
Squeaky-clean PlayStation exclusive Foamstars arrives on PlayStation February 6th as a PS Plus Essential offering, and making good on its earlier threats, publisher Square Enix confirmed the game will feature AI-generated art. This is in keeping with the "aggressive" AI policy the company intends to implement.
At a recent press event, VGC asked Foamstars producer Kosuke Okatani if the contentious tech had been used during development. Okatani claims that most of the game was made traditionally: "All of the core elements in Foamstars – the core gameplay and the things that make the game enjoyable – are all made by hand." A few icons were created using Midjourney, a generative AI tool that turns text prompts into images. Okatani says that regarding game content: "This makes up about 0.01% or even less, but we have dabbled in it by creating these icons in the game".
Square Enix later clarified in a statement that "AI was used in the creation of the in-game album covers for the music featured" and that "as developers, we're always looking at new technologies". Putting the business to bed, the publisher declared: "In this instance, we experimented with Midjourney using simple prompts to produce abstract images. We loved what was created and used them as the final album covers players will see in the game. Everything else was created entirely by our development team."
With Final Fantasy VII Rebirth right around the corner, it remains to be seen how much restraint Square Enix has exercised throughout development. The tech was used in Remake to match in-game character facial and lip expressions to dialogue, and the company wants to use it to further "enhance our development productivity", so make sure to count Cloud's fingers and toes carefully.
How do you feel about AI-generated assets' seeming inevitability in video games? Is it the death of artistic expression or the inevitable march of progress? Generate your response in the comments section below.
[source videogameschronicle.com]
Comments 37
When it's a one man team or a tiny indie developer I can understand it but when you're a big corpo acting like you can't afford to pay someone to draw you a few signs? It's just not a good look.
They just cheapin out.
I've really grown to despise SE over the past few years, outside of FF they have nothing going for them and their leaders are out of touch morons always too late to the party.
I do appreciate Square Enix for at least being upfront about it. It does feel like this is an inevitability though. Even if people complain, companies will just try harder to hide it
@DennisReynolds They really are starting to sound like the Elon Musk of the gaming world. Slowing moving closer to The likes of EA, Activision, and that idiot that was running Unity up until a short time ago.
They seem to have nothing meaningful to say in terms of gaming, in favor of strategizing the best formula to satiate the greed driven shareholders.
@KundaliniRising333 I would say they're worse then EA. EA have been pretty ok this gen imo and they didn't even jump heavy on to NFT's. Not saying EA are now suddenly great they aren't but they are no where near as bad as they were last gen and do a better job at the reading the room then SE does.
want to blame anyone, blame their new CEO. he said they were going to, using his words here, "aggressively" go after using AI.
Imagine being a multi-billion dollar company like Square and they resort to using AI art generators lmao.
Come on Square, be better. You have entire departments of talented artists that can easily create some album covers for in-game bands.
@ATaco Sorry, but I don’t really get this outrage. Most games have music generated by synthesizer, and there is no outrage like „Why don’t they order a small orchestra for hand-made music? They must be mean.“. This all reminds me of today‘s technologies which we love and were hated back then. Photography? Kills painters. Records? Kill musicians. Films? Kill actors. TV? Kills cinemas. Video games? Kill board games. AI? Kills artists, actors, voice actors, everyone and everything. But actually, they became separate forms of art and/or entertainment. So in the near future, AI will make things possible we don’t image right now, especially in video games. And we’ll be happy with that.
Than they must accept my AI generated money. Won't pay even my free time to AI s*it.
Square Enix's determination to torpedo their goodwill over the past few years is astounding to see. They desperately need new management or I really worry about their future once they're done milking Final Fantasy remakes and re-releases.
Can't say I'm happy to see this but at the very least it is for icons that really hold no real value overall. After all I don't think anyone was going to be interested in looking at fake album covers in a multiplayer game.
The concern is of course how slippery this slope could get. This and FF7R's lip sync are at least as far as I'm concerned responsible ways of using the tech. It's when something more substantial like character design, game design, music production, etcetera that will then cause some more legitimate concern.
Grr ai bad I not play grr. Get a grip it for 0.01% of the game. When it’s for 99% of a game come back then but quit trying to pretend you have morals and actually care for the jobs this seemingly is taking away
Wait...people were planning to play Foamstars in the first place? Gonna pass on this bargain bin Splatoon knock-off whether you cheaped on the Art or not.
Gamers: Games are taking too damn long to make it's getting ridiculous.
Also gamers: They used the tiniest little bit of AI art to help speed up development and let their real artists focus on more important aspects of the game so I'm disgusted and they are dead to me.
@Pranwell @Max_the_German I think we need to hear both sides here.
Yes, AI is here to stay and will revolutionize every facet of our lives, from industry to entertainment, and mostly for the better, with a lot of caveats and abuses along the way.
And yes, AI will open the door to abuses if every way (politics, media, social, economy, war, etc) of such a scale that it could be civilization ending (or at least a
drastic shift), and therefore has incredibly hard to solve ethical issues embedded in it.
Both sides are right, and extremists of either side are wrong to not consider the other. If only we had people in charge (politics and corpo CEOs and such) with values and principles to make sure a good fine line is ridden during this incredible transition phase. Sadly we don't, which is why we'll probably get the worst of each side whatever we bitch about on forums...
Not that I will buy this, but I have no issue with - let's say - background stuff being AI generated. The problem is that it will eventually take over main assets..
I'm curious to what these look like? Is this sorta like how splatoon as it's ingame music covers?
@max_the_german that’s not equivalent. A synthesiser is an instrument played/used by a person. if the music was written by AI we’d be in the same space.
The problem with ai is not “ai” itself but the fact that the models are trained on stolen art scraped from the internet. Every piece is technically a derivative work and the original creator should be credited / reimbursed. See the ongoing arguments with SAG-AFTA and rights of actors to their image and voice.
It will never not be funny how some who openly Pirate music, movies video games ect suddenly spawn a moral compass when it comes to AI art 🤣
Well, according to a few lawsuits now, you can't copyright an image created by AI, so feel free to steal those "final album covers people will see in the game". The upside of using AI is it is quick and comparatively cheap. The downside is that you own nothing. So I don't think people should be too worried about AI taking on the more interesting work from artists, like animations, character design, etc, as those are the kinds of things that the corpo's are going to want to ensure is a protectable IP.
@3Above haha very true
I have no issue with this and AI in general. People are still free to vote with their wallets and time.
Personally I think it's quite exciting to see what can be achieved with AI in games.
In the future a single developer could end up creating something we think of as AAA with the help of AI.
@Bezzator That‘s a fair point in my opinion. And still: Also artists have learned their skills from existing pieces of art. They are inspiration for both artists and AI systems. Generating non-generic pieces of art with AI requires new artistical skills, you still need some person as an artist, now with more powerful tools as ever. And, sadly, the most polygonal models and textures are not inspired pieces of art.
AI lipsync makes sense, icons and album covers make them look cheap. At least they are upfront about it, it probably happens all the time lately.
Also:
Foamstars propping up the bar driving in a car it looks so easy
Foamstars propping up the bar driving in a car tonight
Cinema will kill the theatre. Actors will be all unemployed.
Tv will kill the cinema.
Netflix will kill the cinema.
Honestly whenever something new comes along the pushback is unreal.
We have to be risk aware not risk adverse.
@Max_the_German
For me it depends on how it’s used. For small stuff like this it’s probably just saving artist time anyhow. We all champion trying to reduce dev burnout and I see this as a possible solution to do so.
Sure glad those people who are crying about this being taken over by robots feel good lining up at the self-checkout at Walmart or getting their drone delivery from Amazon.
It's not like the CEO is sitting at their desk messing around with Bing Image Creator. The creative people are using it to expand their toolbox and make mundane tasks easier
IDK about AI art in video games. But we've all seen AI art of our favorite characters from anime, cartoons and like. It might resemble Naruto but I think a Naruto drawn by a human hand usually looks closer to me.
Artists have always drawn inspiration from other art. People assume that using A.i. is a cop out or not real art. It takes a great deal of skill to create a great A.i. image.
It's not just a case of typing 'make me an image of x'. It takes an artist to then take that raw data and crop, cut , apply post rendering techniques in order for a final usable image. Virtually every good piece of A.i art requires some form of post processing in a photo editing tool, which takes skill and intelligence to use correctly.
AI has been with us for years, and its evolution has grown. To me, it is a double-edged sword. The best they can do is to be transparent if AI is used and given supervision.
You know how lots of devs are losing their jobs lately… this is why.
What will we think of AI when game development times are halved because coding, QA, art and sound assets are all streamlined, when they are released bug free because an AI could test every permutation of a games function in the fraction of the time it would take a team of humans to do it. People are going to lose their jobs, yes. But when has any world shaking technology in the history of mankind not caused a shift in the work skills to exploit the new technology, leaving those behind who will not/can not move with it.
I mean, the game art design and game concept already feels pretty much something an AI would generate from "copy nintendo but not too much" input.
@Mikey856
No its not. Corporate greed yes, but not this.
@MikeOrator well yes precisely. What else would be the point of using ai. 🤦🏻♂️ point is it’s being used and replacing human actors. Inevitable but still sad
I don't see the problem as this is the way the world is moving, why pay someone when you can use a text prompt and do it yourself? I understand the arguments against corporate greed or they can afford it, but commonsense dictates why pay for something if there's no need for the services? Those artists need to invest in training in Midjourney and other generative AI tools and then touch up the results, we all have to retrain and early bird catches the worm.
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...