Comments 595

Re: Spider-Man PC Attracts Over 60,000 Concurrent Players at Launch

z0d15g0d

@theMEGAniggle Agreed, but now you got companies saying "this is the best you we can do on console" then a year or more later a superior version comes out on PC. If this trend continues I will end up avoiding the console exclusive releases and wait for the final PC version. Lots of my friends are of the same mind so we can't be the only ones who think that way. Remasters should be left to at least 2 gens of a console then it would be at the PC's level.

Re: Apex Legends: Hunted Is Now Live, Battle Pass Detailed and Patch Notes Released

z0d15g0d

I played a few matches yesterday. Vantage was fun but her bat takes too long to reach its destination (sort of like Loba's teleport ring) was hoping it was faster as you can get taken out waiting for it to get to the location. Her Ult has 4 stacks which is helpful but the tracer beam is a nuisance as sniping with a controller is difficult enough without your position being exposed while you aim. Wingman pistol now uses sniper ammo and spit fire is light ammo, dunno why they made such weird changes. The battle pass sucks as always. Only decent weapon cosmetics are at lv 100. They really need to hire new or get more staff to work on the weapons. Season Kills/ stats should not be a battle pass reward and should be removed as majority of players turn that off anyway as it causes players in the 1k+ kills to quit before the match starts.

Re: Would You Pay $45 for an Overwatch 2 Character Skin? Blizzard's Curious to Know

z0d15g0d

I'm pretty sure it's something outrageous like £200 in apex legends to get character specific heirloom weapons when they have those events on. Although you do get all the other event cosmetics for that amount it's the fact you have to go through that to get it especially since most of the cosmetics tend to be for characters I don't use or like. I can see why ActiB would try this out. It's worse on mobile games.

Re: Round Up: Resident Evil Netflix TV Show Reviews Are All Over the Place

z0d15g0d

@GagaOooLaLa haha I completely agree with your review of the first episode. The 1 zero v hero moments were so immersion destroying especially since the zeros tend to attack as a group. This version of Wesker is pretty cool. I think it's an interesting take do far but I hope the violence ramps up. There best be more giant monsters at they are the scariest in the games. Library anaconda anyone?

Re: Poll: Is The Last of Us: Part 1 Really a 'Cash Grab'?

z0d15g0d

@naruball I assumed those reading comments on here were intelligent enough to know or at least verify that a comment has some research behind it rather than responding with bile for their own purposes. In case you haven't figured it out, my description of the term "cash grab" was from the dictionary. Interpret an already defined definition all you want but the facts were in my comment also. Seems like you still don't get it. This will be the 3rd time they will be releasing the same game and in a short span of time. It is not considered a labor of love nor is it new and from a company who have established themselves as a dominant force for story driven content. Taking those factors into account makes it the very definition of the term.

Re: Poll: Is The Last of Us: Part 1 Really a 'Cash Grab'?

z0d15g0d

@Balosi There's uproar for some good reasons but mine is mostly the fact that I like the work this studio does so I'd rather see/ hear of them firing on all cylinders to bring something new to all of us rather than this attempt to entice a new crowd and fleece the old.

Re: Poll: Is The Last of Us: Part 1 Really a 'Cash Grab'?

z0d15g0d

So many comments on here confused at the meaning of "cash grab". It is a product designed primarily or solely with the intent of generating profits or money. Some will give the inane response to that statement that "well aren't all games cash grabs then?" To which I will respond "No". They have already released this game twice and now they expect gamers to be excited a third time because they promise some additional bells and whistles? This is what Capcom did with RE4 back in the day as well as SF4. I was one of the dumb gamers who bought every version expecting something special each time. Lesson learned. Don't be fooled. Vote with your wallets so this trend dies out once and for all.

Re: Poll: Is The Last of Us: Part 1 Really a 'Cash Grab'?

z0d15g0d

Absolute cash grab. With sony consoles, studios barely scratch the capabilities of their potential when they are first released. It's usually towards the end of the consoles life span that we see the best quality games(gameplay/ story aside). This remake should be left till then if it wasn't a cash grab. Every company is feeling the effects of the pandemic. They are just milking a successful franchise to gauze the financial wound.

Re: Kojima Productions Threatens Legal Action After Hideo Kojima Is Falsely Identified as Japanese Gunman

z0d15g0d

@JJ2 Being able to check the primary source would be the best option to get to the truth but in most cases that's just not possible. Especially so when it comes to the high priority topics and events going on in the world. Too many times we've just had to "take their word for it" only to end up finding out it was a lie from the start. Usually once the damage has been done and so much time has passed that the only people crying out for and care about justice are just those directly affected. And the outlets don't get any flak at all.