… And so it starts. Ubisoft has announced a new program called Quartz which will see it release limited edition in-game items as NFTs called Digits, beginning with Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon: Breakpoint. As the trailer explains, this “is just the beginning” – and make no mistake, other publishers will be keeping a very close eye on how this all plays out. EA boss Andrew Wilson has already expressed interest in the controversial business model as well.
So, what does it all mean for you? Well, NFTs – also known as non-fungible tokens – have exploded in popularity this year, as you’ve no doubt already heard. They effectively enable you to “purchase” digital content, like a photograph, GIF, social media post, or video. Ownership is stored on a kind of digital ledger powered by blockchain technology, which means you can then “sell” items to others and transfer the ownership, like you would real-world goods.
The emergence of NFTs has raised all kinds of concerns, spanning environmental issues through to fraud. However, it was only a matter of time before publishers started adding the controversial items to their games, and this is the first example. Ubisoft’s new Digits are unique in-game items which you can obtain and use; the examples shown for Ghost Recon: Breakpoint include helmets, armour, and weapon skins. Every item has a serial code, making it exclusively unique to you, while your Ubisoft Connect username will be stored in the item’s metadata.
Unlike traditional microtransactions, this is a one-of-a-kind piece of equipment, meaning no one else can have the exact same cosmetic as you have. This means you’ll be able to re-sell these items and transfer ownership to other players if you so choose. This creates an entirely new economy that publishers will no doubt be looking to exploit, and you should expect to see more of it moving forwards.
We should stress that this first batch of items will be exclusively earnable in-game, and there are some pretty high requirements attached. For example, you’ll need to have played at least 600 hours to get the helmet. Presumably this is because the program is in beta right now, with the objective to flog these items in the future.
Still, it’s interesting that Ubisoft is the first major publisher to implement the controversial technology. It’s worth reiterating that Digits are currently in beta, and aren’t currently available in countries like the UK. Ubisoft claims that it’s adopting energy-efficient technology for this program, with the power draw “one million times less” than a Bitcoin transaction. Nevertheless, it’s probably a good thing it’s announcing this after YouTube removed its dislike bar – we can’t imagine that would look pretty.
[source youtube.com]
Comments 71
Yeah, this is a bad call and I hope they will regret it.
Well this is awful. Ubisoft really know how to lead the way in utterly terrible business practices.
Nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope nope
🤮...that is all I have to say to this idea.
I have a digit on my hand for them.
NFTs are very recently under federal investigation too in the US as well. This just seems like a horrible idea.
I think this is the point in gaming where I really no longer understand what its going on anymore, having started back with the Atari. Kind of makes me want to play some C64 games.
@Zenszulu
Beat me to it!
No thanks. I beg gamers not to support this nonsense.
If this takes hold across the industry, this is the end of gaming as we know it and i will walk away from the hobby.
Horrible business practice which is even worse for the environment. Big no.
Updated the article slightly. The first batch of Digits are exclusively earnable in-game, so you can't buy them (yet). You can sell them for cryptocurrency, though.
Let me off this ride please.
It’s a Star Wars quote but it easily applies to Ubisoft right now..
“You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.”
This is another initiative designed to pray on young gamers in particular, all for the mighty £, € or $. It's getting to the stage where I'm struggling to justify buying from any of the big boys... Activision, EA and now these idiots in particular.
For me, this is the nail in the coffin for whatever the next Assassin's Creed Infinite or whatever will be.
I was still ready to offer them the benefit of the doubt and imagine that this meta-game could become something I'd enjoy, since I love the franchise so much, but at that point, I have to accept the truth : Ubisoft products are not games anymore, they're virtual vending machine.
Disgusting!
Terrible, terrible news. Shame on you, Ubi.
@Rob_230 and how is it exactly bad for the environment?
It’s all very well saying vote with your wallet, but there are always new generations of gamers coming through who’ll just live with this from day one. It gets normalised. As an older gamer I’ve seen the normalisation of micro transactions and DLC and people eventual just come to think of it as normal without even considering whether it’s right or necessary. These companies are in it for the long game, and calling new young gamers mugs and encouraging them not to open their wallets will only get us so far.
I can’t for the life of me see a way around this.
So everyone will have the same gear just with different numbers on them. Can't wait to not spend money on these.
This is a scary future with these things and i really hope the Governments crack down on them. Trust Ubi to start doing them as soon as.
The outrage will be so great that they will go back on this decision!
If this kind of thing becomes the norm for gaming I'm out I'll stick to my retro consoles plenty of great old games without this sort of s***
No surprises Ubisoft are at the front of the queue for crap like this, not content with abusing their own workforce, they now want to abuse the planet as well and all so someone can earn a helmet which is identical to millions of others but has a different number on it 🙄
I'm already on the verge of being done with modern gaming and things like this are just pushing me further to ignoring the mess it is becoming.
@dBackLash with no malice intended in my response, google it. There are hundreds, if not thousands of articles about why NFTs, bitcoin and crypto currency is bad for the environment and they will explain it much more eloquently than i ever can.
It says to play 600 hours to get the helmet, so does that mean there's only one helmet available, so first person in the world to get to 600 hours gets that helmet?
So basically I could earn these NFT's in games then sell them on ebay for hundreds? Finally making some games rewarding (money wise) from playing them
This is so stupid. I dont think the video game industry will ever return to form. I can really start to see myself playing nothing but indie games 10 years down the road.
“make no mistake, other publishers will be keeping a very close eye on how this all plays out.”
Well if we really don’t want this to become a thing in video games we should all nip this in the bud and not support it at all, it would soon be scrapped and if enough negative noise is made then it may deter other publishers from implementing them in their own games. But it’s the casual gamers, mostly kids I imagine, that don’t care about the negativity that surrounds these sort of practices and it’s those who are part of the masses who make things like this successful. Sad times for those of us who dislike these sort of things.
I'd rather buy Panzer Dragoon Saga than get into NFTs. Go home Yves Guillemot you idiot.
If you are still buying Ubisoft, EA and Activision games in 2021 then its your own fault XD
So it’s simple terms… would be like if Fortnite auctioned off a skin to the highest bidder, instead of everybody being able to buy it for a limited time, like it currently is
@ArcadeHeroes I find it tricky, especially with Call of Duty, their multiplayer is very engaging. Especially when I don’t have hours to play, between family time and work.
I never regret a call of duty game.. and it’s the same with the expansive content in Assassins Creed… now sports games are not my bag, but they got me over a barrel..
I also own a digital PS5, so yeah you’re right… it is my own fault haha
How is this energy-efficient, exactly? Are they expecting us to just take their word for it? I mean, when has a massive multi-billion dollar corporation ever been dishonest, am I right?!
@UltimateOtaku91 I'm not 100% on this but basically everyone can "earn" the helmet but each helmet will be unique to the player as the code will be one of a kind, the actual helmet will look and act the same for everyone but everyone who has it will have a different code or whatever making it unique to them. Its all rather bullsh*t and hints at a dark future where the likes of Ubi and EA get more daring.
@lolwhatno
Not quite what I had in mind but that interpretation works too!🤣
There it is boys and girls, this is yall leader. I got nothing to do with Ubisoft.
So, if I can run a botfarm in Russia to grind Breakpoint to earn digits I can then sell.....can I use them to buy Bitcoins so I can buy a PS5 from "places"?
This is ridiculous. I mean at first I want to loudly complain about them forcing bad business practices, but then I rethink the situation and they're literally selling the same exact in-game cosmetics they've been selling since Team Fortress (Valve), only now up-sold as serialized and limited edition....and people will pay for that. So now buying a ridiculous picture of a mask for your video game for real money isn't enough...now you want it customized and traced. And it's still just a ridiculous picture of a mask for your video game. Monogrammed horse armor. That's what they're marketing as this big new thing. It's utterly rediculous.
I can't even be mad. What kind of idiot gets giddy for "limited edition, serialized" skins? Remove the investor pleasing buzzwords and that's all it is.
What's even funnier is they themselves are promoting the ownership tracking and resell-ability of digital content with NFCs......do they not see this coming back on them as demand for resale rights on digital content...like...IDK....video games?
@Zenszulu Beat me to it. I also have an entirely unique digit to give them.
Just when you thought the state of gaming couldn’t get any worse along come NFT’s. The industry is a joke now in so many ways.
@get2sammyb NFT the biggest joke around a wastr of energy only to make the richest more rich.... The worst company around the one that covers for rapists. A work place where the people still dont feel safe and nothing has changed. The industry that stays quiet about these terrible things such a horrible thing.
One of the companies that brought us terrible things. free to play systems in fully priced games. Cooky cutter/ broken/ unfinished games.
But with the first things i talked about it make the other things look like a small issues.
In an instant, my excitement has turned to horror at the thought of what Beyond Good and Evil 2 is possibly being turned into behind the scenes.
@Medic_Alert I still can't understand why anyone buys non-designer cosmetics in games let alone designer. Does it matter if your Master Chief looks like other Masters Chief? IDK I played Quake DM where you just had 10 of the same Quake Guy with different primary colored shirts. Though ACNH should teach us all that people would gladly do it. If the kids want to blow $15 buying monogrammed horse armor and Restoration Hardware sword cases, and it subsidizes me playing full games unfettered on Game Pass and Now, totally in the absence of such prized content....I'm totally cool with this. Let them bankrupt their rich parents. Sometimes the stupidity of the young can be advantageous for the old....
I thought it was bad when the industry was falling all over itself to sell us core game content ripped out to sell us in pieces. Now they don't need to. Who needs $70 games and $10 upgrades. Just sell $15 Louis Vuitton raincoats in-game for a month and you can hand out the games in happy meals....
Seriously this is all so stupid though. Cooldowns and P2W was making gaming an extortionate gambling operation. But somewhere along the line people stopped needing to be coerced into spending money. Just make the lights flash brighter and they'll throw money into the machine. Who buys this stuff?
I'm usually against manipulative monetization, but I have to admit, I really can only laugh at this. The only actual use for it is completely impractical stuff that only a depraved sucker would buy, trying to tie game benefitting content to it makes no sense because that limits the market they could sell to artificially, and making sure to sell it to all makes it no different than existing mtx/dlc, and the actual practical uses for it are things that hurt industry monetization and benefit the consumer so they'll never actually use it (NFT digital game sales.) The absolute only purpose and value to it I could see is just selling vanity objects to the vain...which...is what designer has always been about, and why the American shopping mall died in 2008....
Unfortunately, for unknown reasons today, it seems like there's more money involved in selling vanity objects to the vain than selling practical objects to the practical. It's at that point we as a society should just consider nuking ourselves and calling it a good run.
Ah Ubisoft. Always finding new ways to pump their games full of microtransactions and charge the consumer about 90 times what they actually paid for the game.
@Rob_230 It's pretty much BS tho that NFTs are per definition bad for the environment. Bitcoin and Ethereum are bad for the environment (although the last one is changing to a more eco-friendly solution in the upcoming years), the only reason people say NFTs are bad for the environment is because most of them currently exist on the Ethereum blockchain.
There are a few other blockchains available that can be used for NFTs that use a fraction of the energy consumption that bitcoin or ethereum uses. And according to Ubisofts statements they aren't gonna use Ethereum anyway so it should be fine environment wise.
@UltimateOtaku91 in theory yes. In reality only a small number of people make any profit. Much like gambling. I just read that a recent study showed that 90% of NFT transactions are done by a small group of people.
I don’t….exactly…absolutely hate the idea of it in theory but of course it’ll be abused and ruined in reality.
Absolute trash.
Easy solution. More people need to support AA developers & Indies that are usually not only more ethical, but also more creative.
I can't wait for someone to release an in game nft that's broken and realise they have to issue an entire new code, as its on the block chain and unique, it can't be patched. I thought WoW had an in game market years ago that didn't require block chain for transfer of license? This feels like a horse armour dlc moment, where ubisoft take the initial hit from gaming communities about this but in 2-3 years time, it will be common to have content in games like fifa etc locked behind this bs. It's a sad day
@thefourfoldroot I'd like to reward you with the award for most sensible comment of all time. I've genuinely never seen anyone say this before.
Not too keen on the idea and i can undetstand everybodys ire but....you dont have to farm the nft's out of your game,you have a choice...its going to suck if they start locking trophys untill you get one of these little blighters...once again i dont like the idea of this but i'm not going to let it ruin my gaming..
@thefourfoldroot there is no way around this and people saying vote with your wallets just seem to forget they wont give 2 squirts of vimto if you buy their games or not..most people saying this will eventually buy their games when that magic sale price "carrot" is dangled under their noses..
@UltimateOtaku91 Actually wondered about this myself. Other rare pieces of equipment from challenges or limited availability, too. Just means you'd have to be dedicated if they aren't widely available items. Hopefully the big players don't start coming in with hacked accounts or even shared, would completely screw everyone else. Then there's the connotations of this currency if it was saleable. Imagine gangsters taking turns playing games all day and threatening children over voice chat to get a piece of gear that would net them enough tokens to sell for 5 grand on eBay lol
Everybody paints this as a doomsday Scenario, but having actual ownership over digital items which can be used outside a centralised ecosystem (like PSN, or any other proprietary platform) can in theory be more empowering to the consumer, since buying a digital item can only enrich the platform holders.
Of course we have to see what BS companies such as EA and UBI might have in store with this tech. I just find the discourse here very one sided and ill informed.
Unfortunately I do think there’s nothing we can do about it. The <1% of people- the whales, will be enough to support this.
As much as I love AC. I hope the next one crashes and burns. Not supporting this no matter the outcome.
Don’t hate this idea yet. Your current micro transactions have zero value now. Now a micro transaction that is numbered for uniqueness, you actually own it, it will go up in value and you have the rights to sell it? Interested to see how this pans out.
Of course, as always, thousand of internet authorities who would never use a particular game feature are going to be screaming that no one should be allowed to have the feature. And so it starts indeed…
I have a hard enough time keeping up with the technology in my job and I work in IT. I still don't understand NFTs or blockchain technology and I am fine with that. Either way this sounds like band wagon crap. Waiting for the wheels to fall off.
We’ll all I can say is F**k ...that ….sh*t.
Ubisoft... please **** ***
Actually if you buy an NFT you don't actually buy the digital good, the copyright of it, the ability to reproduce it, or anything else. You own the NFT, which is something made up and only has value because a person buys it. You can't do anything with it other than sell it to someone else.
Honestly it's only a matter of time before they're regulated away. The only reason for a non-insane person to buy one is to launder money, dodge taxes, or for some other illegal reason.
@frankmcma yeah i agree..even though i'm not too keen on this i have to consider that there are people who will want something like this and see a benefit..people have a choice but i'm starting to think that there is certain group of people that would prefer us to have no choice..how boring would that be if you had no choice in the decisions you make that determine how you enjoy your life?
So what's the reason they needed blockchain instead of a regular database to enable resale of microtransactions? They could've still artificially limited quantity with a non-buzzword database.
In the old days I used to be Ubihard but all the splooge they churn out these days just makes me Ubisoft.
@get2sammyb > You can sell them for cryptocurrency, though.
Ah there it is. They're doing this to avoid paying cuts to platforms and taxes to governments.
Much like cryptocurrency, I'm unsure if nfts are a big scam or I'm just too dim to understand them. I'm staying out of them either way.
Though surely ubisoft could've handed out unique sellable items before if they'd wanted, before the idea got a trendy name?
Seriously, how is this anything other than an amiibo? That was a dlc locked behind a physical good, that generally isn't unique but some are rare and limited and holds resale value? Yeah most of us hate those too, but the point is, it doesn't really affect the core game, it's just another revenue stream of cosmetic mtx. Idk why anyone would care their clone armor is unique but some do I guess. My thinking is the back door on this is the auction house. Sell rare unique content, build in an auction house like Diablo 3pc did say launch, and skim 20% off sales. Pure profit, and has nothing to do with the game. It could go deep and make a new f2p model where you actually pay for things in real cash, but that's already possible return shark cards etc.
I can't think deviously enough to think of how this affects the actual games, but gives lots of opportunity for those with more cash than sense to pump coin into the investors.
The only difference here is investor friendly buzzwords. Unique limited digital content? Already exists but it's account locked with a central drm server instead of public block chain as the drm. People buy game content for real money. Wow, teso, FFXIV, you can buy gear, npcs, weapons, houses for virtual currency, which you buy on PSN for real currency. What's new here other than three method of drm and the meaningless "unique" part of it.
Blech.
Shoot this idea straight into the sun.
Why is everybody so against this? Atleast the vocal ones. Companies should be experimenting, trying new things, exploring?
I have learned in life, if there's something that gets a very strong vocal hate, it probably is a demonized thing with limited basis in reality.
@reek I would be very interested in seeing the particular life lessons that has given you that outlook.
@3MonthBeef I've read many attempts at explaining it, but there seems to be nothing tangible, nothing that can be made as a (traditional at least) asset.
Many cheerleaders for nfts talk about the meta verse too, which honestly only adds to my confusion.
Though that said, there probably is money to be made, if people are prepared to spend it. You could make a profit from mud, if enough people bought into the idea.
@reek companies can explore, experiment and try new things without trying to exploit their consumers, which is what NFT’s are. These companies should should focus on releasing their full priced games in a reasonable state and without needing multiple patches a year on from release before trying to fleece their players more than they already are. The industry is a joke and people like me are rightfully angry about this *****.
@Kidfried Yes, nfts are scarce by definition, because they're "non-fungible". But at least the owner can decide to resell it. Might become valuable, might become worthless, that's for the community to decide.
Not saying this is going to be greatly implemented, but I'd wait and see. I'm a physical only type gamer, because I like to own my games and be able to resell them. Better than sinking money into hundreds of digital games and items that are connected to my account that can never be turned into money again. This tech, if implemented correctly, could make it possible to resell at your own conditions.
Not saying this is perfect or never gonna be abused, but at least keep an open mind, see how things develop and ultimately vote with your wallet.
Hard pass, I will NEVER buy into this disgusting and environmentally damaging practice.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...