Comments 153

Re: Poll: What Review Score Would You Give Elden Ring?

patronmacabre

Having beaten the game yesterday (I did most major things except beat Malenia), I gave the game a 9.

It's very good. It's nowhere near as good as Breath of the Wild in terms of open world design. I didn't like it nearly as much as Bloodborne. But it is still very good and probably my second favorite FromSoftware game after Bloodborne.

It took me 67 hours to beat the game. The game is amazing from hour 10 to hour 40. Past that point, the seams of the game really, really start to show and I started to get tired with how repetitive it is.

I have a lot of complaints with the game, but I think my biggest complaint could be described as "That secret/boss was the coolest secret/boss I've ever encountered and I really wish the game didn't repeat it two more times."

Re: Elden Ring (PS5) - By Far FromSoftware's Best Ever Game

patronmacabre

I feel like more reviewers should mention that the first 10 hours of Elden Ring are awful. It has the slowest start of any Souls game and it initially put me off of it.

It gets dramatically better past that 10 hour mark. I am at the 25 hour mark and the game deserves all the praise it is getting. It is one of the weirdest games I have ever played.

Re: Poll: Did You Buy Elden Ring?

patronmacabre

@suikoden

I was big into the Souls games from 2015 to 2017, but I recently played Demon's Souls and still adored it. Hell, I even really liked Dark Souls II. But Elden Ring is just... so boring.

I think it's the lack of any real forward momentum. I know the open world makes it more accessible because you can go wherever, but at some point I need to know when I need to just tough it out and beat this boss.

And like, I know visual design is more important than graphics. But FromSoftware isn't Atlus and they can't offset older tech with explosive colors. The game looks and runs like it was from 10 years ago.

I am still hoping I like it after a really rough start, but it's a struggle that I have never experienced before with their games.

Re: Poll: Did You Buy Elden Ring?

patronmacabre

I am about 5 hours in and... I really am not feeling it at all.
It's so empty and boring.
I am a huge fan of BotW. I am a huge fan of the Souls games. I wanted to love this so much and it's a real struggle so far.

Re: Could PS3, PS Vita Closures Be on the Cards After Wii U, 3DS Announcements?

patronmacabre

I assume official closures will happen once the PS5 has backwards compatibility thanks to Spartacus.

I do hope the backwards compatibility isn't completely tied to the Spartacus service and you can buy old games individually.

These old stores are major security risks so they cannot stay up indefinitely, but video game companies need to try to preserve old games.

Re: So, It Seems Xbox Really Will Keep Activision Games Like Call of Duty on PS5, PS4

patronmacabre

I absolutely guarantee they wanted to make things exclusive at first.

But then they probably realized the FTC was going to give them way more ***** about the acquisition than they anticipated.

They're committing to multiplatform so that the acquisition can still go through.

One of the things you have to do when you make a M&A is explain why your merger makes things better for the consumer. While exclusives have been approved in the past despite being bad for the consumer, no M&A has been of this scale before.

Keep in mind, this acquisition is still very, very bad for the industry, just like the acquisitions of Zynda, Bethesda, Bungie, and everything Tencent and Embracer acquired. Media consolidation seems inevitable, but it still sucks.

Re: Sony Plans to Launch 10 PS5, PS4 Live Service Games by March 2026

patronmacabre

On the one hand, I hate this. People can only play so many live service games because they can only pay so much attention. Beyond that, I like my games to have stories in them.

Furthermore, most live service games fail. I expect the intention is that they throw 10 live service games on the board, expect Bungie's game to succeed, and hope that one other game succeeds.

My hope is that a lot of these are smaller titles, especially as Playstation expands into mobile.

On the more positive side, at least Sony is open about how it intends to make money. Giant big budget single player games do need a source of continuing revenue to prop them up. Never trust any company (corporations are not your friend), but you should be extra suspicious when you don't understand how a company turns a profit.

Re: Poll: Does Sony Need to Take Action After Microsoft's Activision Buyout?

patronmacabre

@Col_McCafferty Yeah, I always saw Phil Spencer as incredibly oleaginous and insincere. Like, I don't like Jim Ryan and I regularly forget that Doug Bowser exists, but they act like businessmen that are running businesses.

I think Phil Spencer is the kind of person that is charismatic to a certain demographic of people. Like the kind of people that want their grocery store cashier to smile at their job and pretend like it's the best job ever.

Re: Poll: Does Sony Need to Take Action After Microsoft's Activision Buyout?

patronmacabre

Sony probably can't really do much of anything.

If the Activision deal goes through (and I am more optimistic than others that it gets blocked), Playstation is going to diminish substantially. The counterargument put forth by Microsoft that it would still be in third place in the videogames industry after the merger is so demonstrably disingenuous, I don't know where to begin.

I do think that the Playstation brand is too strong to die. My guess is that either Google, Tencent, or Amazon will probably want to save the Playstation brand at whatever cost.

Re: Xbox Boss Expresses Desire to 'Keep Call of Duty on PlayStation' After Activision Buyout Is Complete

patronmacabre

The acquisition is becoming much more politicized than expected. It's entirely within the realm of possibility that Democrats make the acquisition a political issue heading into the midterm elections where they're facing very poor prospects. Warren and Nadler have expresses skepticism at Microsoft and numerous more Democrats, including Biden, are presenting anti-trust as a political issue.

I think Phil Spencer is pre-empting this political backlash. But I genuinely think this acquisition is about to get a lot bigger than videogames.

Re: Sony Responds to Activision Blizzard Buyout, Expects Games to Still Come to PS5, PS4

patronmacabre

Welp, looks like what I expected happened from Sony. I still think it's extremely unlikely that Sony ends up making a big purchase for itself.

That said, I do think there is a higher than expected chance that the Activision deal gets blocked IF (and this is a very conditional if) the merger gets overseen by the FTC. If the merger gets overseen by the DOJ (where there is probably a conflict of interest), then it's very likely the deal will go through with minimal alteration.

Even though I am definitely a Sony fanboy, the following statement isn't fanboyism as there is plenty of documentation on it: Microsoft, of all the big tech industries, currently has a privileged position in Washington when it comes to mergers & acquisitions. Facebook, Google, Apple, and Amazon get heavily scrutinized while Microsoft largely gets left alone. This is largely because Washington doesn't want to have a repeat of what happened in the 1990s with Microsoft.

If the FTC chooses to block the deal, it would come at the cost of Washington burning bridges with Microsoft.

Re: Poll: How Long Should Games Be?

patronmacabre

As long as it needs to be.

As a lover of story-based video games, I also firmly don't believe that games are conducive to being reviewed as art. Art needs to be small enough that it can be consumed multiple times.

Disco Elysium and The Last of Us Part II both demand multiple playthroughs and are both 30 hours-ish long. People try to evaluate their artistic merit on a single playthrough, which is silly.

Re: The Elder Scrolls 6 Isn't Coming to PS5, But It's Not About 'Punishing Other Platforms'

patronmacabre

I was intending to get this for PC anyway, but I keep having to push back getting a new desktop.

Mid-tier computers are super affordable now, but high-end rigs are ludicrously overpriced. It's just frustrating thinking about having to shell out about 2,500 dollars for a computer that is... slightly better than my PS5?

At least I'll get to play games at 144 fps, so there's that at least.

Re: Sony Establishes PlayStation PC Label to Spearhead Porting Push

patronmacabre

I think this is great news overall.
Playstation studios make the most visually impressive games, and it will be interesting to see what can be done with RTX 3090s.
That said, PC gaming is in a difficult place right now. I've been looking to get a new desktop and it is really, really, really expensive. You could get an amazing PC for 1,000 bucks that wiped the floor with the original PS4 in 2014. In 2021, a 2,000 dollar PC is... marginally better than a PS5. And that's if you build it yourself (which I am too lazy to do).

Re: All PS5 Game Reviews

patronmacabre

I know this is probably the wrong place to start a discussion about it, but considering I recently beat Tales of Arise, I am really, really struggling with the universal acclaim it received.

The first 35 hours of the game are really good. But did players and reviewers not play the last 10-15 hours of the game? It's miserable and the Xenogears comparisons are obvious. But almost no review came with the caveat "just stop playing the game once the second opening scene starts."

Re: Sony Finally Confirms Acquisition of Demon's Souls PS5 Dev Bluepoint Games

patronmacabre

@InsertUsername Beyond the original founders, 7 additional members of the original Metroid Prime development team joined Bluepoint as of 2019.

https://www.videogameschronicle.com/news/half-of-the-core-metroid-prime-3-team-is-still-at-retro-studios/

These are small-ish studios based in Austin. There is a sizable amount of overlap. Armature (Recore developer) also has a few former Metroid Prime members.

Re: Poll: Do You Want Even More PS5 Marvel Games from Sony?

patronmacabre

I am somewhere in the middle. Spider-Man and Miles Morales were high quality games that were fun to play, but I didn't think they were absolutely stellar.

Insomniac has an absurd production schedule but their employees seem to be happy.

It's also abundantly clear that the Marvel games makes a preposterous amount of money, and I don't think it's feasible for Sony to rely on time-consuming and expensive games like God of War and The Last of Us to make a profit.

Re: Reaction: PlayStation Showcase 2021 Was Good, But Not Good Enough

patronmacabre

Usually Sony is good at showmanship, and that is where they faltered here.

Objectively speaking, they had a really good lineup, but they didn't present it as such. I honestly felt like their first-party studios didn't have enough time to put together proper trailers so they crammed everything into 6 minutes.

And it's weird that TLOU Multiplayer didn't get shown.

Re: Talking Point: Did PlayStation Showcase 2021 Deliver on the Hype?

patronmacabre

I didn't enjoy most of it at the time, but looking at it retrospectively, I really liked it. I think there was a lot of good stuff, but it seemed poorly edited and paced.

I liked Project Eve, Forespoken, KOTOR Remake, God of War: Ragnarok, Spider-Man 2, and Wolverine.

And I know it confused many people, but as a Radiohead fan, I loved that there was a weird Radiohead thing in there.