
Sony spent a lot of time building up hero shooter Concord during its recent State of Play, and it did a decent enough job. All we’d seen of the release previously was a greasy looking hamburger, so that it was able to establish its cast of Guardians of the Galaxy-esque wise-crackers within the span of a single CG trailer was impressive.
But the Japanese giant also used its livestream to announce Marvel Rivals for PS5, and the Netease shooter occupies a similar space with a popular license and is free-to-play. So where does that leave Concord, and how much will it actually cost?
Well, pre-orders will open next week, so there will be a paid component. However, as many have pointed out, free-to-play games often receive full-price Founders Packs which come bundled with various cosmetics and in-game goodies; this author plumped up for the MultiVersus one a couple of years ago, for example.
However, the small-print on the PS Blog mentions that PS Plus is required to play Concord on PS5, and usually this requirement is relieved for free-to-play games, such as Fortnite. This suggests the first-person shooter will come with a price tag attached, presumably a budget one much like Helldivers 2 earlier in the year.
To be honest, this is a huge risk from Sony. All of the biggest hero shooters already on the market cost nothing to get started, and Concord is going head-to-head with all of them. Fans may claim to hate Overwatch 2, but it’s still enormously popular – and that’s without even mentioning the likes of Valorant et al. The game does look like it’s got a pretty huge budget, but PlayStation’s going to have to work overtime to establish it.
Comments 39
i’d say its a “huge risk” / high reward moment . i wouldn’t mind it not being f2p, maybe the quality would be better & it wouldn’t feel like an FOMO MTX shop first, and a game second; Overwatch was at its best when it wasn’t f2p & then went to crap . so yeah i wouldn’t mind going back to not being f2p , felt more like a premium better product . imagine if fighting games were free to play , yikes.
What they established in that short time was a perfect reproduction of bad acting and writing.
“Bring out the big guns”, seriously??
Oh and they just gender/species swapped every character from Guardians and it’s ridiculous.
What was the point of this presentation if Sony can't even provide the most basic details such as what type of game this is....
Just throwing trailer out there without any context feels like we are going backwards in an era in which Sony should be far more forthcoming.
I wouldn't call it a "Japanese giant" anymore
@Gamer_X Did you struggle to figure out it's a competitive multiplayer title?
why buy this when the games this is competing with are free ?
this looks so generic its painful ive seen nothing that makes me think yeah i will stop playing what im playing got to play this
why does this even exist
Idk man stuff like Fairgame$ and now this just feels so far removed from what Sony fans want. The writing style is so weird. You can’t really appeal to PS fans with these games cuz they normally like grandiose single player games or unique smaller titles like the older days. Ideally something like Helldivers would happen where they attract a new fanbase, but will people really play another hero shooter?
The amount of people giving this a shot will be far less if its behind a pay wall. Redfall and Suicide squad cemented caution with these schemes for sure.
A bone head idea if that's the case.
@Deoxyr1bose - Lots of people who started on PS2/PS3 were crying for some multiplayer games from Sony since last gen. You could say that isn't something the PS4 audience wanted, because Sony really created an audience solely based on single players on that gen. Also, this is the first FPS from Sony in 11 years (which is sad).
Wasn't yesterday that Sony revealed that more than 50% of the revenue on PSN is from a handful of games (all of them live services, of course). Maybe those are the real PlayStation fans tho.
Marvel Rivals looks like it’s gonna smash this honestly.
@MFTWrecks "Did you struggle to figure out it's a competitive multiplayer title?"
Considering about 2/3 of the presentation was a narrative character action sequence, I doubt anyone could figure that out before the last part where they showed the game that's nothing at all like most of the trailer.
@ED_209 @Deoxyr1bose The majority of the 60 million people with PS5 consoles are super casuals who mostly play sports games, free to play/shooters,and occasionally buy other games. They aren’t buying the Stellar Blades or Rebirth’s.
The people who prefer single player games are just more vocal on the internet.
@Shad361 true but why even play this none of it looked any better than games that are currently available. there was nothing in the trailers that made me think ive got to play this
Pretty much remember everybody slating helldivers 2 from their trailers. And we know how that turned out. So maybe give it a bit of a chance?
If they price it at £30/35 I think it will do ok. Not going to set the world alight.
I will pay 50 bucks for the game that’s the sweet spot for me.
@PsBoxSwitchOwner I dont think anyone was slating helldivers 2 when it came out but certainly none predicted how wildly successful it has done.
yes i suspect this game will be at the £30 level
Crazy to charge for these sorts of games in the current climate, but obviously justified as there’s devs behind it who need paying. That’s the problem, the very biggest corpos have devalued games to the point that I would never buy this game as there are several free to play alternatives. Just with hero shooters you have Overwatch and that Marvel game they also showed. Fortnite and now XDefiant exist too. It’ll have to be bloody good to even wrench a fraction of an audience considering it has a price tag attached. And, uh, that trailer didn’t exactly fill me with confidence that the plot will draw people in.
You cannot dethrone Fortnite. Do not even try. It is one of the industry's all time greatest success stories. 230 million active users per month.
Bring something radically new or make it free - because otherwise you've given people NO REASON to try it let alone stay.
The fact that they promoted this finally and then announced Marvel Rivals almost immediately with a better in the same month was so dumb.
I understand 3rd party relationships but these two games are almost identical, overwatch clones.
I t won't be, they literally say new future content like characters will be free, f2p games don't do that.
It's a shame actually because a 5v5 game of this kind most likely doesn't hold a chance with a price tag vs other games like the Marvel game presented in the very same show. S*cks but not every service can be a hit, that's how the industry works, hopefully it gets a playerbase like Paladins or TF2.
Paid or free, i think this game will be dead in less than a month or two. People not gonna play this game when it's just plays exactly like Overwatch, Apex, Valorant, or Destiny.
Old Jimbo doesn't learn the fact that live service hero shooter / PvP market is oversaturated af and he thinks PS future is in that market. I'm just glad he's not at SIE anymore.
@trev666 there were plenty questioning it when it was shown in trailers. I’m just saying that Sony generally release good quality games. So may be worth waiting for hands on
@Shad361 Do you think Mr. John McGee who plays only a couple games will leave something like Fortnite or CoD or Overwatch to play Concord, especially when it isn’t free to play? They’re gonna need to knock it out of the park ten fold and back if they want even a bit of hope of forcing casuals off of games like Fortnite.
@PuppetMaster I'm not sure how a game can play 'exactly like Overwatch, Apex, Valorant, or Destiny' when those four games are very different gameplay experiences to start with.
Needing a PS Plus subscription to play this also seems a bit unfair. Like with Helldivers 2, when PC players don't have to pay for online then why should Playstation users?
"Sony spent a lot of time building up hero shooter Concord during its recent State of Play, and it did a decent enough job." Did it?
What i saw was a rich world and a great story from the cgi trailer of which I'd love to play.
What I got was a generic overwatch fps which didn't give me any hype.
Sorry but Sony are great at third person, they just are. That first part was exactly what I'd want great story telling, some jokes and then let's play those getaway scenes third person and let me enjoy the story.
Instead it seems its going to be a arena shooter with some tact on cgi cut scenes
I was groaning through the entire Concord presentation. Huge budget game for sure, but the writing is, as everyone is pointing out, 2nd rate Guardians of the Galaxy.
Art style is mostly appealing, but I don't think it has the personality that people love in games like Overwatch. Assume it'll be around 50 euro and be free to play after a year. Talented team making this but it's been polished to being generic and the same as so many other competitors
Idk man, appreciate it's not appropriate but this just looks cringe-to-play. Years behind the curve, and none of the characters speak to me as they all seem to busy ticking boxes in terms of tropes and the like.
The valorant reference is irrelevant. It's not even playable on consoles.
This isn't targeting players from games like Apex, COD or Fortnite, it's going after the Overwatch and Valorant crowd to which these games are getting stale so Concord has a serious chance of doing well if they get the game right.
Price is very important, no way they can charge £70 for this as its too much of a risk as it's not a proven IP that people are will okta to spend that much on. I think it needs to either be free to play which in return means it would have to be riddled with MTX, or £34.99/£39.99 which seems like a reasonable price which worked for HellDivers 2.
I don’t think price is a problem. It wasn’t that long ago that Overwatch 1 was a $60 game at launch and it wasn’t exactly feature rich in those days, but still a 10/10 multiplayer shooter. As long as the game justifies itself and its cost, it’ll be fine like Helldivers was. I thought (and honestly still feel) that Helldivers felt free-to-play, but they fooled me there, so I wouldn’t be surprised if Concord does the same. That said though, I’m not the target audience for this one, unlikely I’ll buy, as I feel Helldivers is overrated and I’m not going to waste my money again. I’ll try the beta at least though. That’s a positive.
Not interested in the game but curious to see the price point.
Pretty sure they mentioned pre-orders. You wouldn’t pre-order a f2p game, would you?
@Deoxyr1bose if it becomes trendy they will
If they make it "not full price" like helldivers 2, and the game is actually great fun to play, I think it could do well. It's alright saying Marvel Rivals will stomp it but we haven't played either game yet. If Concord is legitimately great, it'll sell
@Marquez this was my thought while reading those comments as well. 🤔
@Jimbody marvel rivals has been out for select users to play already and is free to play
I bet it's 'free' with PS+. Like Foamstars. I expect this game will do just as well...
The cinematic trailer made me it was a single player game at first. It looked interesting until I heard it's 5v5 . Haha. I'm not into pvp or shooting games.
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...