We’re in the minority, but we liked the inaugural State of Play, which emphasised PlayStation VR as well as other parts of the PlayStation portfolio. The livestream was lambasted by viewers, and yesterday’s instalment felt like a direct response to the criticism. Sony instead opted for a much shorter show, and there wasn’t a single virtual reality game in its roster – a win for all those who harbour an unnecessary hatred for the hardware.
Perhaps most importantly of all, the Japanese giant aligned expectations beforehand, confirming the length of the show and some of its contents. This still wasn’t enough to pump the hype train’s brakes, as we saw pre-stream speculation ranging from The Last of Us: Part II’s release date to a mysterious new exclusive from Capcom. It would appear that fans simply can’t control themselves, and that’s always going to lead to a backlash.
Of course, Final Fantasy VII Remake doused any disappointment, and the response to the 9th May show has been much more forgiving. There are far fewer dislikes on the livestream video – although more than enough to raise eyebrows – and our own poll here at Push Square skews towards the positive end of the spectrum. But there are still plenty of people labelling the show pointless and anticlimactic, and it’s clear that the format still has plenty to prove.
As we wrote earlier in the year: we like it. At just ten minutes, yesterday’s update was pacey, including a good mixture of software across a variety of genres. A new Predator-themed multiplayer shooter may not be the kind of project we’ve come to expect from Sony as a publisher, but it’s refreshing to see the organisation spreading its wings and trying something different. The two indie titles spotlighted – Riverbond and Away: The Survival Series – also had enticing hooks.
There’s much work to be done when it comes to establishing State of Play, though. Can the platform holder effectively manage expectations? It seems that this series may be stuck in a loop where the unrealistic expectations of fans give way to frustration. Our view is that Sony should stick with it – there’s a nice idea here, and the content will undoubtedly improve as the PlayStation 5 nears. The best way to help yourselves is by keeping your feet on the ground.
Are you enjoying these semi-regular State of Play livestreams? How can Sony improve them and better manage expectations? Would you prefer the platform holder to communicate in a different way? Drop some quickfire thoughts in the comments section below.
Comments 23
it was good. next up give me syphon remaster.and dragon dogma 2.and parasite eve remaster.and it will be a legendary show.word up son
stating what to expect was a clever move by sony and they should have done it with the first one aswell tbh. (duration etc)
i also agree that it is not realy hatred for VR but it's just not the type of device that the majority wants/can get invested in atm. the fact that lots of people suffer from motion sickness is also a major downside of VR and for it to truly kick off they will need to find affective counters against that.
that being said last night's event was better for sure and i liked it.
those waiting for news about the big 3 will have to wait for the state of play in the summer (around e3) or even the end of the year.
I can't say I am disappointed by either of the 'State of Play' showings. I think a lot of that was down to fact that I wasn't expecting anything to actually interest me and, as Sammy will recall, I predicted before the live show began.
From a purely exclusive Point of View, of all the games that I know are in development (not unconfirmed games like H:ZD2), there is only Ghost of Tsushima and Last of Us 2 that I am actually looking forward to at the moment. Death Stranding hasn't got me excited yet but I haven't written it off either.
Predator almost grabbed my attention enough to put it on my list to keep an eye out for but being an Asymmetric MP game (like Evolve, Friday 13th etc) lost any anticipation I may of had for a 'Predator' game.
Another part of the reason I wasn't expecting anything major was because I didn't think Sony were ready to speak about the PS5 and any titles that are 'definite' for its release - even if they are still releasing these games on PS4 too. Certainly not in a 10mins window.
E3 is just around the corner and whilst we know Sony won't be hosting a briefing, I wouldn't be surprised if we see some 'Sony' only games from one of the 3rd Party publishers - such as FFvii at Square Enix's briefing. I can see Sony also releasing trailers and/or game-play video's as and when they want rather than be pressured to either keep things from leaking or rushing to get something ready for their allotted time - if they were attending.
For example, if they wanted to release some new game-play for LoU2, they don't have to hold it back to have something to show in their E3 slot or try and rush together something to be ready in time - they have more freedom to announce what they want and when they want.
I knew last nights briefing wasn't going to be of big interest to me because we knew before hand that Medievil (not a game I am looking forward to personally) was going to be shown - if that's the 'biggest' news, I knew it wasn't going to be of interest - they could of had a big surprise but I wasn't expecting one. I can see why some would have loved it, Medievil and FFvii are games that some are really excited for but they are not my 'taste' in games.
I dont appreciate the writer insulting the fanbase not gonna lie. Some of us have unrealistic expectations but not always. Also just because someone does not use VR doesn't mean they hate it. Get off your high horse.
I’m hoping we get some more variation to it in the future. Or maybe supplement them with a post show interview with a dev of one of the shown games or something to make it more interactive/personal. Have viewers post live questions or something idk.
I honestly feel like they need to be closer to a Nintendo direct. I would have less of them during the year but them be more meaty. If sony don't have much to show themselves they need to start using the 3rd parties like they did at the beginning of the generation
People always complain. And why they use it for VR how simple can you be? Its to make more people interested in VR. Get over yourself everyone not everything is for yourself. And the ridiculous expectations that are the people making insane assumptions and then act like its a promise made.
The problem was last time people weren't capable of looking at things a bit more objectively. PSVR needed a strong showing to show that Sony is still firmly behind it. Games like Iron Man and No Mans Sky were massive deals for those who have PSVR but it felt like we couldn't enjoy it all that much because spoil sports just had to complain because Sony didn't deliver a megaton.
Like I said over on the poll article, I really like that the streams are quick with a rapid fire of games. Heck, when they showed the Days of Play console, it only lasted around 20 seconds.
I feel the people that downright blast it are the people that can't keep their expectations in check.
People that expect a lot are the ones loudest about their disappointment. 🤷♂️
Managing expectations is far from easy. You can be concrete on what to expect, but depending on what you show, it's still possible to disappoint someone. You can say there's a two minute trailer for FF7 and yeah, it can curb some expectation, but if it's just a cutscene or two, it probably wouldn't go down well like a trailer featuring gameplay (such as a boss fight) would.
Sony can try, but they can only do so much. Especially since people today are very vocal.
I honestly appreciate how State of Play doesn't waste my time. 10 minutes, bang bang bang, done. I'll take that over an hour of people yammering about nothing.
I sometimes feel Sony are dammed if they do purely because its Sony. Eurogamer for example wrote a very sarcastic headline/ story in the leadup to it...& yet if it had been a Nintendo/Xbox showing I'm sure they'd never do such a writeup....
And people said MS won last year's e3 when it boiled down to them hosting mostly 3rd party trailers of stuff also appearing on ps4!
Even if stuff like Predator wasn't my cup of tea i liked a bit of showing off some indies again liked they used to mixed in with the major exclusives/AAA stuff.
I like them. I was really impressed with them leading the first "episode" with PSVR heavy content. It was assurance for me that they are committed to the peripheral and to me, one of many PSVR owners. I honestly believe that because people have had years of Sony giving them what they want, they now feel "entitled" to continue that vain. These are going to be regular videos, maybe two per month. We can't expect AAA every single video, or reveal every trailer. The second video wasn't really aimed at me, the games not on my radar. I still upvoted it on YouTube though as I appreciated the games would tick a lot of people's boxes. So, I will continue to watch and look forward to seeing what they have to show us in the future.
@ShogunRok "doesn't waste my time"
I think that's the biggest - unaddressed - problem w/ these types of "shows", people feeling like their time is being wasted. People don't want to feel like they need to plan 2 days in advance to watch a 13 minute video that doesn't show or tell them anything a trailer could that went up on twitter. We live in an "on demand" society, people don't like being told to show up at a certain time to watch something unless it's live, like sports. IF a company like Sony is saying - "Hey, do we have a show for you, make sure you are here live at 11PM, dont' go to sleep, you don't want to miss it." - then people have expectations. If they just put it on YT or their blog when they were done w/ it then people wouldn't have any expectations, they could just watch it at their leisure like we do w/ big movie trailers. And yeah, I dislike hyped up trailers too. Don't announce - new Avengers trailer tomorrow - just drop it when it's ready.
If they don't want people to have expectations the solution is extremely simple, don't announce it beforehand, just put it on the blog or twitter or Yotube when it's done. People will find it and watch it when they like. Or, just make it a weekly thing. Nintendo has "Nintendo Minute" news segments on the Switch. I think they are weekly or so. Nobody talks about how "disappointed" they are in those b/c Nintendo doesn't promote them, they just upload them to the Switch news feed. Done.
Sony is the one hyping unreasonable expectations by announcing these State of Plays days in advance. If you dont' want people salivating like dogs then don't ring the bell. Simple.
Edited for way too many typos, even for me.
Many people just forget the PlayStation brand serves millions and millions of people. The main thing that makes PlayStation Great is Variety! Every State of Play will or should not focus on what You or I want to see!! That would be a disservice to the fan base/PlayStation owners as a whole.
I think, if Sony sticks with it, the format will start satisfying more after the full reveal of the PS5. I imagine they're holding back some stuff to give the system a solid push at launch, which, honestly, is a smart idea.
@ShogunRok
Totally agree with that feeling. Id go even further though in that Sony doesnt need to announce anything beforehand. Only tease it a couple hours before and go.
Its not like it matters if you watch it live or later. Dedramatise the event !
@rjejr
Yea I agree with your point of view. However a compromise is often the right approach. I say tease it just before and then go a few hour later. Just enough to please everyone considering a short notice imp!ies your only lucky to know its coming and also feels right not to give anymore details than just a small tease.
There were certainly some over-the-top reactions about the first one, but I understood the negativity.
They announced and hyped this new (for them) concept, and then the show was basically all PSVR content, which completely overlooked the fact that very few PS4 owners actually own the thing.
Essentially, given sales figures of PSVR and PS4, 95% of the content in the first State of Play was irrelevant to 95% of PS4 owners. It's not surprising a lot of people weren't happy.
@playstation1995 A Parasite Eve remaster would be amazing!
I have positive feelings, overall, about this edition of State of Play. I think the more Sony refines the format, the better it will become.
@Shatter parasite Eve remaster would be legendary.it will happen.im happy crash bandicoot.spyro. and medievil is coming back.now parasite and syphon filter needs to come back.and I can have my favorite legendary mascot ps1 games back to either ps4 or ps5.👍😁😃.word up son
@JJ2 A couple of hours would probably tame things a bit. They do need to just figure it out, they've only had 2. They could have managed things a WHOLE lot better the first time by adding a : and 4 letters - State of Play: PSVR. This one I only watched last night b/c once I heard it was only going to be 10 minutes I lost the need to see it live. I've also seen about 7 years worth of Nintendo Directs so my expectations have learned to be in check, but Sony needs to train it's own audience on what to expect. I thought they did a good job this time myself w/ the time listing and basically saying - Medievil and reshowing (hint hint wink wink FF7R) - but people are gonna people.
I am just disappointed i couldn't get my hands on that state of play console last year
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...