Star Trek: Into Darkness director JJ Abrams has revealed how disappointed he was with the video game adaptation which accompanied the recent movie.
Speaking to Xboxer360, Abrams said:
The last game, which was obviously a big disappointment to me...[It] was something that we were actually involved in from the very beginning and then we sort of realised that it was not going in a place where we were going to get what we wanted, so we dropped out and they continued to do it despite… y’know.
To me the video game could have been something that actually really benefited the series and was an exciting, fun game with great gameplay and instead it was not and was something that I think, for me emotionally it hurt, ‘cos we were working our asses off making the movie.
Then this game came out and it got, this isn’t even my opinion, it got universally panned and I think that it was something without question that didn’t help the movie and arguably hurt it.
The game — which was developed by Digital Extremes and published by Namco Bandai — certainly wasn't a classic. We gave it 3/10 in our review, stating that: "Star Trek: The Video Game shows signs of promise, and even manages to deliver a serviceable plot – but buried beneath its palatable dialogue is a calamitous third-person shooter that makes a mockery out of its source material".
Do you feel the director's criticism is valid? Post a comment to share your feelings.
[source mcvuk.com]
Comments 7
I'll give him that it didn't help the movie, but I don't see how it could have hurt it either. People who see Star Trek movies know video game adaptations suck, or they are people who don't play video games at all. And the movie wasn't even all that good - "oh look it's Star Trek 2, let's put Khan in it". The first one was great though.
I guess that Avatar game explains why that movie only made the most money EVER.
http://boxofficemojo.com/alltime/adjusted.htm?sort=gross&order=DESC&adjust_yr=1&p=.htm
http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/james-camerons-avatar-the-game
Doesn't he realize that most games that are based on movies are not that great? It might not of helped the movie but it certainly didn't hurt the movie.
Absolutely loved his first remake. Haven't seen the second one. But I heard somewhere that Star Trek fans voted it their least favorite of ALL the movies. I don't see how the game can possibly affect that at all.
@Squiggle55 most of reviews come from so called harcore trek fans that don't like the fact they rebooted the franchise, but as a life long Star Trek fan I can tell you it is not the worst trek movie (that honour belongs to Star Trek 5) infact I think into darkness was better than star trek 2009
also you would think that they would be more grateful to the reboots because it brought new life to the franchise and of couse the new fans will also want to check out the original stuff thus keeping the franchise alive because CBS and Paramount had pretty much ended it before these films
Into Darkness was better than JJ Trek, but not by much. It also just sits in 'pointless remake' territory.
I'm a Trek fan, and other than Karl Urban (doing a very good DeForest Kelly impression) there's not really anything I like about JJ's treks, all flash and not much else. His Kirk is a shallow, whiny punk who really just seems to have been made a captain because he was there ans whined about it. Urhura isn't even a person and at best, Zac Quinto sort of resembles Nimoy.
Then there's that ship. The Tomy 'My First Enterprise'. It'd look ok were something done about the nacelles. Instead they managed to make them look worse.
Don't see how it hurt the movie. People who don't care about game won't care it wasn't a good game, people who that much about games know it doesn't reflect the movie. It was great move indeed I will say, better than its predecessor.
I didnt even know the video game was around till long after I watched the movie. Most gamers know video game movie adaptations are all crap
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...