
Sony will be keeping a close eye on the courtroom over the coming weeks, as Palworld has been struck by a Nintendo lawsuit overnight. Many had expected the Mario maker to come after the surprise survival game success earlier in the year, after its creature designs appeared to lift directly from the Pokémon franchise. However, it seemed like Tokyo-based developer Pocketpair had eschewed legal action – until last night.
Nintendo released a statement declaring that it had filed a patent infringement lawsuit on 18th September, seeking compensation for damages. It didn’t explicitly state which patent rights it believes Palworld infringes; it’s also interesting that it’s followed this legal path as opposed to one involving copyright, although it’s clearly spent the best part of a year building its case and has clearly determined this is the strongest path to victory.
In a statement, Pocketpair said it’s “unaware of the specific patents we’re accused of infringing upon, and we’ve not been notified of such details”. It continued: “Pocketpair is a small indie game company based in Tokyo. Our goal as a company has always been to create fun games. We will continue to pursue this goal because we know that our games bring joy to millions of gamers around the world.”
It also argued that fighting this court case will have implications for the game: “It’s truly unfortunate that we will be forced to allocate significant time to matters unrelated to game development due to this lawsuit. However, we’ll do our utmost for our fans, and to ensure that indie game developers are not hindered or discouraged from pursuing their creative ideas. We apologise to our fans and supporters for any worry or discomfort that this news has caused.”
All of this will have implications for PlayStation, as it was widely expected a PS5 version of the game would be announced at Tokyo Game Show next week. Gematsu spotted that the game was due to be on display for Sony’s system at the Japanese convention in the coming days; whether this lawsuit will alter those plans remains to be seen. It’s highly likely Pocketpair was planning to make an announcement during next week’s rumoured State of Play.
It’s also worth noting that Sony Music subsidiary Aniplex has been investing heavily into Palworld. The company announced earlier in the summer that it had formed Palworld Entertainment, a new division similar in concept to The Pokémon Company, designed to explore “commercial business endeavours” beyond the game, presumably including animes, comics, and licensed toys.
With all of this taken into account, Sony has a vested interest in quashing this lawsuit from Nintendo, which threatens to derail its plans. While we’re not legal experts, we’d expect proceedings to be settled outside of court – although things could get spicy if this drags on, especially when you consider Nintendo must be confident it’s going to win this case given the length of time it’s taken to file it.
[source nintendo.co.jp, via x.com]
Comments 48
I'm all for fighting for your right to your own patents, but surely this money would be much better spent on making an actual next-gen Pokemon game, rather than the woefully buggy low-tech slop Game Freak has served with Sword/Shield and Scarlet/Violet.
There is a timeline out there where Nintendo managed to wrestle control of the franchise away from Game Freak and Creatures Inc, and had actually competent studios do the mainline games and achieve world peace.
Utterly pathetic.
Pokémon Go File a Lawsuit
Palworld has been a better Pokemon game then the actual pokemon games have been for the last decade.
@HotGoomba Very good.
Nintendo shouldn't win this, game design shouldn't be patented and if it's the character designs that warrant the lawsuit, unless it's an exact copy I can't see them winning this. Look at the designs from Dragon Quest and then Pokemon, it's basically what Palworld has done. In the end though, it's Nintendo and the only thing they love more than making half-baked Pokemon games in recent years is lawsuits.
I wonder if this derails all the PS5 announcement plans or they just go ahead anyway.
It's pretty obvious Sony and Pocketpair were going to make a big deal out of the PlayStation version next week.
@get2sammyb They should carry on with the reveal if Sony have already spent the money, it's not like the Palworld will get taken down right away, of course I could be drunk on cope....
@get2sammyb I really don’t know why. For most the 15mins fad of this game is over.
If there is definitely a patent infringement then I'm all for Nintendo taking them to court, you don't pay to patent something for no reason.
As someone mentioned on NintendoLife, Nintendo have 3 patents for pokemon
They do have 3 patents around data storage and transfer of "objects" in a virtual space that specifically deal with Pokémon; 20240100432, US11782898B2 and US11782898B2. These deal with software and coding techniques, as well as DB infrastructure.
Not a fan of Nintendo's overly litigious nature
How long do they have the IP and they couldn't come up with a game like Palworld?
It's utterly pathetic how incompetent these companies are.
One indie dev comes along and gives the fans the game they didn't know they wanted for decades on FIRST TRY.
Someone finally showed Nintendo how it's done and now they're mad lmao
This is kinda reminds me of Capcom who sued Koei-Tecmo because they used gameplay mechanics or DLC expansions for Dynasty Warrior & Hyrule Warrior that looks similar from Capcom games. iirc KT lost the lawsuit and must pay Capcom like a million USD or something.
Possibly Pocketpair would lose since Nintendo has big influence in Japan.
It's unlikely Palworld would be taken down. I think at worst some changes will have to be made and don't forget millions of people paid for this game.
Nintendo copied some monsters from Dragon Quest in Pokemon. Square Enix could have sued Nintendo for that.

@Otaku1 They aren't suing based on the character designs, just the game design mechanics that they paid to patent.
This Is getting ridiculous it's never a year with out Nintendo suing someone
THAT PICTURE! Give whoever did it a promotion and quickly.
Also Palworld was pretty fun tbh I lost a month of my gaming time to it
Of course they should protect their IP and patents. I'm just surprised the lawsuit hasn't happened sooner.
Virtually every review I read used the phrase 'Pokémon with guns' at some point.
The games have gone downhill steadily over the past 7 or so years. Sun & Moon and ORAS were decent efforts, but generations 8 and 9 are the low point for the series. Hopefully Z-A can do what Arceus couldn’t, and be a good game without looking like it’s from 2006.
@PaperAlien I was happy with the picture too, hahaha!
nintendo’s like that spoiled entitled golden child brat that gets a pass & gets away with everything despite being mediocre af , imo . they treat their delusional fanboys like crap, & do grimy **** like this too
@LowDefAl 100% agreed. The reason this took so long is because Nintendo did their homework and feels confident in a win. All litigation is dangerous (I think my firm has been in actual trial once in the last two years) which is why most people settle. Patent litigation is especially dangerous.
@nomither6 Mediocre? Some of the best games of the past 7 years are Nintendo made games.
@nomither6 they still release some quality titles like the latest Mario and Zelda, but they definitely play it safe with their franchises (though I applaud them for what they did with wii and switch). It's one of the main reasons I moved on from Nintendo.
@Otaku1 except they’re not suing for that. It’s some mechanics in the game they patented. You can literally look it up yourself.
@UltimateOtaku91 yes that is the one. HeadPirate on NL has done a wonderful job explaining and I commend him for that. It’s quite dangerous to go in and talk without knowing what it is actually about. Because I see a lot of comments here, NL and PX thinking it’s a copyright infringement DESPITE the lawsuit being a patent infringement. I think now most people in NL now understand though while some here and PX don’t quite understand either.
If Palworld did violate any of those patents, then they are going to be taken to court.
Dunno, but I always felt like PocketPair was violating something with Palworld, I always thought it was copyright but it seems Nintendo has filled some patents.
Nothing but some Ninten HOS!!!
I'm sorry but I'm with Nintendo on this one.
It basically just a Pokémon rip off.
My only real suprise is that it's taken Nintendo this long to take action
Did Nintendo fob it off until the rumbling started that Sony was looking to support it? I think so.....
It is amusing that it took them this long to file the lawsuit, but as the article said, their lawyers were definitely busy building the case for this one before filing it.
I tried Palword on PC, it's a great game on its own merit for an early access especially after the disappointment that was Scarlet/Violet. For me it doesn't have a lasting value as I got burn out quicker than regular Pokemon games. You can't argue however, some of the Pal designs are really close to their Pokemon counterpart with minimal alteration like colours and maybe body parts.
It'll be interesting to see where Nintendo is taking this case; but as a customer and a long-time Pokemon fan, I hope they lose this one and it'll be their wake up call to not release another sloppy trash like Scarlet/Violet.
Nintendo is so scummy
They also shutdown grass roots fighting tournaments for having SmashBros there
They're almost as bad as Disney
@IamJT could you explain what makes patent litigation or infringement dangerous?
If I remember correctly, Capcom sued KT for patent infringement as well?
Nintendo's lawyers strike again.
Nintendo wants a monopoly on these Pokemon style games. Why allow healthy competition if you can just sue the opposition? That way you can continue to release low effort games and make millions.
I'm surprised this hasn't happened sooner TBH.
@UnlimitedSevens lawyers???
YOU MEAN NINJAS?
@DennisReynolds That's true not the Pokemon titles though they were total garbage. 😬
There also partnered with Microsoft
Can't help but think the timing is not a coincidence. Close to getting a PS5 release. A console that is decidedly more popular in Nintys back yard than Xbox where it's been out ages and they pick now to kick off?
Legal Eagle did a good video about how Japanese copyright law is a bit different than the rest of the world. Even "very similar but still different" cases that normally don't get anywhere in the US have sometimes gone the way of the plaintiff in Japan.
All of that said, I have no idea what will happen here. My gut says Palworld will likely survive or at worst, have to redesign some things, which would be easy IMO. I guess we'll see.
@Golem25 Nintendo's been around since the 1800's. They aren't strapped for cash. They're more concerned about sending a message. And regardless of how they attained the IP, litigation is how they roll. I saw this coming since the day this game released
@get2sammyb Litigiry Puff?
@anoyonmus
NINJA lawyers
I'm only surprised it took this long. Nintendo must have been preparing for this lawsuit very thoroughly.
I mean... we all could tell it would happen. The similarities are obvious.
Can't be surprised when it finally does.
They are right to sue, I am not the hugest Pokémon fan but IPs should be protected. This is not some kind of inspiration or omage, it’s a blatant rip-off that capitalizes on the recognizable appearances of characters created by another company …
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...