The ridiculous start to 2017 continues, as apparently Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon: Wildlands is a bit of alright. We haven't got our grubby mitts on the final game just yet, but rest assured we're itching to exercise our trigger finger and bring you a full review on public servers as soon as possible. Here are a handful of reviews that have trickled in alongside today's embargo lift.
Games Radar - 4.5/5
Wildlands is so far removed from what most have come to expect from a Ghost Recon title that it could have benefitted from shedding its sub-franchise namesake and simply standing on its own. It's certainly got the legs for it.
Hardcore Gamer - 4.5/5
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands is an open world thrill ride. The departure from the formula used in previous Ghost Recon games is a welcome change, as playing like a military-themed Grand Theft Auto or Watch Dogs is a blast. The in-game version of Bolivia is enormous and Santa Blanca is a large organization, so players will be spending a lot of time exploring the beautiful scenery in their hunt for El Sueño. The action packed gameplay and well developed story make the time in Bolivia enjoyable, and the freedom to play solo or cooperatively through campaign caters to anyone's preferred social level in gaming. Wildlands might not be what longtime fans were hoping for from a new Ghost Recon, but putting expectations aside, Wildlands is not a game to miss.
GameSpot - Review in Progress
In the 10 hours I've spent on the road to liberate Bolivia of El Sueño's rule, I've unlocked 20-percent of the map. As I've slowly made my way through the hit list of underlings, I've been curious about the risks of sticking to the critical path, and whether there's such as thing as being underleveled in Wildlands. That said, it's been easy to take brief detours to earn extra experience and skills, thanks to the added efficiency of my teammates, AI-controlled or otherwise. Whatever path my journey takes, I know it will involve more diversions to earn extra abilities, the takedowns of the boss' lieutenants, and the elimination of El Sueño himself, which I estimate will take an additional 30 to 40 hours. Stay tuned for our full review in the coming days.
USgamer - Review in Progress
As a multiplayer game, though, Ghost Recon Wildlands really shines. It's very entertaining, and many of the frustrations that are part of the single-player experience melt away when four people are participating in the action. It's clear that this is what the game was really designed for, and while it's still possible to exploit the game's weaknesses to beat some missions, it just feels a bit more of a laugh with other players.
Will you be heading to the Wildlands this week, or is Ghost Recon just not your cup of tea? Spot another tango in the comments section below.
Comments 16
I only played the Beta for a couple of hours but for me it was just The Division (in the woods).
@Bad-MuthaAdebisi "for me it was just The Division (in the woods)."
This cracked me up!
"As a multiplayer game, though, Ghost Recon Wildlands really shines. It's very entertaining, and many of the frustrations that are part of the single-player experience melt away when four people are participating in the action."
I soloed the Betas, so yeah it wasn't as fun. My AI squad didn't do much besides only killing enemies during sync shots and reviving me. lol
Interesting. With scores like that, one could be lead towards assuming that the utterly ridiculous squad AI from the betas has been significantly upgraded for the final game.
(Am I allowed to link a video here? I'll chance it. I'll apologise in advance if I'm not. Sorry mods, feel free to delete! - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mDuiS84tKk)
@Bad-MuthaAdebisi
I hope you're writing this site's review.
I didn't care for the beta, but most people tell me I just didn't give it enough time. I think I'll risk this one and get it anyways (it helps that Target is doing a buy 2 get 1 free promotion this week in the US)
@WanderingBullet It probably appeal directly to Rainbow Six Siege players as they'll just join in a with their current teams. I imagine it's probably a lot more fun with friends but then aren't all multiplayer.
I played the Beta and I thought it was a load of tosh.
I'll give this a pass maybe, but looks interesting
Didn't think much of the beta so i'm gunna wait a couple of week's before I buy it a couple of friend's are getting it so i'll see what they think, I want it to be good but I have serious doubt's. "like a military themed GTA" is not a plus for me and I was interested when I heard about the PvP but it's only one 4v4 mode as far as I know.
Hopefully it does well. I can see they put a lot of work into it.
I got a lot of games in my backlog so Ill wait for a sale.
Surprised by those scores. Didn't think much of it from the beta.
Beta bored me, pass.
Beta was awful, no thanks
I never bothered with the Beta because how bad the game was from what i've seen, driving like in the original watchdogs wasn't good. And a lot of other things obviously it could have been a old build, but a lot of games release with the same problems as the Beta and only get fixed once the game is out. I am surprised some websites can review a games offline and online component so fast, and the obvious fact the servers won't be online yet.
No thanks, to many good games to care about this generic open world/shooter hybrid.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...