Comments 161

Re: Indiana Jones Game Deal Amended to Exclude PS5, PS4

Jaxx420

@Tharsman agree. The hoo har with this one seems to be around something Phil said about not taking games away from PS.

Dont know the ins and outs but Id hazard a guess development was in pre production when the acquisition went through so a contract amendment at that stage is perfectly fine.

Should he have made a broad statement like that and not think it wouldnt come back to bite him? Nope. But how many times has Jim Ryan done the exact same, all as bad as each other.

Re: Indiana Jones Game Deal Amended to Exclude PS5, PS4

Jaxx420

@Tharsman its a little bit different than Spiderman. Sony bought the licensing rights to the franchise for film and gaming rather than just to make a singular game exclusive.

If it turns out MS has done the same with the Indy license you are right its hypocrisy to complain about one over other.

Outside of that I am not sure it can be compared though? Maybe Im wrong. I am in the camp of I dont see the issue anyway it happened with Redfall was bound to here too.

Re: Sorry, But Games Are Probably Going to Take Longer Than Ever to Make on PS5

Jaxx420

@Triumph741 just games with a small budget and not special? I recommend giving Indie Game the Movie a watch the amount of effort those people go into just to get a game out there is unreal and some indie games are absolute classics.

I dont disagree with Rockstar games pushing the envelope at all, they do. But you cant discount all linear experiences as being dinosaurs. They offer something different and there are some cracking linear games out there.

As for boycotting Ubi and Guirella for being lazy. I dont really play Ubi games so cant comment. As for Guirella Horizon is their only open world franchise so cant really say they copy and paste the same formula into all of their games. Their releases prior were mainly FPS.

Re: Sorry, But Games Are Probably Going to Take Longer Than Ever to Make on PS5

Jaxx420

@Triumph741 none of the games in my earlier post were made by Sony studios so a bit off base making that comparison.

They were all made by indies. Indie devs keep the industry fresh. Provide something new. Because they are indies a lot of the games due to dev size are linear experiences, doesnt make them dinosaurs.

You seem to be intent on just plugging Starfield into every comment so I am probably wasting time here, but linear and open world provide very different experiences, they cant be compared directly.

Re: Sorry, But Games Are Probably Going to Take Longer Than Ever to Make on PS5

Jaxx420

@Triumph741 Great games just need to be fun to play. What defines that is down to the individual gamer. Big budget doesnt always = a good game.

Way you are talking its like you have access to some Starfield review code already. Lets see come September, I am sure it will be a great game but even if it is, it is not the only one pushing the medium forward.

If open world games were the only games pushing it on the industry is in a sad state.

Re: Sorry, But Games Are Probably Going to Take Longer Than Ever to Make on PS5

Jaxx420

@Triumph741 I still remember Project Ego on Xbox "anything you see in the distance you can walk to it" turned out to be Fable and while a great game in its own right, was a classic example of being far from the vision the dev talked it up to be.

Its certain from footage so far Starfield is vast, it is ambitious but without it being out and played, driving the medium forward is a bit premature, remember how long it has been in development for. Almost a case example of the point of the article.

Ubi games are bad examples but I would argue games like lets say, Journey or Pentiment, or Limbo, or Ori, do as much to "drive the medium forward" as any AAA game out there with a fraction of the development time.

Great games dont always need open worlds.

Re: Poll: Was This Sony's Best PlayStation Showcase Yet?

Jaxx420

I think its pretty clear they are permanently going down the road of (with exception of Spiderman) saving any detailed look at first party games for State of Plays. Which is why they perhaps were not shown much here. Announcing them here with CGI trailers imo would have been a bad idea.

Geoff Keighley has probably secured a couple for Summer Games Fest but outside of that id expect SoPs.

This one was mainly to showcase indies, third parties and the upcoming GaaS titles.

Re: Soapbox: PSVR2 Already Feels Like It's on Course for Failure

Jaxx420

I get the worry but I think it is too early to have it.

I dont think it is the lack of software or the lack of marketing that is causing the issue. Its the price. And that is the risk with a high end product.

Eventually manufacturing costs catch up and that price comes down. By that time there will be a lot more content and it may hit its stride.

Re: Poll: Did You Buy Sonic Frontiers?

Jaxx420

Like most 3d sonics going to be a bit of a marmite type of game. But i preordered and enjoying it so far. On the level of Generations? Not quite but one of the better games in recent years.

Re: Talking Point: We Need to Discuss This Horizon Zero Dawn PS5 Remaster

Jaxx420

On one hand, I can understand these remasters targeting those new to the Playstation Ecosystem that have not played the original games.

But on the other, it is just the price. Even targeting those players I cannot understand or see how they could justify the £70 price tag on Last of Us Part I so if this goes the same way it paints a very bad picture.

Re: We're Sure Fans Will Be Rational Over This The Last of Us PS5 Clip

Jaxx420

This is being targeted towards PS5 owners who have come from other formats and have never played it.

Is it a cash grab? To an extent as they know those who have never owned ps3/4 probably would take a punt.

But those of us who have played it cant get in too much of a tizzy over it, we just dont buy it.

Re: PS Stars' Digital Collectibles Are 'Definitely Not' NFTs, Sony Stresses

Jaxx420

@Neverwild I rarely input on tit for tat but im going to as a one off.

Id second check that one @NEStalgia is one of the regulars across both sites that stays out of the console wars bs and most of their posts are a good read.

Was it a badly timed dig? Maybe but as a multiformat user myself you cant help but think if Jim saw an in for NFTs, he would be in.

On the same token. MS would absolutely do the same if they found a minimal impact on PR way to do it.

Re: Jim Ryan to Discuss PlayStation's Past and Gaming's Future in Fireside Chat

Jaxx420

Jim Ryan is the gaming equivalent of lets say Ed Woodward at Man Utd.

Ed isnt a football man. Jim isnt a gaming man. And it reflects in some of the quotes and perception. But both are good at making their companies a lot of money.

I just wish they would put someone else in play as the PR guy. Like Phil is at MS and Reggie was at Nintendo.

They are missing Tretton and Layden on that front.