Perhaps the final high profile release of 2023, Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora is out for PS5 on the 7th December — and the reviews are starting to drop. This latest open world adventure from Ubisoft is an original tale in the Avatar universe, and while reviewers are heaping praise on the game's luscious alien setting and overall visual prowess, they seem quite torn on the actual gameplay structure.
Indeed, initial impressions are rather mixed, with the title commanding a good-but-not-great average of 74 on Metacritic. Review scores range from 9/10 to 4/10, and that's certainly not the kind of split we're used to seeing when AAA projects are involved.
As for our own Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora review, you'll unfortunately have to wait a bit longer before we can deliver our verdict. But until then, check out some other takes from across the web and let us know if you plan on grabbing this game in the comments section below.
Destructoid - 9/10
If you walked away from Avatar wishing a world like Pandora actually existed out there, here you go. This is that world. Seeing Pandora is one thing, but being able to scale its massive treetops, soar high above its floating mountains on an Ikran, and traverse its wide open plains on the back of a Direhorse is really something special. This is the best version of Avatar yet.
GameSpot - 8/10
Best of all, I never felt like an open-world trashman, dumping junk on the way to the next map marker. Instead, Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora made me feel like I was adventuring in a place worth exploring, and I'm eager to go back.
VideoGamer - 8/10
Hiding locations behind simple instructions is by no means novel or groundbreaking. Assassin’s Creed has done it on occasion too. But by hiding the beaten path from view, Avatar asks players to let go of decades of muscle memory and rely on their senses instead. I hope Massive Entertainment’s gorgeous rendition of Pandoran exploration inspires the next generation of Ubisoft-likes in the right ways.
IGN - 7/10
Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora features a stunning alien world to explore with a refreshingly uncluttered approach to navigation, countless enemy bases to destroy and Na’vi clan sidequests to complete, and no shortage of exotic flora and fauna to harvest and hunt. However, its combat is pretty one-dimensional, its mission design is a bit on the repetitive side, and its environment is generally lacking in any major surprises beyond visual splendor, meaning that Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora is a solid shooting adventure that’s more inside the box than truly out of this world.
Games Radar - 3.5/5
The vibrancy of the world and the pure alienness of almost everything you encounter make Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora an enjoyable place simply to exist in, with all its otherworldly environments and creatures adding freshness the mechanics lack.
TechRaptor - 5/10
If you're looking for a sparse open world to run around, tackle some military bases, and soar through the skies you might get some enjoyment out of Far Cry: Pandora, but anyone hoping for a deep Avatar experience will want to pass.
Shacknews - 5/10
The problem is that other, similar games have done this dance with more satisfying results. Take the alien exoticism away and you’ve got the “Ubisoft checklist game” that doesn’t even do that thing as well as the last several of those. Even in the licensed game space, titles like Mad Max are practically identical in a framework sense, but so much more fun to engage with.
Comments 55
Thinking about picking this up because the missus has been wanting to play a co op game online with me since I bought her a series s for the bedroom lol
Despite the review-score spread, I think it’ll be a game that I’ll really enjoy. I like the films and always enjoy the hell out of the Far Cry games. Will save it for when I have a decent amount of free time though, as I’ll want to fully immerse myself in Pandora.
Not happy with the day one mandatory patch for the physical release
Sounds like a solid 7/10 but may higher if you love Avatar or love its world. I myself aren't a big fan of Avatar the films but i do love the world and lore and an open world Pandora is something i've wanted since the first film, Far Cry: Pandora is enough for me and i can't wait to play it later when it unlocks.
I had a feeling this might happen. Visually its looked great but the gameplay is like a far cry game. The ubisoft formula is getting/has gotten stale for most people. Still il check it out when its discounted. Mainly because im not a huge avatar fan so its not a day one
I'm torn on it. I know it's not a popular thing to say, but I enjoy Ubisoft games for the most part. It looks a bit like Far Cry which I enjoy and it's made by the Division team which I love.
I rate ACG pretty highly and often agree with his appraisals. He released a very complimentry review of this on Youtube earlier pointing out why it was much better than Far Cry games in his opinion, and if you are interested in the game, I'd recommend you check this review out. He rated it a 'buy'.
I've been waiting on this for some time now and I'm pretty sure I'll enjoy it regardless of reveiws. Indeed, I've come to realise this year that most reviewers simply dont want what I want out of game, so their overall score is meaningless to me, even if some of the observations mioght offer a little insight.
Knowing that this is no 'FarCry set in Avatar world' means I will be buying it.
Definitely going to be getting it. I really enjoyed the Avatar films and I've always found Ubisoft games fun which is the important thing. I'll probably wait a bit for the inevitable sale though.
Well, we all knew this is indeed Far Cry:Pandora. Same mechanics and idea, just different skins on simmilar map....pass
A middling open world game from Ubisoft?!? I don't believe it!
Why play crap?
"Take the alien exoticism away and you’ve got the “Ubisoft checklist game”"
Pretty much what most people were expecting, some will see it as a positive but for me is a giant negative. I think Black flag was probably the last time Ubisoft innovated, now they just go through the motions and make sure everyone of their games has everything in their checklist.
I've got this arriving in my Santa stocking for Christmas 😂🤣
I do wonder whether there is some Ubisoft snobbery at work. It seems to be that some companies get bumped up a point or two, and others have their games knocked down in the same fashion. It maybe an unconscious bias, but I do think it exists. I think some reviewers cannot wait to praise games that need to be held under a spotlights, where with other reviewers it is simply vindictive.
I've always just gone with what I like, mostly regardless of reviews, though that is not to say that I haven't picked up a few er... questionable titles, but for the most part, I've been happy with my choices...
Nearly ordered it yesterday from Shopto but I've got so many games I've not finished yet and I've still to buy Baldurs Gate 3 so I'll wait till after Xmas should be half off pretty quick like most Ubisoft games.
You know a game is bad if generous IGN and GamesRadar give low scores. People would argue otherwise but I always say I wonder what Ubisoft could come up with if they give respect to franchises and focus all time and resources to develop just one, like Rockstar does. I mean imagine all the time/resources used for Origins, Odyssey, Valhalla was just used for ONE.
Pretty much what I expected. I don't really have a problem with a bog standard Ubisoft open world game, but I'm not buying this unless they add a third person mode.
@Mad001 looks like someone's been on the naughty list...🎅
Ignoring all negativity I know I'll personally like it because I like the world of Avatar. Clearly the people that don't get much from this don't like Avatar that much. Never let strangers online decide for you, play the game for yourself and decide that way. If you don't like it then sell it.
I haven’t read any of the reviews but I can imagine a lot of people are comparing this to Far Cry, which is fine by me! Despite being the same formula every game, I still enjoy them. The Avatar setting is just the cherry on top.
I'm just going to ignore those lower scores especially as I've never heard of those last 3 sites, yet the more respectable and popular sites scored it highly. This may have to be a day one for me now.
Not a day one for me but as a fan of Ubisoft games (stop laughing at the back) mainly Far Cry, AC and the Division I will pick this up down the line. Something soothing about clearing a map with that formula.
I mean why anyone would pay £70 for a 7/10 Ubisoft game that will be £40 or below come Xmas sales baffles me!?
(Not saying it’s going to be bad) but everyone screams of backlogs etc.
It could be the perfect in between type of game. I know after BG3 I'll want to play something moody and serious, or just an rpg with great depth, but that might not be the best thing for me to do when I could play something a little more shallow and colourful to reset my gaming brain 😁
I'll check my backlog and PS Plus, and then see if I end up buying this the first time a sale hits or not.
“ Take the alien exoticism away and you’ve got…”
I really don’t like when reviewers make their point by suggesting a selling point or main characteristic be ignored.
I didn’t expect this game to be a universal smash, but I’m glad there seem to be enough good things to say.
Yeah, the graphics are nice, but it's just gonna become yet another boring open world game chore, doing the same repetitive missions, for 100 hours. I'm done with Ubisoft.
Any news on console performance.
Modes etc, quality/performance
Resolutions and frame rate.
I can see 7/10 being fair, but I think anyone giving it a 5 or under went into it knowing they were going to give it a bad score because it’s Far Cry on Pandora. Say what you want about the Far Cry formula, but it’s still a solid gameplay loop.
@KillerBoy I don’t mind because I, like most of the modern world, have an internet connection
@SgtTruth It was apparently the highest grossing movie of 2022. How is it a dead IP?
@PsBoxSwitchOwner yes I agree, I don't see the point in rushing to pay full price for a game everyone has played so many times already with different coat of paint, especially as it will be in the bargain bin soon enough.
Ah yes, Tech Raptor. My reliable source of reviews.
Whenever I see low reviews from sites with these sorts of names, I automatically dismiss them as they're usually trying to be 'different' and 'edgy'.
I would buy this game even if it had 1’s across the board. It’s Avatar. That’s all that matters and is absolutely the main draw for me. If it’s ‘Far Cry with an Avatar skin’ even better. I love Far Cry too.
I’ll be rewatching the movies tonight in preparation for the game arriving tomorrow 😁
@Nailz it’s not about having internet, it’s about preservation. If you want to re install the game in future and Ubisoft says no then that’s it.
I check reviews out of curiosity, but from my own opinions. If I didn’t, would miss out on a lot of games.
The reviews were weird. They won't make a survival game. They will make an open world RPG with the IP.
I love the plants that PS2 era organics to it. Leaf trampolines. Vine plants to lift you up. So nice to have. The world isn't the same but gives me Scaler vibes that forest/swamp but good balance of colour and particles (minus the motion blur, maybe or not the distance blur or whatever it's called in the game as a setting). We stopped seeing that. I love games with more immersive worlds then it looks but doesn't act/animate lively enough because they are too static or scripted. The plants move and the player interacts with them in engaging ways. The team had fun I think with them and I love the plant life. The plant life is my favourite character not the moving people and fauna in the footage/world.
I think the movement is pretty good, it suits the Na vi and it's also engaging then the more heavy/formulaic moments in other games besides Mirror's Edge or certain ones. The character creator is a sure few options but no functional purpose just decorative is a bit eh. Biomutant's gas immunity (I had issues with it not offering more animal ability traits for swimming/digging/flight or other traits. Like come on make the animals interesting not still human level bland but a 4 legged sprint animation, there is a reason I find platformer animals from 5th/6th gen more interesting and even then just because oh they have weapons in 6th+ plus doesn't make them better their movesets in 5th gen without weapons showed how interesting and still unique they are even today because 'no one' or 'rarely' do devs want to push them that much again, what a total waste of potential nowadays we don't see again) or some RPGs I think setting things is more interesting then just visual options.
The outposts seem a bit weak which as someone who isn't a fan because the level design/tools don't change what level design doesn't. Aka like GT7 who cares about cars if there is no new tracks to drive is and challenge the use of them. Aka a tools is less fun if the level design doesn't change. That's the problem with many spaced out and more possibilities but if the design doesn't have much use for them or feel good enough why should I care. Whether an explosion, whether electrifying water aka Bioshock, whether other things. More interactivity. Sure the wiring like Watchdogs is there but where is the more interesting tools and interesting environmental triggers.
Too mechanical too static then more oh I see that and that. It's why I can see people going I love the fire offers wind to up sail in Breath of the Wild that element can be in games but most don't. Not saying it's a Zelda only thing but as I wished more did more player interactivity like we used to get would be nice then static worlds all the time with limited interactions.
They don't have to be only explosives and breaking apart the world even though that would be nice just more things the player can do. If crafting is possible, why not the crafting logic (not meaning building mechanics I mean the level design personality lacks) of the world as a playground not a playgrywoth too many stop signs/rules/laws/don't in it. That's boring. It's a video game give us a world that's more livable.
Whether weapons that aren't just guns and bows but plants and more. Not just tipping arrows either.
It why I liked Journey to the Savage Planet or Pitfall The Lost Expedition that not using manmade but using more organic and irregular elements it's just more exciting, more fun animations exaggerated or not. Not safe, manmade and boring.
So with an interesting world alien and fictional then eh open human worlds and cities and boring done to death things give me more exciting worlds, exaggeration of organics of them.
There is a reason I found High On Life so cool for the weapons (not played it) the designs and what they could do is cool. It's why I like Ratchet games weaponry not always categories of weapons and visuals and functions being so been there done that.
In another review the AI didn't have that Valhalla/Odyssey or Far Cry 6 elements. It isn't a bad thing as The Division isn't known for that but I was surprised still as used to thinking they would have shared tech or attempted it themself. Or Ubisoft pushing AI. Not all have to though just surprised they don't have Na Vi fight for you but mention they would over radio. XD
Loot system has its issues it seems of score/stats/ and which you get/craft/buy.
I am very open world picky of design, this isn't my type of open world at all (Sunset Overdrive give me more tower defence missions or platforming challenge ones other open world developers I don't care for outposts or some general missions but some of them do need to be there still to suit situations, Darksiders 2 hub based and content or Infamous Second Son fun side missions eh story missions gameplay wise fair story) but at the same time I can tell they mixed things up somewhat here. By how much no idea. How much story/themes over same gameplay no idea probably a lot as that does happen.
The world and the setting aka Na vi and human war besides the project with the Na vi inbetween makes sense for the world in the films.
I think the graphics are fine. Snowdrop is beautifully used for sure. The world looks how I think Pandora would. The varied areas we have seen.
By that you can tell how far gaming has come. But they can't replicate Cameron and his team's tech and well I notice gameyness always but it looks to capture it well. But CGI versus games are very different of course.
I won't play this game but I won't deny they tried and put an interesting spin on their formula still. I can tell when Devs put effort in even if I don't play their games.
Far Cry Primal was enough a sign of kind of what to expect, besides The Division studio being the one behind it. The world makes sense, the tribal angle or mix of that and the Na vi in the project with human weapons.
The outposts make sense, the rest no idea what half the side missions or story will be besides footage/trailers.
Ubisoft I think put a fair spin on the world in certain areas and understand the IP.
I found the simplistic combat one to me was hilarious I saw on metacritic yeah sure. Some games are far more basic let alone can have good worlds but I don't think Ubisoft ever makes basic combat ever unless it's Rayman as it's a platformer and accessible but still has varied moves still in other areas.
@Fiendish-Beaver that impression seems to be the case any time I see a Ubisoft game. Literally my family checks the reviews for any major Ubisoft game they are into and yeah we notice. I have no interest in their open world games but I do notice the differences the studios make even besides their design not being for me. The reviewers have their minds set for sure of praise or hate even besides changes between the games in the way they write. Verdicts or full reviews.
Regardless of the design some design keys or the studios in general.
I'll probably still enjoy the game, but this does make it easier to wait on it for the typical Ubisoft price drop. I have no time to play it for the foreseeable future anyways between what I'm already playing and then Final Fantasy VII Rebirth, so it's all good in the end.
I mean it looks like blue farcry which for me is fine just fine
I enjoy farcry really liked 5 and liked 6 (6 was a good improvement but liked the setting, music and story in 5 more) so I'm happy with more farcry even though I haven't watched avatar in years not seen 2.
Also Co op so another bonus 🤷
Aannnddddd I've go ubi + soooo👀
I've just put in a couple of hours and while, yes, it is totally FarCry but with big blue cat aliens, it also drop dead gorgeous and so explorable. And that is the thing I like in Farcry and AC:(origin:odessey:valhalla); being able to explore a huge and novel world.
I think it is more like Farcry 2-3Primal than 4-5-6. It has that feel but that might just be jungle induced. But so far I'm enjoying it.
@PsBoxSwitchOwner I'm a DIEHARD FarCry fan, (FC 2 most beloved shooter ).
I usually ...preorder(farcry only], and usually the Gold steel case versions. FC6 dropped by half after a couple weeks, so I'll wait
@SuntannedDuck2 Is this your opening statement for your University Thesis, or are you auditioning for a job?
Do you climb a really tall tree instead of towers to reveal more of the map?
Why anyone would buy a Ubisoft game at release is a mystery to me. Ubisoft games are discounted so fast ,monetized, and with tons of DLC why pay full price. Plus most if not all of their games are solid 6 or 7/10 games that fixed over time anyway.
If you look at all their games I think not one game will be preserved for the future and I don't think they have released a game that is not monetized or complete on release for more then a decade.
@KillerBoy I guess that you are never happy then as pretty much every game has a mandatory day 1 patch these days.
I'll purchase this in the new year as December is a very expensive and busy time of the year for me. I have plenty to be getting on with anyway and spare time is a luxury I just don't have at the moment.
@TheArt
You have no idea what you are talking about. A 7.0 and 3.5/5 is a low score?
Try making your own decisions for once in your life and not believe what a random reviewer on a website says. Think for your self. If u actually read their reviews NONE of them even like or enjoy the movies. So why listen to what these ***** have to say?
Do u need a 9-10 score to enjoy a game? Scores dont matter. Its 1 opinion from a random jackass not 100 staffers of a website.
Such a stupid ass mentality.
@Deljo haha oh no I love avatar lol
@Mad001 only joking bud, enjoy 👍
@Wolfstar Such a fool you are boy.
I know it's cool to snub Avatar, but beyond the odd visuals they're just very well told classic tales that resonate extremely well on an emotional level.
As for the game, I'll wait for the usual 2-3 month Ubisoft Discount.
@Deljo lol I know all good 👍
@Northern_munkey I don’t mind optional day one updates but required day one patch is joke
@CallMeDuraSouka If only. XD Nah just random thoughts. Also yes I can post small comments too.
@SuntannedDuck2 I did read it, enjoyed your point of view 🫡
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...