was a multiplayer game , let that soak in 😁
Epic treated their playerbase with a lot more respect than most live service games these days. No pay to win ever (outside of that 1 skin I think). Constant story for those who want to look for it. And an entire creative mode that is its own giant.
Fortnite is ancient now, so I would argue it's the present of gaming, not the future. I also agree with the sentiment that there can only be so many games that exist in this space. Traditional SP may get rarer and rarer, but as long as budgets take into account the smaller player base there isn't a reason they can't continue to be made. It's all about what you want out of gaming.
@LavenderShroud psp/nds/vita for life.
@Kierant202 can't say the same about Fall Guys. they ruined that game with seasons pass and usual things
Let’s not forget that Tim Sweeney is not a game creator or an artist, he is mostly a tech guy in computer graphics. So his opinions on gaming….
@waynesworld ok they added monetisation but what was fall guys long term profit strategy to support the servers and new content beforehand?
Of course it is. Does he think he's Nostradamus or something? Multiplayer games have always been more popular than single-player games. Now that a lot of them are free and there's not as big of a barrier to entry, it's easy to see that they're the future. It's going to make some old people without vision mad, but the world doesn't revolve around them. I don't play live service titles and I have no interest to start, but I'm self aware enough to know that I'm in the minority.
I still don’t get the appeal of Fortnite. It might be the old in me, but I just don’t think it’s a great game. It’s a collection of 4/10-6/10 games now when it used to be a 6/10 flat at best. It’s fine, but jeez are there better live service games on the market.
Fortnite saying it’s the future of games is sort of like McDonalds saying it was the future of food 50 years ago in basically every connotation you can imagine.
"the future of gaming is Facebook!"
-Tim Sweeney
"Fortnite is the metaverse! Also we're never making VR Fortnite in the actual metaverse"
-Tim Sweeney
Between this and his POS UE5 engine that runs well on absolutely nothing, I'm starting to really dislike Sweeney. Didn't really like him in the 90s either though.
Easy for the guy that's at the top of live service to say live service is the future. He's also the reason it's NOT the future for other games. Maybe after he loses all his players to someone else's live service he'll be all in on jazz jackrabbit 4.
@somnambulance Honestly, I don’t think it would be anywhere near as big as it is without all the multiple collaborations and crossover skins it has.
@somnambulance The appeal of fortnite isn't as a game. It's a digital hangout space. 3d Facebook. VrChat without headwear. 2nd life without smut. It's popular because it's a social media platform kids can hang out with friends in. Same with gtav.
Of course a social media platform in 3d would be more popular than a video game.
Thank god I’m stuck in the past, then. Give me my single-player one-and-done games. Well, and FF14, of course.
I wonder if anyone remembers what a joke Fortnite's development was? It was an actual punchline, for years. People would go see it and talk about it and get hit with "that's not a real game, stop making things up" because it was floundering and rudderless for so long. Epic is lucky PUBG came out and gave them an idea. They were probably pretty close to giving up on finding the fun.
This won't last forever. Seems they've forgotten that.
Of course Fortnite is the future of games to Sweeney. It's not like that's his plan or anything, just what he thinks will happen with how consumers change their tastes from big budget games to a free to play game that has all of their friends and wants them to only play that game. No alter motive with him
It's impossible to be the future of games unless having no more new games is the future of gaming.
There is a limited amount of people and time to make these games a success. It's not possible to keep having new ones if the existing ones horde the players. 🤷
@Medic_alert I remember how Cranky Kong in Donkey Kong Country complained about the good ol’ days. Find myself more and more like that the older I get.
@Shad361 We can use the same logic to your argument. Cherry picked games. What about Suicide Squad failing? Concord? Redfall? Babylon's Fall? Marvel's Avengers and the inevitable failure of the upcoming Sony Fairgames?
Besides, Mario Kart, Animal Crossing and Smash Bros are all also single player with extensive single player content. Meanwhile Animal Crossing, much like Elden Ring, was mainly brought for its single player component. It having multiplayer is just a plus. That's something you ignored. None of the games you listed are live service multiplayer only games. Few live service games are actually successful and not many even come close to the success of Fortnite or Call of Duty. Even established franchises like Halo tried and failed. Halo Infinite is practically dead, regularly being beaten on Steam by its non live service counterpart: the Halo MCC collection.
Meanwhile strictly single player experiences continue to do well like others have said, like the recent example of Black Myth Wukong.
If Nintendo thought single player was dead, we wouldn't have got Zelda TOTK last year, a new top down Zelda this year and we wouldn't be getting Metroid Prime 4 next year. There also wouldn't be any new 3d Mario games ever again.
I despise most live service games.
Perfectly happy playing single player games
@nomither6 You are correct, my comment was a knee jerk reaction based on my dislike of the genre - one seemingly being attempted by every publisher out there and having felt somewhat saturated for years already hence several high profile failures. I am nevertheless a hypocrite for putting hundreds of hours into Warzone during the pandemic and finding Helldivers 2 to be just about the most fun multiplayer game I have experienced since I started gaming in the late 80's .
The future looks bleak if everyone copied Fortnite. But luckily, a lot of devs are not Tim Sweeny.
@Shad361 Still better and more fun for me. If this is the future I can always stay in the past playing older games there is so much to play.
Yea maybe for the them and a hand full of ones that jumped in early. The ones late to the party die off in 6 months to a year. The youth is a big part of this. It's why I block my 8 and 10 year olds from playing most live service games. They beg to play Fortnite, but I refuse to provide another cog in there machine.
@Ken_Kaniff Good decision. Your kids needs to taste gaming in the best form without bulls* like MTX or gambling like gacha that can be addictive with the random loots.
Give them retro games like Super Mario, Tetris, Sonic, Zelda, or Mega Man (this one probably too hard for 8-10 years old).
@dskatter every FF14 worshipper talking like this makes me die to find the time to play it. Well, I DID buy the FF1-6 remaster yesterday, perhaps that would ease me in.
@Ken_Kaniff awesome parenting, 100 approve 👏
@PuppetMaster Megaman 10 has a really great easy mode!
@DennisReynolds maybe Tim Fortnite was one of the few trophy hunters for Concord and is trying to justify his insanity.
@NEStalgia knowing Fortnite, they’d let you play as Facebook. Not as someone who represents Facebook, but the logo itself. And maybe give it arms and legs or nothing at all.
I mean yeah, there have been some big AAA games that have struggled... but there have also been huge successes too. Wo Long says hi.
There is room for both to exist. And if there ever isn't enough room...well that's when I'll stop gaming. I like multiplayer games too but single player games are still the heart of my gaming interests.
@Yousef- lol depressingly true 😂
IDK that 1-6 will ease you into xiv that much. The feel and vibe yes, but very different combat where 1-6 is classic turn based and 14 is based on real time skill rotations and cool downs. 14 is awesome though no doubt. Monstrosly huge thigh. I played nothing else for 5 months or so and only got half way through the first expansion. I love it but it might be another year before I touch it again lol.
@Yousef- Oh i didn't know that. I own Mega Man Legacy collection 2 but only played a bit of MM 7 and 8.
@NEStalgia There’s more fun places to hang out though! I don’t understand the appeal still, but Hookshot is my entire social media presence, so that’s probably why.
My son’s favorite game is Astro Bot and he tried Fortnite and said it was boring. I will shelter my closest line to the future as long as I can!
@NEStalgia meant like put me in the mood again since I already beaten a few FFs before but never quite found the urge to invest in the franchise again so maybe things will change 😂
@PuppetMaster I hope you enjoy it when you give it a go! It’s in my top 3! Played it since its 2010 release on ps360
@somnambulance Yeah you have a lucky break there. Most modern kids seem to be like jackals, moving only in groups and coordinated via discord. And seem completely hyper. I remember everyone being like they were zombies even I was their age, now suddenly they act like they have an IV drip of Speed.
@TruestoryYep mario kart and especially smash bros are bought for the multiplayer . those games wouldn’t sell half as much without it . Smash bros entire origin is about 4 players playing against eachother
Fortnite man hypes Fortnite.
I have zero interest in “Live Service” games. Having got seriously burned by Anthem.
But surely for every GTA Online, there should also be a Hogwarts Legacy, or Wo Long.
I will always prefer deep and emotional single player stories such as Uncharted.
I think that if this concept of “live service” pay-as-you-play was used in any other industry, it would be called out as a scam.
I was in the same room at Unreal Fest when he spoke about (t)his future last year. I did not like it back then and I do not like it now.
There will always be indie games and single player experiences, but the time of the big budget AAA(A) games may come to an end.
Kids are playing on mobile devices, consoles may die..
I'm so glad that I was born in the 80s and was able to witness all the big leaps the industry made.
My guess is that the future will be with Nintendo in the coming years as the western capitalism driven developers and publishers seem to be unable to play by the rules of perpetual growth.
it is a bit sad...
Must be true then...
Yes. Us single player gamers are just going to evaporate into thin air, as if Thanos himself snapped us into nothingness. Greedy game creators like Tim Sweeney that want to feel like all-knowing deities really need to fall back down to earth.
Obviously he does people like him are not interested in selling you a product because that takes time, money and risk. He wants to sell you a service which overall is less investment the risk is still there but reward is there too. I don't believe the future is live service games.
@Yousef- You need zero previous FF knowledge, and it’s free to play up thru level 70! Previous FF knowledge makes you appreciate references, but that’s about it.
Well worth your time. The story is excellent (tho the first part is more world building and isn’t quite as interesting, but HOLY MOLEY it gets there) and it’s an MMORPG where interacting with other players is mostly optional.
Haven't we learnt anything from the so many fiascos out there...?
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...