Every year, the announcement of the latest FIFA, NBA 2K, MLB The Show, or Madden is met with the same chorus of complaints: copy-and-paste. It’s a reductive comment, of course – the Internet, as a whole, is rarely constructive with its criticism – but these titles are developed on such short cycles that it’s hard for the likes of EA Sports, 2K Sports, and Sony to really rebuild an entire experience in under a year.
As a result, these releases tend to be iterative: they progress under-the-hood year-on-year, but it’s hard to appreciate the changes sometimes. There’s no doubt that if you compare, say, NBA 2K15 to NBA 2K21 there are a lot of changes – although not everyone will agree they’re for the best – but it’s much more challenging to notice the tweaks on an annual basis. Gameplay animations are added and Franchise modes layer on new systems, but the alterations tend to be minor.
For years, then, fans have argued that these series should be free-to-play, or at least service-based – especially seeing as the microtransaction boom has added controversial gacha mechanics in the form of Ultimate Team to almost all of these franchises. PES, newly rebranded eFootball, is the first to make the jump, with Konami recognising that it simply can’t compete with the FIFA juggernaut anymore. For years it’s had the better playing soccer sim, but its full-price sales have been on the decline.
But is this the future of sports games? Many argue that these titles are so iterative there’s very little value in buying a new one every year, but resets like what EA Sports is doing with HyperMotion Technology this year are important when it comes to pushing the genre forward. Would that be possible in a free-to-play, service-based game? Perhaps, but the monetisation would need to be aggressive to justify the work.
eFootball is effectively starting out as a demo, with a handful of teams and an exhibition mode. There’s no doubt it’ll grow over time – Konami has mentioned the fact that you’ll be able to buy bolt-on modes later, presumably including the popular Master League – but given the business model it’s adopting we have to assume the emphasis will be on the areas of the game that can be monetised, such as MyClub. Story modes, such as NBA 2K’s MyCareer, would be less viable in a free-to-play environment.
Publishers would have to work hard to ensure lucrative modes like Ultimate Team don’t get stale. Typically, these modes follow a power curve, where the best content is gradually rolled out over the course of a season – but this author already has about eight Cristiano Ronaldo cards in eFootball PES 2021: Season Update alone, so how many R7s be dished out in eFootball over the course of its lifespan? With no annual reset, it’ll be interesting to see how Konami retains interest over the course of an entire generation, and perhaps it’ll push it to be more creative.
Where do you stand on all this? Are you the kind of person who happily laps up a new sports game every year, or are you of the belief that the changes are so minimal that these games don’t justify full-price each season? It’ll be interesting to see whether eFootball triggers a paradigm shift for the genre as a whole, or kills the series for good. We’re in an era of subscriptions and service games now, so it’s not the wildest idea. The question is: is this what you want?
Is the future of sports games free-to-play, and why? Are you the kind of person who’s in the market for new sports games every year, or are you a casual sideline observer? Have a kick about in the comments section below.
Comments 43
I wouldn’t mind F2P for sports games. Beats paying 70 dollars for the same game every year imo
I feel Yes. Can't justify spending £60 pounds on FIFA anymore, looking back at all those years I missed a lot of games because if that. Even if they shouldn't go F2P, something like £30 would've been okay. I think this eFootball is a good move.
Its important to compare this to MMOs. Free to play MMOs inevitably make their money back in abhorrent monetisation at some stage. Paying a monthly fee is what makes FFXIV so good. PES will need to make its money back somehow and this move towards releasing essentially a demo is not really what I wanted to see.
Sports games are ideal for a games as a service. However when 10+ million buy fifa, madden, nba 2k every year on top of billions in microtransactions I simply don't see it happening with their current financial success
Not bought a FIFA since 17 (well for myself son plays them) but with this being free can't hurt to have a look can it? Can it? Depends I suppose how much you can get out of it for free as I'm not one for microtransactions.
Big fan of sports games but not nearly as much as I used to be. Free-to-play probably is the direction the genre is headed and that absolutely is not for the better.
Is it the future? Probably. Do I want it to be? Nah. Inevitably any financial success with a free to play in one genre will creep into another. But I guess if there's demand for it, so be it. Hopefully there's a healthy balance of paid for games and "free" (lol) to play games for years to come.
I think free to play is a better alternative than EA charging full price and having lootboxes in the game as well
I agree it should be F2P and just update the game annually with new squads, kits etc. Even with minor graphic/physics upgrades too to keep it fresh. EA will never go this route with FIFA though as they absolutely rake it in every year, would be to much money to lose from EA’s point of view.
Anyone that doesn’t believe sports games should be a F2P or live service game have no idea what they’re talking about.
These games should be a platform to build upon, like Fortnite and GTA Online. The argument could even be made for the GT games. I mean just look at Ubisoft with AC.
This should be the way of sports games 100%
I don't know about free-to-play but it could definitely benefit from just being a subscription service.... with a tacit promise of a graphical overhaul every couple years or so.
Tiered monthly subscription options and some SOME microtransactions seems like the way to go.
But then I don't even play sports games so I don't know who asked me really.
For me buying the base and the Master League as a bolt on would be a better way to do this. I have no interest in a lot of modes such as online play and such. If they charged me £20 for squad updates and access to either career mode/master league I would be more interested than paying £70 for a game with lots of modes I will not play
A bit late to the parade on the new FIFA, which was covered yesterday I think, but do you know if the Career Mode Sim Match mode is going to get improved over last year? It was a good idea but could do with improvements to match Pes and Football Manager.
There is still no news about FM coming to PS5 I take it.
And I may be able to buy a PS5 before November - I am hoping
I'm not a sports fan so I'm not daft enough to buy into the yearly FIFA cycle like all my friends and colleagues , but my nephew who's fitba mad always wants the same game for Xmas each year and I have to buy it. Giving EA money makes me feel dirty. Rocket League is the best fitba game and it's already FTP!
The thing is, they have no reason to change anything. People buy these games up every single year. $60? $70? Doesn't matter. Heck EA such test this by raising the price every year and seeing if sales numbers go down. Sports gamers will probably still buy at $100.
I ONLY play sports games as single player, offline franchise/owner mode. While I hate how those features have been pushed to the back burner in favor of online microtransactions, I don't even know what would become of them were the games free to play. Would that aspect - the only one that I care about and one of my biggest hobbies in life - just completely disappear?
Unpopular opinion but I'm happy to pay full price each year for the new fifa as I probably get more value for money over the year than with any other game...
PES without Master League is nothing.
If a sports game offers great value for what you pay for (i.e. in how many hours you play between releases) then it's worth paying for each year.
I play certain sports games all year long for 100's of hours, so happy to pay each year for my favourite annual titles. Plus a lot of F2P games I have played need some form of payment to get the full experience. I would rather just pay upfront. I never buy fluff or loot boxes anyway and I'd imagine there would be even more of that and advertising in a F2P model.
Nah f2p isn't the future...it should be as I can't see how making them free would make them worse...but why do that when they can still have lootboxes season passes ect and be yearly best selling video games? Would make no sense.
Maybe a f2p editions is the future
as long as there is a classic tournament mode to play with friends i'm ok with efootball.
Not overly surprised by the poll results, I've thought for a while that people "against" the annual sports cycle don't actually play them much.
I personally enjoy the seasonal reset and the annual iteration. I also feel like I get value for money out of the 100s of hours I put into these games.
There's potential in the free-to-play model I think, although I'm bitterly disappointed with eFootball.
Nope... Just buy the game. I ignore microtransactions anyway.
Sports games are how I spend time with family in Spain (Fifa) and my old college friends around the US (Madden/MLB)
I also have more fun racing F1 online than most games I play for $60 (and it last me far, far longer)
PES is nowhere near a title that can launch a trend in Sports games (Especially not here in the US). Like saying Sports games would reduce price because Mega Baseball 3 sells for $39.
If they put in less work they should just charge less. Sell the yearly update for £25. That would be my preference as someone who used to play FUT but never spent a penny on micro transactions.
Sports games are the cesspool of anti-customer practices in the video games industry - yearly updates, full-price games with microtransactions, gambling advertised to kids by professional athletes . . . It's all gross.
PES needs to adapt because it's been "losing" for 15 years, but other sports games make crazy profits with the current model. The other day there was an article that mentioned that over 25% of all money made by EA is made by FIFA microtransactions (including loot boxes). This is on top of a game people have already paid for. EA has no incentive to change this.
I think I would prefer they release a new game every two years, with an update for new kits and squads at least then they get two years to work on a new game and hopefully they make enough changes. I don't think I will be buying FIFA this year had enough of it now last one was awful. Might just pick it up when it's massively discounted but not sure.
I feel the yearly updates are a little too much.
What have have tended to do is buy FIFA one year then pro Evo the next. At least that way it kind of feels like I'm getting a different experience each year
Pes sales less than 2 milion copies until 2013, fifa and nba2k sales about 10 milion copies every year. pes become free and the solution is obvious. that doesn't mean the others will become free too, because they sell well after all
At some point in future, I can absolutely see EA releasing cut-down F2P versions of FIFA and Madden geared around Ultimate Team.
So basically for those that actually buy new sports games its pretty much split down the middle.
Yes (15%) + Yes Occasional (7%) = 22%
No (17%) + No Occasional (11%) = 28%
By a small margin of just 6% of people who regularly buy annual sports games prefer to pay and not free to play. It will be interesting to see how this new format will work and if it will sway people one way or the other in future.
EA and 2K will screw over the consumer in any pricing model. What we really need is market choice and competition to force them to improve their products - they will not do this without being forced.
@KippDynamite I agree and that was my thought — that is, PES and Konami are in the perfect position to take this first chance. They are pretty solidly far behind their competitor FIFA so what have they got to lose? It’s kind of like Microsoft Xbox and the GamePass experiment — they needed to shake up the industry and put pressure on the competition by filling a niche that hasn’t been tried yet. If Konami does football sim F2P correctly, then they’ll pull business away from FIFA in a way they have not been able to by just competing toe to toe with a similar product. Why not? Nothing else they could do would likely shift market share.
@nessisonett Whale hunting takes care of a lot of F2P titles. They might not need to have a fee.
Hey @pushsquare and family site Purebox, what about creating a site only about offline games ? Do you remember MTV Unplugged? Same concept. Help building the resistance against Skynet!!! 🤖
After buying Fifa 5-6 years in a row, I completely stopped half a decade ago. Played Fifa 21 against a relative this summer, having not played since around Fifa 16, and still I won, because nothing's changed.
In my opinion, EA should've released one base game (at a higher price) every five years or so, with seasonal updates released as (cheaper) DLC. That way they could've improved the game mechanics, instead of throwing out good mechanics, inventing new ones, only to introduce the old ones as «new» four years later. And they would've brought players like me back - having the base game, I wouldn't mind paying for a cheaper seasonal update every year or every two years.
@Unlucky13. I agree. I used to by Madden every year just to do the franchise offline. I haven't bought one in well over 10 years or so because the franchise mode seemed to take a back seat. Im on the fence about going f2p tho. I can see the argument for and against it. The only sport game i play is NCAA Football 14 on occasion on ps3
@Sinton Can't upvote you enough. That is precisely why i stopped buy Madden every year.
I think this would be an interesting discussion regarding annual games in general, not just annual sports games.
I wouldn't go so far as to say I want free to play. I would personally get into sports games more if they adopted a model like fighting games did last generation.
Here's the new MLB The Show for PS5 at a starting price of $70 but future roster updates are like $25 a year. Then if they actually have a legitimate big improvement such as what Fifa claims their new thing is, save it for the PS6 version and charge full price again then.
The way it is now I mostly buy one sports game for the entire generation and thats it. I just can't justify $60-70 for a "new" sports game every year but a smaller fee for a roster update would be much easier to justify.
I got Rocket League from PS Plus, but when I gave up my subscription , I bought it... then I bought it on Switch for portable play ... then it went F2P
Which means, I can play it again without an online subscription ... its brilliant, I went from hardly playing it last couple of years, to most played game this year.
I think a free base with an annual (tenner?) to update the squads and have relegation/promotion would be great .. then they can make more money in some of the other modes ....
I've been saying this for years, I don't play FIFA but I'm a big F1 fan but I don't buy that yearly as I see no point. As far as FIFA goes isn't the big attraction Ultimate Team? A mode which is essentially designed as a free to play title anyway
I'd be happy to pay a base fee then £20-30 a year for updated squad lists / kits etc. These games end up costing £5-10 second hand after a few months, so it's no wonder they are going down this route.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...