Red Dead Redemption 2 will saddle up and ride to the PlayStation 4 next Christmas, but what do we want from Rockstar's long-awaited Western? In this article, we consider some tweaks that the label could make to improve upon its PlayStation 3 predecessor, and also we fantasise over some features that we'd like to find their way into the game.
Keep single player and multiplayer separate
The prolonged popularity of Grand Theft Auto Online should give some indication as to how important multiplayer will ultimately be to Red Dead Redemption 2, but we're hoping that Rockstar keeps the modes separate. There's nothing wrong with a bit of line blurring a la Watch Dogs or Dark Souls, but in order to deliver the dark humour and set-pieces that we've all come to expect from the label's releases, then it's important that this sequel has a standalone story mode – even if, like Los Santos, its multiplayer ultimately shares the same sandbox world.
Stick with a single protagonist
Grand Theft Auto V's crossover story approach was ambitious and it worked better than it had any real right to do. But even despite such praise, we still prefer the tale of John Marston, which forces you to fall in love with the character before he meets his poignant end. While the ending to Red Dead Redemption was divisive, it's the kind of conclusion that could only succeed by laser-focusing on a single figure, and while we're hoping for a different kind of tale here, we've very much got our fingers crossed that it'll all revolve around one protagonist.
A decent control scheme, please
Rockstar doesn't like following trends; its disregard for tradition is part of what makes the company's software stand out. But the label's output sometimes shines in spite of itself, with its titles riddled with bad control schemes. Red Dead Redemption was no different, shunning traditional third-person combat in favour of Grand Theft Auto IV's swimmy auto-targeting method. This made for a bad deathmatch experience, as well as some sub-par combat encounters, which were only saved by great audio and animation work. The publisher's penchant for making you tap X to sprint is also an exhausting inclusion, which we hope is finally removed with this sequel.
Health bars aren't healthy
Red Dead Redemption featured fully regenerating health – and for good reason, as far as we're concerned. Given the amount of times John Marston could be ambushed by wild cougars or bears during one of his infamous hunts for rare flowers, having the option to run like hell and gradually get your life back was a godsend. With that in mind, we're hoping that Rockstar opts to keep the same health system for Red Dead Redemption 2, because we really don't like the thought of being mauled by a big furry animal and having to go all the way back to a town just to find a health pack.
Encounters of the crazy kind
Random encounters added a lot of character to Red Dead Redemption's world, so we'd definitely like to see them make a return. Whether it was that poor guy getting chased across the plains by a pack of snappy little coyotes or that group of bandits who'd ambush you in the middle of nowhere, dynamic events added an element of unpredictability to your travels, and without them, we dare say that the game's vast and open map would have seemed a little lifeless. Bring them back Rockstar, and don't be afraid to make them even crazier than before.
The hunt is on
In articles like this one, it's easy to start painting pictures of an ideal, but ultimately unrealistic game. However, we reckon that bounty hunting is one area that Rockstar really could go the extra mile with. In Red Dead Redemption, you could pick up wanted posters and set off to either capture or kill your target. These optional missions were a nice extra, but they could be so much more in Red Dead Redemption 2. What if each bounty took you on a gradual chase across the map, as you slowly but surely gathered information on the criminal in question? What if you had to use tracking skills to pick up their trail through the wilds? By getting to know each scumbag, you'd build up your own reasons to take them down – just like in some of the best Western movies.
What would you like to see in Red Dead Redemption 2? Are we bang on with these suggestions, or do your hopes for the sequel sit elsewhere? Shake some snake oil in the comments section below.
Comments 24
More of this guy
I think this game will end up like a wild west version of GTA V.
I definitely want more than one character to play and hopefully John Marston will be one of them. And I agree with the separate multiplayer and single player modes can't be having loads of people running around whilst trying to relax with the story don't make a mmo Rockstar!
Urghhh really hope there isn't more than one character. Was a major negative with GTA5 for me. The main reason RDR is good is Johns personal story. Don't dilute that with other characters. (I know there were one or two other playable characters but these were fairly minor)
Can't wait for the microtransactions on Red Dead Online.
@SoakedCarrot Oh there will be many, don't you worry about that.
What we really need is more manimals!
What I need is for them to not announce it so stupidly early. There's nothing worse than chomping at the bit for a game then finding out its not due out for an age. Skyrim was the worst 9 months of my gaming life, now this & it's a whole year away!!! Really? Why didn't they wait to announce until next summer?
@Tenacious-P A year ain't really that bad, assuming there are no delays of course!!! Either way, I'm happier knowing it's coming in a year than left guessing for another 8 months. Release date will be the same either way. Least we know
Isn't the release scheduled for Fall 2017?
"Red Dead Redemption 2 will saddle up and ride to the PlayStation 4 next Christmas,"
@kyleforrester87 but that's my point, I'd rather not know if it's so far away. I think games are announced way too early. Bethesda got it just right with Fallout 4. Four months notice is more than enough anything over that is just agonising.
@Tenacious-P knowing it's coming is better than wondering if it's coming
Nice tune in the background of Sam's video.
T'ain't no big thing
To wait for the bell to ring
T'ain't no big thing
The toll of the bell.
Bird aint half bad either.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0n3OepDn5GU
How about pre 1911 buffalo and tomahawks ....
@SoakedCarrot micro transactions hardly ruined Gta online.. if you are half decent at any of the modes you can rack up the money easily. Without glitches.
Imo they've done it very very well in Gta. Everything is well within reach without having to pay
I know what I want...More of the same because Red Dead Redemption is the best Rockstar game. Done, I'm happy.
More legendary horses would be cool. Maybe a jousting mini game too.
"Keep single player and multiplayer separate."
THIS!!!
Whats a 'traditional' third person control scheme then, as opposed to what was in RDR? I've never had any issues with the controls in any R* game to be honest.
Unless the other six are supporting characters it's hard to see how this game would be focusing on just one protagonist. Or maybe those seven characters are for multiplayer mode? If so, it would be great for each of them to have different skill sets and weapons.
We want epic music. Better call Ennio!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RGrz1mZve8
I do wonder if the 7 shown in the photo are the bad guys, though. Maybe you need to take them all out.
@Neolit Yeah, that's pretty much what I'm expecting - kind of hope it isn't the case, though, as it's a bit predictable. I'd actually prefer an alternate universe approach.
That said, I know RDR was set toward the end of the days of the Wild West, but there's no reason it couldn't pick up directly after the events of the last game. Actually there was a good chunk of time between the shoot out at the end and playing as Marstons son so it could fall into that period as well.
A Valley of Gwangi inspired expansion this time please...cowboys and dinosaurs...what's not to like!!
@kyleforrester87 nah not for me I'm too impatient, I'd rather not know. It's why I never watch game trailers, want to go in without a clue & I don't want to know a game's coming out until it's almost on top of us. Waiting is the worst thing. If you don't know, you're not waiting
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...