The FTC (USA's Federal Trade Commission) has confirmed it will attempt to block Microsoft's $69 billion acquisition of Call of Duty developer Activision. In a statement on its official website, the FTC pointed to Microsoft's record of buying other developers to suppress content from its rivals. "Microsoft decided to make several of Bethesda's titles including Starfield and Redfall Microsoft exclusives despite assurances it had given to European antitrust authorities that it had no incentive to withhold games from rival consoles."
The Commission voted 3-1 to issue the complaint, with the director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition Holly Vedova adding: "Microsoft has already shown that it can and will withhold content from its gaming rivals. Today we seek to stop Microsoft from gaining control over a leading independent game studio and using it to harm competition in multiple dynamic and fast-growing gaming markets."
To try and get other platforms and hardware manufacturers on board, Microsoft offered a 10-year deal to companies to ensure Call of Duty would remain on their consoles. Nintendo and Steam accepted the offer, but Sony did not. "With control over Activision’s blockbuster franchises, Microsoft would have both the means and motive to harm competition by manipulating Activision’s pricing, degrading Activision’s game quality or player experience on rival consoles and gaming services, changing the terms and timing of access to Activision’s content, or withholding content from competitors entirely, resulting in harm to consumers."
Sony's sticking point over the acquisition has clearly been access to the Call of Duty franchise, but it appears the FTC is taking a wider perspective, pointing to lesser-known exclusives like Redfall. It sees the move as enabling Microsoft "to suppress competitors to its Xbox gaming consoles and its rapidly growing subscription content and cloud-gaming business". Sony has argued its PS Plus service is losing to Xbox Game Pass when you at least look at the more expensive tiers PS Plus Extra and PS Plus Premium.
EVP Corporate Affairs and CCO of Activision Blizzard Lulu Cheng Meservey responded with the following: "This vote departs from precedent but the law hasn’t changed. Any claim the deal is anticompetitive ignores facts; the deal benefits gamers and the industry, especially given competition from abroad. We look forward to proving our case in court and closing our deal with Microsoft."
[source ftc.gov]
Comments 149
Nice. This acquisition was bad for the industry.
That’s actually quite sucky.
I know this might not be a popular opinion here, but as a multi platform gamer I was looking forward to paying less for games with all those new games on Game Pass…
I hate when The Game Awards announcements get leaked early.
Geoff Keighley: "I'd like to welcome Lina Khan to the stage for the next announcement"
Lina Khan: (walks on stage) "I have a lawsuit to announce..."
Wow, well at least they were listening. MS was too slow to offer the 10 year deal. The fact that they started it off at just 3 years shows they really intended to impact CoD availability at some point.
I haven’t given up the idea that it will be blocked and this is FHE right decision. So many people talked about how ridiculous Sony was being, but they’re getting things done it looks like. MS already lied it looks like and now they pay the price. This might actually force MS to do something innovative instead of just trying to buy out the competition
Except this doesn't really mean much at the moment only that it now goes to court, which I still think they have a chance of winning.
Will be very interesting going forward now where they go if it is blocked.
will go through with concessions, as any large merger has to.
MS will happily give Sony CoD.
CoD isnt even big for MS here (still on GP)
king is what they want, thats where the money is.
I didn't mind it since I don't play Call of Duty franchise and it was interesting to see how Xbox is building its competition against Sony. I guess not
@Kienda you rather sacrifice your hobby to save some money? You have to think long term and beyond yourself. This, and subscription model like game pass is not good for gaming.
Even the US Antitrust sees the problem with this, no way Europe votes for Microsoft now.
I didn't know Microsoft had lied to European antitrust groups, that is quite the crucial detail that might just be the FTC's smoking gun.
@Cutmastavictory Subscription corners the market and kills creative competition. I rather pay for the games I will play then subscribe to this. I'll be getting all future Bethesda games on PC.
So it is okay for Sony to buy Insomniac which keeps the Spider-Man games and PS exclusives and broker deals where PS players have it better in COD on their systems, but MS keeping two games from Bethesda as exclusives is forbidden? If the deal is blocked, Sony is screwed. This frees up almost $70 Billion for Microsoft to use to get exclusivity rights that make Sony's deals look like nothing. And before anyone comes at me as an MS fanboy, I could care less about console wars. I have all three systems and don't care where the games are. I would like to see the acquisition go through because I think MS would do a better job of managing the studios over what Bobby has been allowing to happen.
@TheMarinePS I don't play COD Either, but it brought in 1 B in opening weekend. And if I go to any group of people who play COD Primarily, they will go where COD exists. Simple. If it's third party it won't affect where people choose to game. If it's exclusive, it will.
This arc of the anime is getting crazier by the day
I rather have Ms buying Activision then going after Square enix or Capcom to be honest. If this isn't going through they will probably want revenge on Sony and go after what hits them harder
Phil Spencer's little PR games finally flopped. This is bad for the industry and the right decision. Jim Ryan was actually right in his crusade.
@jrt87 I think they're gradually beginning to realise that they should have blocked a lot of these a lot earlier.
I mean, we're talking decades ago really. There's no way the likes of Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon, Disney, et al should be as big as they are.
But it's too late!
@JSnow2 Lol why are you celebrating? The FTC has lost every single case they’ve taken to court, the worst it could happen is that Microsoft will be forced to make concessions (which they’ve already shown they’re happy to do so), but the deal will end up being approved.
Even if the acquisition doesn’t go through it’s probably still not going to end well for Sony. Activision will not be happy about Sony being vocal against the buyout and may just let Microsoft/Xbox have the CoD marketing rights and day one exclusive content that PlayStation have had for many years. Also MS will still have $69 billion that could enable them to acquire other studios that in the end could mean even more less games on PlayStation.
It’s also not a good look on the FTC to block this when MS have made their intentions to release CoD on even more platforms than before to more audiences. MS have already said they would fight for this and do you think the FTC could do with the headache of taking this to court only to lose like all the times before?
Good. MS’s money has always given them the capability to build a dominance that is anti consumer because, quite simply, they have orders of magnitude more cash than their competitors in the industry.
They haven’t really made use of this in the past, keeping Xbox pretty isolated, but by leveraging azure, and their vast cash reserves, they were clearly looking to make this play. Hopefully they don’t succeed, for the sake of continued competition.
@Microbius I think it will fail like you said. It now will take years from now to make the Deal what is going to make things even more difficult to maintain professionality in the Company itself. This will hurt all gamers earlier we would think.
@theGoodChap
I would have been shocked if it didn't happen, the U.S has antitrust laws for these exact scenarios, and it really needs to be enforcing them more.
@NomNom how is that any different to the current situation? My friends that own multiple systems play CoD on PS because they get more stuff. If the deal goes through they will probably play on Xbox because of game pass. They will still have a choice of where to play and will make that decision based on their own circumstances.
Im not sure how ppl we’re defending this deal in the first place. Microsoft defended its deal with bethesda and said it was “good for the industry” and immediately made starfield exclusive. They trying to benefit themselves, and in their eyes, thats “good for the industry”.
They may keep COD multiplatform but they’ll probably make some warcraft sequel exclusive. I dont believe at all that microsoft is concerned about sonys success. They are lying and using clever wordplay.
Even if it does go through now in some watered down form, it won't be for many years.
Honestly exclusive titles is one thing, however if it is true that during the Bethesda buyout, they claimed they had no intention of making titles through those studious exclusive to Microsoft platforms... Well then, that's bs. As we now know.
That alone would be reason enough to suggest they will pull similar monopolization with buying out the Activision/blizzard scumbags.
@Kienda get them physical & trade them in when you've done with them if you don't want to own them
It is true that game passes have a positive impact on the game market.
Well this is a surprising turn of events.
Doesn’t mean it’ll make it through the court system, though. Like others have mentioned the FTC has lost the vast majority of cases it’s took to court.
With the FTCs recent history of losing everything, I still think it will be approved.
If I was reviewing this news story I would give a 10. Banger of a twist. Comedy gold. Fanboy tears. Love it.
@SacredPYRO COD + Choice exclusives will still draw a substantial amount of people.
Versus
No choice
Cool.Black moon who got the props.thats what sony PlayStation is flexing its muscle on micro you so soft.word up son
This Lulu chick is an idiot. Antitrust laws were not made to specifically “protect the consumer”, they were made to stop companies in any industry from monopolizing a market. This in turn absolutely protects the consumer but first you have to protect the marketplace.
Looking at a company that is way beyond Google or Amazon is Comcast. Most states in the US have them as the ONLY solid option for Internet access and look what that did.
They’ll lose this suit like usual but maybe this will create a standard where major concessions need to be made to even bring a deal like this to the table.
@KaijuKaiser I'm not surprised you got banned. They didn't like Sunset Overdrive, but God forbid Sony acquired them.
@johncalmc If I was reviewing your comment I'd give it a 10
@Cutmastavictory yep, I’m poor and like free games.
I’m sorry for being selfish.
I really hope this sticks, MS getting too big would be terrible for the industry in the long run.
Maybe, just maybe they could try making some good games with their 24 studios rather than just trying to buy their way to the top. And i say this as a series x owner.
And for the people saying this could backfire on Sony because they could spend the 70 billion on other studios, MS have already stated they haven't finished after the Activision deal, they intend to buy more studios after.
The problem with Microsoft is, they buy up all of these companies and then run them into the ground. Why is it so difficult for them to invest in and grow their own studios? They have so much money but I couldn’t name a single Xbox exclusive from the last five years (maybe more) unless I took a guess with the usual Forza, Halo, Gears franchises. Pretty shocking really. I really hope this Activision sale is stopped.
@Would_you_kindly I only buy physical except Game Pass and PS+.
That’s why my Switch collection is bigger. Then my PS4 collection, then Xbox.
@HunterRose But there is a difference between Microsoft and Activision, and Sony and Insomniac.
Activision is a historically multiplatform games publisher with numerous sub studios and ip under its control which Microsoft would be able to take off the market at will. That harms consumers and is bad for competition.
Insomniac is a developer, not a publisher. Same as Housemarque, Bluepoint, or any other studio Sony has acquired (excluding Bungie). Whilst they were previously free to launch on any system they wanted and can no longer do so, they were historically primarily affiliated with Sony. They also have nothing to do with the spiderman ip. Disney approached Microsoft - who turned down developing a game - and Sony, who decided to do a deal. But Disney could take that ip anywhere they like. They own it.
Not looking to disagree with you btw. And certainly not accusing you of fanboy-ism. I agree if Microsoft dont succeed here, then they will absolutely be looking to blow that 70 million on other exclusivity deals which could be just as - if not more - damaging to Sony. I also think Activision staff would probably have better employee rights under Microsoft.
Ultimately though all of these companies are just there to make money at the end of the day, and i dont think its fair for anyone to paint Sony alone as the bad guy here. They are just working to protect their business.
This case has just brought everything into the public domain in a very ugly way. Sooner its done, the better
@MaccaMUFC just because they don't get a 69 billion dollar deal from going in, doesn't mean they will still have that money to blow. After paying Activision 3B, I don't think their share holders will be too happy to put any money towards the Gaming industry in the near future. Shareholders care about profit, end of the day.
Win or lose, I'm glad they at least pointed out the bull that is making Bethesda games exclusive. That one still hurts, not enough to make me heal the wound with an Xbox or play more PC, but still hurts
@Intr1n5ic we're just givin' 10s away here!
@KaijuKaiser purexbox is similar. not as bad but they dont like anti MS.
pushsquare is good in that regard, criticisms challenged/discussed etc
@Rob_230 Well said. I was going to say something about the Insomniac thing, but you did a great job of it.
Personally, I don't care whether the deal goes through or not. I just want to stop hearing about it.
Lol this coming out immediately after Diablo 4 devs spoke out about the horrific working conditions. Notice which one doesn’t have an article.
@playstation1995 Yo son they don't know about old school hip like Bkackmoon and Smif n Wesson. Miss Rap City.
@Kienda But now you keep paying money for promises rather than actual games, aren't you?
Why is it almost an hour later and your sister site, Pure Xbox, still doesn’t have an article about this?!?
@awp69 they're busy having meltdowns lol
@nessisonett This is also extremely true. If they’re going to investigate the deal maybe they should pop their head in on the employees.
Never underestimate the power of PlayStation!
I have all three consoles and are still on the fence about this.
If Microsoft took Activision and grew them and they made better and more AAA quality games then I suppose it’s a good thing for me and my game pass.
If Microsoft took Activision and they stayed sort as they are or more so even produced less games and of lower quality then it’s a bad thing.
That’s how someone owning all three consoles and game pass. might look at it.
And hopefully this is the start of common sense prevailing.
@HunterRose Last I read, Xbox turned down the opportunity to make the Spider-Man game, and hence it went to Sony. Sony asked Insomaniac to make the game. Spider-Man wasn't exclusive just because they bought Insomaniac. Your facts are twisted.
@HunterRose Others have responded well to you, but I'd just add you've got to take into account the numbers involved here.
Insomniac cost Sony $229,000,000.
Activision costs Microsoft $69,000,000,000.
In other words, this deal costs approximately 300 times more than the Sony deal you're comparing it to. Just think about that.
Sony also already owned most of Insomniac's intellectual property, including Ratchet & Clank and Resistance. Disney owns Spider-Man.
Well what a suprise! But you have to say, they make a decent case and appear to have a smoking gun. Whatever eventually happens, this is a huge set back for the deal.
Removed - flaming/arguing; user is banned
Did I read that right about MS lying to the EU regulators about Bethesda?
I knew they had lied to everyone else, but didn't think they'd be so brazen as to lie to the regulators.
@stvevan Surely you jest? This site is an echo chamber.
@HunterRose there's a huge difference from buying insomniac and Microsoft buying a whole publisher. Let's not conflate the two as equal.
Insomniac also didn't have the Spiderman licence it's also worth noting which I'm sure you know about both points.
Worth saying I'm not for all the studios being bought up by both Sony and Microsoft but your points are scraping the barrel.
@HunterRose just face it sony will always be number 1
Good. Hopefully, regulators are not as easily fooled as a lot of folks are. There are plenty of ways Microsoft can be anti-competitive with Activision-Blizzard King properties. Additionally, what happens after ten years?
Yeah they gonna lose this one. After the Ticketmaster ***** show, monopolizing an industry is going to be frowned upon.
@Shepherd_Tallon It looks that way, and if true, that's going to be one of the harder points for them to defend in court. Having precedent that demonstrates them lying to European regulators about their exclusivity intentions during the Zenimax acquisition, definitely doesn't bode well for any case they're trying to make about their intentions with this one.
Wow! Big news that.
Good news!
And since PushSquare requires a longer comment than that, I'll say it again: Good news!
Ain't jack s*** happening.
Corporations have American politicians in their pockets.
MS just freed up some more gazillions for lobbying probably
Grabs popcorn to see the meltdowns. In honestly there's no game I really care about from Activision.
those ten years of cod tweets from yesterday had a bit of desperation behind them so I guess uncle Phil and Activision will be like Minecraft guy got word of this.
Forget just COD, for the concessions it should be all future Activision console games must remain multiplatform.
10 year Bethesda IP deals coming soon.
@NomNom
There are few things investors hate more than cash-on-hand, especially during a period of high inflation. Investors want that money spent in growth, one way or another, not sitting on a bank.
Anyways, anyone taking this as the end of the deal has not paid attention to the FTC poor track record with these lawsuits. Combine that with current US courts being much more corporation friendly than usual, and we are back at the EU and the UK being the biggest potential roadblocks.
@Shepherd_Tallon I would love to see any evidence of them lying to anyone about Bethesda. They were always vague and stuck to their “case by case basis” theme during that acquisition.
"Microsoft decided to make several of Bethesda's titles including Starfield and Redfall Microsoft exclusives despite assurances it had given to European antitrust authorities that it had no incentive to withhold games from rival consoles."
Wow, so basically all this BS about keeping call of duty on other consoles is a lie as well?
Ok good. Now let's prevent the growth or even break up other massive companies like Google, Facebook, Disney, etc.
This shall get bloody now (it was already quite messy, but we are turning a new gear and I love it). It's like Seconds before catastrophe
@HunterRose better management? They haven’t had an amazing game since Xbox 360 and they ruined halo with 343 mismanagement, they’re not doing a good job
Sounds like some careers are about to end at the FTC. Crazy throwing away your entire career on something like this, but they wanted to double down...
@Rob_230 I absolutely love intelligent responses. Very well said.
If Microsoft had given assurances that Starfield wouldn't be affected by the Bethesda buyout, then it's not really surprising that their promises are being met with raised eyebrows now.
@Hindenburg "How is GOW Ragnarok being easily mistakable for DLC, but with a worse story good for the industry?"
Easily mistakable for DLC by whom exactly?
@get2sammyb
Insomniac is no comparison in size to ABK. They are just kicking the "You know what" out of MS and pretty much every developer outside of Sony. Actually, let me correct that statement, they are kicking the "You know what" out of every developer outside of Sony. They are one of the Premier Studios in the world, just like almost all of Sony's studios, and there other recent acquisitions the other Premier studio Bungie and their nearly 1,000 developers (which is 6 or 7 times larger than what is considered a large developer size). Bungie and Sony are going to make so much money over the next decades in video games, movies, tv shows, and merchandise.
However, MS has lied in the past with Europe they will do it again. ABK should spend some time taking care of their developers and producing best in class top quality games.
Cheers!
@naruball trolls, well poor attempts of trolls
@HunterRose
serious? Sony owns the Spiderman license. (at least for the movies) Microsoft has had the chance to buy the Spiderman license and make Spiderman games. She didn't want that. Because Microsoft doesn't want to make games. They have 23 studios but NOTHING comes out. The only thing coming now is because Bethesda was already working on those games. Just go make games Microsoft. So does Sony.
@UltimateOtaku91 I can see them honoring their promise of keeping CoD on other platforms, but only for the amount of time they are saying, and not a second longer. Their long term goal is in 15-20 years, have gamepass be the only real option, and raise the price astronomically. Think when NBA 2k was $30 15 years ago, and the disgusting mess it is today.
@Cikajovazmaj well, yes. Sony have taken a stance on Nintendo now so it certainly will continue to get messier i fear -
https://xboxera.com/2022/12/08/sony-claims-xbox-nintendo-cod-deal-is-meaningless-as-the-switch-is-for-children/
(the headline is a bit misleading mind)
@naruball thank you! Its been a hard day today so i genuinely appreciate that 🙂
Interesting that the Bethesda purchase may end up preventing Microsoft from acquiring Activision.
As for the studios Sony acquires, the majority are small and have long running partnerships with Sony...especially Insomniac. Outside of Sunset Overdrive, they've pretty much been Playstation or PC. Bungie was Sony's only true option to retain a FPS presence if Activision went through.
@BeerIsAwesome Sony has yet to purchase a large IP/studio and keep it from their competitors. We can discuss their intentions on that matter after.
Bungie being their largest acquisition, remains a third party publisher.
Maybe we will see Starfield on PS5 after all.
@PegasusActual93 With Bethesda, according to the CMA reports, they had made assurances to third parties stating that they did not intend to make Bethesda games exclusive to their platform (streaming). Aside from that, they made assurances that it does not intend to take away games from competing consoles, stating that it is the best or first on Xbox, then saying it is on a case-to-case basis, before finally stating that it will all be exclusive. Activision, they started by stating that they were still going to release AB and COD on competing consoles, Then they said they wanted COD to be like Minecraft, Then Satya made the infamous statement, "Let's compete," He continues on saying that this deal should be allowed without concessions. It leaks that there is a offer for three years, which in itself is really unprofessional and then Jim responds equally unprofessionally. They bump up the offer to 10 years, Microsoft also used Bethesda as a bargaining chip to get Game Pass on Playstation.
@Greifchen I will not be surprised if there are a few surprise announcements in the court case.
@NomNom
It will be interesting to see if The Callisto Protocol gets any mention, as Sony put a lot of resources into helping Striking Distance release a multiplatform game.
Looks like the FTC are going to lose another court case. This may stall the deal but it’s still gonna go through.
I would like to randomly insert that the NY Post is every bit the unreliable tabloid that many suspected. Their earlier report of a FTC division that would lead to a 2-2 was wrong.
@Rafie. Yeah a tribe called quest.onyx.epmd.the fugees.brand nubian.lords of the underground.etc.yeah i miss rap city also.yo mtv raps.video music box.im from queens new york and them days was legendary.word up son
@Fenbops maybe...even probably, but they'll have this in the court for years.
If this goes through M$ should be embarrassed at being creatively bankrupt hoarding bums. serves them right if it happens .
Just a heads up for those not in the United States, this is a political talking point and nothing more. The 3 who voted for the lawsuit are Democrats assigned by presidents who have pushed for higher scrutiny on tech firms. The one who didn't is a Republican. All this does is send it to the courts which are heavily conservative right now and have a precedence of approving deals like these. No matter if you want it to succeed or fail all this is doing is trying to win back points for a President who just denied union members to go on strike.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/ftc-moves-to-block-69-billion-microsoft-activision-deal/ar-AA153FeR?PC=EMM
Buying Activision isn't the answer for them. It may be good for their business to keep them going but it's surprising that fans are supporting it. Getting Activision or any publisher is like saying they can't make their own success so they give up trying. Why bother making games themselves when they can just buy another successful company to survive.
The best thing for Xbox is to focus on making great games of their own. Not to keep making more CoD and relying on that to keep the business running.
MS has been failing with their excluisve for years now. It's their own fault. They can fix that by stepping up and go make some great games of their own to pull in some new fans, grow their studios, buy some smaller ones and work on parterships to get games made.
Nintendo likes to buy studios that work on games that are very Nintendo. Sony buys studios that are pretty much family. MS should take notes from them. Buying up Activision and use their sucess to pass off as their own is just lazy and shows they don't know much about gaming. The only thing they are being good for is writing cheques
@Kienda The reason your opinion is unpopular is because people like me realize once games like TES appear immediately on Game Pass upon release, Bethesda will no longer have a reason to produce quality games.
@NoFaceBigFoot Why? Where is your proof? HFW is not on a subscription service and it does nothing well besides how shiny the grass looks.
Starfield will be played and modded for over a decade unless they somehow ***** it up completely and through GP it will reach more players than even Skyrim throughout it's lifetime. You won't even need a console or expensive PC because of xcloud.
Bah, I thought with MS monopolising these it would inspire new fresh games to come out from other companies.
Bit like it was the old days, like you'd have 7/8 different fighting games on each console, maybe a couple would be good. But todays market, I guess the risks are too high.
@Gloamin Don't think MS has broken anything. They said to look at it, case by case ...
Kienda wrote:
As a long time Game Pass subscriber I do understand that point of view, at least in the short term. But what you have to also understand is that one of the things these commissions have to look out for is deals like Game Pass that undercut all the other competition, which may appear good for consumers in the short term, but ultimately may lead to less competition in the long term which would be bad for consumers. i.e. Are Microsoft coming in and using their unrivalled wealth to offer a value proposition no one else can in order to corner the marker. In short they sometimes have to protect us from ourselves. Cheaper and a race to the bottom is not always better.
Regardless the deal may still happen, so you may have your wish.
@NoFaceBigFoot I think if Sony were buying Activision-Blizzard and putting their games day one on PS+ the opinion here would be very popular.
Let’s not fool ourselves.
If xbox studios actually made great games id be all for this acquisition, but they don't ,so I'm not ,they've been making the same crap for a couple of decades.
@LightningLeader those exclusives Sony make have been grown over the years with Sony buying small companies and then funding them so they become the behemoths they are now, ms are buying established multiplatform studios to snaffle up all their catalogues of games ,surely you see the difference?
@NoFaceBigFoot thats what I've been saying since gamepass was first announced ,I mean look at it already ,its 95 percent throwaway indie garbage.
@UltimateOtaku91 microsofts whole company is built on a foundation of lies and deceit.
@Fenbops lmao ftc is going to win just like they won against Nvida with Arms
@LightningLeader xbox can have exc if they want to they just need to pay the money like sony does lmao
@tallythwack well one quick Google search says it all, they have broken anti trust laws before and even got done for issuing multiple bribes. Can definitely see the FTC's concerns and the lies about Bethesda games adds to it. And some of Microsofts biggest supporters have the nerve to call sony scum and anti consumer on a weekly basis.
@Slayer25c FTC also stopped Facebook (Meta) from acquiring an emoji company and won a case against amazon in 2016, those two plus nvidia are the biggest ones so anything is possible.
I haven't seen a comments section this toxic since I was on Bulbapedia witnessing Koffing Vs Grimer!
I'm so sick of hearing about this. The deal should go through. Sony have been pathetic crybabies in this whole situation and completely hypocritical.
At this point I'm close to thinking that companies like Tencent should just buy everything up so that console fanboys can just shut the **** up and stop fighting over their boxes.
If the buyout happens, then Sony should really stop releasing PC ports and make games such as MLB The Show, Callisto, Bungie Destiny future releases only for Playstation again. Sony is trying to evolve the industry into multiplatform where every gamer regardless of platform can enjoy their games. Microsoft on the other hand are the gaming bullies whom don't want to share their projects to the masses.
Corporate ethics of the gaming industry have become toxic. If a Microsoft vehicle crashed, a Sony exec would stop and help them out of the burning vehicle. However if a Sony vehicle crashed, a Microsoft exec would drive away saying sux to be you.
@BeerIsAwesome I think with Jimmy being so obsessed with live service games, Sony is more willing to release to other platforms. They just want to own publishing rights, to ensure they maximize profitability.
@pip_muzz can you provide a link?
@Slayer25c Nope, the FTCs recent track record is absymal. You can't just say you're going to block something, you have to show a court evidence of why the deal should not go through. Standing up in court and saying "this deal is bad for Sony' is not going to impress a judge. You need a lot more than that.
@LightningLeader who said they're not allowed exclusives? They've been acquiring developer after developer for years and Sony said nothing until now, because this is clearly different.
Fully agree that the expressions of the FTC's concerns,& moreso Microsoft/Xbox's track record speaks for itself that this is a poor deal for gamers....that is,any gamers that play on systems in direct competition to XB.
Phil Spencer made such a big deal about 3rd party timed exclusives being anti-gamer & then spun the "gaming for all" rhetoric during the lead up to the Zenimax purchase only to show their true intent once the ink dried & anything not already under contract with Sony instantly went exclusive.
It's been laughable to hear them arguing in Europe that titles like Elder Scrolls were small selling franchises like they were an indie developer! As it stands,for all the rhetoric of "But what about FF7 remake!",XB/MS has been quietly cornering the western rpg IP's under their exclusive umbrella already.
Likewise,for all the PR War/carrot dangling of COD,the silence on the rest of the IP's like Crash,Spyro,future Diablo/Starcraft,etc. have been deafening.
Rather than bother investing billions into creating new IP's,Phil Spencer has been weilding the corporate credit card & taking the easier route of buying existing entire AAA publishers & use the established 3rd parties & Gamepass as a means to block competition including timed exclusives or PS Plus etc.
Timed exclusives are annoying...but they are timed...even Square recently stated its unlikely to continue doing one format releases in the future like it had been this past ps4/ps5 gen.
As to if this'll survive the courts & a desperate Bobby Kotick looking for a golden parachute out of his mismanagement? Maybe not due to years of mega corps like Google,FB,Disney etc. But it'll be a thorn in their side from doing much meantime.
@Kienda no it wouldn't. Most people here have already said they don't want first party games being available on ps+ day 1, because inevitably the quality would drop.
So now Sony fanboys have no right to complain about Bobby Kotick or how Activision runs their company.
I hope they are successful, no single game company should be able to take over so many IPs.
I think Microsoft might have done something good with Activision. Like bring back old IPs or make something new. But oh well. At least now, they can stop focusing on them and focus on xbox. I think it would be better if they bought up new or smaller dev teams.
@CutchuSlow ms has plenty of old ips they don't want to use them like where is the next dam banjo kazooie
@Tasuki so ps cod fans have no right to complain that a game they love could possibly be taken away ? ,ms will make kotick head of hr or something anyway.
Once upon a time, both Microsoft and Sony had half a dozen solid studios that made good exclusive content. Life was balanced, and life was good.
The 3rd party developers were aplenty, and developed games for ALL platforms. All was fair, and games were abundant.
But then one day, some of Microsoft's studios started making some pretty ***** content, and some even lost control. Some couldn't even focus enough to release their games anymore.
With a blind eye, Microsoft continued making consoles with the same old controller, and developed games in the same old franchises, but couldn't figure out why their console (the Xbox One) wasn't selling.
But then came Phil, with his one idea that has been rightfully frowned upon since 1862.... "Let's just buy people!" said Phil.
So, Microsoft started buying a bunch of good 3rd party developers to keep for themselves, to prevent Sony and Nintendo from sharing the goods.....But it apparently wasn't enough to the power-hungry Phil....
"Let's buy MORE people!" he exclaimed......And that brings our tale to the present, where some people can see what's really going on, while others rebuttal with "But....but....Sony has a few timed exclusives!!".
@Baccaman Apart from the fact that Sony have been buying studios outright to only make games for PlayStation since the early 90s.
And comparing this to the slave trade is incredibly poor taste and completely wrong.
@C25CLOUD oh right. Maybe Rare are busy with something else. I don't really know much about Microsoft first party IP.
I was thinking that with activision, maybe they might be able to bring some PC exclusives to the console.
I'm not a fan of either companies or their games. But I assumed something good might come out of it for console players.
Also if they make new studios from scratch and hire student developers, they can train them up, and test them with old IPs maybe. And see how they do.
@tallythwack The only way CoD is going to be taken away from PS is because of Jim Ryan himself not MS.
It's funny how PS fanboys want to make out MS as the badguy here when MS made an offer to Nintendo, and Steam which accepted but Sony refused. Maybe you all should stop drinking the Kool-aid and open up your eyes and see what going on here.
I am pretty sure if Sony was the one buying Activision you all would be for it.
@Tasuki oh and why do you think ms has suddenly made this offer ,surely you're not that stupid after ms has repeatedly gone back on agreements made ,why do you think this will be any different ,take off that cult of Phil blindfold, and maybe then you will see the truth.
@__jamiie you can't compare Sony buying small studios or ones that have predominantly made games for ps for years, to this acquisition,surely you're not that dim to not know the difference ,that seems to be the argument with a certain demographic of people ,"well Sony bought insomniac" etc etc, it beggars belief
@tallythwack Did you read the post I was commenting on or are you too dim to read that? The poster made it seem as if MS invented studio buying.
Also, a bit of punctuation in your comment would be nice. Or are you too dim to understand how to use that?
@tallythwack OK Cult of Phil thats cute. MS is a software company first and foremost, they don't care what device you use their software on as long as it's theirs. Did MS Cry like this when Sony bought Insomniac? What about Bungie?
Again Sony is just bad cause MS beat them to the punch and instead of admitting so, Jim Ryan has to cry like the bitch he is.
@Tasuki bungie themselves made a statement regarding destiny's future and categorically stated it would remain multi platform ,insomniac has made one game for ms ,sunset overdrive of which they approached ms regarding a sequel, ms refused ,and you've kind of proved my point.
Well of all entities, the EU came to the defense of Microsoft and said that FTC statements are wrong.
@tallythwack And Phil stated that CoD will stay multiplatform even went as far as offered a deal so it was all on paper and Sony turned them down. So tell me again how MS buying Activision is wrong but it's OK for Sony to purchase Bungie.
@Tharsman yeh but I very much doubt they will update this fake news article or do a new article saying it's not true
@Martsmall I would not call this fake news, it reported on what happened, but I find it odd they post this but not post an article on the immediate follow up.
@Tharsman wasn't fake when it came out but sure is now
@Tasuki they offered a 3 year deal ,Sony said no, then they gave nintendo a 10 year deal ,Sony refused ,starfield was also in development for ps ,that was halted ,they have gone back on deals they made with the European Union in the past ,whos to say they won't again, now tell me again how uncle Phil can be trusted ,anyone without a neck shouldn't be.
@tallythwack So I guess then the FTC should file a lawsuit against Sony for Street Fighter 5. I mean that was unfair practice to Xbox and Switch owners.
Bungie MIGHT go back on their word and make Destiny Sony only product maybe they should file a lawsuit for that as well?
Let's get to the point MS has done nothing wrong here it's just Jim Ryan being a crying bitch but then again I guess it works to fool people like you and the FTC.
@Martsmall the news is still accurate, since it covers what did happen and it’s still happening.
The news could use expansion about additional facts, the FTC being wrong about the EU deal. I am not going as far as saying FTC lied either, but they likely took Sony complainants to their word without doing additional follow up.
@get2sammyb I’m sure you guys are sick of this topic too, but this is, imo, an important follow up to a story you guys published. Will this development end up getting coverage here, be it as an update or a new article?
@tallythwack you seem to need to get caught up in the news, I know this site has not covered it, but the EU came out to defend Microsoft on this. Phil never went back on any promises, because no such promises or concessions were part of the Zenimax deal approval.
The FTC was wrong.
Show Comments
Leave A Comment
Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...