It might be cool to hate on Assassin's Creed these days, but there's no getting away from the fact that the series is more successful than ever before, raking in absurd amounts of dosh for Ubisoft. What was once a stealth-focused sandbox franchise is now a proper open world RPG property, with Assassin's Creed Odyssey and Assassin's Creed Valhalla going all-in on incredibly long adventures that boast things like loot, levelling, and player choice.
It's a direction that has divided even the most loyal of Assassin's Creed fans — but there is a game that arguably gets the best out of both directions, and that's Assassin's Creed Origins. Yes, the 2017 title may have established the series' open world RPG blueprint, but it doesn't outright ignore the stealth-focused foundations of its predecessors. In its story structure and its approach to objective-based gameplay, Origins feels a lot closer to traditional Assassin's Creed than the two games that succeeded it.
Because of this, Origins is still widely considered to be one of the series' best instalments — and having recently played it again, we'd honestly have to agree. Just last week, the game got an anticipated PS5 update, allowing it to run at 60 frames-per-second on Sony's current-gen console. Playing through Origins at double the original frame rate obviously makes for a much smoother and more responsive experience, and if you have fond memories of Bayek's Egyptian excursion, it's well worth going back on PS5.
There's a certain magic to Origins that Odyssey and Valhalla simply don't possess. Perhaps it's the brilliantly realised (and rather unique) Egyptian setting, or the more focused storytelling — or both — but having last played Origins several years ago, it's actually quite fascinating to revisit it here in 2022, two Assassin's Creed games later.
What sticks out to us the most is how detailed Origins' open world is. It doesn't have the scale of Odyssey's gigantic map, but it feels far tighter in how it's been pieced together — handcrafted, rather than copy and pasted. Every military base and bandit camp is unique, each city feels distinct. There's a hustle and bustle to Origins' streets that hasn't been replicated since; exiting the desolate desert sands to find such abundant life in a major city like Alexandria is a defining moment. That kind of contrast is almost completely missing from the likes of Valhalla.
Now look, different games go for different tones and atmospheres — direct comparisons don't always work. But there's just no denying that Origins' world feels more dynamic and enticing. NPCs have routines that they follow, and you can watch them go about their work, complete with custom animations. Wildlife interactions are everywhere — whether it's a hippo taking chunks out of a boat or packs of hyenas hunting an unfortunate gazelle. Rebels attack soldiers out on the roads, and crocodiles wander into villages to create total chaos.
Origins' world has so many moving parts, to the point where we're starting to think that it was actually ahead of its time (although we did call it one of the best open worlds we've ever seen back in 2017). Given how stripped back the open worlds of Odyssey and Valhalla are by comparison, it's almost strange to think of them as sequels. Origins feels more ambitious, more cohesive. Maybe it comes down to better project management, or perhaps it just had more time in the oven than its successors — it's hard to say. But the proof is right there, clearer than ever on PS5.
The impressive attention to detail is just one part of the package, though. Bayek, Origins' protagonist, is noticeably quicker than the historical heroes who followed in his footsteps. Actions like climbing and jumping feel more precise, and the environmental design — especially in civilised areas — features a lot of verticality. That traditional Assassin's Creed blood hasn't been drained from Origins, and it shows. Parkouring your way across rooftops feels great, just as it did with Ezio in Italy.
And then there's the combat. Generally speaking, it's quite methodical. Bayek doesn't have action RPG abilities like Alexios / Kassandra or Eivor. There's a greater emphasis on timing your attacks, positioning, and parrying when you can. Bayek's shield gets loads of use thanks to how accurate enemy archers are, but you can't just dodge your way to victory like you can in Odyssey. Getting surrounded can be a death sentence in Origins — Bayek isn't some kind of superhuman warrior (at least, not until you're equipped with the game's most powerful weapons later on). We're tempted to say that Origins' combat is more 'hardcore', and that's why stealth can still seem like a truly viable option.
A special shout out to the kill animations, by the way. Odyssey reused a few of these, and it's easy to see why. Some of them are satisfyingly brutal — the sickle sword! — and are yet more examples of how much effort went into crafting Origins as a whole. Out of the open world trilogy, Origins still holds the highest standard when it comes to overall polish.
So, is Origins the best open world Assassin's Creed game? We've put hundreds of hours into this trilogy, and we're very close to saying...yes. And most of you would agree, judging by our Best Assassin's Creed Games list.
Going back to Origins after Odyssey and Valhalla has made us realise just how well it holds up as both an Assassin's Creed title, and as an open world game. It's five years old and it manages to put its successors to shame in multiple areas, which is something that can't be said for most franchises in modern gaming.
Have you made a return trip to Egypt since Assassin's Creed Origins got its PS5 update? Establish the Hidden Ones in the comments section below.
Comments 72
Yeah, I’d probably agree. I enjoyed Odyssey and Valhalla for the most part but Origins is a more satisfying game to play. The story especially, it’s brilliant.
I think this is the best of the 3, I enjoyed Odyssey for the most part but it's too big and bloated and I just don't think Valhalla is very good at all. Going back to this, whilst not small it seems to have better focus in it's story and progression and has better combat for me too. I'm not shy about my criticisms of Ubisoft open worlds but this is one I do genuinely enjoy exploring
Its a great game indeed and its silky smooth but the amount of crashes i've had with this on my ps5 is leaving a sour taste in my mouth..never crashed on my ps4..
As most of the above, yes, it was better than the 2 that followed.
Will replay on PS5, after Lost Judgment.
So that'll be a while.
@Northern_munkey That's weird, I've had no crashes (or any other issues) on PS5. Might be worth reinstalling to see if it fixes itself?
Ive never liked any Assassin's creed game
You get to ride camels! C'mon!
I enjoyed Origins the most out of the 3. I think what I also like is the fact I can do the base game & the expansions, with most the locations done. In around the 80h mark. (Compared to Odyssey 180h)
Done around the 180h mark in Valhalla as well. But can't be bothered with the latest expansion. It's not AC, and I am kinda fatigued by the game tbh.
I appreciate this article!
I only started playing AC games with Odyssey during the first lockdown. I spent about 150 hrs in it and loved it
Valhalla kept me for about 90 hours but I didn't finish it as it got too much.
I always thought Origins would be worse, as it came out first and was presumably improved upon with the following two but that doesn't seem to be the case here or the consensus among most others. Gonna buy this!
@ShogunRok 👍i'll give it a go while i'm cooking tea..
@Atreus97 Egypt is just an awesome location and so unique in games. Origins was definitely my favorite of the 3 games. Enjoy!
It needs to be noted that Origins also set the standard for bonkers off the wall awesome DLC that its successors followed, too.
It made me wish (like Odyssey thereafter - haven't gotten to Valhalla) that Ubisoft would take this blueprint and put it within a fully unique fantasy RPG IP and ditch the historical stuff entirely. I think the game structure and depth, coupled with the (literally) fantastic enemy and world design of the DLC, with a small expansion of the player abilities (which, let's face it, are outright magical anyway in the end what with teleporting and elemental damage), could truly rival the likes of Witcher and Dragon Age for the fantasy RPG crown.
Yeah I love this game.
I had not played an AC since Black Flag. Origins brought me back and Odyssey/Valhalla have made me a "Day 1" fan again
It is amazing how Ubi managed to turn this iP around.
I prefer odyssey myself, but I did enjoy origins.
As much as I like Origins, I enjoyed playing Odyssey so much more. The protagonist (Kass), the setting, the stories told were all much better, in my opinion.
I recently bought the DLC on sale just so I could replay this one day with the new patch.
I’ve not played an assassins creed other than the original for a while and the pirate one when I first got my PS4. They never appealed in their tone or setting (and, honestly, I find stealth tedious), but this piece really got me enthusiastic. Can this game be played without any knowledge of the preceding games?
I've never been a massive fan of the series, but I really wanted to enjoy Origins and Odyssey because of how gorgeously rendered the worlds are. I re-downloaded Origins because of the new patch, but I bounced off it HARD almost immediately. It's curious, after pumping so many hours into Elden Ring, I've realized how much I cherish (and how much I missed) that feeling in video games of genuine, unsignposted exploration and peril. I wonder if there's a way to tweak the settings on the modern AC games to replicate, at least a little bit, this feeling, because the bloated overpopulated map and cluttered HUD of the AC franchise and its ilk just don't do it for me any more.
@thefourfoldroot1 you can definitely play this without prior AC knowledge. There is a few nods to the original i guess in someways.
And there's is one "OH I see" moment but it's unimportant having not played other AC games
@Texan_Survivor you really think Altair is more charismatic than Bayek?
To your point about the map being empty though, empty space is often vital in enhancing a game world when used right and the deserts in Origins do just that, it's quite the experience riding through until Bayek slowly loses his mind and at that point it becomes pretty haunting. Certainly never got old for me.
Nah for me its in Odyssey's shadow. I like Origins but its one of my least favourite maps in the series and combat wise i'm not fussed. Odyssey corrected every flaw in my opinion with Origins, gave us Kassandra and has the amazing Ancient Greece to play around in.
I'm knee deep in Immortals Fenyx Rising, and have a renewed appreciation for Ubisoft. Immortals seems to me like the most underrated title of the previous generation. It's a gem, with solid writing and very entertaining combat and mobility. While it's not the most perfectly polished game I have played, it's one of the most entertaining gaming experiences I've had, which is all I care about.
I bought Origins during a sale and can't wait to start it as soon as I finish Immortals. This article just built up my hype further! I played the original ACs a bunch (especially the Ezio ones) but eventually felt like I was dealing with too much bloat and let go of the series. Really looking forward to Origins, with what seems like a good blend of traditional AC and RPG.
Odyssey was way better.
I made it about 1/3 of the way through back on PS4. Very excited to get back into it on PS5 with the performance improvements. It really is a fantastic game, and the ancient Egypt setting is just the coolest thing ever!
I tried playing this again last week on PS5, and I was shocked at how dated it looks now compared to H:FW, and even Ghost of Tsushima on PS5
Let's be real, this game is the best of Odyssey, Valhalla and it, but it still isn't a good game. Ubisoft really killed me on this one. I used to buy their AC games day 1 without fail but since Origins I played on a friends console first, before choosing not to buy them.
@trev666 Thabks for your input 🤣
Hmm nah, thanks! Odyssey is the best of this new trilogy to me. The protagonist (Kassandra) is way better than the annoying Bayek, you have a bit more mythological elements, the ability to fall down high places with no damage is a HUGE blessing, there is naval combat, there is a huge beautiful map and the setting itself is better imo!
But I still like Origins more than Valhalla!
I thought Odyssey was incredibly beautiful but I tapped out at around 20 hours, it just got too repetitive and the world was too overwhelmingly big.
Should I give Origins a shot instead?
@ShogunRok ok i've reinstalled it but i'll have to try it later..i'll let you know how it goes..
Is one of my favorites for sure. The world it's just beautiful. I didn't like the story that much, but everything else, I loved.
I love Assassins Creed Origins.
It is one the best open world games, in my opinion. The attention to detail is amazing. And (having read a lot about ancient Egypt) it seems to be practically historically accurate, too.
It seems fair comment to say that the world is half empty. But Upper Egypt is mostly empty, it is the desert, after all.
I never did play either Odyssey or Valhalla, because neither of those two appealed to me, after the Egyptian setting.
Currently replaying it, now.
The start of the loot box nonsense, but aside from that it was great.
Started Odyssey afterwards, couldn't get into it, no interest in Valhalla at all after that.
I keep trying AC games cos I’m hoping I’ll like one but they just feel cheap
@Northern_munkey more importantly what did you have for tea???
Origins was definitely the best of the three new ones, even though I did think Bayek was a bit dull and forgettable (had to Google his name just now). The dlc was awesome though! Best dlc by far.
The new games still pale in comparison to the old games though. Those old AC games were legit. Even AC3, which I replayed a few years ago (Remaster) and it felt so good to play a real AC game after years of whatever the new games are supposed to be.
I was fortunate to pick up an almost mint copy of the Deluxe Edition from a Cash Convertor for a ridiculous £1.99 just after the new year and it still has all it's DLC codes unused, haven't even played it yet in anticipation for this patch. Not played one since Black Flag as by that point I was burnt out by the series, even though BF was a brilliant game. Looking forward to finally playing this, I love the Egyptian setting.
@aSmilingMan It's SOOOO good, gave me Zelda vibes which I liked. Funny it didn't get the attention it deserves but it came right off the coat tales of Odyssey and little promotion.
I'm playing it again now thanks to the patch, and while I think it is great to be able to play Origins at 60 FPS, I will never agree that it's better than Odyssey. I know plenty of people will always say Origins is the best of the 3, and to each their own, but Odyssey was my favorite game of the last generation. Obviously it's impossible to pass it then.
Odyssey was a special experience for me, and I'm not sure I would have played Valhalla if it wasn't. I liked Origins well enough, but me having issues with parts of the story and Bayek not really standing out had it end up being a slight disappointment for me. I have been looking forward to giving it a second chance for a while now though, so the patch dropping was nice.
@bozz I would say yes, but I also love Egyptian settings of most things. Plus the map is much smaller than Odyessy maybe the same as Valhalla.
@BritneyfR_ee I can't comment on the DLC for Origins as I never played them since the ending of Origins left me disappointed enough to move on from the game (I will once I'm done replaying the game now though), but it would be hard to beat the Fate of Atlantis DLC from Odyssey. That was fantastic and one of the best DLCs I've ever played.
I always like to suggest the hard (possible) truth that the worst part of AC games are the assassinations. The last three have been all out RPGs and they're the best the series has been since Revelations. The franchise needs to drop the boring assassination missions and lean into well established RPG trends instead.
I’m an unabashedly huge fan of the AC games and origins is easily the best out of the new trilogy. Odyssey is beyond boring with a boring and sterile world that somehow made ancient Greece one of my favorite settings absolutely not fun to explore with its million copy and pasted locations and the story was nowhere near the brilliance of origins. Valhalla was really fun with a beautiful setting plus I love Viking stuff but like odyssey it’s too big for it’s own good and the story isn’t up to snuff except the end which is bonkers in the best way possible. Not to mention Origins gave us multiple beautiful cities I’ll never forget first arriving in Alexandria while Odyssey only had Athens which was a letdown and Valhalla I can’t even recall having one but if it did that should tell you how memorable it was.
@feral1975 Lootbox? Origins, Odyssey and Valhalla don't have any lootboxes and never have done.
After playing Origins on PS4 the other two have just felt wrong. I’ve tried both and can’t get into them. I think I’ll just replay Origins on series X this time to get my Creed fix.
@WallyWest
Similar idea, you find something and it's a type of item/weapon/armour of varying power, usually something you've seen before.
Bring back the days of working hard on side missions to get a definitive upgrade.
@Deljo mexican chilli beef with home made tacos and sour cream..🤪
@ShogunRok ok so far so good..played for about an hour and no crashes yet. Installed straight to the ps5 ssd this time...thanks for the help 👍
The opening story was surprisingly creative for an Assassin's Creed game, but I still found myself dropping out shortly after Alexandria because I wasn't enjoying the moment to moment gameplay much.
I find the combat very repetitive, and whilst it's nice that assassinations are still possible, you lack a lot of the assassination abilities earlier games had.
Kassandra being so charismatic, and having dialogue options so you can roleplay makes a big difference to me.
Odyssey was sunnier and more generically attractive, but I do agree that Origins world feels much more alive.
So I’ve played both Odyssey and Valhalla. As much as I enjoyed them, the world content felt bloated. I thought both would’ve been superb games if they didn’t make the map so pointlessly large. My question is this: is Origins the same way? Or is it much less? I want to play it but don’t want to get overwhelmed to the max again
I think I'm excited to play this game someday after reading this article. But I personally don't find the setting anywhere as interesting as the two newer games in the series, and I haven't played those either. Maybe open world games are just too similar and repetitive for my taste
So far I'm enjoying it, I like Egyptian mythology. Not paying attention to trophies, as they're most probably tied to collecting every little thing there is, wondering how many will I have missed by the time I beat the game
@CWill97 In the article, it says, "It doesn't have the scale of Odyssey's gigantic map, but it feels far tighter in how it's been pieced together — handcrafted, rather than copy and pasted". I've read similar things about Origins on other sites about the game, so it appears it's less "pointlessly large" like Odyssey and Valhalla, which I also dislike about open world games
For me Odyssey with Kassandra was the best of the three. Valhalla was a slog for me character-wise. Odyssey is a game that I played over many many months though as I can't play these types of games for days on end unless they have compelling side quests like Witcher 3.
I wish ubisoft would see it the same way and would remaster origins for psvr2. Who would not want to walk in between the columns of ancient Egypt and climb pyramids?
i only played origins among the 3 beacuse the Egyptian setting is just super appealing, crawling in dark tombs is just awesome
it is not only about assassinating people
AC always suckers me in with the historic settings and then I play them for a few hours, get bored and never go back. The only one I ever completed was the first one!
@aSmilingMan Immortals Fenyx Rising is one of the bast games of recent years, though the DLC did leave a lot to be desired. Hope the second one is going to be as good.
@MFTWrecks Have to agree - I wish Ubisoft would just do an open world RPG. They have the experience and clearly have the engine to do it. Leave Assassin's Creed as the stealth-em-up and just do something original or use the lore of a decent fantasy series.
I prefer Valhalla but I certainly like this one more than I like Odyssey. This is probably my second favourite one.
@Northern_munkey Whey! Great to hear, enjoy.
@pharos_haven 100%. Feels like they took the BOTW formula and made it more action, less survival - and less annoyances IMO. No breaking weapons, simple potions, no rain, less early 1-hit deaths. Don’t get me wrong, BOTW was a masterpiece. Yet, I’m finding myself grinning constantly with Immortals and think it’s actually more entertaining.
@sanderson72 pity to hear about the DLC. Still haven’t started it but heard the same from others too. Really hoping this becomes an IP Ubisoft continues to invest in. I would certainly jump on any sequel.
@Texan_Survivor I disagree. AC: Origins is one of my favorite games of all time.
The last good AC game. Now hopefully they release 60 fps patches for AC3, 4, Rogue, Unity and Syndicate
To me it's either the best AC game or second after Unity. Oddyssey map was too boring and it didn't bring the same excitement exploring new places. Everything felt the same, no matter where you go. Even if did look good and gameplay had improvements. It also felt too long and Origin was just the right size. I think I platinumed it in 55 hrs, while Oddyssey I played over 75hrs and only around half of what it has to offer. Reason I'm not going to touch Valhalla any time soon.
@CWill97 Origins have probably one of the greatest game world's out there. You can finish the game in under 60 hrs with platinum trophy and full exploration. Everywhere you went it just felt like a new place, exactly what oddyssey failed to do. Oddyssey map just felt the same no matter where you went
I have Origins on my XBOX One but I don't really use that anymore so think I'll get this on PS5 and make the most of it.
I started Odyssey twice or even 3 times, it is historically wrong in so many ways. Leonidas and most of the Spartan Soldiers and your hero use a Spear without a Shield which is ridiculous especially when this whole thing is about Sparta vs. Athens. Like the whole Intro totally destroys everything that actually happened in the epic battle of the Thermopylae. Because the united greek army was nothing without their shields and their whole strategy to hold back the overpowered and generally superior Persians was based on solid shield walls. That being said, there is not even an option in the game for just using a shield like any fighter in history did to survive any fight.
This thing alone made Odyssey really bad. Also that instead of a Shield you wield a shortened Spear is just plain stupid nobody would ever do that, you would just die immediately.
Another thing that sucks big time in Odyssey is that Ubisoft just went back into white supremacist eurocentristic mode that totally denies the fact that many other cultures than the freaking pirates who called themselves Greeks and Persians ruled over vast territories of the mediterranean, including islands that are officially greek today. In general, they just cut all the amazing diversity of Origins out of the game and recreated the nationalist propaganda that the mediterranean was 'greek' which was totally wrong in ancient times and is still totally wrong or not true today.
And then they even went hardcore white supremacist and eurocentristic when they launched a freakin Viking Assassins Creed which is even more pathetic than the dual wielding spear fighting instead of a shield in Odyssey.
So after all, I will always come back to the only historically accurate and black Assassin's Creed and won't ever touch this Valhalla which really is every white supremacists stupid, historically wrong wet dream.
@Bamila that's also because they have the historically wrong black and white narrative of the ancient mediterranean world which in Odyssey is strictly Athenian or Spartan which is so stupid there are no words, it could not even be more wrong than that even if we tried. And then they removed the shields in a game that's based on the most epic shieldwall in history and on 2 factions that would not have gained any power ever without their shields it is ridiculous.
It just lacks all the historically correct diversity we had in Origins.
I only played half-way through Origins a few years back, but I loved what was there. It was everything AC used to be finally back. Then the new ones happened. If it's not stealth, it's not AC. That's the entire point of assassin missions. 3 and Valhalla decided 2005 Kratos was an assassin and ran with it.
Looking forward to being able to finish it with a smooth fps. Eventually. The backlog is real.
I still have most of Odyssey as well, which, I don't think is nearly as good but still has its merits. I have Valhalla which I wonder if I'll ever finish. It's just...not AC. Like, at all.
@BritneyfR_ee I thought AC3 is the template by which Valhalla was built. Though I have yet to play the remaster which they claim to have fixed some of what was wrong with it. Playing it at launch it was terrible. It was a combat brawler with little to no stealth, flat terrain, basically, nothing AC about it. I thought Origins fixed everything wrong with 3, and Valhalla brought it all back. BUT, it's possible they didn't lie and the remaster fixed it.
Looking forward to replaying this one again!
For me Odyssey is the better game when it comes to the gameplay and using the bow. But I prefered Origins for it's setting and story. Both of those are much better than Valhalla imo.
Just wish they made AC like they used to. As much as i enjoy these open world ACs, they feel like they could have been their own standalone warrior games.
@NEStalgia Oh, I’m not sure? Those games seem vastly different from memory.
I didn’t like AC3 when I first played it on PS3 (I didn’t hate it but I didn’t love it either). I just know that when I played the Remaster on PS4, I enjoyed it a whole lot more and came away feeling that it wasn’t as bad as I remembered (it was actually quite good).
I don’t know if that’s because the newer style games have left me cold (I thought Valhalla was awful) or if it was because I was playing it without the high expectations I had when it was originally released?
It could also be that I didn’t really know much about the American Revolution when I originally played it (they don’t teach much American History in UK schools sadly). But when I played the Remaster, I had done quite a bit more research on it, in my own time. AC3 was far more interesting to me once I had a greater understanding of the history and the events that are covered in the game.
One thing I did appreciate (more than anything else) was that it actually felt like an AC game. The classic gameplay is still superior to the new gameplay, I don’t care what anyone says.
I just don’t think any of the newer style games feel like AC at all. The newer style games are too big, too bloated and too aimless. The old AC games could be completed in a reasonable about of time and it was always satisfying to know that you had completed the game 100%. You looked forward to the next one. Im definitely not looking forward to more AC after Valhalla 😂
I think less is definitely more where AC is concerned.
@BritneyfR_ee You have me curious, now, how much the remaster changed things. I don't think it was your imagination that you liked it more than the PS3 game. They must have made a solid change to it. I bought the Odyssey Gold edition in part because it bundled the remaster of 3 and they claimed it was better now, but I never actually went back and played it again. What I most remember about 3 was that Haytham's intro was better than the rest of the game, the game was mostly grabbing pikes and axes and brawling openly with hordes of enemies instead of sneaking in the shows like AC ought to be, and the series hallmark vertical was replaced with single story flat roofs. So, Valhalla's 7th gen sibling, basically
Syndicate fixed most of that as long as you pretend only Evie's missions are canon. I didn't like 4 as an AC game. It was a fun, if repetitive pirate game, but it wasn't an AC game at all. I loved Origins, though since it seemed to bring back much of the original game's ideas. Personally I think Origins feels more "Assassin-y" like AC 1 and 2 than 3 did. I trace the feeling of "Brawler's Creed" back to 3, mostly. Syndicate did a decent job of appeasing both the 1 & 2 classic fandoms with 3's brawler fandom. Origins went back to 1, and then Odyssey and Valhalla decided the brawling was best. But I do agree that as good as the open world designs are, they massively break the flow of the AC gameplay.
Then again, I'm the weird one that likes AC1 the best. Sure the side missions were repetitive nonsense, but the actual assassinations were the best in the series. It had that whole buildup where the whole level area was designed around the infiltration of that one installation, and the whole infiltration was intense right up to offing the target. I think Hitman embodies what AC1 was more than any other AC game, even 2...
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...