Forums

Topic: So That’s It For Spider-man 2 Huh?

Posts 1 to 20 of 46

nomither6

Still no new game +
No DLC

The hype and all the talk about it has tapered off completely

If they ever do release new game plus , i can’t even be bothered at this point since it’s been so long and ive forgotten how to play . what a shame .

[Edited by LiamCroft]

nomither6

AdamNovice

People have no patience. The studio had to deal with the hack last month. I think NG+ takes less priority over that.
If you can't wait a few months then that's on you.

AdamNovice

X:

nomither6

@LN78 damn that actually could’ve been a great idea! a co-op experience makes so much sense , they really dropped the ball with this game in terms of what they could’ve done better. like a lot of people say - they played it too safe & kept the issues of the first .

nomither6

Grumblevolcano

@AdamNovice In addition, there's State of Play to consider. Back around when the 1st game and its DLC released, Sony were moving away from events after E3 2018 (e.g. Playstation Experience didn't happen in December 2018) and State of Play didn't exist yet which led to stuff being announced out of nowhere more often.

Nowadays, State of Play and Playstation Showcase exists which is a suitable place to announce that kind of stuff.

Grumblevolcano

nomither6

@Savage_Joe why compare this to ragnarok though , especially since theyre not from the same dev… the first game got DLC quick , like just a couple months afterwards .

nomither6

nomither6

@Korra i think most people agree. the spider-man games are no arkham, but they’re some of the best spiderman games and having no new content for it is kind of bizarre.

nomither6

Max_Headroom

LN78 wrote:

@Kidfried Well fingers crossed because as it stands "Spider-Man 2" is an incredibly underwhelming game - I was expecting an "Asylum" to "City" style leap and was sorely disappointed.

I thought it was brilliant and i only bought it because of the many positive reviews i had read it not being my type of go to game, I think yours is the first review i have read saying the player was underwhelmed

[Edited by Max_Headroom]

Max_Headroom

nomither6

@Max_Headroom it could’ve been much more better than it turned out to be . most people besides diehard fanboys agree it wasn’t a GOTY contender and a solid 8/10 game .

nomither6

Max_Headroom

most people besides diehard fanboys agree it wasn’t a GOTY contender and a solid 8/10 game

It would appear you stats do not match those published by sites that have been going for years, unless you think the 7000+ voters are all fanboys.

.

Untitled

[Edited by Max_Headroom]

Max_Headroom

nomither6

@Kidfried It’s an 8/10 on IGN, Gamespot, and even pushsquare , the majority of the reception here was that the game was too safe and didn’t offer as much as it should have especially for a supposedly 9th gen game.

nominations don’t mean much if the game doesn’t win . it didn’t win a single one .

nomither6

nomither6

@Kidfried wasn’t game of the year contender as in - i , and some others, didn’t think it was worth being a contender let alone GoTY.

I also mentioned 3 websites/sources compared to just one (metacritic) , didn’t you ask me to list sources where it was 8/10?? also, isn’t only mentioning metacritic considered “selective” too?

me asserting the games a 8/10 is indeed my opinion, but has there ever been a GoTY that was an 8/10 ? If it was a 9/10 game it would’ve at least won one

nomither6

JohnnyShoulder

@Max_Headroom That must be the only explanation for it.

Life is more fun when you help people succeed, instead of wishing them to fail.

Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.

PSN: JohnnyShoulder

Max_Headroom

LN78 wrote:

@Max_Headroom According to IGN, the game sold something like 5 million units in its first 10 days on the market.

Its not compulsory to add feedback to a gaming site when you buy a game in fact i have never posted a score in one of these sites and i will not be in a minority, the feedback and scores show its a great and very popular game you are entitled to disagree but please stop with this fanboy nonsense.

Max_Headroom

Max_Headroom

Kidfried wrote:

The things we cannot conclude are that a) only fanboys liked the game
.

I am glad someone else gets it i didn't realise the concept was so difficult to grasp

[Edited by Max_Headroom]

Max_Headroom

Max_Headroom

nomither6 wrote:

@Max_Headroom 7279 really ain’t a big number to generalize. 😂

I have a feeling you wouldn't have said that had the same 7279 voters given it a 1/10

Max_Headroom

Rudy_Manchego

I'm playing it now and it's the kind of game made for the masses. Doesn't take much risks but does what it does competently. I'd argue its not made for massive gaming enthusiasts - its a branded open world game that is designed to get the average person to buy PlayStation.

Also Sony normally wait at least a good few months before DLC or update announcements and often up to a year for release.

Now I may be an idiot, but there's one thing I am not sir, and that sir, is an idiot

PSN: Rudy_Manchego | X:

Please login or sign up to reply to this topic