EA Sports has released a longer, updated statement outlining the ongoing #EAGate scandal that has rocked the FIFA 21 community. You may recall earlier in the week, the publisher said it was investigating social media claims which appeared to insinuate that an employee had sold some of the rarest cards in the Ultimate Team mode for €1,000s.
The publisher’s now said that, as a result of its initial investigation, it has discovered “questionable activity involving a very small number of accounts and items”. The statement adds: “Although it is not a large number, if these allegations prove out, this activity is unacceptable. We want to thank our committed community members for bringing the issue to our attention so quickly.”
The company continues that “it appears one or more EA accounts, which were either compromised or being used inappropriately by someone within EA, directly entitled items to individual accounts”. While it stresses that it’s now conducting a rigorous investigation, it notes that “we will take action against any employee found to have been engaging in this activity” if it turns out to be true.
For the time being, it’s indefinitely disabled discretionary content granting, which is a feature the publisher uses primarily for customer service purposes – for example, if a technical error results in the loss of a particular card. It’s also said that it’ll ban the accounts purported to have purchased the cards for real money.
Heavy stuff, then, and it sounds like EA Sports is taking this seriously. Of course, it has no alternative option really – this seriously undermines the integrity of the entire game’s ecosystem, and legally could land the organisation in serious hot water.
[source ea.com]
Comments 32
"EA would like to express its disappointment at the actions of an employee who sold rare Ultimate Team cards for €1000. We feel that, due to the rarity of the cards in question, they could have been priced at double that, possibly more. Sadly, this employee has acted in a way which does not reflect our company values and we will be investigating into how such a mistake could have happened."
EA Gate has been standard operating procedure for the last 8 years or so.
Good. I hope it lands EA in plenty of legal trouble. I hope websites stop supporting UT with free articles. I hope it leads to all games with egregious, cynical, addictive, manipulative 'surprise mechanics' becoming outlawed and we can get back to games being designed and developed for the game's sake as the primary reason and not purely as a vehicle with which to ensnare and prey on the vulnerable.
@Hyperluminal Preach, Brother! Amen!
@LordSteev 😄 Hallelujah!!
...and yet people will defend it saying, 'but i don't spend any money on it, it can be ignored, its like collecting Panini stickers..' blah, blah, blah. I don't see Panini making billions of pounds a year profit. They wish! 😃
@Hyperluminal Hell yea! It's one thing not to spend any money on it, it's another thing entirely when it's constant presence destroys any immersion the game might have. Especially when the design is purposely insidious.
It’s a worryingly addictive experience despite the gameplay being genuinely dire. I’ve found myself playing too much because the crap rewards are so few and far between but at least I haven’t felt compelled to spend any money.
EA will only tolerate EA ripping off gamers. Be told.
Shame I was really starting to trust EA........ Ha! Nah I'm kidding of course.
Do people still play fifa!?
Let's be honest, EA is upset that the shady behaviour became public, not that it was happening.
Haven’t touched a game published by EA since the first UFC title at the beginning of the PS4 and I don’t see that changing anytime soon.
Why would this land EA in legal trouble?
The fact that spending 1000 on one card is something that is more worth it than spending 1000 legitimately in game is the ridiculous thing.
@Saucymonk 11,600,000. as of 19 November 2020 on PSN alone 👍
@BloodNinja Because they claim that cards can't be directly bought for real money, or something like that. There are 'black market' sites, but those are out of EA's direct control. If it turns out an EA employee has been selling direct, it possibly opens a whole can of worms.
Or so I've heard.
Yong Yea: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGdS0EnLW8c
Ok! Well, glad I'm not EA, then LOL
NINJA APPROVED
They have to take the issue seriously because regulators will be eyeing this and probably using it to potentially ban loot boxes.
@Saucymonk ya what this guy said
@Saucymonk North American? Football is huge in Europe and South America. It always will be. It's part of our culture.
Which is why EA found the perfect gold mine to exploit. People will never stop loving football, and FIFA encompasses the world of football.
Only way would be for EA to lose the license. But guess what? FIFA are a bunch of corrupt *****, so it's a dream match. As long as EA hands them out the big bucks, it's unlikely they will lose the license.
So... the way to fight this is in the courts and governments, in order to protect consumers from predatory practices.
@BloodNinja in an investigation EA stated that FUT is not classed as gambling because the players have no real world value after purchase. The selling of players for 1000s kinda disproves that.
The last EA game I played was FRWL on the PS2. To think that 20 years ago, they were making the best Bond games. To see what they have become, makes me glad that they no longer have the licence.
@Saucymonk the real question is, why?
We at EA are very disappointed with the former employee because he didn't share his profits with us and he won't tell us how he did it.
Unfortunately the normal people will have no idea about this and won't care and will still buy them
It is sad to see people complained about a well made game to cost 70$ but spend thousands of dollars on microtransactions. No wonder mobile games companies are making a lot of profit and company like roblox worth about 30 billion dollars.
EA only disappointed they didn't think of this first.
No matter what E.A. claim if you spend real money on something that generates a random prize its gambling..although the model is different to slot machines and the bookies you are still taking a chance and "gambling" on having something great drop for you...i wish game companies would drop loot boxes and micro transactions when games are hitting the £70 mark..E.A. are looking really shady at the mo..
EA are only angry because it turns out one of their employees is more unabashedly EA than they'll ever be
Here's a thought for EA. Make consumer retail products, where you present the product your offering, and then list a price next to it for how much you'll accept as trade for that product. Is much less prone to this type of fee manipulation.
Yes, I'm an economic genius revolutionary. I know.
@Arugula QA Sports, It's in the Name.
Check on Ebay there are enough other ways
@mrbone I know right but Pushsquare likes too keep it up that its a price hike but does not say these games are almost always MT free polished and complete without any DLC. And if we get DLC its quality stuff. But they did call the NBA2K mambo edition that costs €99 are free PS5 upgrade what a joke.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...