
MultiVersus has re-released and we reckon it’s pretty good, as explained in our review. As is always with the case with free-to-play titles, though, its business model is being put under huge scrutiny. Many feel that the pace at which new characters can be unlocked is far too slow, and while it’s probable new in-game Events will speed up the process, fans aren’t happy.
Perhaps most egregious of all, however, is the allusion to a microtransaction for extra lives. In the current version of the game, the Looney difficulty for the fighter’s single player Rifts mode includes a bullet point with the following description: “Complete matches with a limited number of lives per day. (You can purchase more).” Looney mode isn’t supposed to be available until 10th July, but some players were able to access it early through a glitch, and discovered a single life costs 49 Gleamium (approximately $0.50).

According to an update from developer Player First Games, this is a “bug”. Here’s what it wrote on Discord and social media: “We’d also like to let you know that the option to purchase extra lives is a bug that has been addressed and is not an intended feature in the game.”
This is one of those rare occasions where the developer probably should have owned its mistake and acknowledged it as such. The reality is that the code currently exists within the game to buy extra lives, and we can’t imagine any scenario where such a feature would be present as part of a bug. Perhaps it intended to remove the option at launch after experimenting with it, but then that’s still not a bug, is it?
Honesty is the best policy, and while it’s ultimately a good thing Player First Games is getting rid of this microtransaction, it’s done unnecessary damage by seemingly lying about the situation instead of owning it.
[source twitter.com]
Comments 8
Pay to live, sounds just like real life
Game development is hard. I'm sure they tinkered with this initially because WB is WB, then fortunately decided to not implement it in the finished mode that'll come out later. Weird thing to not just come clean with though, seems MORE shady now that they're obviously lying about it.
If that pic w/ the words (You can purchase more) on it is real and not just someone having a go on Reddit, then whoever said "bug" probably should be fired. But will probably be promoted to President of the company instead b/c lying and receipts don't matter anymore. 😩
We are getting 35 years back, where you payed for any life (credit) on gaming machines ...except you didn't have to pay for machine itself.
Coding sure is getting complex, now bugs in the program create accidentally written monetization schemes all on their own! We truly live in the future.
@Gaia093 They'll probably just blame it on AI and call it a day.
You’re not telling us a free-to-play game was trying to rip-off its players and back-peddled when it was caught out, the shock, the horror!
Would've respected them more if they had told the truth.
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...