Nocturnal92

How could they possibly make it worse?

Another L for Sony

This "shooter moniker" needs to die.

@stvevan I'm sure they'll be in their hundreds on launch 🤣.

Like I said, I'll wait and see.

@thefourfoldroot1 we'll have to wait and see I suppose.

Immediately, they've lost one in me until they can address a lack of software, at that point I'm sure I'll grab one.

@thefourfoldroot1 I agree that it isn't so simple and there are obvious cost implications, all of which are not the consumer's issue past a potential increase to the base cost of the unit.

I skipped PSVR 1, I've acquired a small library of titles (provided through PSN) assuming PSVR2 would be an absolute day one buy for me, and now with this, it isn't. This is going to cost Sony more in the long run as others have echoed similar disdain to the announcement.

I'm a consumer so I have the luxury of appearing pitiful, Sony do not.

@thefourfoldroot1 True, if you were to completely remove any responsibility from Sony's engineering team for PSVR2 to build backwards compatibility at a system level, and Sony directly to incentivise and influence any 3rd parties to offer patches/ports.

A blanket statement saying it's just not backwards compatible is pitiful and indefensible in my opinion.

Meaning, they'll be released as full price ports so you have to buy them again, classic Sony.

They'll throw in a remove or add penis option next.

I'm so burnt out with Ubisoft games and their copy and paste open world formula and monetisation practices.

Not a chance in hell for £70!

Sony is taking you all for mugs and getting praised and encouraged for the most part.