Ah, the poor old PS Vita. Sony's second generation handheld was largely abandoned just a few years into its life following rather dismal sales and a lack of dedicated software support. But as with any gaming system, the Vita certainly has its hardcore fans — and for what it's worth, we always thought that it was an especially slick little machine.
Anyway, it's 2022, and the Vita's still being snubbed by Sony. The Japanese giant has just revealed its overhauled PlayStation Plus service, which includes three tiers of increasingly expensive subscription. The most pricey of these tiers, PS Plus Premium, is basically PlayStation's answer to full backwards compatibility.
A Premium sub gets you access to a (currently unconfirmed) selection of PS1, PS2, and PSP titles, which — as far as we know — can be either streamed or downloaded on PS5 and PS4. A catalogue of PS3 games will be also be available to stream.
Of course, Vita is the only PlayStation console that's missing out on the fun — there's no mention of the handheld whatsoever in Sony's announcement. Now, it's worth noting that some Vita titles made use of the hardware's additional control methods — like the rear touchpad or gyro motion sensors. This could potentially make it a lot harder to emulate these games on PS5 and PS4, which could explain the Vita's PS Plus absence — at least in part.
But it's still a bit of a shame that the Vita's being overlooked once again. Obviously we don't know what classic games the Premium tier will include yet — we're of the mind that is has to be a pretty damn good selection to warrant the price — but without Vita, many will argue that it paints an incomplete picture of PlayStation history.
Comments 48
I'm surprised they didn't choose Vita over PSP since it's more modern than the PSP. You can't tell me that the Vita would of been more difficult to implement than the PSP.
Surely nobody thought they would include it while they are still heavily supporting it? Why cripple all the sales by giving it away for free.
Just be thankful we still like in a thriving Vita world. One day they may decide to drop it and just forget it existed.
At least add support for the proper games, those that don't require the Vita's gimmick controls. That would be my dream.
Shame, I wanna play Uncharted: Golden Abyss, Killzone: Mercenaries & BLOPS: Declassified since they're my last games in these series. Hopefully in the future they'll make it work.
@Snake_V5
You're right, I can't. That would be too logical.
Jimbo Ryan doesn't logic
other than back panel controls, surely the DS4 or Dual Sense can emulate the gyro elements? Both controllers have a touch pad, so only those which have mandatory back screen functionality would suffer?
It's unfortunate if Vita is left out, but hey - I've got a real one. But it would be nice to have the system in the new service.
Considering I have a hacked Vita that I can put any game on it; I’m ok with that lol but then again I have Adrenaline on it to play PSP games as well
@michaelf Yeah you're right, but it would likely take extra tuning / testing to make sure it all works as intended on a game-by-game basis.
@ShogunRok yeah - and that's "too costly". Much easier to say "no Vita games" than put in a bit of effort, ey?
/sarcasm.
But I do agree with you that Sony would have to put in resources to check each game they're uploading to the platform, so perhaps it wasn't deemed worthy
I think the problem with the Vita is that there was never really all that much first party support for it so there aren't really that many titles that they could offer easily in a subscription. Most people love the 3rd party JRPGS from that catalogue which might be tricky to get licensing for.
@michaelf There are also Vita Games using the Camera tho. Like Uncharted for example
@ATaco And yet it was home to the best Uncharted (fight me), the best Killzone (fight me), the original home of Gravity Rush, the original home of Tearaway, AND the original home of the best Wipeout collection yet made.
That's because they know the library available on PSV wasn't worth converting into a file format that they could stream on the service. There are maybe a handful of titles available on the dropped like a box of rocks handheld... most of which are available as better versions on PS3 or PS4. Golden Abyss is the only one that really stands out and is not available elsewhere.
It’s because PS Vita II announcement coming up in the next PS games showcase 😂
To be fair, the amount of Vita games that aren't also on PS3/4 isn't tremendously high, and a good number of the ones that aren't would be pretty tricky to emulate because of the use of both touch panels, or the camera. Uncharted Golden Abysa would be a nightmare, but Killzone Mercenary would be sick to play on a PS5.
@Snake_V5 it would be more difficult to implement, it being more powerful than a PSP means more grunt required to emulate, plus the feature set differences. Granted I'm sure a PS5 wouldn't have trouble emulating the Vita (PS4 would probably be trickier), but then the problems go to the things I mention above. Not many Vita games that aren't already playable on PS4/5 and awkwardness with the small remaining library.
Not surprised, vita doesn't really have a lot games that are vita only. Alot of the games were ports or indie that are on other platforms. I can think of maybe a handful of vita only. Uncharted,killzone,lbp, severed and ..
@Snake_V5 Its the rear touch panel and all that gubbins.
Realistically the Vita didn't have any big exclusives that weren't available on PS3 or a sequel to some other franchise. WipEout 2048 is playable within Omega Collection and AC Liberation is available on PS4. That leaves, what Golden Abyss?
@Snake_V5 it's because they've already implemented a psp emulator into the PS4/ps5 software. It's what the locoroco and parappa the rapper remaster run on.
The main reason that Vita is the only excluded platform is that it's the only system that relied on ARM-architecture. PS1, PS2 and PSP all relied on MIPS-architectures, which means that there are some similar challenges to address. PS3 is a prominent platform that has a broad popular library among the mainstream, so I'm sure that they're looking to bring this to native compatibility as well. Vita was a platform that was popular among a very small audience, but wasn't successful, and is therefore a much lower priority for implementing in a service.
@IonMagi yup! Forgot about that bit! Tearaway also had that functionality as well.
@MFTWrecks I think I will have to fight you over best Uncharted and Killzone and Gravity Rush already got remastered but I guess it was cool that Wipeout was bundled in a great collection. Don't get me wrong, I loved my Vita but in terms of first party support Sony abandoned it to focus on the PS4.
Freedom Wars on my ps5 would be nice... Guess i don't get it
Pathetic but not shocking given how idiotically Sony managed things with Vita from the start. Still, that era is long over and the system had some killer games that deserve to be brought back.
I think the “failure” of PS Vita was really traumatic for PlayStation or one of the PlayStation “bosses” really takes this one personally…
The Vita is dead so it makes sense.
Glad I modded my VITA! It's a bit weird they didn't include those games when they basically don't support the console anymore!
@SoulChimera Friend... You may want to sit down for this...
lolol, that comment made me chuckle.
They could have worked on a handful of exclusives even just for optics. Something like Soul Sacrifice, Freedom Wars and, like, 3 more that are easy to port. It wouldn't require that many resources and it'd make them look a bit better, but alas.
They really want to kill off all trace of its handheld dont they, they could have added all the vita games to the higest tier and added the vita as support and it would have been great to play on the go. Vita would and never was I dont think in Nintendos league but for those have that system they could have revived it just as an extra for those owners
It makes no sense not to include Vita for one key reason: PsTV existed. This was already a "gimmickless" Vita and simply didn't run games that required too many "extra features."
Vita would’ve been nice, damn games are expensive on the store and physical.
@SoulChimera I was so mad at this comment until I realised the sarcasm ngl 😂😂
I mean they can add it later if people make enough noise about it
It's sad because the Vita did have some great titles and was very technically impressive for the time. I've always had a soft spot for handhelds, but Sony acted like the Vita was dead by 2014, and it limped along for years after without Sony. Plus It'd be challenging to adapt some of those titles for a non-touch interface. Sony still demonstrating they never believed in Vita, not then and not now. 😔
Would have been a perfect opportunity to get more Vita games exposed to major PS fans. Oh well, Freedom Wars, Muramasa Rebirth and Uncharted Golden Abyss will need to sit on the corner indefinitely yet again.
Shame really, but they might add it down the line. Dumb gimmicks like the rear touch pad do make it tricky though. So glad I still have mine.
I quite like my Vita and still play stuff on it any time I have to travel or have to take my kid somewhere and wait on him. It surrrrre beats reading the news these days!
I hope we see the Vita support later down the road. Maybe it just needs a bit more time to sort out the Vita features. Still pretty sweet having PS1 and PSP so that's a start. Now just need to see what games we will get
Wouldn't of minded playing persona 4 golden on the big screen, oh wait I can
PlayStation vita TV 😂
No surprises here, alas. Not even much of a point in excusing this with hardware challenges - not only a good bunch of Vita exclusive classics didn't seem to heavily use them, but the ones that did never stopped Sony from releasing PlayStation TV way back when. But then again, I have no stake in this matter (I've already commented that I don't picture myself playing such games on PS4 which I'd have to stream to the same damn Vita); it may be more of a bummer for home console users who never had the handheld.
@tameshiyaku
Not exactly the same but the DualShock 4 and DualSense have the front touch pad. At least for Uncharted: Golden Abyss, it shouldn't be hard to adapt.
Vita has some bangers.
I was also sad to not see Vita listed, but it makes sense given the motion controls.
Don’t forget we had vita tv so a number of games were already DualShock compatible. More legacy disrespect from Sony.
@Shepherd_Tallon What’s the news? Is it that rumour Sony will stop support of the Vita in 2027? I doubt that’s true. They are in it for the long run. Haha.
@Jacko11 Understandable. Reading some of the comments on the internet can make you want to bang your head against a brick wall. Haha.
They should remake and expand Killzone Mercenary, it was such an amazing experience.
@Cloud7794 or even just stop charging an insane amount of money for the storage. Better yet just release the proprietary code for the vita cards and let 3rd party make some cheaper ones. This and primarily this was the reason for failure of the Vita. Storage was too damn expensive.
@KidBoruto The dual shock 3, 4 and dual sense all support "motion controls" so I dont know what you mean.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...