Remind us to never, ever get on the wrong side of Rockstar and parent company Take-Two. UK-based website Trusted Reviews has pulled an article from earlier in the year that included unannounced Red Dead Redemption 2 details – and it’s stumped up an eye-watering £1 million (~$1.3 million) in order to settle. That money, as per Take-Two’s directive, will go to charity.
Back in February 2018, the site ran a story based on development notes pertaining to the hotly anticipated Western. It claims that it received the document in August 2017, but wasn’t able to corroborate its contents until the following year. The article – which has now been removed – mentioned first-person mode and a potential Battle Royale feature, the latter of which hasn’t been officially revealed.
“On 6th February 2018, we published an article that was sourced from a confidential corporate document,” the site said. “We should have known this information was confidential and should not have published it. We unreservedly apologise and we have undertaken not to repeat such actions again. We have also agreed to donate over £1 million to charities chosen by Take Two Games.”
It’s an odd one because it’s not entirely clear what laws have been broken and in which countries, although you’d imagine that Trusted Reviews would have sought some form of legal advice before podding out a seven figure settlement. “Take-Two takes security seriously and will take legal action against people or publications who leak confidential information,” the company explained.
To our knowledge, this is the first story of its kind, with video game coverage often relying on leaks and insider sources. There are laws to project media from this sort of thing, but it can be costly going through the courts. The upshot of all this is that the American Indian College Fund, the American Prairie Reserve, and the First Nations Development Institute will all benefit from the cash injection.
[source trustedreviews.com, via variety.com]
Comments 15
That's some expensive click bait.
Wow seems pretty dam unnecessary and over the top if you ask me?
@bbtothe My immediate thought was how the heck can Trusted Reviews even afford that? It seems to be a pretty big website but... £1 million!
Man, if this type of lawsuit becomes the norm, Kotaku will be shut down in the next few months. It's a win-win, less spoilers, less clickbait, and money for charity!
Also @get2sammyb, did you mean "protect"?
Umm I reckon there's more to the story than what is said.
I'm sure gaming sites will be a lot more reluctant now and its probably a good thing with all the fake leaks clickbaits.
@get2sammyb My thought too, I wouldn’t think a game review/news site would have 1M lying around. That’s insane. I mean, I can’t imagine would must have happened behind the scenes, because Rockstar being able to get that much of a settlement is kind of worrying.
Wow, that’s a lot of coin for a few spoilers that are just facts most of us would have guessed anyways.
£1 million — Shoot, that’s half of Sammy’s salary.
I thought it was weird the institutions chosen for charity & found out it's Native American Heritage Month.
Trustedreview pays £1M? That's really expensive lawsuit, are press protected by law?
@get2sammyb TI Media owns Trusted Reviews, they paid the settlement.
@Neolit ''probably'', we don't know. Either way, this means that every leak can be considered ''stolen goods''. From leaked promotional material to confidential information about the working conditions at the company. Games journalism shouldn't exist to please the big company, which is already an issue. So I find this a bit of a weird case, I think the person leaking it should be the blamed.
@Kidfried Even if it is, aren't all leaks ''confidential'' material? Games journalism would be bankrupt if they were sued for all the times someone reported on leaks!
@get2sammyb Also, as the payments are going direct to charity and not via RockStar they will get tax right off they can carry for a number of years. So in truth it may have little long term cost over cash flow and most certainly cheaper than a legal battle.
How did they afford it? Well, I looked at an article and AdBlock showed 14 ads blocked. When I turned it off, there were a number of self-refreshing ads, background ads, and video pop-up ads. They're a popular site with heavy traffic, so I guess it soon ads up.
@Bad-MuthaAdebisi
Well its not a 'deluge', I'm not sure if your trying to be sarcastic for some reason. Its the usual fake leaks and fake news blown out of proportion anyone can notice if they are not being naive. Gaming sites are very much like tabloid papers.
I can understand this to an extent, but was the "leak" equal to one million in lost sales or something. I mean, there gotta be some reasoning in the court for this :/
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...