E3 is widely considered to be the biggest week in the gaming calendar, but is that actually true anymore? In just over ten days, publishers and platform holders will descend upon Los Angeles to reveal to the world their biggest wares – well, assuming they haven’t already leaked on Walmart’s website anyway. It’s a period of much enthusiasm for the industry’s most hardcore circles, as animated images serve to illustrate the sector’s excitement – and social media teams have a field day.
But is the event on the decline? It’s a question that gets postulated every year, but the show never seems to go away. And yet there are signs that its relevance may be waning just a little bit – even if it’s unlikely to disappear soon.
Chief among that is just how many titles have started to be revealed prior to the event itself of late. In the case of titles like Fallout 76 and Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, it’s been little more than teasing; Bethesda and Ubisoft want you tuning in to their press conferences to learn more. With releases like RAGE 2, though, it’s been much more than that – they’ve been revealed early in order to avoid being overshadowed by the sheer noise that E3 brings.
And it makes you wonder: do we even need E3 anymore? In this social media age, companies have no problem reaching their consumers directly; between Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, and Twitch, these organisations can get news out to their fans any day of the week. Look at Sony: the PlayStation Blog has become a source for official daily news drops, and it even has its own E3-esque event in PlayStation Experience.
E3 is obviously about more than press conferences: it’s a major convention for products to be shown off. But it’s transitioned from an industry-only event into something that consumers can now attend, and even then it’s eclipsed by the likes of Gamescom in terms of sheer scale. EA, the biggest third-party publisher in the world, has opted to hold its own event for a few years now – and while its EA Play initiative rides the coattails of E3, it’s only a matter of time before it fully breaks away.
Whether you like it or not, publishers are becoming savvy to the sheer volume of E3, and the challenges that brings. It’s the reason you’re seeing early announcements; heck, it’s the reason that Sony’s Paris Games Week showcase eclipsed its E3 2017 one. When you have the opportunity to dominate the news cycle, why scream desperately into the din? Nintendo, to its credit, was one of the very first to recognise this; its Nintendo Directs attract interest all year round.
And yet, there is still an inherent draw to E3 – a week in which the spotlight is on the games industry, and mainstream news publications send out reporters to feel the pulse of a medium that makes a lot of money, but does still largely get overlooked. There’s a togetherness about all of the biggest companies coming together for one week only, and demonstrating what the industry is capable of. Exactly how much life the event has got left in it, though, is a question that's going to continue to be asked.
Do you think the allure of E3 is waning? Do you still enjoy the theatre of the Los Angeles event – even if it means some announcements inevitably get lost in the noise? Try to standout in the comments section below.
Do we still need E3? (133 votes)
- Yes, it's the best part of the gaming calendar
- Hmm, I'm not sure and honestly not fussed
- No, it's slowly losing relevance in my opinion
Please login to vote in this poll.
Comments 48
Why not I love it when all big companies come on stage to show us what they are up to.
And the banter among fans that follows after the conferences were done.
The big difference being, Sony has far more brand new IPs to show off than its competition. So not shouting about that in the loudest way possible could be seen as a little risky.
Halo & Morio have been around since the stone age so yet another sequel doesn't need much advertising.
I think it still has it's place, even if it gets overshadowed by other conferences. Partially because it has that legacy status of being the top place of the industry for years. That allure is hard to fully get rid of after a long time.
In addition, the inherent excitement is something that's always there, because there's always some hype announcement, even if it's just a reveal trailer. E3 2015 for example. Debate the merits of it all you want, but the trio of large reveals was one of the biggest hype moments you'll ever see in the industry.
This article feels a little deja vu. E3 was supposedly abandoned more than a decade ago b/c nobody cared anymore. (That may predate PS so no article on here about it.)
http://www.ign.com/articles/2006/07/30/e3-cancelled
I think they can abandon it. I mean I like it and I'd miss it, but the industry can get along just fine w/ twitter, Youtube and other shows on their own. And this year just feels slow anyway. Whenever the PS5 gets announced, either March 2019 or 2020, that E3 may be special again, but really we'd get along just fine w/o it. And sammy could get some sleep.
Nope. I most certainly don't. Others seem to for some reason.
Whether a game is leaked/announced today or in a few days makes zero difference in the end. It will be the same game when it comes out.
E3 can be fun if you don't take it seriously. If you worry about fanboy warz and who won each year, it becomes sad.
!!! ABSOLUTELY !!!
Of course we need E3! It's better than Christmas...the conferences are always fun even if we only see cringe after cringe, there's game trailers, jokes, the chat from this site is funny...what's not to like?
I hate that they are kind of trying to step away from E3 itself and announcing stuff before it! Takes away the magic and now that I know the games that have been announced (AC, Fallout, Rage 2) they fall to the low point of my hype list...cause if there's no surprise announcement, I don't care anymore until the games come out lol now I'm hyped for the games that may come as a surprise!
E3 is not as 'important' as it once was - primarily because the world has moved on significantly since it started. It used to be a great event for the Press to get to see what was in the works for the upcoming future of gaming. This news would then be passed on to the viewing public through printed material.
Nowadays though, the internet has taken over and now designers, publishers and manufacturers have their own way of getting the information out there to their target audience. Just release a new trailer on their own youtube channel, tweet about it etc and their fans will get to see it instantly - often before some of the Press and gaming website can write up an article or spread the word that way.
E3's relevance is no longer as important BUT that doesn't mean as an event its not important either. Its become part of the gaming calendar and established as a gaming 'event' - something gamers still look forward to BUT its relevance is no longer as important as it once was.
I remember a few years back how I was looking forward to all the new AAA games being announced at E3. Now, however, with all the leaks and early announcements my enthousiasm is not the same. On the other hand, I still happily watch all the press conferences and I love the fact that it feels like gaming Christmas.
I remember when people ridiculed Nintendo, and later EA actually, for holding separate events almost. Now it's the norm and we see why.
The internet changes the focal point of E3. Its still a huge trade show for partners and corporations, but the public angle of it has waned as the internet rips it apart weeks in advance
Is this a late april fools joke.of course e3 is still important.e3 is the best.im hype.new games is stil coming.word up son
@rjejr Yeah, this discussion seems to come up every year, and it's certainly not the first time the relevancy has been questioned. @Knuckles-Fajita is correct that there's still a big draw for behind-the-scenes business deals and stuff.
From the consumer-facing side, though, I think a lot has changed since the last time they tried to downscale E3. Social media is a much bigger deal now, and all of these publishers have a much more direct relationship with fans than they did 10 years ago.
i'm never realy as hyped for e3 as most people are.
i mean sure we get to see new games being announced but that also happens in the rest of the year just on a smaller scale.
plus not to mention that lot's of the games announced at e3 are mostly a long time away and we don't hear from those games anymore for months after e3 has passed untill they are close to being released or they just wait to show info at the next e3. (sony is very guilty of this)
e3 is only "worth it" for those that go to the show.
The way websites report on the event I can save time by not watching any of the talks. I think it loses relevance with all the other events throughout the year.
I wouldn't say we "need" it, but I still love it. I love the hype, the reveals, hell even just the constant stream of high quality trailers we get around this time of year. It's an awesome time to be a fan of the games industry.
Long may it continue.
We probably don't need it, as such. But something funny or interesting usually comes out of it though. 2015 is obviously the best example.
As long as someone somewhere makes money out of it, it'll continue to exist.
Why have an E3 when major things are snooped/leaked/announced weeks before the event, like what is happening now? Just have a worldwide "release week" and show some gameplay videos and trailers. No, we don't need an event for people to give "hands-on" impressions, because every one of them that I've seen is usually bring played by someone who is terrible at gaming in general, and it does the games a disservice, really. Here's a thought: release an actual Demo to the public!
The gaming industry would get by without it, but that doesn't mean it shouldn't exist. I get more excited about E3 than I do for any holiday.
"But is the event on the decline? It’s a question that gets postulated every year, but the show never seems to go away." - Asked and answered, I'd say.
"...even then it’s eclipsed by the likes of Gamescom in terms of sheer scale." - In terms of scale, maybe. But importance? Not really. All the big announcements are generally held for E3, including hardware.
My 'problem' comes from some of the absolute nuggets who work in the industry, who don't seem to realise that being under an NDA probably means that you shouldn't update your LinkedIn CV until there's been an official announcement.
And as for those brain-dead cretins at Walmart...
I personally book a couple of days leave, stay up to watch the conferences, watch a load of Giantbomb content and hang arounfbof gaming websites reading all the articles etc. E3 is my favourite gaming event of the year by a country mile.
Of course we don't need it, but it's still fun to have.
@RogerRoger E3 had to evolve too. The press don't really need it either despite some of the 'back room' deals and reveas etc that go on. The devs no longer need E3 to show off games behind closed doors as they now invite the press to the studio for things like that. You don't need to send out physical 'demo's' and 'press packs' as all that can be sent digitally now and a video can do a LOT more than just a few screenshots ever could. Its also a LOT cheaper for devs/publishers too.
E3 doesn't have the relevance it once had and needed to evolve to 'justify' its inclusion on a gaming calendar. One way is of course to make it more 'public access' - although its still more exclusive but if it remained a 'press only' event, the Press as well as the companies would have no reason to attend - because the internet and digital world have replaced its function. As an 'event', a marker in the gaming calendar, it can still succeed and is more important to gamers now.
honestly i'm not sure, it's fun to watch and see all the new stuff but then again if it ended i wouldn't really miss it as many put on their own events now a days anyway
they could probably just turn it into something like the eurogamer expo. have all the show floor stuff for people to come and play games, and watch informal developer talks. not really sure it needs to have 1-2 hour long conferences from publishers to see trailers of games that have already been announced.. in fact, a lot of the conferences i've watched over the years have had pretty embarrassing presentation. companies like rockstar, activision, and EA don't even bother. but then again, the only one i've really any interest at all in is sony's.. and am not expecting anything particularly surprising to come out of it.
As the question is worded I don't understand how "Yes" is winning. How have we ever needed E3? Games would get developed, announced and released pretty much the same with or without E3. There just wouldn't be the big spectacle of the huge conference. Now maybe you like E3 and maybe you don't, but there is almost no case to be made that it was ever needed.
Eh, I just like the game announcements. I almost never watch the actual conferences. Just the trailers and gameplay videos.
The "Leaks" have to stop. Its like rummaging through your parents closet 2 weeks before Christmas. The element of surprise is gone.
As big a gamer as I am, I have never watched E3. Or any of the big gaming conventions. I do enjoy reading the articles in the days following. Maybe this year I’ll tune in to see what all the fuss is about. Or maybe I’ll try to make progress on Persona 5 instead.
I look forward to e3 every single year and watch all the shows. It's still the best concentration of gaming news all year and it's exciting. There is benefit to developers and publishers being there, regardless of the risk of some games being lost in the noise, because all eyes are on the event. When it to being a husk in 2008, let's face it, it was awful.
E3 is also so much more than just the press conferences. I like all the trailers and hands-on videos as well as interviews and what Nintendo has been doing with its Treehouse Live stuff recently. If there was no e3 sure, the information would be released one way or another, but it wouldn't have the same buzz or excitement for me.
The industry has obviously changed a lot in the last 20 years, and we now have information on tap, but there's still something awesome about the big trade shows and old way of marketing games through them.
E3 and PSX is all I need show-wise. Oh and probably Gamescom as it's EU-related...
I personally think E3 gets too much hype. It's cool that there's a celebration of the game industry, but when you consider how companies are all competing with one another to show who has the best games, I feel like it's too much. Especially if the hyped games aren't impressive to me. Considering how we see games revealed long before the event, it doesn't carry as much impact imo. Nintendo and Sony are now doing separate events. They know they don't want to overshadowed each other.
always enjoyed E3 every year long may it continue.
Watching E3 news conference is fun so yes, I think E3 still need to stay
2015 got me hyped enough for gaming that I got my PS4 after several year's break from consoles. I am grateful for that. And I'll be tuning again this year.
It’s a good discussion, but I still like E3 even if with so many leaks and being difficult to keep a secret nowadays. I’m sure we will discuss a lot of The Last of Us 2 plot, the gameplay of Ghost of Tsushima and Spider-Man, also the craziness of Death Stranding.
Can’t forget to laugh about the MS conferences too, lol.
Anyway, I still think that E3 is our World Cup and an exciting event.
I left PC gaming for the excitement of console gaming! You think it should go away??? E3 will not go away until all digital takes over. I hate the thought of that. I love retail Disc AAA games!!!
I like it E3, always something to look forward to.
I love E3. It makes me feel like Xmas (but for adults!). The anticipation. The late night crawl to walk the next day. The games to add to an ever huge library! It's also a start/end of a gaming cycle for me. Lovely jubbly!
I know for my part I'm not gonna watch much of E3 even though there's a bunch of stuff I'm pretty excited for. A new Splinter Cell possibly, The Last of Us 2, whatever Nintendo has...but I'm tired of knowing so much about games before they're even released. I'm not even going to watch The Last of Us 2 gameplay. I want to go into that game fully blind.
With companies stepping away from E3, hosting their own shows, leaks, delays, datamining and PR nightmares, I would say no. E3 has to be the marketing department's nightmare; you spend all that time and money trying to make your company's products look good but the consumer base and the news outlets have already picked apart everything they could present, and when e3 hits they still aren't happy. At this point I say announce games two months before release to allow for preorders and move on. Do you own shows sure but that's about it.
If you have been to the events like myself you know why they should continue, they are a celebration for gamers unlike any other.
It's bad enough with leaks but now even the Developers themselves are ruining the surprise... And it's just annoying being teased about something like Fallout 76 then dealing with possible rumours. Assassin's Creed as well, I'd much rather have been surprised whilst watching the E3 conference.
I think it's important but certainly not as much as it once was. Nintendo's Directs always garner a lot of attention and those are held at all sorts of random times during the year, and sometimes a Direct during a slow period for gaming is exactly what's needed to cause excitement. The PlayStation Experience, before the absolute snoozefest that PS Experience 2017, had also become a nice annual show where Sony could simply celebrate its own brand and put the focus for those few days 100% on that. I'd love to see MS start during 'X' events like it used in the days of the original Xbox right through the early part of the Xbox 360 generation. A singular brand event has potential to be far more crucial for the first parties but E3 will always be a good time for the third parties to get out there and show what they have lined up.
Speaking as an anthropologist, I'd say its akin to a religious festival. An occasion for devotees, worshippers, followers, people who say the occasional prayer or light a joss stick; and people who just like festivals.
Surely the point of E3 is the communal thing where we can collectively come together and watch new trailers, get release dates and then there is the one more thing moment when we may get a complete surprise.
The one with FF7 remake and Shenmue 3 announcement will go down in history.
I am hoping that we will get a release date for FF7 and George R R Martin turns up and says he has finished the last two Game of Thrones books.
I am also hoping if I say what I did in the last paragraph often enough it will happen sooner rather than later.
Of course it would help if the show wasn't in the middle of the night over here in Europe.
We need/want the event but not always in LA.
E3 isn't needed but it's still awesome to watch, and we're all still gonna watch it every year
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...